Analisa Burnup - WordPress.com

advertisement
Analisa Burnup
Zaki Su’ud
Pengertian analisa burnup
• Analisa yang berkaitan dengan perubahan
jangka panjang (hari-bulan-tahun) komposisi
bahan-bahan dalam reaktor akibat berbagai
reaksi nuklir yang terjadi saat pengoperasian
reaktor nuklir
• Bahan-bahan pecahan reaksi fisi jumlahnya
sangat banyak (lebih dari 1200 nuklida) dan
karakteristiknya sangat beragam
Analisa burnup secara umum
• Proses burnup merupakan mekanisme yang
sangat kompleks yang dipengaruhi berbagai
faktor seperti komposisi bahan teras,
distribusi fluks netron, temperatur, histori
pengoperasian reaktor, dsb.
• Beberapa program analisis burnup telah
disiapkan untuk operasi yang bersifat standar
misalnya terkait PLTN yang banyak
dioperasikan
Analisa Burnup secara umum(2)
• Akan tetapi untuk kasus-kasus khusus
misalnya menyangkut advanced NPP yang
memiliki skema fuel cycle yang cukup
kompleks maka diperlukan program yang lebih
komprehensif
• Dalam beberapa kasus program-program
analisis yang ada pun perlu dimodifikasi agar
cukup akuran dalam menganalisa kasus
tersebut
Contoh
rantai
burnup
Persamaan Burnup terkait
CONTOH DERET BURNUP YANG
DISEDERHANAKAN
Am-241
^
•
Pu-239Pu-240Pu-241Pu-242
•
^
•
Np-239
•
^
• U-238 U-239
Persamaan Burnup untuk deret
yang disederhanakan
dNU 8
  aU 8 NU 8
dt
dNU 9
  cU 8 NU 8  U 9 NU 9   aU 9 NU 9
dt
dN Np 9
 U 9 NU 9  Np 9 N Np 9   aNp 9 N Np 9
dt
dN Pu 9
 Np 9 N Np 9   aPu 9 N Pu 9
dt
Persamaan Burnup untuk deret
yang disederhanakan(2)
dN Pu 0
  cPu 9 N Pu 9   aPu 0 N Pu 0
dt
dN Pu1
  cPu 0 N Pu 0   aPu1 N Pu1  Pu1 N Pu1
dt
dN Pu 2
  cPu1 N Pu1   aPu 2 N Pu 2
dt
dN Am1
 Pu1 N Pu1   aAm1 N Am1  Am1 N Am1
dt
Solusi numerik
• Ada sangat banyak metoda yang dapat digunakan
untuk memecahkan persamaan burnup
• Di sini diberikan contoh yang bersifat standar
diantaranya metoda eksplisit berbasis finite
difference dan metoda semi implisit berbasis finite
difference juga
• Metoda eksplisit mudah dirumuskan hanyasaja
mempunyai tingkat stabilitas yang lebih rendah dari
metoda implisit
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Eksplisit
i 1
U8
i
U8
i 1
U9
i
U9
N
i
  aU 8 NU 8
t
i 1
i
NU 8  (1   aU 8t ) NU 8
N
N
i
i
i
  cU 8 NU 8  U 9 NU 9   aU 9 NU 9
t
i 1
i
i
NU 9   cU 8tNU 8  (1  U 9 t   aU 9t ) NU 9
N
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Eksplisit
N
i 1
Np 9
N
i
Np 9
 U 9 N
i
U9
 Np 9 N
i
Np 9
  aNp 9 N
i
Np 9
t
i
i 1
N Np 9  U 9 tNU 9  (1  Np 9 t   aNp 9t ) N Np 9
i 1
Pu 9
N
i
i
 Np 9 N Np 9   aPu 9 N Pu 9
dt
i
i
i 1
N Pu 9  Np 9 tN Np 9  (1   aPu 9t ) N Pu 9
N
i
Pu 9
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Eksplisit
i 1
Pu 0
i
Pu 0
i 1
Pu1
i
Pu1
N
i
i
  cPu 9 N Pu 9   aPu 0 N Pu 0
t
i 1
i
i
N Pu 0   cPu 9tN Pu 9  (1   aPu 0t ) N Pu 0
N
N
i
i
i
  cPu 0 N Pu 0  Pu1 N Pu1   aPu1 N Pu1
t
i 1
i
i
i
N Pu1   cPu 0tN Pu 0  (1  Pu1tN Pu1   aPu1t ) N Pu1
N
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Eksplisit
i 1
Pu 2
i
Pu 2
i 1
Am1
i
Am1
N
i
i
  cPu1 N Pu1   aPu 2 N Pu 2
t
i 1
i
i
N Pu 2   cPu1tN Pu1  (1   aPu 2t ) N Pu 2
N
N
i
i
i
 Pu1 N Pu1  Am1 N Am1   aAm1 N Am1
t
i 1
i
i
N Am1  Pu1tN Pu1  (1  Am1t   aAm1t ) N Am1
N
Metoda Implisit
• Pada metoda implisit ruas kanan diisi dengan
kombinasi duku pada iterasi waktu ke i dan i+1
dengan bobot yang dinyatakan dalam
parameter tertentu
• Metoda numerik jauh lebih rumit
perumusannya dari metoda eksplisit tetapi
memiliki keunggulan stabilitas yang jauh lebih
tinggi
t
t
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Implisit
NUi 81  NUi 8
  aU 8[ NUi 8  (1   ) NUi 81 ]
t
NUi 81[1   aU 8t (1   )]  (1   aU 8t ) NUi 8
i 1
U8
N
(1   aU 8t ) NUi 8

[1   aU 8t (1   )]
NUi 91  NUi 9
  cU 8[ NUi 8  (1   ) NUi 81 ]  (U 9   aU 9 )[ NUi 9  (1   ) NUi 91 ]
t
NUi 91[1  (U 9   aU 9 )t (1   )]   cU 8[ NUi 8  (1   ) NUi 81 ]  (1  U 9t   aU 9t ) NUi 9
i 1
U9
N
 cU 8[ NUi 8  (1   ) NUi 81 ]  (1  U 9t   aU 9t ) NUi 9

