Disdrometer Love Rain on My Parade By Josh Molzan Steve Gronstal What the Heck is a Disdrometer • An instrument to measure the drop size distribution falling hydrometeors • Three main types: – Video disdrometers – Acoustic disdrometers – Impact disdrometers An Impact Detector Momentum transferred: – P = Mass * Velocity – Mass = f(size) – Velocity = f(size) Basically, Size is EVERYTHING Creating Our Disdrometer Our Disdrometers The piezoelectric device: What is it and how does it work? • Piezoelectricity is the ability of some materials to generate an electric field or electric potential in response to an applied mechanical stress. • Basically, the harder you push it, the bigger the voltage. But its sooo small • Is the detector big enough to accurately measure the rainfall distribution? Rainfall Rate N (d ) *V ( sam pled) *V (drop) d N (d ) * A * v(d )dt *V (drop) d Adh R dh v(d ) * N (d ) *V (d ) dt d How many drops hit per second? n N (d ) *V ( sam pled) d N (d ) * A * v(d )dt d R but N (d ) * v(d ) V (d ) d n V (Rd ) * A dt d So how many drops hit? Rainfall Intensity Rainfall Rate (mm/hr) Average Diameter (mm) Detector Area (mm2) Hits (#/s) Light < 2.5 mm/hr 1.0 1257 1.33 Moderate 2.5 - 10 mm/hr 1.5 1257 0.99 Heavy 10-50 mm/hr 2.0 1257 2.08 Experiment 1 Examining the signal of a drop on each sensor The Good (Head 3) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 The Bad 0.1 0 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.7 5 10 15 20 25 30 The Ugly (Head 1) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Analyze lots of drops per detector 2.5 3:42:15 PM 3:42:16 PM 3:42:17 PM 2 3:42:18 PM 3:42:19 PM 1.5 3:42:20 PM 3:42:21 PM 3:42:22 PM 1 Voltage 0.5 0 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 Time 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 Experiment 1: Results Peaks Oscillation Period Decay Rate Amplitude (V) Percent Deviation Per Event StDev Average St. Dev Average St. Dev Average St. Dev Head 1 135.818182 155.770497 3.491192 0.669199 0.048031 0.079475 -0.312816 0.561897 -179.63 Head 2 31.647059 12.504260 3.963884 0.560468 0.037397 0.028595 -1.226879 0.289811 -23.62 Head 3 31.476190 4.377431 5.120894 0.114121 0.021697 0.005515 -1.797458 0.207548 -11.55 Head 4 Failed Head 5 32.500000 9.042827 2.461976 0.246496 0.022683 0.003937 -0.728157 0.306096 -42.04 Head 6 31.666667 4.779182 5.822552 0.116779 0.021119 0.003954 -1.822322 0.126192 -6.92 Head 7 Failed Head 8 Failed Experiment 2 • Examine how much size matters. – Drop 4 different size drops onto our favorite detectors. – Find the relationship between Voltage response and drop size. Creating Drops Head Fall Height (cm) 25G 166.0 2.38 7.085 4.356 7.26 21G 165.8 2.86 12.240 4.710 7.85 18G 168.3 3.55 23.400 5.142 8.57 Buret 181.5 4.55 49.365 5.412 9.02 Diameter (mm) Mass/ Drop (mg) Estimated Velocity (m/s) Terminal Velocity (m/s) This Signals (H3, Buret) 8 4:38:15 PM 4:38:16 PM 6 4:38:17 PM 4:38:18 PM 4 4:38:19 PM 4:38:20 PM 2 0 -2 900 -4 -6 -8 -10 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 Analyzing the Signal • Damped Harmonic Oscillator • (i.e. a spring) V (t ) A sin(t ) * e 2 / Period k decay A Am plitudemax t tim e kt Results…. But… What does it mean? Peaks Head Drop Mass Average Period St.Dev. Average Decay St.Dev. Average Amplitude St.Dev. Average St.Dev. Voltage Offset Average St.Dev. 3 7.085 17.06 3.316 7.463 1.4767 0.005065 0.00155 -1.12 0.119 0.1158 0.03371 3 12.240 16.50 2.710 16.090 5.9211 0.004162 0.000925 -1.40 0.139 0.1569 0.02095 3 23.305 17.94 3.490 18.708 5.6337 0.004838 0.000938 -2.04 0.095 0.1982 0.01894 3 49.365 38.26 4.348 34.525 4.1816 0.003699 0.000384 -7.86 0.012 -0.0415 0.01222 6 7.085 21.60 5.400 10.667 3.6000 0.007038 0.001653 -1.49 0.298 0.0635 0.01683 6 12.240 18.94 3.725 18.283 4.5605 0.007626 0.001581 -2.57 0.268 0.0075 0.02701 6 23.305 15.32 2.593 20.938 5.6411 0.007875 0.001468 -3.39 0.455 0.0659 0.05093 6 49.365 39.94 3.247 24.208 2.4057 0.006065 0.000394 -7.82 0.016 -0.0881 0.01578 Voltage Relationships? • Possibility One: – Model our system using Electrical Potential Energy – V α KE? • Possibility Two: – Model our system as a spring. – V2 α KE Electric Potential Energy • Assumptions – The KE of the raindrop is completely transferred to the detector – The initial KE is then converted into Electric Potential Energy. – The Voltage Change acts like a pt charge moving in an electric field. KE U V Is V α KE?? 0.00 0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 -0.50 Head 3 Head 6 -1.00 y = -1.9049x - 0.8737 R2 = 0.9995 Voltage (V) -1.50 -2.00 -2.50 -3.00 y = -3.6374x - 1.2454 R2 = 0.8984 -3.50 -4.00 -4.50 KE (mJ) Linear (Head 6) Linear (Head 3) Energy of a Spring • Assumptions – The KE of the raindrop is completely transferred to the detector – The initial KE is then converted into Spring Potential Energy. – For Piezoelectric materials, a change in stress results in a change in potential – Capacitors have the same relationship! x V D KE PE V 2 Is V2 α KE?? 12 y = 18.249x + 0.5608 2 R = 0.9547 10 Voltage^2 8 Head 3 Head 6 6 Linear (Head 6) Linear (Head 3) y = 6.1317x + 0.3785 2 R = 0.998 4 2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 KE 0.5 0.6 0.7 Log D vs Log A 0.6 0.5 Log Amplitude 0.4 y = 2.0465x - 0.5719 R2 = 0.9459 0.3 0.2 y = 1.5194x - 0.5313 2 R = 0.9901 Head 3 0.1 Head 6 Linear (Head 3) Linear (Head 6) 0 0.35 0.4 0.45 Log Diameter 0.5 0.55 Diameter3 vs Amplitude2 14 12 10 Amplitude Squared y = 0.2883x - 1.0448 R2 = 0.9686 8 Head 3 Head 6 Linear (Head 3) Linear (Head 6) 6 4 y = 0.0959x - 0.1359 R2 = 0.9933 2 0 10 15 20 25 30 Diam eter Cubed 35 40 45 50 Conclusion • After analyzing 250,000,000 lines of data, our results indicate Kinetic Energy is proportional to Potential Squared. • More data points are needed to confirm the relationship between particle diameter and voltage response! • With more work, a piezoelectric transducer will make a decent disdrometer. Future work to do: • Experiment with smaller drop sizes (< 2mm diameter). • Experiment with drops at terminal velocity. • Experiment with an oscilloscope that can handle larger voltages. • Determine the voltage variation due to drop impact location. • Move analysis to real-time…..