Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Vortex Physics
Laws in physics have to be accepted
19th NPA Conference, Albuquerque
Friday July 27, 2012, 2:15 PM, 1h
Vortex Physics and its consequences like:
* basic forces,
* derivation of the gravitational force,
* extended field theory,
* big bang nonsense,
* calculation of all particles and atomic cores
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
about vortex physics
Spherical Symmetry
The law of “inverse square“ of distance
field source (E or H):
projection screen = x L²
L = distance to the source
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
about vortex physics
Spherical Symmetry
The law of “inverse square“ of distance
field source (E or H):
projection screen = x L²
L = distance to the source
E  1/r²
H  1/r²
surface of a sphere = 4r²
r = radius of the sphere
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
conclusion:
about the speed of light
from
E, H  1/r2
and
rc
follows:
•
the field determines the length measures (what is 1 m)
•
the field determines the velocities v (in m/s)
•
the field determines the speed of light c [m/s]
•
Measurement of the speed of light is made with itself
•
measured is a constant of measurement c = 300.000 km/s

the speed of light c is not a constant of nature!
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
about the Big Bang Theory
problem solving

the Doppler-effect
is based on the
addition theorem of
velocities
v
c - v:
c
c+ v
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
Big Bang contradicting laws of physics
fixed stars are without
any blue shift?
 because the galaxies
are contracting slowly
 other galaxies outside
our galaxy have to
show a red shift?
 even if they don’t move
 the red shift increases
with an accelerated
contraction (Nobelprize 2012

Perlmutter, Schmidt und Riess)
problem solving
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
About the light carrying aether
If electromagnetic waves
would be bonded
to a stationary
aether, we should
measure the
proper motion of
earth and sun as
a wind of the
aether
What determines the
speed of light?
wind of the aether
earth
sun
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Potsdam 1881
Michelson
Interferometer
Wirbelphysik
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
field-dependent length contraction
statement of the law in physics
E  1/L²
H  1/L²
field source
scale of length L
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Observation of an action of force
one body is in the field of another
from
E, H  1/L2
follows:

the distance is getting smaller

the bodies are attracting each other
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
curvature of space
the earth in the gravitational field of the sun
E, H  1/r2 
Orbital curvature depending on the field
R.J. Boscovich: the earth is respiring unobservable!
De spatio et tempore, ut a nobis cognoscuntur, 1755.
Ruder Boscovich
1755
E, H  1/r2
R.J. Boscovich:
the earth is
respiring
unobservable.
De spatio et
tempore, ut a nobis
cognoscuntur.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
interactions, forces
Auxiliary terms = formalization of our imagination
Examples for auxiliary terms: (Mass or charge)

Gravitational law (central force + centrifugal force)
m1 m2
1
F = G· ——— ~ ——
r²
r²
(gravitational mass or inertial mass)

Coulomb‘s law (force in the electric field)
1
Q1 Q2
1
F = ——— · ——— ~ ——
4or
r²
r²
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Speed reduction in a field
field dependent speed of light
experimental examples about:
E, H  1/c2

field-or gravitational lenses

Deflection of light (Einstein, at the eclipse 1919)
observer
x
gravitational field
star
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
curvature of space
in the gravitational field of a heavenly body
An experimental example:
L[m]  1/E,H
with
c [m/s]
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Length contraction in a field
cause: only electric or magnetic field
More experimental examples:
E, H  1/L2

field- or gravitational lenses

deflection of light

Space curvature

electrostriction (piezo speaker)

