Mass Asymmetric Fission of Iridium Nucleus Mass Asymmetric Fission of Nucleus Produced in 7Li + 186W Katsuhisa Nishio Advanced Science Research Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Tokai, JAPAN ARIS2014 Tokyo ① ④ ② ⑤ ③ ⑥ ① K. Nishio, K. Hirose, I. Nishinaka, H. Makii, R. Orlandi, R. Léguillon, J. Smallcombe, S. Mitsuoka, T. Ishii, H. Ikezoe ② A. Andreyev ③ N. Tamura, S. Goto ④ T. Ohtsuki ⑤ I.Tsekhanovich ⑥ P. Möller Properties for Low-Energy Fission Region of our interest I: betadelayed fission of A~180-200 N/Z~1.22-1.3: Tl,Bi, At, Fr ISOLDE(CERN) A. Andreyev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 252502 (2010). Z=82 180Hg - particle induced N/Z=1.25 187Ir 196Au x - e.m. –induced E*~11 MeV Calculated Fission Fragment Yield 180Hg Calculated by P. Möller (LANL) and J. Randrup (LBNL) 193Ir 7Li + 186W 193Ir* P. Möller, 10th ASRC International Workshop, “ Nuclear Fission and Structure of Exotic Nuclei ”, 2013.March, Tokai, Japan JAEA at Tokai and Tandem Facility Tokai Campus, JAEA 20 MV Tandem accelerator (20UR) J-PARC Tandem facility Tokyo Time difference signal of FFs in 7Li + 186W MWPC1 10000 Ec.m.= 65.5MeV 5000 7Li Beam 0 100 8000 44o 186W 150 200 250 300 350 400 40.0 MeV Counts Fragment 1 4000 0 100 160 150 200 250 300 350 400 30.0 MeV Fragment 2 80 0 100 MWPC2 150 200 250 300 TOF Channel 350 400 Time difference (ch) Fragment Mass Distributions in 7Li + 186W Elab 68.0 MeV Fusion reaction is assumed + 186W 193Ir* Events (u) 7Li 41.5 MeV 31.1 MeV 83As N = 50 110Ru N = 66 Fragment Mass (u) Folding Angle between Fission Fragments Elab = 31.1 MeV Complete Fusion 7Li + 186W θfold =169o FF 1 θ1 FF 2 θ2 Counts Beam Recoiled Fissioning Nucleus θfold = θ1 + θ2 (deg) Analysis assuming fusion-fission 7Li + 192Os 199Au* 7Li θfold, =167.9o + 186W 193Ir* θfold =167.5o Ebeam = 41.5 MeV <TKEViola> =134 MeV Fragment Mass (u) Folding Angle (deg.) TKE (MeV) TKE (MeV) Folding Angle (deg.) Z=118 Fragment Mass (u) Viola Formula from Phys. Rev. C 31, 1550 (1985) <TKEViola> =129 MeV 7Li 7Li + 186W, 192Os + 186W 7Li 180 EBeam = 64.0 MeV 180 σfiss 170 = 67 μb qfold (deg) 160 41.5 MeV + 192Os 170 180 180 170 170 160 14 μb 110 μb 160 160 2.1 μb -20 0 180 31.1 MeV 170 0.8 μb 160 -20 0 20 dT (ns) dT (ns) 20 Break-up Fusion 7Li 3H + 4He (Q= -2.467 MeV) 187Ir 188Ir 189Ir 190Ir 191Ir 192Ir 193Ir Counts p + 192Os 186Os 187Os 188Os 189Os 190Os 191Os 192Os Fragment Mass (u) 185Re 186Re 187Re 188Re 189Re 186W( 7Li, 184W 185W 186W t)190Os* 186W( 7Li, α)189Re * Break-up Fusion and Fission 3H 3H 7Li 4He 4He 186W + 186W 190Os* 3H + 186W 189Re* 4He Fragment 2 Fragment 1 CN VCoul Ebeam,thres (7Li) 4He + 186W 190Os* 20.3 MeV ̴ 36 MeV 3H + 186W 189Re* 10.3 MeV ̴ 24 MeV Fission Barrier Height for 189Re and 190Os 189Re, 190Os Fission Barrier is 25 MeV 189Re* or 190Os* should have excitation energy larger than 25 MeV P. Möller, 16th ASRC International Workshop, “ Nuclear Fission and Decay of Exotic Nuclei ”, 2014.March, Tokai, Japan Folding Angle at E* = 25 MeV of Fissioning Nucleus 7Li 180 Elab α) 189Re*, θα = 25o 186W(7Li, t) 190Os* , θt = 45o 186W(7Li, 170 64.0 MeV + 186W = 193Ir* 41.5 MeV qfold (deg) 160 180 α) 189Re*, θα = 45o 186W(7Li, t) 190Os* , θ = 45o t 186W(7Li, 170 160 180 31.1 MeV 186W(7Li, 170 α) 189Re*, θα = 55o E*max = 36 MeV 160 -20 0 20 dT (ns) Setup for Break-up Fusion Induced Fission MWPC1 Target 7Li Beam 189Re*… 186W θLAB t, α MWPC2 ΔE-E 7Li ΔE E Summary Mass-asymmetric fission was observed for nucleus produced in 7Li +186W. The fissionig nucleus could be populated by break-up fusion. Coincidence experiment between particle and both fission fragments is planned. Properties for Low-Energy Fission 180Hg A. Andreyev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 252502 (2010). Folding Angle Distribution at E* = 25MeV 180 Elab 7Li 170 64.0 MeV 186W(7Li, 186W(7Li, 41.5 MeV qfold (deg) 160 180 t) 190Os* , θt = 45o, 170.0 α) 189Re*, θα = 25o, 173 t) 190Os* , θt = 45o,170.0o 186W(7Li, α) 189Re*, θ = 45o , 172 α 186W(7Li, 170 160 E* max = 26 MeV 180 31.1 MeV + 186W = 193Ir* t) 190Os* , θt = 45o, 170.0 186W(7Li, α) 189Re*, θ = 55o, 172 α 186W(7Li, 170 160 -20 0 20 dT (ns) E*max = 36 MeV Summary E* (MeV) Cross section (mb) 104 103 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Fusion 102 101 Fission 100 10-1 10-2 10-3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Ec.m. (MeV) 7 Cross section (MeV) 4 Li + 7 Li + 186 W 182 W 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Ec.m. (MeV) 21 22 23 Multi-nucleon Transfer Induced Fission 18O + 232Th F O 15N Be B Esum (MeV) N C Coincidence between particle and fission fragments 232Th(18O, 15N) 235Pa* Transfer of 3H Fragment Mass Distributions for 3H Transfer → Fission Counts Excitation energy (MeV) 232Th(18O, 15N) 235Pa* Fragment mass yield (u) Fragment Mass Distributions for 232Th* Excitation energy (MeV) 232Th(18O, 18O) 232Th* Fragment mass yield (u) 26 Multi-nucleoon Transfer Induced Fission 18O + 232Th Coincidence between particle and fission fragments F O N Be B Esum (MeV) C New Region for Mass Asymmetric Fission 180Hg 100 80 A.Andreyev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 252502 (2010). T. Ichikawa et al., Phys. Rev.C.86, 024610 (2012). 28 Theoretical Mass Yield 189Ir 193Ir Fission Q-value Q-value for Fission (MeV) 300 Large Fission Saddle Point Shape Probability 258 1980 Fm 250 258 Fm 200 236 150 2010 180 100 193 Present 50 160 124 238U U Hg 193Ir Ir Gd Sn 0 Small Fission Probability -50 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fragment Mass (u) 160Gd