Takashi Sako (STE lab/KMI, Nagoya University) for the LHCf collaboration HEAP 2011, 13-15 Nov. 2011, KEK 1 Uncertainty in hadronic interaction 0g/cm2 Xmax Deep in the atmosphere Proton shower and nuclear shower of same total energy 1018 1019 Pierre Auger Observatory (PAO) 2 Uncertainty in hadronic interaction 0g/cm2 Xmax Deep in the atmosphere Proton shower and nuclear shower of same total energy 1018 1019 Pierre Auger Observatory (PAO) Constraints from accelerator experiments indispensible 3 What should be measured at colliders multiplicity and energy flux at LHC 14TeV collisions pseudo-rapidity; η= -ln(tan(θ/2)) Multiplicity Energy Flux All particles neutral Most of the energy flows into very forward 4 The LHC forward experiment √s=14TeV LHCf Detector(Arm#1) ATLAS Elab=1017eV 140m Two independent detectors at either side of IP1 ( Arm#1, Arm#2 ) LHCf Detector(Arm#2) Beam Beam pipe Charged particles (+) Neutral particles 96mm Charged particles (-) 5 The LHCf Collaboration K.Fukatsu, T.Iso, Y.Itow, K.Kawade, T.Mase, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, G.Mitsuka, Y.Muraki, T.Sako, K.Suzuki, K.Taki Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Japan H.Menjo Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan K.Yoshida Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan K.Kasahara, Y.Shimizu, T.Suzuki, S.Torii Waseda University, Japan T.Tamura Kanagawa University, Japan M.Haguenauer Ecole Polytechnique, France W.C.Turner LBNL, Berkeley, USA O.Adriani, L.Bonechi, M.Bongi, R.D’Alessandro, M.Grandi, P.Papini, S.Ricciarini, G.Castellini INFN, Univ. di Firenze, Italy K.Noda, A.Tricomi J.Velasco, A.Faus A-L.Perrot INFN, Univ. di Catania, Italy IFIC, Centro Mixto CSIC-UVEG, Spain CERN, Switzerland 6 LHCf Detectors Imaging sampling shower calorimeters Two independent calorimeters in each detector (Tungsten 44r.l., 1.6λ, sample with plastic scintillators) Arm#1 Detector 20mmx20mm+40mmx40mm 4 XY SciFi+MAPMT Arm#2 Detector 25mmx25mm+32mmx32mm 4 XY Silicon strip detectors 7 8 9 Event category of LHCf Leading baryon (neutron) LHCf calorimeters Single hadron event Multi meson production photon π0 π0 photon Single photon event Pi-zero event (photon pair) 10 Expected Results at 14 TeV Collisions (MC assuming 0.1nb-1 statistics) Detector response not considered Operation 2009-2010 With Stable Beam at √s = 900 GeV Total of 42 hours for physics About 105 shower events in Arm1+Arm2 With Stable Beam at √s = 7 TeV (Elab = 2.5x1016 eV) Total of 150 hours for physics with different setups Different vertical position to increase the accessible kinematical range Runs with or without beam crossing angle ~ 4x108 shower events in Arm1+Arm2 ~ 106 π0 events in Arm1 and Arm2 Status Completed program for 900 GeV and 7 TeV Removed detectors from tunnel in July 2010 Post-calibration beam test in October 2010 Upgrade to more rad-hard detectors for 14TeV in 2014 12 TeV Gamma not only from Crab but Underground! Longitudinal development Lateral development Silicon X ! Energy Determination Position Determination Silicon Y Event sample measured by Arm2 at 30 March 2010 Particle Identification PID (EM shower selection) – Select events <L90% threshold and multiply P/ε ε (photon detection efficiency) and P (photon purity) – By normalizing MC template L90% to data, ε and P for certain L90% threshold are determined. hadron EM EM hadron EM L90% L90% 14 Photon spectra at √s=7TeV collisions (Adriani et al., PLB, 2011) Spectra of Arm1&2 at common η σine = 71.5mb assumed; consistent with the other LHC experiments zero degree 15 Comparison with Models Adriani et al., PLB, 2011 DPMJET 3.04 QGSJET II-03 SIBYLL 2.1 EPOS 1.99 PYTHIA 8.145 16 π0 identification Longitudinal development Large SmallEvent sample in Arm2 Cal. Cal. • A Pi0 candidate event • 599GeV & 419GeV photons in 25mm and 32mm tower, respectively • M = θ√(E1xE2) Lateral development Silicon X 1(E1) R R 140 m 140m Silicon Y 2(E2) Invariant mass of photon pairs = I.P.1 Comparison with models, in progress17 0 π Analysis more… Original Idea New Analysis! 