magnetostriction
Question: is it always the electromagnetic field?
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
electromagnetic interaction
caused by open field lines
E, H  1/L2  Example charged mass points (e¯, e+, Ions,...):
 As a consequence of open field lines:
strong attraction or repulsion
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Derivation of Gravitation
caused by closed loop field lines
E, H  1/L2  Example: uncharged Mass points (n°, atoms,...)
 As a consequence of closed loop field lines:
weak attraction, no repulsion
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
From Subjectivity to Objectivity
physical standpoints
the following physical standpoints can be distinguished:
Subjectivity
Relativity
Objectivity
observal laboratory physics
mediator role
transformation
not observal.
exemplary theories and their representatives:
Newton
Maxwell
Poincaré
Einstein
Boscovich
Meyl
with the associated transformation:
Galilei-transf.
for c  
Lorentz-transf.
c  constant
new transf.
c  variable
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Derivation of the standpoints
two approaches are possible:
example: a signal in a distance (r) from the source
approach: r  c  t
(determine distance by signal prop. time)
dr  cdt + tdc
change:
case 1: c = constant
(total differential)
case 2: t = constant
dr  cdt
dr  tdc
r  ct
r  tc
theory of relativity
r  t
theory of objectivity
r  c
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Relativity versus Objectivity
a comparison of the physical standpoints
case 1: c  constant
r  ct
theory of relativity
r  t
case 2: t  constant
r  tc
theory of objectivity
r  c
from: length contraction
variable speed of light
follows: time dilatation
dependence of meter measure
with absolute speed of light
Observation domain
with absolute time
model domain
(measurable)
many paradoxons
x(r)
(can only
be calculated)
without
paradoxon
M{ x (r)}
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
unified theory
Relativity - Objectivity
model transformation
Observation domain
model domain
(measurable)
(only calculable)
x(r)
M{ x (r)}
I. approach
II. transform
III. calculate
VI. compare
IV. transform back
V. result
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
the unified field theory
New Transformation I
transformation of the length dependency
dependency:
SRT (observation)
AOT (model domain)
S.of L. c [m/s]
 = 1/c²:
 [Vs/Am]
 [As/Vm]
c = co = constant
oo = 1/co²
o = constant
o = constant
c  r
H [A/m]
E [V/m]
H  1/r²
E  1/r²
H  1/r
E  1/r
B=H [Vs/m²]
D=E [As/m²]
B  1/r²
D  1/r²
B  1/r²
D  1/r²
  1/r
  1/r
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
the unified field theory
New Transformation II
transformation examples
SRT (observation)
capacity:
charge:
energy:
AOT (model domain)
C [As/V] = 4r
Q [As] = CU
W [VAs] = Q²/C
C = constant
Q = constant
W = constant
derivation of the law of energy conservation: W = const.
relaxation time:
sp. conductivity
1 [s] = /
 [A/Vm]
elementary vortices are indestructible:
1 = constant
  1/r
  1/r
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
physical particles
derivations with the theory of objectivity
4500
Comparison of the
measured
with the
calculated
particle
mass.
4000
3500
3000
particle mass
related to the electron mass
measured
gemessen
calculated
berechnet
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Elementary particle: – 0 – K0 K¯ 0 – n0 0 + ¯ 0 0 ¯ ¯ – F+
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
Principle of causality
Vortex as a primary form of causality
Quantum Physical Approach:
Field theoretical Approach:
cause
effect
cause  effect
quanta  fields
fields  quanta
Principle of
causality requires a
vortex physics
The vortex term in the science of Demokrit (460-370 BC) was identical
with “natural law“ - the first attempt to formulate a unified physics.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
Vortex in Nature
Ein physikalisches Grundprinzip
•Innen: expandierender Wirbel
•Außen: kontrahierender Wirbel
•Bedingung für Wirbelablösung:
gleich mächtige Wirbel
•Kriterium: Viskosität
•Folge: röhrenförmige Struktur
•Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre:
Tornado, Windhose,
Wasser-, Abflusswirbel
•Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
another Vortex in Nature
Ein physikalisches Grundprinzip
•Innen: expandierender Wirbel
•Außen: kontrahierender Wirbel
•Bedingung für Wirbelablösung:
gleich mächtige Wirbel
•Kriterium: Viskosität
•Folge: röhrenförmige Struktur
•Beispiele in d. Strömungslehre:
Tornado, Windhose,
Wasser-, Abflusswirbel
•Beispiel E-Technik: Blitz
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
vortex and anti-vortex
a physical basic principle