[1  (U 9   aU 9 )t (1   )]
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Implisit
i 1
i
N Np
9  N Np 9
i
i 1
 U 9 [ NUi 9  (1   ) NUi 91 ]  (Np 9   aNp 9 )[ N Np
9  (1   ) N Np 9 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
N Np
[1

(




)

t
(1


)]



t
[

N

(1


)
N
]

[1

(


t




t
)

]
N
9
Np 9
aNp 9
U9
U9
U9
Np 9
aNp 9
Np 9
i
i 1
i


t
[

N

(1


)
N
]

[1

(


t




t
)

]
N
U9
U9
U9
Np 9
aNp 9
Np 9
i 1
N Np
9 
[1  (Np 9   aNp 9 )t (1   )]
i 1
i
N Pu
i
i 1
i
i 1
9  N Pu 9
 Np 9 [ N Np
9  (1   ) N Np 9 ]   aPu 9 [ N Pu 9  (1   ) N Pu 9 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
N Pu
9[1   aPu 9t (1   )]  Np 9 t[ N Np 9  (1   ) N Np 9 ]   aPu 9t N Pu 9
N
i 1
Pu 9
i
i 1
i
Np 9 t[ N Np
9  (1   ) N Np 9 ]   aPu 9t N Pu 9

[1   aPu 9t (1   )]
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Implisit
i 1
i
N Pu
i
i 1
i
i 1
0  N Pu 0
  cPu 9[ N Pu
9  (1   ) N Pu 9 ]   aPu 0 [ N Pu 0  (1   ) N Pu 0 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
N Pu
0[1   aPu 0t (1   )]   cPu 9t[ N Pu 9  (1   ) N Pu 9 ]   aPu 0t N Pu 0
N
i 1
Pu 0
i
i 1
i
 cPu 9t[ N Pu
9  (1   ) N Pu 9 ]   aPu 0t N Pu 0

[1   aPu 0t (1   )]
i 1
i
N Pu
i
i 1
i
i 1
1  N Pu1
  cPu 0[ N Pu

(1


)
N
]

(




)[

N

(1


)
N
0
Pu 0
Pu1
aPu1
Pu1
Pu1 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
i
N Pu
1[1  (Pu1   aPu1 ) t (1   )]   cPu 0t[ N Pu 0  (1   ) N Pu 0 ]  (1  Pu1tN Pu1   aPu1t ) N Pu1
N
i 1
Pu1
i
i 1
i
i
 cPu 0t[ N Pu
0  (1   ) N Pu 0 ]  (1  Pu1tN Pu1   aPu1t ) N Pu1

[1  (Pu1   aPu1 )t (1   )]
Solusi Numerik Finite difference
Eksplisit
i 1
i
N Pu
i
i 1
i
i 1
2  N Pu 2
  cPu1[ N Pu
1  (1   ) N Pu1 ]   aPu 2 [ N Pu 2  (1   ) N Pu 2 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
N Pu
2[1   aPu 2t (1   )]   cPu1 [ N Pu1  (1   ) N Pu1 ]   aPu 2 N Pu 2
N
i 1
Pu 2
i
i 1
i
 cPu1[ N Pu

(1


)
N
]



N
1
Pu1
aPu 2
Pu 2

[1   aPu 2t (1   )]
i 1
i
N Am
i
i 1
i
i 1
1  N Am1
 Pu1[ N Pu
1  (1   ) N Pu1 ]  ( Am1   aAm1 )[ N Am1  (1   ) N Am1 ]
t
i 1
i
i 1
i
N Am
1[1  ( Am1   aAm1 ) t (1   )]  Pu1t[ N Pu1  (1   ) N Pu1 ]  ( Am1   aAm1 ) t N Am1
N
i 1
Am1
i
i 1
i
Pu1t[ N Pu
1  (1   ) N Pu1 ]  ( Am1   aAm1 ) t N Am1