18 π0 spectrum and air shower QGSJET II original Artificial modification X=E/E0 Ignoring X>0.1 meson π0 spectrum at Elab = 1019eV Longitudinal AS development Artificial modification of meson spectra and its effect to air shower Importance of E/E0>0.1 mesons Playing at LHC energy within reasonable modification range 30g/cm2 19 900GeV Analysis (Next target to publication) 102 102 100 200 300Energy 400(GeV) 500 Entry normalization No PID bias correction Ongoing works • Luminosity normalization • PID correction • Systematics study • Increasing MC statistics , etc… 100 200 300 400(GeV) 500 Energy Data DPMJET 3.04 QGSJET II-03 SIBYLL 2.1 PYTHIA 8.146 EPOS 1.99 20 Experimental Plan 14TeV p-p collisions (Elab=1.0x1017eV) • Assured in 2014 LHC p-Pb collisions • In discussion for 2012 RHIC 500GeV p-p collisions • Starting discussion LHC/RHIC (p,C,Fe)-CNO collisions 21 Experimental Plan 14TeV p-p collisions (Elab=1.0x1017eV) • Assured in 2014 --- highest energy LHC p-Pb collisions • In discussion for 2012 RHIC 500GeV p-p collisions • Starting discussion LHC/RHIC (p,C,Fe)-CNO collisions 22 Experimental Plan 14TeV p-p collisions (Elab=1.0x1017eV) • Assured in 2014 --- highest energy LHC p-Pb collisions • In discussion for 2012 --- nuclear effect RHIC 500GeV p-p collisions • Starting discussion LHC/RHIC (p,C,Fe)-CNO collisions 23 Experimental Plan 14TeV p-p collisions (Elab=1.0x1017eV) • Assured in 2014 --- highest energy LHC p-Pb collisions • In discussion for 2012 --- nuclear effect RHIC 500GeV p-p collisions • Starting discussion --- energy dependence LHC/RHIC (p,C,Fe)-CNO collisions 24 Experimental Plan 14TeV p-p collisions (Elab=1.0x1017eV) • Assured in 2014 --- highest energy LHC p-Pb collisions • In discussion for 2012 --- nuclear effect RHIC 500GeV p-p collisions • Starting discussion --- energy dependence LHC/RHIC (p,C,Fe)-CNO collisions • Dream! Before my retirement… 25 Related to CTA??? Related to CTA??? Proton : E-2 (<512TeV) Beam (3° FWHM) 0° 5° 20° 10° Karlsson and Kamae, ApJ 674, 278-285 (2008) 27 Summary LHCf successfully took data at LHC 0.9 and 7TeV p-p collisions First analysis results for photon spectra None of the models can fit the data, but the data is within model diversity Further analysis on going Variety of future experiments are assured and in discussion Possible relation to CTA physics? 28 Backup 29 30 31 32 Secondary in Hadron Interaction Multi meson production (High energy) π0 π+ (Low energy) π- Leading baryons γ μ proton / neutron Next interaction EM shower 33 LHCf can measure Multi meson production (High energy) π0 π+ (Low energy) π- Leading baryons γ μ proton / neutron Next interaction EM shower 34 Key measurements in colliders E0 EM shower E leading baryon Elasticity / inelasticity Total cross section (TOTEM at LHC) Meson Multiplicity Forward spectra Air shower experiments Astrophysical parameters - source type - source distribution - source spectrum - source composition Primary CR - propagation - energy - chemical composition - direction Observations - lateral distribution - longitudinal distribution - particle type - arrival timing Air shower experiments Astrophysical parameters - source type - source distribution Primary CR - energy - source spectrum - source composition - chemical composition - direction - propagation Air shower development - interaction - atmosphere Observations - lateral distribution - longitudinal distribution - particle type - arrival timing