High Brilliance X-rays from Compact Sources

advertisement

High Brilliance X-rays from Compact Sources

W.S. Graves

MIT

Presented at High Brightness Electron Beams Workshop

San Juan, PR

March, 2013

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

1

People

MIT

K. Berggren, J. Bessuille, P. Brown, W. Graves, R. Hobbs, K.-H. Hong,

W. Huang, E. Ihloff, F. Kaertner, D. Keathley, D. Moncton, E. Nanni,

M. Swanwick, L. Vasquez-Garcia, L. Wong, Y. Yang, L. Zapata

DESY

J. Derksen, A. Fallahi, F. Kaertner

Jefferson Lab

F. Hannon, J. Mammosser, ...

NIU

D. Mihalcea, P. Piot, I. Viti

SLAC

V. Dolgashev, S. Tantawi

With funding from DARPA AXis,

DOE-BES, and NSF-DMR

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

2

Gun

Basic Layout for ICS

Linac

3 m

Quads ICS X-rays

Cathode laser IR laser or THz ebeam dump

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

3

RF

GUN

X-band ICS source with 1 kHz rep rate

ICS X-RAY

GENERATOR

ELECTRON

SPECTROMETER

EMITTANCE

EXCHANGE LINE

LINAC

Equipment cost $3M

X-rays 0.1 – 12 keV

Not shown

- klystron and modulator housed in one 19” X 6’ rack

- instrumentation & power supplies housed in one 19” X 6’ rack

- 10W (10 mJ at 1 kHz) mode locked Ti:Sapp amplifier for photocathode and ICS collision

- x-ray optics

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

X-band ICS source with 1 kHz rep rate

RF

GUN LINAC

EMITTANCE

EXCHANGE LINE

ICS X-RAY

GEN.

ELECTRON

SPECTROMETER

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Optimized X-band SW Structure

Coupler to two adjacent cells

Simulated p

-mode with coupling

Standing wave accelerator structure with distributed coupling

Feed power

Structures by S. Tantawi and V. Dolgashev of SLAC

• Just 3 MW RF power to accelerate 20 MeV in 1 m

• 1 kHz rep rate with 9.3 GHz klystron developed for medical linacs

• 1 kHz solid-state modulator with <.01% stability

• RF gun is 2.5 cell 9.3 GHz structure needing just 2 MW to produce 200 MV/m on cathode

6

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

High Repetition Rate ICS with SRF Linac

Superconducting

RF photoinjector operating at 400

MHz and 4K

4 MeV

RF amp

RF amplifiers

RF amp RF amp

Electron beam of ~1 mA average current at 10-30 MeV

30 MeV

Coherent enhancement cavity with Q=1000 giving multi MW cavity power

8 m

Bunch compression chicane

Inverse Compton scattering

30 kW beam dump multi kW cryocooled Yb:YAG drive laser

X-ray beamline

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

7

High Repetition Rate ICS with SRF Linac

Emittance exchange beamline

ICS x-ray generator

Niowave Inc

SRF gun

Jefferson Lab

SRF linac

Equipment cost $15M

X-rays 0.1 – 12 keV

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Superconducting Accelerator R&D for Coherent Light Sources

PI: J. Mammosser, JLab

Goal: develop a low cost, high efficiency SRF solution suitable for compact light sources and other uses

• Compare spoke and elliptical b

=1 cavities

• Evaluate cavity materials, including Nb

3

SN

• Evaluate beam dynamics for highest brightness.

• Develop digital LLRF system for cavity / module testing

• Evaluate options for a low cost versatile cryostat

Beam dynamics

Single cell

CLS concept

Nb

3

Sn

Spoke cavity Elliptical cavity

RF system

Superradiant X-rays via ICS

ICS (or undulator) emission is not a coherent process, scales as N

Super-radiant emission is in-phase spontaneous emission, scales as N 2

N electrons

Steps

1. Emit array of electron beamlets from cathode 2D array of nanotips.

2. Accelerate and manipulate correlations of beamlet array.

3. Perform emittance exchange (EEX) to swap transverse beamlet spacing into longitudinal dimension. Arrange dynamics to give desired period.

4. Modulated electron beam backscatters laser to emit ICS x-rays in phase. FEL gain appears possible.

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Emittance Exchange (EEX)

y

Beamlets from tips

Current x t

Acceleration x’

Energy x t

EEX x’ Energy x t y x

Bunched beam emits coherent ICS

Current t

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Layout for Super-radiant ICS

RF gun

Linac

Quads

Dipoles

RF deflector

Nanocathode

Emittance Exchange

(EEX)

IR laser or THz

ICS

X-rays ebeam dump

12

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Nanostructured Cathodes

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

13

Au Nanopillar Array Geometry

10 nm

30 nm

80°

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

14

Nano Stripes

• Note similarity of stripes to wavefronts.