[1  (Am1   aAm1 )t (1   )]
Metoda semi analitik
• Metoda analitik seperti yang dirumuskan
dalam Bateman equation memiliki akurasi
yang tinggi
• Kendalanya metoda ini sangat rumit untuk
deret yang panjang, hanya dapat diterapkan
dalam deret linier, serta tak dapat digunakan
untuk rantai siklus
• Solusinya adalah dengan menggunakan
metoda semi analitik
Metoda Semi analitik(2)
• Dalam metoda semi analitik maka rantai
burnup dipotong-potong dengan panjang
potongan yang diatur sesuai dengan
kebutuhan/optimasi
• Selanjutnya dilakukan iterasi burnup untuk
masing-masing potongan rantai secara
pereodik
• Selanjutnya dilakukan updating nilai
konsentrasi nuklida untuk tiap jenis nuklida
THEORY
BURN UP EQUATION
An explicit Burn Up equation for each nuclide is :
where
Ni = concentration of ith nuclide
λi = decay constant of ith nuclide
σa,i = absorb microscopic cross section for ith nuclide
Ф = neutron flux of nuclide
Sm,i = production speed of ith nuclide from mth nuclide
BATEMAN SOLUTION
• Bateman equation is one of analytic method to solve
transmutation process in linear chain depend on
time evolution
• General solution for linear chain of transmutation
process
SIMULATION
Linear series for analytical method
1
92234
92235
92236
24
94238
92234
92235
47
95242
94242
94243
95243
2
92235
92236
92237
93237
25
94239
94240
94241
48
95242
96242
96243
96244
3
92236
92237
93237
93238
94238
26
94240
94241
94242
49
95242
96242
96243
94239
4
92237
92237
93238
93239
94239
27
94240
94241
95241
50
95242
96242
94238
94239
5
92237
92237
6
92237
92237
93238
94238
94239
28
94241
94242
94243
51
95242
96242
94238
92234
93238
94238
92234
29
94241
95241
95742
52
95243
95244
96244
96245
7
92238
92239
93239
93240
94240
30
94241
95241
95742
96242
53
95243
95244
96244
94240
8
92238
92239
93239
94239
94238
31
94241
95241
95242
94242
54
95244
96244
96244
94246
9
92238
92237
93237
93238
94241
32
94242
95241
93237
55
95244
96244
94240
94241
10
92239
93239
93240
94240
94241
33
94243
94243
95243
95244
96244
56
96242
96243
96244
11
92239
93239
94239
94240
34
94243
95243
95244
96244
96245
57
96242
96243
94239
12
93237
93238
93239
94239
35
95241
95243
95244
96244
94240
58
96242
94238
94239
13
93237
93238
94238
94239
36
95241
95742
95243
59
96242
94238
92234
14
93237
93238
94238
92234
37
95241
95742
95242
94242
60
96243
96244
96245
15
93238
93239
93240
94240
38
95241
95742
95242
96242
61
96243
96244
94240
16
93238
93239
94239
94240
39
95241
95242
94242
94243
62
96243
94239
94240
17
93238
94238
94239
94240
40
95241
95242
96242
96243
63
96244
96245
96246
18
93238
94238
92234
92235
41
95241
95242
96242
94238
64
96244
94240
94241
19
93239
93240
94240
94241
42
95241
93237
93238
94238
65
96245
96246
96247
20
93239
94239
94240
94241
43
95742
95243
95244
96244
66
96246
96247
96748
21
93240
94240
94241
94242
44
95742
95242
94242
94243
67
96247
96248
96749
22
93240
94240
94241
95241
45
95742
95242
96242
96243
68
96248
96249
23
94238
94239
94240
46
95742
95242
96242
96243
69
96249
95243
95243
95243
95244
Burnup chain
1
92234
92235
92236
2
92235
92236
92237
93237
3
92236
92237
93237
93238
94238
4
92237
92237
93238
93239
94239
5
92237
92237
93238
94238
94239
6
92237
92237
93238
94238
92234
7
92238
92239
93239
93240
94240
8
92238
92239
93239
94239
94238
9
92238
92237
93237
93238
94241
10
92239
93239
93240
94240
94241
Burnup chain(2)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
92239
93237
93237
93237
93238
93238
93238
93238
93239
93239
93239
93238
93238
93238
93239
93239
94238
94238
93240
94239
94239
93239
94238
94238
93240
94239
94239
92234
94240
94240
94240
94239
94239
92234
94240
94240
94240
92235
94241
94241
Burnup chain (3)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
93240
93240
94238
94238
94239
94240
94240
94241
94241
94241
94240
94240
94239
92234
94240
94241
94241
94242
95241
95241
94241
94241
94240
92235
94241
94242
95241
94243
95742
95742
94242
95241
95243
96242
Burnup chain (4)
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
94241
94242
94243
94243
95241
95241
95241
95241
95241
95241
95241
95241
94243
95243
95243
95742
95742
95742
95242
95242
95242
93237
95243
95244
95244
95243
95242
95242
94242
96242
94242
95244
96244
96244
94242
96242
94243
96243
96244
96245
94240
95243
Burnup chain (5)
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
95241
95241
95742
95742
95742
95742
95242
95242
95242
95242
95242
93237
95243
95242
95242
95242
94242
96242
96242
96242
96242
93238
95244
94242
96242
96242
94243
96243
96243
94238
94238
94238
96244
94243
96243
96243
95243
96244
94239
94239
95243
95244
Burnup chain (6)
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
95242
95243
95243
95244
95244
96242
96242
96242
96242
96243
96242
95244
95244
96244
96244
96243
96243
94238
94238
96244
94238
96244
96244
96244
94240
96244
94239
94239
92234
96245
92234
96245
94240
94246
94241
Burnup chain (7)
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
96243
96243
96244
96244
96245
96246
96247
96248
96249
96244
94239
96245
94240
96246
96247
96248
96249
94240
94240
96246
94241
96247
96748
96749
21
22
15
2
10
1.5
1
5
0.5
0
0
200
400
600
800
Nuclide concentration (NPu240 )
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
x 10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
time1
22
14
10
x 10
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
6
x 10
Nuclide concentration (N)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
time
20
12
x 10
Nuclide concentration (NPu239 )
x 10
Nuclide concentration (NU8 )
2.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
time
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
8
6
4
2
2
6
x 10
0
0
2
4
time6
8
10
12
5
x 10
BEBERAPA HAL PENTING TERKAIT
