Update on Newborn Screening/Jacquelyn Zirbes, DNP, RN, CNP

advertisement

Update on Newborn Screening for

Cystic Fibrosis

Jacquelyn Zirbes, DNP, RN, CNP, CCRC

Stanford University Cystic Fibrosis Center

Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital

Discovery of the ∆F508

CFTR Mutation

Research teams led by

Lap-Chee Tsui, Jack Riordan, and Francis Collins

Newborn Screening Definition *

Population-based public health program applying preventive medicine in defined regions to reduce infant morbidity and mortality from certain biochemical and genetic disorders by using presymptomatic detection/diagnosis with dried blood specimens from newborns analyzed in central laboratories employing automated procedures linked to clinical follow-up systems.

Principles of Achieving Better Outcomes Through

Newborn Screening

Screening/Follow-up Diagnosis

Effective Therapy

Birth

Preclinical Stage

Biologic

Onset

Symptomatic

Onset

Life Threatening

Or Irreversible

Disease

Death

Time/Event

Diagnosis Through Newborn Screening

This ~0.4 ml dried blood specimen supports numerous screening tests!

CF Center

Dedicated Line

NBS Coordinator

NBS State Program:

Positive Screen

Primary Care Provider

Family

California 4-Step CF NBS Model

1. Immunoreactive Trypsinogen assay (cut-off = 1.6%; projected sensitivity= 95.7%)

2. DNA analysis with a panel of 40 CFTR mutations

(15/23 ACMG* mutations + “minority” alleles)

3. DNA scanning  sequencing by Ambry

4. Sweat test when 2 or more mutations detected

California 4-Step Method’s Goals

1. Use initial dried blood specimen only

2. Focus on “severe” cases of cystic fibrosis

3. Identify at least 90% of Hispanic, White, and Black cases

4. Reduce burden of false positives & negatives, sweat tests, and costs

5. Achieve efficient reporting of NBS test results

6. Follow-up and diagnosis of positive screens at CF

Centers

SCREENING ≠ DIAGNOSIS

(exception: DF

508

/DF

508

= CF)

Definition of “Screening for Early

Detection of Disease”

“The screening procedure itself does not diagnose illness.”

“Those who test positive are sent for further evaluation by a subsequent diagnostic test or procedure to determine whether they do in fact have the disease.”

Hennekens and Buring, Epidemiology in Medicine, p327

California Minimum Guidelines

1 .

Preparation for Sweat Chloride Test

2. Sweat Chloride Test

3. Laboratory testing at first CF Center visit

4. Family Studies

5. Interpretation of Sweat Chloride Test

Results

Throat Culture Results

Updated California Results

210 infants identified

13 CF Centers

27 LPCH

ΔF508/ ΔF508

1

ΔF508/other

18 other/other

8

Genotype-Phenotype Relationships*

General Principle: genotype determines phenotype

(e.g., pancreatic insufficiency vs sufficiency in CF)

But, gene modifiers and extrinsic factors contribute also

In metabolic disorders such as PKU, mild (non-classical) cases can occur

In CF, genotype alone does not determine the pulmonary phenotype

* Zielenski J and Tsui LC, Ann Rev Genet 1995; 29:777-807

California Genetic Disease Screening Program

Children’s Hospital of Central California

Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles

Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland

Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Miller Children's at Long Beach Memorial Medical

Center

Stanford University

Sutter Sacramento Medical Center

University of California San Diego

University of California San Francisco

Ventura County Medical Center

Frank Accurso, MD

University of Colorado

Phil Farrell, MD, PhD

University of Wisconsin

Paul Quinton, PhD

University of California San Diego

Jeff Wine, PhD

Stanford University

In a well defined cohort of newborns with fully identified CFTR mutations determine:

 1. The feasibility of applying a uniform infant preparation protocol for sweat testing that

 includes salt supplementation and adequate fluid intake guidelines

2. The genotypic determinants of sweat chloride concentration and its longitudinal changes.

3. The effect of fluid and electrolyte balance on sweat chloride results

-Primary Outcome Measure

 Sweat chloride concentration at diagnosis.

We hypothesize that under the baseline conditions created by the preparation protocol sweat chloride will unequivocally discriminate between varying levels of CFTR dysfunction.

