Quality Improvements HBB India Experience Dr. Anju Puri HBB Review Meeting 17th July 2012 Burden More than 2·3 million children die annually 1.1 million occur in neonatal period Million Death Study investigated 10892 neonatal deaths 12260 deaths in 1-59 months 0-28 days – 3 causes (78%) Prematurity & LBW 32% N. Infections - 26.7% B. asphyxia & trauma 18.8% 1-59 months – 2 causes (50%) Pneumonia 27.7% Diarrheal diseases 22.3% Ref: Report on causes of Death 2001-2003, RGI 2009 2 Our overall goal is MDG 4 ENC/R Goal: Support the MOHFW, State health departments, USAID bilateral health programs and the new National Newborn Care and Resuscitation Initiative (NSSK) to strengthen and expand access to ENC and teach basic resuscitation technique. 3 Geographic presence to support and influence implementation Gonda Uttar Pradesh Deoghar Jamtar a Giridih Jharkhand Immunization focus districts Integrated districts Simdega Chaibas a Landscape of program inputs Facility readiness assessment using 8 parameters was conducted in Oct 2010 using a structured questionnaire and 75 indicators generated. KAP performance for maternal and newborn care especially neonatal resuscitation was mapped. District mapping of the gaps generated and facility wise plan made for realistic program. Based on this implementation included provider mapping, 3- Day skill based training in essential newborn care and resuscitation skills of all district level primary providers conducted (250) Job-aides and skill lab of key providers (28) in the demo-facilities. Supportive supervision involving quantitative and qualitative checklists was used to provide on-going hand holding. Involving district authorities at each step was critical to success of the program. Strengthening of health information systems by improved reporting and feedback mechanism, Follow up of facility births of birth asphyxia newborns conducted in the community. Quality Improvement Quality Improvement (QI) approach is being used to analyse performance of the providers during training; and thereafter using systematic effort to improve the competence for the skill proficiency on neonatal resuscitation for improved outcomes. QI areas Skill acquisition Skill competency Criteria Knows the steps and their sequence to perform the required skill but needs assistance Knows the steps and their sequence and can perform the skill Tools Quality Assurance Checklist (QAC) Purpose Measured QAC is used to document the inputs and process followed during the training Results QAC results During training Performance checklist (PC) Read and Do tools (R&D) Skill rating (Mega-Score) using pre-post checklist Health worker with a step by step outline of the procedure for use during the practice phase of lesson. Pre-post test results Self – Practice observations During mentoring Supportive supervision (SS) Skill Proficiency Knows the steps and their sequence and effectively performs the required skill Cross-learning visits Standard checklist used during supervisory visits regular intervals Best Practices are focused Knowledge attitude Practice (KAP) Change in behaviour & practice HIMS trends Survival rates SS checklist Facility Readiness During benchmarking exercises Skill Acquisition - QI Quality Assurance Checklist Been used to assess and adhere to a minimum standard for quality of process during the training. 10 observation questions Score less than 80, training is repeated. Pre-Post Performance checklist Pre-post test scores are used to rate the training and provide feed-back to the providers. Measure changes in both the knowledge and skill acquisition by the health providers as a result of the training. S no Field for scoring. 1 Facilitator to participants ratio 2 Whether planning session conducted before the start of the training? 