• Emittance exchange demagnifies pattern and transforms periodicity from ‘x’ to time.

SEMs of tips fabricated by R. Hobbs, MIT Nano Structures Lab

110 nm wide Au lines at 500 nm pitch 18 nm wide Au lines at 100 nm pitch

15

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Cathode spot size maps to pulse length

Cathode stripes

Laser spot

Large laser spot makes long pulse

Current

EEX time y x

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Number cathode stripes illuminated sets number of micropulses after EEX

Laser spot

EEX

Current time

Small laser spot makes short pulse

16

Tune resonant wavelength with quadrupole

Weak quad images cathode at low demagnification

Longer wavelength

Current y

EEX t x

Strong quad images cathode at large demagnification y

Shorter wavelength

Current

EEX x t

17

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

Simulation of 300x40 Tip Array through EEX

5M particles tracked, similar to full bunch charge zd slope due to imperfect matching (correctable)

Bunching at 13.5 nm

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

10 fs bunch length

Tests of coherent ICS code

Simulations by NIU grad student Ivan Viti using Lienard-Wiechert solver written by Alex Sell of MIT. Work in progress.

Examine radiation from many nanobunches

Simulations are designed to study coherent radiation opening angle, bandwidth, and electron beam size effects.

Emittance is set unrealistically small to remove its effect. Purpose is to explore radiation properties.

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

19

Radiation from many nanobunches

Bandwidth tends to 1/(number bunches) for large numbers of bunches

Opening angle tends to

1

N w

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

20

13.5 nm flux vs transverse ebeam size

Bunching factor = 0.2

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

RMS electron beam size (microns)

21

13.5 nm GENESIS Simulations

Laser parameters

Pulse energy

Pulse length

Waist size w0

Units

100 mJ

1 ps

7 micron

Pulse shape

A0 at waist flattop

0.3

Wavelength 1.0

Undulator period* 0.5

micron micron

*Undulator period = ½ laser wavelength

Electron parameters Units

Peak current

Pulse length

100

45

A fs

Norm. emittance

Energy

RMS energy spread

0.01

micron

1.7

0.1

MeV

%

Bunching factor 0.2

Beta function at IP 1 mm

• .01 micron emittance is consistent with 150 MV/m cathode field and 5 pC

• 45 fs bunch length contains 1000 periods at 13.5 nm

• Assume uniform bunching factor of 0.2 (not yet a start to end simulation)

• FEL rho parameter = .0012

• FEL gain length = 20 microns

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

22

13.5 nm FEL Simulations

Power growth over

300 periods

280 kW peak

Bunching factor

• 14 nJ or 10 9 photons/pulse in 0.15% bandwidth

• Emittance requirement during exponential gain

N

4

 p b x

L g

=50 Very different ratio than cm period undulator

23

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

13.5 nm Power and Spectrum Simulations

Spectrum

Radiation RMS size during interaction

0.15% BW

Power vs time

50 fs

280 kW peak

Optical guiding allows larger ebeam size

24

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

GENESIS Simulated 13.5 nm Performance

13.5 nm Output

Photons per pulse

Pulse energy

Average flux*

Bandwidth (FWHM) 0.1

Average brilliance* 5 x 10 14

Peak brilliance 3 x 10 25

Opening angle 0.8

Source size

Pulse length

Repetition rate

10 9

1 kHz rep rate

14

10 12 nJ photons/s

1.5

50

1

%

Units photons/(s .1% mm photons/(s .1% mm mrad m m fs kHz

2

2 mrad mrad

2

2 )

)

Avg current 5 nA

*Avg values rise 5 orders of magnitude for SRF linac

• Simulations use aggressive but achievable parameters

• Complete start-to-end simulations in development

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

25

Summary

• Nanobunched beam and ICS heading toward tabletop x-ray laser

• Develop accelerator technology specifically for this application

• SRF at 4K with low heat load and modular construction

• kHz rep rate x-band gun & linac using only 6 MW total RF power

• Inexpensive to test and develop

• Compact highly stable RF power supplies are commercially available

• Nanoengineered cathodes likely to have big impact on high brightness beams

W.S. Graves, MIT, March 2013

$3M

~$15M

26

Download