Presentation

advertisement
Consultations in Pathology Practice:
Clinicians & Patients
Jennifer L. Hunt, MD, MEd
Associate Chief of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital
Associate Professor of Pathology
Foundation.cap.org
v. #
Harvard Medical School
Agenda
•
•
•
•
Background
Direct Patient Consultations
Training program
Summary
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
2
Personalized
Medicine
The task of science is to stake out the limits of the knowable,
and to center consciousness within them
-Rudolph Virchow
Case Presentation
• 2009: 55 year old male
• Presented with a new rapid onset neck mass
• CT scan showed multiple enlarged lymph
nodes (largest 2.6 cm)
• FNA: squamous cell carcinoma
• Tonsil biopsy: squamous cell carcinoma
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
5
Tonsil Tumor
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
6
Case Presentation
• Tumor pathology
• Predominantly non-keratinizing squamous cell
carcinoma of tonsil with metastases to neck
• HPV testing
•
•
•
•
•
p16 strongly positive
HPV (high risk) in situ hybridization negative
Reference lab HPV in situ negative
HPV PCR negative
HPV positive at outside facility
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
7
PIK3CA mutation: E545K
Normal Control
Our patient’s tumor
Diagnostic Timeline
Diagnosis
3/2009
Molecular
Testing
Erbitux
Chemo
Rads
Chemo/Rads
3/2009
Lung mets
5/2010
Neck Dissection
12/2009
11/2009
Recurrence
11/2009
6/2010
9/2010
3/2011
Brain mets
9/2010
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
9
Personalized
Impersonal
Healthcare
Direct Patient Consultation: Model
• Clinician sends patient to pathologist for
consultation
•
•
•
•
•
Review the tumor morphologic features
Go over staging parameters
Review any molecular or ancillary testing
Answer questions
Discuss treatment options
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
12
Direct Patient Consultation: Why?
• Education and information for patients
• Informed patients participate in medical
decision making better
• Health literacy correlates with outcome
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
13
Direct Patient Consultation: Why?
• Better patient satisfaction
• Patients like access to their healthcare team
• Advanced technology is a driver of satisfaction
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
14
Direct Patient Consultation: Why?
• Allows the pathologist to be an active
participant in patient management
• Personalized interactions are rewarding
• Valuable role to play in the house of medicine
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
15
The Clinician Perspective
“As a medical oncologist, I can’t look at
pathology slides and speak to what the
slides are showing with any real
understanding of what I’m looking at.”
Lori Wirth, MD
Mass General Hospital
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
16
Direct Patient Consultation: Barriers
• Willingness: Pathologists and Clinicians
• Some pathologists are uncomfortable with the
idea, while others are totally excited
• Most clinicians are eager to try it.
• Logistics: Pathologists
• Organization and billing issues
• Experience: Pathologists
• Most pathologists haven’t seen patients since
medical school
• Exception: Cytopathologists
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
17
Willingness: CAPToday Article
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
18
Willingness: CAPToday Article
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
19
Logistics: Best Practices
• Optimize information flow and
communication
• Consultation questions and discussion
• Use good hand-off procedures and
documentation
• Letter or note in chart
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
20
Logistics: The Billing Conundrum
• There is no perfect E & M code (without
overstepping)
• Currently, billing for this may lead to
clinician hesitation
• The real answer will come with healthcare
reform
• Creating a valuable new service for pathology
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
21
Why Some Pathologists Hesitate
• “I went into pathology so I wouldn’t have to see
patients”
• “I’m shy! I don’t want to see patients”
• “It isn’t paid!”
• “My clinicians don’t want me to see their patients”
• “I don’t have time!”
• “I haven’t seen patients since medical school XX
years ago!”
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
22
Standardized Patient Simulation
• An experiential training program for
pathologists (sponsored by CAP
Foundation and Transformation Program
Office)
• One-on-one direct interaction with a
standardized patient (actor)
• Standard case with advance preparation
• Immediate feedback from “patient” perspective
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
23
Standardized Patient Simulation
• Event held at CAP ’10
• 33 pathologists participated
• 30 did the pre- and post-surveys (91%)
• 24/30 were in practice for more than 10 years
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
24
Where They Practiced
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Academic
Community
Hosp
Private
Group
Commercial
lab
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
25
How Often They See Patients
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Never
Once a year Once a month Once a week
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
26
Comfort Level Consulting with Patients
5
4
3
2
1
0
Average pre
Average post
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
27
Constructive Feedback from Patient
25
20
15
10
5
0
Excellent
Good
Fair
OK
Poor
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
28
Constructive Feedback from Patient
25
20
15
10
5
0
Excellent
Good
Fair
OK
Poor
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
29
Improvement in Specific Skills
Explain report
Relate as a
clinician
Post
Pre
Treatment info
0
1
2
3
4
5
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
30
Quotes About the Experience
• “Reawakened my dormant clinician!”
• “Training like this is vital for future
pathology services”
• “I will speak to the clinicians I work with to
offer patient consultations”
• “I will be more open to opportunities, even
in informal unpaid situations”
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
31
Next Steps: Patient Consultation
• Science: A randomized controlled trial
• Does patient consultation improve health
literacy, patient satisfaction and disease
management (coping)
• Education: Standardized patient simulation
• Offer again at CAP 11
• CAP Foundation fundraising campaign to
expand the program to offer more broadly
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
32
Summary
• Case Presentation
• The Model: Direct Patient Consultations
• Standardized Patient Simulation Training
Program
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL
33
Download