ANALISA BURNUP
• Untuk reaktor cepat maka efek self shielding
pada perubahan cross section microscopic
tidak terlalu besar sehingga analisa burnup
berbasis microscopic cross section dapat
diterapkan
• Untuk reaktor thermal efek self shielding pada
perubahan cross section microscopic cukup
besar sehingga analisa burnup harus dilakukan
dalam sel bahan bakar
BEBERAPA HAL PENTING TERKAIT
ANALISA BURNUP(2)
• FP berjumlah lebih dari 1200 nuklida dan
karakteristiknya bergantung jenis reaktor
nuklir yang digunakan
• Untuk reaktor thermal ada beberapa FP yang
sangat dominan sehingga dapat mewakili
keseluruhan FP yang ada: misal Xenon, Sm, dll.
• Untuk reaktor cepat tak ada Fp yang terlalu
dominan sehingga secara keseluruhan harus
diperhitungkan
BEBERAPA HAL PENTING TERKAIT
ANALISA BURNUP(3)
• Untuk reaktor cepat metoda yang biasa digunakan
adalah menggunakan lumped FP atau menggunakan
beberapa puluh nuklida FP dan sisanya
menggunakan lumped FP
• Untuk perhitungan conversion/breeding ratio maka
perlu dilakukan kalibrasi cross section fisi dan nilai v
untuk masing-masing bahan fisil dominan
• Dalam hal digunakan sejumlah bahan fisil secara
serempak maka dilakukan kalibrasi FP
Senstivitas Burnup pada Cross
section
Code Modification
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
37
Parameter
Parameter Value/description
SPINNOR A
SPINNOR B
VSPINNOR
Installed capacity
55 MWth /
20 MWe
27.5 MWth/
10 MWe
17.5 MWth/
6.25 MWe
Operation life time (without
refueling and fuel shuffling)
15 years
25 years
35 years
Mode of operation
Basic/load follow (selectable)
Beyond 95% *
Load factor
Summary of major design
characteristics
- type of fuel
- fuel enrichment
- type of coolant/moderator
- type of structural material
4/13/2015
UN-PuN**
10 – 12.5%
Pb-Bi eutectic
Stainless
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
UN-PuN**
10 – 12.5%
Pb-Bi eutectic
Stainless
UN-PuN**
10 – 12.5%
Pb-Bi eutectic
Stainless
38
S
S
S
S
S
S
R
R
R
R
R
S
C2
C2
C2
C2
R
S
C1
C1
C1
C2
R
S
B2
B2
C1
C2
R
S
B1
B2
C1
C2
R
S
Radial direction
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
39
To
stack
outlet
4/13/2015
Figure 1. Reactor assembly of SPINNOR AND VSPINNOR
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
40
Burnup parametric study results: U238 fission
105%
102.5%
100%
97.5%
95%
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
41
Burnup parametric study results:Pu-239 fission
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
42
Burnup parametric study results:Pu-241 fission
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
43
Burnup parametric study results: U-238 capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
44
Burnup parametric study results: Pu-239 capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
45
Burnup parametric study results: Pu-240 capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
46
Burnup parametric study results: FP capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
47
Burnup parametric study results: Pb capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
48
Burnup parametric study results: Bi capture
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
49
Burnup parametric study results: Pb transport
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
50
Burnup parametric study results: Bi transport
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
51
Burnup parametric study results: FP scattering
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
52
Burnup parametric study results: Pb scattering
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
53
Burnup parametric study results: Bi scattering
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
54
Burnup parametric study results: Pu-239 fission
conversion ratio
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
55
Burnup parametric study results: U-238 capture
conversion ratio
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
56
Burnup parametric study results: FP capture conversion ratio
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
57
Burnup parametric study results: Pu239 fission coolant void
coefficient
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
58
Burnup parametric study results: U-238 capture coolant void
coefficient
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
59
Burnup parametric study results: FP capture coolant void
coefficient
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
60
Burnup parametric study results: Pb scattering coolant void
coefficient
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
61
Conclusion for Burnup parametric survey
• From the parametric survey results, we find that FP
cross section is important to be considered to get
reliable neutronic analysis results.
• Some other cross section is also critical such as U238 capture cross section and main fissile fission
cross section, and Pb and Bi transport and scattering
cross section.
• FP cross section is important to be treated in more
accurate way to get better accuracy especially at the
end of life.
4/13/2015
IAEA CRP RCM 21-25 Nov. 2005
62
INTRODUCTION:Background
• Small and very small nuclear power plant with
moderate economical aspect is an important
candidate for electric power generation in many part
of the third world countries including outside JavaBali area in Indonesia.
• The nuclear energy system with the range of 5-50
Mwe match with the necessity and planning of many
cities and provinces outside Java-Bali islands.
• In addition to electricity, desalination plant or
cogeneration plant is a good candidate for nuclear
energy application
INTRODUCTION:Background
• Due to the difference of the load between afternoon