•Inside: expanding vortex
•Outside: contracting anti-vortex
•Condition for coming off:
equally powerful vortices
•Criterion: viscosity
•Result: tubular structure
•Examples in hydrodynamics:
tornado, waterspout,
whirlwind, drain vortex
•Example in electrical
engineering: lightning
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Maxwell approximation
Failure of the Maxwell theory
problem of continuity in the case of the coming off of vortices
In conductive materials vortex fields
occur, in the insulator however the
fields are irrotational.
i.e.hightension
cable
That is not possible, since at the
transition from the conductor to the
insulator the laws of refraction are valid
and these require continuity!
Hence a failure of the Maxwell theory
will occur in the dielectric!
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
vortex physics
Vortices in Microcosm and Macrocosm
spherical structures as a result of contracting potential vortices
examples:
expanding vortex
contracting vortex
• quantum
physics
collision processes
(several quarks)
Gluons
(postulate!)
• nuclear
physics
repulsion of like
charged particles
strong interaction
(postulate!)
• atomic
physics
centrifugal force of the electrical attraction
enveloping electrons
Schrödinger-equation
• Newton‘s centrifugal force
physics
(inertia)
gravitation
(can not be derived?!)
• astro phys. centrifugal f.(galaxy)
dark matter, strings, ...
Vortex physics seminar
Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl Albuquerque 2012
Thank you for your attention!
• Books available including the
presentation:
Prof. Dr. Konstantin MEYL, www.meyl.eu
K. Meyl: Scalar Waves (all we know about)
Furtwangen University, Germany and 1st
K. Meyl: Self consistent Electrodynamics
Transfer Centre of Scalar wave technology:
www.etzs.de )
(in the shop of www.meyl.eu
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Discovery
the extended 3rd Maxwell-equation
self-consistent electrodynamics
solution 2 With the consequences:
(field vortices
are forming a
scalar wave):
- prooved by
experiments,
-reproducible
-international
accepted
1) div B ╪ 0 (offence against the 3rd Maxwell-eq.)
2) Maxwell-equations are only describing a
special case (loosing universality).
3) The existence of magnetic monopoles calls
for field vortices and scalar waves
4) Vector potential A is obsolete (→ 1)
5) The new vector of potential density b
replaces the vector potential A
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Discovery
electric monopoles (charge carriers)
consitent with the Maxwell-theory
curl H = j + D/t)
(Ampère‘s law)
div curl H = 0 (acc. to the rules of vector analysis)
and:
0 = div j + /t (div D) (eq. of continuity)
• relation:
j = – vel = D/1
with 1 time constant of eddy currents (relaxation time)
div D = el (electric charge density,
resp. electric monopoles)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
discovery
magnetic monopoles ?
extension of the Maxwell-theory
– curl E = b + B/t)
(law of induction)
extended by the potential density b [V/m²], Meyl 1990)
– div curl E = 0
and:
0 = div b + /t (div B) (eq. of continuity)
• relation:
b = – vmagn = B/2
with 2 time constant of the new developed potential vortex
div B = magn (magnetic monopoles?!
conflicting the 3rd Maxwell-eq.)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
discovery
self-consistent calculation
extended Poynting vektor S
– div S = – div (E x H) = E·rot H – H·rot E
– div S = E·( j + D/t ) + H·( b + B/t )
– div S = ½·/t E·D + ½·/t H·B + E·j + H·b
input
power
=
stored power
(electric + magnetic)
+ ohmic + dielectric
losses losses
d
d 1
1
U²
– —
divS dV = —(—·C·U²
+ —·L·I²)
+ I²·R1 + —
dt
dt 2
2
Self-consistent electrodynamics, if b replaces A:
R2
New!
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
Summer Semester 2010
Supervisor at the University of Konstanz
Experimental
proof of
calculated
losses
(qualitative
comparison)
with a MKT
capacitor
(SiemensMatsushita)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl:
potential vortex
vortex structure in HV-capacitor
visible proof for the existence of potential vortives
Measurement set up
(a) and photo of
vortex structure in
a metallized polypropylen layer capacitor (at 450 V/ 60 Hz/ 100OC),
A. Yializis, S. W. Cichanowski, D. G. Shaw:
Electrode Corrosion in Metallized Polypropylene
Capacitors, Proceedings of IEEE, International
Symposium on Electrical Insulation, Bosten, Mass.,
June 1980;
Prof. Dr.-Ing. K. Meyl:
potential vortex
Vortex and anti-vortex
Energy of losses
The power density
shown against frequency for noise (a)
according to Küpfmüller,
as well as for dielectric
losses of a
capacitor
(also a)
and for eddy current losses
(b) according to Meyl
(b in visible duality to a)