3 Items present at the training 4 Number of participant’s for whom both pre & post test was conducted 5 Whether the performance list was correctly used 6 Feedback given using performance checklist 7 List of skill demonstrations 8 Good quality video used in the training (Thermal protection and feeding) 9 Mega code score conducted correctly (Performed for all 5 bold items) 10 Number of participant’s with less than minimum passing score (optional) Total score Scoring by observer/participants Trainee 1 2 3 4 5 District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI District A District AI District B District BI 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 45 40 40 45 10 5 10 0 10 10 4 3 3 3 72 77 72 82 5 0 5 5 NA NA 0 NA 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 35 35 45 45 10 5 10 0 10 10 0 4 3 3 5 0 5 5 NA NA NA NA 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 45 40 45 45 10 5 10 0 10 - 5 0 5 5 NA NA NA NA 2 2 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 50 40 50 40 10 5 0 0 10 10 5 0 5 5 NA NA NA NA 2 2 5 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 50 40 50 40 10 5 10 0 10 10 - 67 72 62 77 87 62 72 70 82 77 70 85 82 77 90 72 6 0 5 NA NA 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 40 45 5 10 10 10 - 82 85 Total score Average score Ideal score 25 0 30 25 0 5 5 5 10 12 21 10 25 30 30 25 20 30 25 20 15 25 25 20 225 235 275 215 50 30 50 0 20 50 20 20 4.2 0.0 5.0 4.2 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.7 2.0 3.5 1.7 4.2 5.0 5.0 4.2 3.3 5.0 4.2 3.3 2.5 4.2 4.2 3.3 37.5 39.2 45.8 35.8 8.3 5.0 8.3 0.0 3.3 8.3 3.3 3.3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 50 50 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 390 447 451 386 65 70 80 57 100 100 100 100 Pre-post test scores - trainings Skill Competency – QI Practice exercises at skill labs Skill Competency – QI Read and do tools Supportive supervision A structured guide & training methodology for supportive supervision was prepared An “yes and no “simple checklist” is being used for regular supervision & feedback. Each skill is only scored, if all the steps is followed for the skill. The checklist has two copies, one for the health provider being supervised and the other for the one who supervises the activity. By this mean we assured that the provider who was supervised knows the misses and can be motivated to improve his performance. All At-least one None All No of observations At-least one None All Interventions No of observations May-12 None Mar-12 At-least one Jan-12 No of observations Skill station demo Postnatal Care Immediate newborn care Before Delivery Month/ year Provision of warmth 21 7 14 1 28 13 15 7 30 15 15 9 Infection prevention 20 15 5 3 30 21 7 9 30 23 7 11 Neonatal kit 20 12 20 16 28 Functioning of B&M 23 3 6 3 23 17 6 3 23 23 6 3 Effective partograph use 23 3 12 7 23 11 16 17 24 12 12 4 Looked for meconium 24 20 24 20 25 Immediate warmth 24 2 22 22 28 2 22 22 28 28 0 10 1-3 cord clamp 23 24 0 6 27 27 0 27 25 16 12 1 Skin to skin contact 21 12 12 0 25 13 12 1 27 16 12 1 Breast feeding initiation 24 24 0 2 26 26 0 0 18 18 0 4 Newborn examination 14 14 0 0 15 15 0 0 18 18 0 4 Vaccination 27 27 0 0 29 29 0 0 29 29 0 1 Counselling 28 16 12 0 29 21 12 0 27 22 5 5 % Demo mannequin 11 68.2 14 74.3 16 16 21 77.5 Skill Competency QI Questionnaire and exercise methodology developed to focus on the “preparedness” of the health facilities to deliver newborn care services as per the national guidelines. The results framework is quantifiable in operational terms rather than health systems framework. The analysis tool works on 75 broad indicators to generate color- codes to map the status of 8 parameters – Infrastructure, Delivery and Newborn Care services, Human resource, Essential drugs, equipment and supply, Register and client case record, Protocols and guidelines, universal precautions & infection prevention and Provider’s knowledge & competency on core skills. A computerized SQL based analysis system has been developed to generate score based color-codes. Implementing a planning exercise based after this exercise is found very useful and allowed us to bench mark the health facilities over a period of time. Score-card and improvement scores Graph showing change in knowledge on diagnosis of birth asphyxia Depresse d breathing 89.3 67.9 Central cyanosis (blue 67.9 tongue) 78.6 Floppines s 0.0 53.6 3.6 0.0 Heart rate below 10078.6 beats per minutes 71.4 Not cried at birth 100.0 89.3 Delayed crying (1 or 5 minutes) Deoghar Oct 10 Deoghar Jan 12 Graph showing change in provider’s knowledge & practice