and night the use of fast reactors is a better choice due
to capability to follow the load.
• Lead and lead bismuth cooled nuclear power reactors
is now considered as potential candidate of next
generation nuclear power reactors in the 21th
centuries.
• Various versions of lead cooled nuclear power
reactors have been analyzed and safety analysis also
have been applied to them.
• Accuracy of the simulation system need to be tested
through international benchmark program under
IAEA.
Introduction: Objective
Solving FP treatment group constant with the following
approach:
• First alternative: Rigorous treatment : We cover 165 nuclides
with other relevant FP nuclides in direct individual burnup
calculation. This method will give rigorous results but with
considerable calculation time. However this method is
important to test other simpler methods.
• Second alternative: Lumped FP treatment : We just build
best FP lumped cross section for many general condition and
use this FP group constant in burnup calculation. This method
can give accurate results if the spectrum is same or near the
spectrum to build the lumped FP cross section.
Introduction: Objective
• Third alternatives : Combination method: We treat some
most important nuclides individually and treat the rest FP
using lumped FP cross section. This method seems to be good
alternative for general usage.
• Forth alternative : Lumped FP cross section with many
interpolable parameter: We develop the concept similar to
the back ground cross section in the Bondanrenko based cell
calculation libraries. This will improve Lumped FP cross
section results for general usage.
• Fifth alternative : We develop the few group effective FP
similar to that in reactor kinetic problem. If we can get
reasonable good few group effective FP then we can solve for
all type of the core generally
METHODOLOGY
•
•
•
•
Identifying the important FP nuclides which have
strong influence to the overall FP cross section
Identifying important FP decay chains relevant the
important nuclides
Analyzing the contribution of each FP nuclides to
the overall FP crosssection based on the
equilibrium model
Analyzing the contribution of each FP nuclides to
the overall FP crosssection based on the time
dependent model
Identifying the important FP nuclides which have strong
influence to the overall FP cross section
• Based on the study of Shiro TABUCHI and Takafumi
AOYAMA we select 50 most important nuclides for
fast reactors.
• Based on this selection we then identify relevant and
important decay chains which should be considered.
• The 118 nuclides which has the contribution to the
total FP cross section more than 0.01% are shown in
the following table.
Table 1
118 Important FP Nuclides
No
Z
A
%X-sect Symbol
1
44
101
8.93
Ru
2
46
105
8.93
Pd
3
43
99
7.06
Tc
4
45
103
6.02
Rh
5
55
133
5.72
Cs
6
46
107
4.65
Pd
7
42
97
4.54
Mo
8
62
149
4.39
Sm
9
61
147
3.77
Pm
10
60
145
3.37
Nd
11
55
135
2.74
Cs
12
60
143
2.64
Nd
13
54
131
2.38
Xe
14
44
102
2.21
Ru
15
62
151
2.19
Sm
16
42
95
2.15
Mo
17
42
98
1.89
Mo
18
47
109
1.80
Ag
19
44
104
1.69
Ru
20
42
100
1.58
Mo
40
37
85
0.43
Rb
21
63
153
1.56
Eu
41
53
127
0.42
I
22
40
93
1.27
Zr
42
57
139
0.42
La
23
44
103
1.19
Ru
43
46
106
0.41
Pd
24
59
141
1.03
Pr
44
63
155
0.35
Eu
25
53
129
0.97
I
45
40
94
0.32
Zr
26
40
95
0.88
Zr
46
62
147
0.31
Sm
27
40
96
0.75
Zr
47
58
142
0.29
Ce
28
60
146
0.70
Nd
48
60
150
0.28
Nd
29
54
132
0.69
Xe
49
60
147
0.26
Nd
30
46
108
0.68
Pd
50
55
137
0.25
Cs
31
41
95
0.67
Nb
51
39
91
0.20
Y
32
58
141
0.62
Ce
52
60
144
0.19
Nd
33
40
91
0.61
Zr
53
36
83
0.19
Kr
34
40
92
0.48
Zr
54
58
144
0.18
Ce
35
54
134
0.48
Xe
55
64
157
0.18
Gd
36
44
106
0.48
Ru
56
46
110
0.14
Pd
37
62
152
0.48
Sm
57
42
99
0.14
Mo
38
60
148
0.46
Nd
58
64
156
0.13
Gd
39
48
111
0.44
Cd
59
48
113
0.11
Cd
60
55
134
0.11
Cs
80
51
121
0.05
Sb
61
63
154
0.10
Eu
81
52
127m
0.05
Te
62
58
140
0.10
Ce
82
61
148m
0.05
Pm
63
51
125
0.10
Sb
83
34
79
0.05
Se
64
65
159
0.10
Tb
84
45
105
0.05
Rh
65
62
154
0.10
Sm
85
62
150
0.04
Sm
66
38
90
0.10
Sr
86
51
123
0.04
Sb
67
53
131
0.09
I
87
64
155
0.03
Gd
68
39
89
0.09
Y
88
50
117
0.03
Sn
69
56
138
0.08
Ba
89
61
149
0.03
Pm
70
59
143
0.08
Pr
90
54
136
0.03
Xe
71
35
81
0.08
Br
91
46
104
0.03
Pd
72
52
130
0.08
Te
92
64
158
0.03
Gd
73
49
115
0.08
In
93
44
100
0.03
Ru
74
52
128
0.07
Te
94
36
85
0.03
Kr
75
48
112
0.07
Cd
95
38
89
0.03
Sr
76
52
129m
0.07
Te
96
48
114
0.02
Cd
77
37
87
0.06
Rb
97
38
88
0.02
Sr
78
36
84
0.06
Kr
98
50
119
0.02
Sn
79
54
133
0.05
Xe
99
62
148
0.02
Sm
100
34
82
0.02
Se
101
56
136
0.02
Ba
102
47
110m
0.02
Ag
103
34
77
0.01
Se
104
36
86
0.01
Kr
105
63
156
0.01
Eu
106
34
80
0.01
Se
107
63
151
0.01
Eu
108
48
116
0.01
Cd
109
50
118
0.01
Sn
110
48
110
0.01
Cd
111
34
78
0.01
Se
112
54
130
0.01
Xe
113
56
137
0.01
Ba
114
64
160
0.01
Gd
115
56
140
0.01
Ba
116
50
126
0.01
Sn
117
52
125
0.01
Te
118
50
120
0.01
Sn
Identifying important FP decay chains relevant
the important nuclides
84mBr
(1)
6.0m
 84Ge  84As  84Se
0.085s
0.95s
3.2s
3.1m
84Ga
84Kr
stable
84Br
31.8m
(2)
85mKr
4.48h
85Ga  85Ge  85As  85Se  85Br
(0.09s) 0.54s 2.02s
31.7s 2.90m
85Kr
10.77y
85Rb
stable
II.3 Analyzing the contribution of each FP nuclides to
the overall FP crosssection based on the equilibrium
model
• Based on the relevant and important decay
chains, differential equation for the model can
be derived.
• And using equilibrium approximation model
we can obtain the formula for the contribution
of each nuclide for certain flux level.
• Detail process will be discussed in the next
part.
Analyzing the contribution of each FP nuclides to the
overall FP cross section based on the time dependent
model