Secondary Outcomes

 Serum aldosterone, urinary and serum electrolytes.

Serum IRT

Longitudinal changes in sweat chloride

Longitudinal changes in clinical parameters during the first 2 years of life to gain

Inclusion criteria:

 1) Positive California CF newborn screening result (2 CFTR

 mutations identified).

2) Post-menstrual age ≥ 36 weeks

3) Age at time of first sweat test ≥ 2 weeks old and ≤ 16 weeks old

4) Weight at time of sweat test ≥ 2 Kg

Exclusion criteria:

1) NICU Hospitalization at the time of diagnosis.

2) Requiring IV fluids and/or TPN at the time of test.

3) Diagnosis of hypothyroidism or other endocrinologic/metabolic abnormality.

4) Presence of any other active medical condition (e.g. congenital heart, liver, or renal disease) that in the opinion of the CF Center would interfere with reliable sweat testing.

Study participation for approximately 2 years

Patients will be evaluated 5 times over the 2 year period

Family will receive salt supplementation kit

(salt packets, instructions and educational material) in anticipation of study visit

Time

Salt Kit

Sweat

Serum

Urine

Clinical

Measures

Micro

Stool

Pre-Visit Visit 1

Phone

Result

X

Initial

Diagnostic

X

X

X

X

X

Visit 2

1 month post visit 1

X

X

VISIT

Visit 3

6 (± 1) mos. old

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Visit 4

12 (± 1) mos. old

X

X

X

X

X

Visit 5

24 (± 1) mos. old

X

X

X

X

X

X X

Care of the CF Infant Diagnosed after

Newborn Screening

CF Foundation Consensus Guidelines are still evolving

Need to develop a collaborative care model with PCP- subspecialist partnership

An evidence based medicine strategy is very difficult to develop

Thus, prudent principles of Dx → Rx based on need should be followed

Set high standards such as > 50th percentile growth and normal PFT’s

But, avoid overly aggressive clinical management (primum

non nocere)

Goals of CF

Early Diagnosis & Treatment

Initiate CF center care in newborns

Provide genetic counseling

Prevent severe malnutrition

• Vitamin E deficiency (hemolytic anemia)

• Vitamin A deficiency

• Essential fatty acid deficiency

• Protein energy malnutrition *

• Growth failure

Prevent hyponatremia/hypochloremia

• Salt loss in sweat *

• Associated with breast feeding

Prevent early progression of lung disease

• Recurrent bacterial infections

• Obstructive pulmonary disease

• Atelectasis with mucus plugs

* Potentially fatal

The GI/Nutrition Rationale for NBS

1. CF patients are generally well nourished at birth

2. PI will develop in ~90% of patients by ~1 year

3. Severe malnutrition will develop in ~50% untreated

4. PI can be anticipated and malnutrition prevented

5. Long term benefits of normal nutrition are significant

The Pulmonary Rationale for NBS

1. The CF lung is normal at birth, but not for long.

2. Lung disease often develops as early as 2 months.

3. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) colonization may occur in ~1/3 of undiagnosed patients.

4. Transformation from PA to mucoid PA is the greatest long term risk for children.

The 21st Century is a

New Era for Children with CF

• An established trend of early diagnosis through NBS

• A paradigm shift in therapeutic strategy from the 3 I’s to the 3 P’s

• No longer dominated by intervention in individuals with illnesses

• But prevention in presymptomatic patients

– Prevention of early deaths

– Prevention of salt depletion

– Prevention of malnutrition and growth failure

– Prevention of “cross-infection”

– Prevention of chronic PA and early mPA

– Prevention of hospitalizations

– Prevention (eventually) of lung disease

Summary of Advantages of CF Newborn

Screening

Avoid diagnostic quest

Early, specific and proper care

Proactive strategy of care

Prevention

Improved quality of life

Improved parental learning

Reduce costs

Prevent malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies

Reduce risk of cognitive dysfunction

The Stanford Cystic Fibrosis Center at

Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital

Individual Treatment Plan

Collaborative Care

Interdisciplinary Team

Standards of CF Care

Family Centered Care

Emphasis on Family and Primary Provider Education

Research

Download