in using chronology of steps during resuscitation process Explain to mother condition of baby Were the steps in sequential 60.0 order Explain to mother condition of baby Place the newborn face 70.0 up 40.0 0.0 Start ventilation 80.0 using using bag and mask 0.0 16.7 4.2 Suction mouth then 90.0 nose Place the 90.0 newborn face 50.0 0.0 4.2 70.2 80.0 Were the steps in 88.0 sequential order 44.0 Wrap or cover baby except for face and chest Position 66.0baby’s head so neck is slightly extended Start ventilation using using 61.1 bag and mask 98.0 0.0 Suction 83.3 mouth then 94.0 nose up 0.0 Wrap or cover baby 62.0 except for 5.6 face and chest Position 74.0 baby’s head so neck is slightly extended 22.2 Deoghar Oct 10 Deoghar Jan 12 Jamtara Oct 10 Jamtara Jan 12 Sustaining and scaling efforts Monthly HMIS data HMIS Data ( Focus Facility Data) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3* Total number of deliveries 3354 3139 3107 No. of Live births 3176 3034 3019 No. of Still births 11 97 122 No. of Neonatal deaths 0 0 2 No. of full term deliveries NA 1020 3064 No. of pre-term deliveries NA 6 41 No. of neonates receiving vitamin K NA 0 455 No. of newborns with weight <2.5kg 159 213 277 No. of newborns breastfed within 1hr 3176 1918 2734 0 10 124 NA 8 30 No. of newborns requiring Bag & mask resuscitation No. of sick newborns referred to higher facility District Hospital Jamtara Year 1 % Total number of deliveries 1541 No. of Live births 1275 82.7 246 16.2 (160 per 1000 LB) No. of Still births No. of Neonatal deaths Year 3* % 1510 1442 95.5 68 4.5 (41 per 1000 LB) 0 0 No. of full-term deliveries NA 1477 No. of pre-term deliveries NA 18 No. of neonates receiving vitamin K 0 0 No. of newborns with weight <2.5kg 42 3.3 139 9.6 1275 100 1263 87.6 No. of newborns breastfed within 1hr No. of newborns requiring Bag & mask resuscitation NA 86 No. of sick newborns referred to higher facility NA 12 Consistency of reported Vs register data HMIS Data N Register Data % N Difference % Total number of deliveries 3107 2433 No. of Live births 3019 97.2 2351 96.6 0.5 No. of Still births 122 38.8 91 37.3 1.6 No. of Neonatal deaths 2 0.7 0 0.0 0.7 No. of full term deliveries 3064 98.6 2319 95.3 3.3 No. of pre-term deliveries 41 1.3 10 0.4 0.9 No. of newborns with weight <2.5kg No. of newborns requiring bag & mask resuscitation 277 9.2 268 11.4 -2.2 124 4.1 86 3.7 0.4 Number of newborns with meconium (AI) Number of newborns who had floppiness (AK) JAM DH 33 2 43 75 11 3 37 13 14 27 67 JAM Pabia 36 0 8 10 0 0 4 8 0 8 10 DEO Palajori 7 1 8 18 12 0 1 5 2 7 29 DEO Madhupur 30 0 6 15 3 4 2 3 2 5 18 84 3 82 125 36 8 44 29 18 47 124 All sites total Total number of newborns with asphyxia or meconium or floppiness (AJ+AI+AK) Total number of newborns on whom bag and mask has been used Number resuscitated by stimulation ,suction and bag and mask and oxygen Number resuscitated by stimulation ,suction and bag and mask Number resuscitated by stimulation and suction Number resuscitated by stimulation only Number of newborns with asphyxia (AJ) Still borns brought back to life (BV-CU) Number of still borns resuscitated (X) Facility Name District Name Resuscitation Details Resuscitation indicators Non - breathing % newborns with birth asphyxia Non - breathing or meconium or floppiness 3.5 5.3 Proportion of "Non - breathing" newborns resuscitated with stimulation alone 9.8 6.5 Proportion of "Non - breathing " newborns resuscitated with stimulation and suction 53.7 42.2 Proportion of " Non- Breathing" resuscitated with stimulation, suction and bag and mask 35.4 48.2 Proportion of "Non-breathing" newborns resuscitated successfully 98.8 96.9 Lessons Learned Newborn care programs have tended to be vertical, and slow to take up, have not considered or contributed to their quality. It is feasible and beneficial to integrate ENC with Maternal Health programs and improve quality of care and have access to their concomitant resources. The mother and baby dyad can be assessed and managed together. The first week, especially the first three days, should be covered as a priority in the most feasible and effective manner at both facility and community levels with links between the two. 26