• To see the process toward equilibrium, the
time dependent change of each important
nuclides is calculated.
• The calculation is performed based on the
most important equation using analytical
method or numerical methods
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
DESCRIPTION AND THE
METHODOLOGY
OF SOLUTION
1. Simplification of Decay
Scheme and Mathematical Model
Differential Equation
dN Kr 5m
 y85 * F   Kr 5m N Kr 5 m
dt
dN Kr 5
 f 2  Kr 5m N Kr 5m   Kr 5 N Kr 5
dt
dN Kr 5
 (1  f 2 ) Kr 5 m N Kr 5 m   Kr 5 N Kr 5   aRb5N Rb5
dt
(2.a)
(2.b)
(2.c)
dNY 1
 y91* F  Y 1 N Y 1
dt
dN Zr 1
 Y 1 N Y 1   aZr 1N Zr 1
dt
dN Zr 2
 y92 * F   aZr 2N Zr 2   cZr1N Zr 1
dt
dNZr 3
 y93* F  Zr 3 N Zr 3   aZr 3N Zr 3   cZr 2N Zr 2
dt
dN Nb 3
 Zr 3 N Zr 3   aNb 3N Nb 3
dt
dNZr 4
 y94 * F   aZr 4N Zr 4   cZr 3N Zr 3
dt
(8.a)
(8.b)
(9)
(10.a)
(10.b)
(11)
dN Zr 5
 y95 * F   Zr 5 N Zr 5   aZr 5N Zr 5   cZr 4N Zr 4 (12.a)
dt
dN Nb 5
  Zr 5 N Zr 5   aNb 5N Nb 5 -  Mo 5 N Mo 5
(12.b)
dt
dN Mo 5
  Nb 5 N Nb 5   aNb 5N Nb 5
(12.c)
dt
dN Zr 6
 y96 * F   aZr 6N Zr 6   cZr 5N Zr 5
(13)
dt
dN Mo 7
 y97 * F   aMo 7N Mo 7   cZr 6N Zr 6
(14)
dt
dN Mo 8
 y98 * F   aMo 8N Mo 8   cMo7N Mo 7
(15)
dt
dNTc 9
 y99 * F  Tc 9 N Tc 9   aTc 9N Tc 9   cNb8N Nb 8 (16.a)
dt
dN Ru9
  Ru9 N Ru9   aNb 5N Nb 5
(16.b)
dt
dNMo 0
  Nb 0 N Nb 0   aNb 0N Nb 0   cTc 9N Tc 9
(17)
dt
dN Ru1
 y101* F   aRu1N Ru1   cNb0N Nb 0
(18)
dt
dN Ru 2
 y102* F   aRu 2N Ru 2
dt
dN Ru3
 y103* F   Ru3 N Ru3   aRu 3N Ru3
dt
dN Rh3
  Ru3 N Ru3   aRh3N Rh3
dt
(19)
(20.a)
(20.b)
dN Ru 4
 y104* F   aRu 4N Ru 4   cRu3N Ru3
dt
dN Pd 5
 y105* F   aPd 5N Pd 5   cRu4N Ru4
dt
dN Ru 6
 y106* F   Ru 6 N Ru 6   aRu 6N Ru 6
dt
dN Pd 6
  Ru 6 N Ru 6   aPd 6N Pd 6   cPd5N Pd5
dt
dN Pd 7
 y107* F   aPd 7N Pd 7   cPd 6N Pd 6
dt
(21)
(22)
(23.a)
(23.b)
(24)
dN Pd 8
 y108* F   aPd 8N Pd 8   cPd 7N Pd 7
dt
dN Ag 9
 y109* F   aAg 9N Ag 9   cPd8N Pd 8
dt
dNCd 1
 y111* F   aCd 1N Cd 1
dt
dN I 7
 y127* F   aI 7N I 7
dt
dN I 9
 y129* F   aI 9N I 9
dt
dN Xe1
 y131* F   aXe1N Xe1
dt
dN Xe2
 y132* F   aXe 2N Xe2   cXe1N Xe1
dt
dNCs 3
 y133* F   aCs 3N Cs 3   cXe2N Xe2
dt
(25)
(26)
(28)
(30)
(32)
(34)
(35)
(36)
dN Xe4
 y134 * F   aXe4N Xe4
dt
dNCs 5
 y135* F  Cs 5 N Cs 5   cXe4N Xe4
dt
dN Ba5
 Cs 5 N Cs 5   aBa5N Ba5
dt
dNCs 7
 y137* F  Cs 7 N Cs 7
dt
dN Ba7
 Cs 7 N Cs 7   aBa 7N Ba7
dt
dN La 9
 y139* F   aLa 9N La 9
dt
(37)
(38.a)
(38.b)
(40.a)
(40.b)
(42)
dNCe1
 y141* F  Ce1 N Ce1
dt
dN Pr 1
 Ce1 N Ce1   a Pr 1N Pr 1
dt
dNCe 2
 y142* F   aCe 2N Ce 2   cCe1N Ce1
dt
dN Nd 3
 y143* F   cCe 2N Ce 2   aNd 3N Nd 3
dt
dN Nd 5
 y145* F   aNd 5N Nd 5
dt
dN Nd 6
 y146* F   Nd 6 N Nd 6   cNd 5N Nd 5
dt
dN Pm6
  Nd 6 N Nd 6   aPm 6N Pm6
dt
(44.a)
(44.b)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(49.a)
(49.b)
dN Nd 7
dt
dN Pm7
dt
dN Sm 7
dt
dN Nd 8
dt
dN Sm 9
dt
dN Nd 0
dt
 y147* F   Nd 7 N Nd 7   cNd 6N Nd 6
(50.a)
  Nd 7 N Nd 7   aPm7N Pm7 -  Pm7 N Pm7
(50.b)
  Pm7 N Pm7   aSm 7N Sm 7
(50.c)
 y148* F   aNd 8N Nd 8   cNd 7N Nd 7
(51)
 y149* F   aSm 9N Sm 9   cNd 8N Nd 8
(52)
 y150* F   aNd 0N Nd 0
(53)
dN Sm1
dt
dN Eu1
dt
dN Sm 2
dt
dN Eu3
dt
dN Eu5
dt
dNGd 5
dt
 y151* F   Sm1 N Sm1   cNd 0N Nd 0
(54.a)
  Sm1 N Sm1   aEu1N Eu1
(54.b)
 y152* F   aSm 2N Sm 2   cSm1N Sm1
(55)
 y153* F   aEu3N Eu3   cSm2N Sm 2
(56)
 y155* F   Eu5 N Eu5 -  aEu5N Eu5
(58.a)
  Eu5 N Eu5   aGd 5N Gd 5
(58.b)
Table 2 Cumulative fission yield
(Form JNDC)
_______________________________
Kr-85m 6.10677000000000025E-1
Y -91
2.43774999999999986E+0
Zr-92
2.95633999999999997E+0
Zr-93
3.67079000000000022E+0
Zr-94
4.26259000000000032E+0
Zr-95
4.70092999999999961E+0
Zr-96
4.78516399999999997E+0
Mo-97 5.27359000000000044E+0
Mo-98 5.62816999999999990E+0
Tc-99
5.98852000000000029E+0
Mo-100
Ru-101
Ru-102
Ru-103
Ru-104
Pd-105
Ru-106
Pd-107
Pd-108
Ag-109
Cd-111
I -127
I -129
Xe-131
Xe-132
Cs-133
6.58037000000000027E+0
6.54110999999999976E+0
6.63984000000000041E+0
6.83164999999999978E+0
6.51982000000000017E+0
5.41333999999999982E+0
4.36779000000000028E+0
3.05134600000000011E+0
1.90365600000000001E+0
1.92017700000000002E+0
3.55362000000000011E-1
5.52984999999999949E-1
1.63166999999999995E+0
3.86864000000000008E+0
5.30914999999999981E+0
6.88192000000000004E+0
Xe-134
Cs-135
Cs-137
La-139
Ce-141
Ce-142
Nd-143
Nd-145
Nd-146
Nd-147
Nd-148
Sm-149
Nd-150
Sm-151
Sm-152
Eu-153
Eu-155
7.37063999999999986E+0
7.45038000000000000E+0
6.58718100000000018E+0
5.61065699999999978E+0
5.23207999999999984E+0
4.77627000000000024E+0
4.30201999999999973E+0
2.96883600000000003E+0
2.43299999999999983E+0
1.97354680000000005E+0
1.63632099999999991E+0
1.23951699999999998E+0
9.80944000000000038E-1
7.76606000000000018E-1
6.06010999999999966E-1
4.34675499999999992E-1
2.26013600000000009E-1
Results of EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
Nuclide Equilibrium atomic density
Kr-85m 4.44770531791907562E+14
Kr-85 1.97633360887029606E+18
Rb-85 4.07118000000000076E+22
Y -91
5.56515074783236992E+17
Zr-91
1.87519230769230774E+23
Zr-92
2.69704499999999973E+24
Zr-93
7.22362078298686804E+23
Zr-94
1.44399416962568053E+25
Zr-95
4.42046908461249792E+18
Nb-95 2.41666241370500864E+18
Mo-95 4.77426312204802589E+23
Zr-96
5.52377933331738450E+24
Mo-97 7.48809471931197233E+23
Mo-98 2.84272507230397735E+24
Tc-99
5.80448830818055222E+23
10 years fission yields
6.01822183500000051E+18
6.01822183500000051E+18
6.01822183500000051E+18
2.40240262499999990E+19
2.40240262499999990E+19
2.91347307000000020E+19
3.61756354500000031E+19
4.20078244500000031E+19
4.63276651499999969E+19
4.63276651499999969E+19
4.63276651499999969E+19
4.71577912199999980E+19
5.19712294500000072E+19
5.54656153500000010E+19
5.90168646000000041E+19
Mo-100 6.50652098679982160E+23
Ru-101 1.64415151553121916E+23
Ru-102 1.11917766324970256E+24
Ru-103 4.07353193643529267E+18
Rh-103 3.62142075730733155E+23
Ru-104 1.90874718849906334E+24
Pd-105 3.71900383008765652E+23
Ru-106 6.23076879994554204E+19
Pd-106 2.80060091023820422E+24
Pd-107 7.33297125020930985E+23
Pd-108 3.10105667293295228E+24
Ag-109 1.16346325998803663E+24
Cd-111 4.33608363654999232E+21
I -127
8.31849101789200961E+21
I -129
3.96245109681555547E+22
Xe-131 1.21112624246693271E+23
Xe-132 1.20288420958816868E+24
6.48495463500000051E+19
6.44626390499999990E+19
6.54356232000000082E+19
6.73259107499999969E+19
6.73259107499999969E+19
6.42528261000000061E+19
5.33484656999999980E+19
4.30445704500000031E+19
4.30445704500000031E+19
3.00710148300000010E+19
1.87605298800000000E+19
1.89233443350000026E+19
3.50209251000000000E+18
5.44966717499999949E+18
1.60801078499999990E+19
3.81254472000000000E+19
5.23216732500000031E+19
Cs-133
Xe-134
Cs-135
Cs-137
La-139
Ce-141
Pr-141
Ce-142
Nd-143
Nd-145
Nd-146
Nd-147
Pm-147
Sm-147
Nd-148
Sm-149
Nd-150
Sm-151
Sm-152
Eu-153
Eu-155
3.62009300606139853E+23
4.91376000000000031E+24
7.45522158674253426E+23
2.82069197535739773E+20
1.65677159309021128E+24
1.51566891983954208E+17
9.13746420803279551E+22
2.51802498411755389E+23
4.34924587526784595E+23
5.88221448186497744E+22
7.71690857142856989E+23
1.02188351991170944E+17
8.89640490784821760E+18
2.20304355074652252E+22
1.32707108147550356E+23
1.43957988001329279E+22
3.06545000000000014E+22
8.09183452634436700E+15
1.42246774052948772E+22
4.44932410294246792E+22
1.53124322481422464E+18
6.78213216000000000E+19
7.26376572000000000E+19
7.34234948999999980E+19
6.49166687550000005E+19
5.52930247350000026E+19
5.15621484000000000E+19
5.15621484000000000E+19
4.70701408500000031E+19
4.23964071000000020E+19
2.92578787800000020E+19
2.39772150000000000E+19
1.94493037139999990E+19
1.94493037139999990E+19
1.94493037139999990E+19
1.61259434550000005E+19
1.22154400350000005E+19
9.66720312000000000E+18
7.65345213000000000E+18
5.97223840499999949E+18
4.28372705250000026E+18
2.22736402800000026E+18
Equilibrium results analysis
• Not all of the nuclides can be treated properly using
equilibrium approach.
• The nuclides which need long time to reach the equilibrium
are not appropriate for this approach.
• To investigate this we also show the yields of 10 years of burnup using 100 W/cc power density and fission macroscopic
cross section 0.01 cm-1.
• The equilibrium approach will be useful for nuclides in which
equilibrium atomic density is much larger than the
corresponding yields in the right column.
• Therefore we can find that Y-91, Zr-95, Nb-95, Ru-103, Ru106, Ce-141, and Nd-147 are nuclides which can be treated
collectively using equilibrium approach.
• The verification of this can be found in the next session.
DIRECT NUMERICAL SOLUTION
RESULTS
Kr-85
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5.5E+18
5E+18
4.5E+18
4E+18
3.5E+18
3E+18
2.5E+18
2E+18
1.5E+18
1E+18
5E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Rb-85
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+19
3.5E+19
3E+19
2.5E+19
2E+19
1.5E+19
1E+19
5E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nb-95
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.4E+18
2.2E+18
2E+18
1.8E+18
1.6E+18
1.4E+18
1.2E+18
1E+18
8E+17
6E+17
4E+17
2E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Y-91
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.2E+18
2E+18
1.8E+18
1.6E+18
1.4E+18
1.2E+18
1E+18
8E+17
6E+17
4E+17
2E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-91
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-92
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-93
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.8E+20
2.6E+20
2.4E+20
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-94
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-95
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4.5E+18
4E+18
3.5E+18
3E+18
2.5E+18
2E+18
1.5E+18
1E+18
5E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Zr-96
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Mo-95
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Mo-97
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Mo-98
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Mo-100
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Tc-99
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ru-101
5E+20
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ru-102
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ru-103
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+18
3.5E+18
3E+18
2.5E+18
2E+18
1.5E+18
1E+18
5E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ru-104
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ru-106
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.4E+19
2.2E+19
2E+19
1.8E+19
1.6E+19
1.4E+19
1.2E+19
1E+19
8E+18
6E+18
4E+18
2E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Rh-103
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pd-105
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pd-106
3.2E+20
3E+20
2.8E+20
2.6E+20
2.4E+20
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pd-107
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pd-108
1.5E+20
1.4E+20
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.3E+20
1.2E+20
1.1E+20
1E+20
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ag-109
1.5E+20
1.4E+20
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.3E+20
1.2E+20
1.1E+20
1E+20
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Cd-111
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.6E+19
2.4E+19
2.2E+19
2E+19
1.8E+19
1.6E+19
1.4E+19
1.2E+19
1E+19
8E+18
6E+18
4E+18
2E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
I-127
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+19
3.5E+19
3E+19
2.5E+19
2E+19
1.5E+19
1E+19
5E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
I-129
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.2E+20
1.1E+20
1E+20
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Xe-131
3E+20
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.8E+20
2.6E+20
2.4E+20
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Xe-132
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Xe-134
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5.5E+20
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Cs-133
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Cs-135
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5.5E+20
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Cs-137
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
La-139
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ce-141
1.8E+17
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.6E+17
1.4E+17
1.2E+17
1E+17
8E+16
6E+16
4E+16
2E+16
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Ce-142
7.5E+20
7E+20
6.5E+20
6E+20
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5.5E+20
5E+20
4.5E+20
4E+20
3.5E+20
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pr-141
2.8E+19
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.6E+19
2.4E+19
2.2E+19
2E+19
1.8E+19
1.6E+19
1.4E+19
1.2E+19
1E+19
8E+18
6E+18
4E+18
2E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-143
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3E+20
2.5E+20
2E+20
1.5E+20
1E+20
5E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-145
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.2E+20
2E+20
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-146
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.8E+20
1.6E+20
1.4E+20
1.2E+20
1E+20
8E+19
6E+19
4E+19
2E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-147
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3E+17
2.5E+17
2E+17
1.5E+17
1E+17
5E+16
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-148
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.2E+20
1.1E+20
1E+20
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Nd-150
7.5E+19
7E+19
6.5E+19
6E+19
5.5E+19
5E+19
4.5E+19
4E+19
3.5E+19
3E+19
2.5E+19
2E+19
1.5E+19
1E+19
5E+18
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Pm-147
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
2.8E+19
2.6E+19
2.4E+19
2.2E+19
2E+19
1.8E+19
1.6E+19
1.4E+19
1.2E+19
1E+19
8E+18
6E+18
4E+18
2E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Sm-147
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.2E+20
1.1E+20
1E+20
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Sm-149
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
9E+19
8E+19
7E+19
6E+19
5E+19
4E+19
3E+19
2E+19
1E+19
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Sm-151
1.4E+16
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
1.3E+16
1.2E+16
1.1E+16
1E+16
9E+15
8E+15
7E+15
6E+15
5E+15
4E+15
3E+15
2E+15
1E+15
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Sm-152
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
4.5E+19
4E+19
3.5E+19
3E+19
2.5E+19
2E+19
1.5E+19
1E+19
5E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Eu-153
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
3E+19
2.5E+19
2E+19
1.5E+19
1E+19
5E+18
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Eu-155
Series1
Series2
Series3
Series4
5.5E+18
5E+18
4.5E+18
4E+18
3.5E+18
3E+18
2.5E+18
2E+18
1.5E+18
1E+18
5E+17
2
4
6
8
10
12
Time (years)
14
16
18
20
Analysis
• The first pattern is about nuclides which soon reach
asymptotic value, such as Nb-95, Y-91, Zr-95, Ru-103, Ru-106,
Ce-141, Nd-147,and Sm-151.
• Such nuclides can be grouped together with certain weight
which ma depend on some parameters such as flux, power
density, etc.
• This results are also inline with the equilibrium model. The
Ru-106 is may be in the boundary between first pattern and
second pattern.
• The second pattern includes nuclides which change during
burn-up include non-linear pattern. Such nuclides includes Kr85, Pd-106, Cs-137, Ce-142, Pm-147, Sm-147, and Eu-155.
Such nuclides can be combined into one group or more with
non linear wight (quadratic, cubic, quartic, etc.)
Analysis
• The third pattern is about nuclides which change
almost linear during burnup.
• Such nuclides includes Rb-85, Zr-91, Zr-92, Zr-93, Zr,
94, Zr-96, Mo-95, Mo-97, Mo-98, Mo-100, Tc-99, Ru101, Ru-102, Ru-104, Rh-103, Pd-105, Pd-107, Pd108, Ag-109, Cd-111, I-127, I-129, Xe-131, Xe-132,
Xe-134, Cs-133, Cs-135, La-139, Pr-141, Nd-143, Nd145, Nd-146, Nd-148, Nd-150, Sm149, Sm152, and
Eu153.
• Such nuclides can be grouped into two or more
group constants with flux level, power level and time.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION
• In this study we focus on the FP group constant treatment by
considering around 50 most important nuclides. We then
calculate the fission product effective yield for each modified
chains and also generating one group constants using SRAC
code system and other method (Origen etc.).
• We use two approach for investigating the important FP
nuclides: using equilibrium model and using numerical
solution for time dependent model. We found that we can
separate the FP nuclides into three groups: which soon reach
asymptotic value, which have non linear pattern and which
have linear pattern
CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION
• In he future work we will complete the detail
lumped FP model and include this in the full
core benchmark calculation
Download