Practical Nutrition Tips for the Primary Care Physician

advertisement

Hot Topics in Nutrition for the

Primary Care Physician

Phillip Snider, RD, DO

Bon Secours Medical Associates

Virginia Beach, VA

Should Vitamins be

Considered Drugs?

 Medline search of 4 online databases (Medline Plus, Drug Digest,

Natural Medicine Comprehensive Database, and the database of the

University of Maryland) 1966 through October 2009

Vitamins are used by over 1/3 of North Americans

Vitamins have documented adverse effects and toxicities, and most have documented interactions with drugs

Some vitamins (biotin, pantothenic acid, riboflavin, thiamine, vitamin

B

12

, vitamin K) have minor and reversible adverse effects

Others, such as fat-soluble vitamins (A, E, D), can cause serious adverse events

Two water-soluble vitamins, folic acid and niacin, can also have significant toxicities and adverse events

Should Vitamins be

Considered Drugs?

 Vitamins A, E, D, folic acid, and niacin should be categorized as over-the-counter medications

 Labeling of vitamins, should include information on possible toxicities, dosing, recommended upper intake limits, and concurrent use with other products

 Vitamin A should be excluded from multivitamin supplements and food fortificants

 The Annals of Pharmacotherapy : Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 311-324

Folic Acid

 Aka B9, Folacin or folate (natural form)

– Name derived “folium” - Latin for leaf

– Beans, peas, spinach, broccoli

 Functions

– Synthesize, repair and methylate DNA

 Deficiency

– Neural tube defects

– Pernicious anemia

– Accumulation of homocysteine

– Theoretical increased risk of cancer

Folate Metabolism

 Intestinal Cells

 Folate reduced to tetrahydrofolate

– Folate reductase

 inhibited by methotrexate

 Methylated to N

5

-methyl-THF

– primary blood form

`

Risk Factors Associated with Low Folate

 Genetic polymorphism MTHFR

C677T

7 out of 10 depressed patients

56% - C/T polymorphism

4 X more likely to have depression than general population

14% - T/T polymorphism

 Lifestyle

ETOH

Smoking

Poor nutrition

Medications

– anticonvulsants

– oral contraceptives

– lithium

– fenofibrates, niacin

– sulphasalazine

– methotrexate

– metformin

Illness

– diabetes

– atrophic gastritis crohn’s disease

– hypothyroid

– renal failure

Alpert M, et al. Jrnl Clin Psychopharmacology. 2003;23(3):309-13.

Fava M, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(3):426-28.

Arinami T, et al. Am J Genetics. 1997;74:526-28.

Procopciuc L.M., Poster Pres. P86 presented at Biol Psych. 2005.

Popakostas G, et al. Psychiatry Research, 2005;140(3):301-7.

Bjelland I. et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(6):618-26.

Bottigleri T. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 29:1103-12. Kelly B J, et al. Psychopharmacol. 2004 ;18(4):567-71.

Deplin as a Trimonoamine Modulator

Stahl S.M. Novel Therapeutics for Depression: L-methylfolate as a Trimonoamine Modulator and Antidepressant Augmenting Agent. CNS Spectrums. 2007;12(10):739-744.

Bioavailability

L-methylfolate

Vs.

Folic Acid

Dihydrofolate

(Dietary Folate)

Tetrahydrofolat e

DHF Reductase

Enzyme

5, 10 Methylene THF

L-methylfolate

MTHFR C > T

Polymorphism

L-methylfolate

• Folic acid requires a 4 step transformation process to be converted to the active form of folate, L-methylfolate (5-MTHF).

• L-methylfolate is unaffected by the MTHFR C  T polymorphism.

Folic Acid (FA) Benefits

 Nurse’s Health Study (JAMA 1998)

– 80,000 nurses, 14 yr follow-up

Relative Risk - highest vs lowest quintile

RR = 0.69 for folate

RR = 0.67 for B-6

RR = 0.55 for folate + B-6

 FA supplementation – vast majority of recent studies

– Lowers homocysteine but this has not turned out to offer any clinical benefits

Folic Acid (FA) Benefits

 Depression

– Deplin (L-methylfolatye)

 Stroke

– Limited evidence shows moderate benefit

Cancer

– Complex relationship

– High folate intake may protect against early carcinogenesis

High FA intake may promote advanced carcinogenesis

Dietary folate usually associated with lower risk

FA supplementation associated with higher risk

FA and Cancer

 A Finnish study

– 29,133 older male smokers

– Prostate CA risk - no relationship with serum folate levels

 Recent RCT

– FA 1 mg/day

 Prostate CA increased

– Dietary folate & plasma levels increased

 Prostate CA decreased

FA and Cancer

 Doubles the risk of prostate cancer

 2006 prospective study

– 81,922 Swedish adults

– High dietary folate

 Associated with a reduced risk of pancreatic cancer

FA and Cancer

 2007 RCT

– Folic acid supplements

Did not reduce the risk of colorectal adenomas

 Did significantly increase the presence of advanced adenomas by 67%

A Randomized Trial on Folic Acid Supplementation and

Risk of Recurrent Colorectal Adenoma

FA 1 mg/d (n = 338) vs placebo (n = 334) for 3-6.5 yr

Primary endpoint: Any new diagnosis of adenoma during the study period (May 1996-March 2004)

Secondary outcomes: Adenoma by site and stage and number of recurrent adenomas

Low plasma FA = sig decrease (RR: 0.61; P = 0.01)

Adequate plasma FA = no diff (RR: 1.28; P = 0.27)

Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1623-31.

Dietary Factors of One-carbon Metabolism & Prostate Cancer Risk

 27,111 Finnish male smokers aged 50-69

 End point = Diagnosis of prostate cancer between 1985 and 2002

 Vit B6 intake inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (RR for highest versus lowest quintile: 0.88; P = 0.045)

 Vit B12 intake associated with sig incr risk (RR = 1.36; P = 0.01)

 FA or alcohol intake no association with prostate cancer risk

 FA or alcohol intake no association with risk according to stage of dz

 Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Oct;84(4):929-35

FA and Cancer

 European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

University of Chile, in Santiago

 Hospital-discharge data for two 4-year periods

– before folic-acid fortification (1992–1996)

– after (2001–2004)

 Significant increase colon cancer

– 162% in people 45 to 64 years

– 190% in people 65 to 79 years

FA and Cancer

 Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study

 J Natl Cancer Inst . 2009;101:432-435

 3-fold increase in prostate cancer among men who took the folate supplement compared with men who took placebo

AARP Diet and Health Study

Prospective study of 295,344 men 50 to 71 and free of cancer at enrollment in 1995

 Multivitamin use assessed at baseline.

 5% used multivitamins > 7 times a week

 36% took a multivitamin daily

 5 yr follow-up: 10,241 developed prostate cancer

– 8,765 localized and

1,476 advanced cancers

179 cases of fatal prostate cancer

AARP Diet and Health Study

 No association: multivitamin use and risk of prostate cancer overall (relative risk 1.06)

 No association: multivitamin use and risk of localized prostate cancer (RR 1.02)

 Increased risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR 1.32)

 Elevated risk of fatal prostate cancers (RR 1.98)

The associations were strongest in men with a family history of prostate cancer or those who took selenium, β-carotene, or zinc.

FA and Cancer

 Increased breast cancer risk at high plasma folate concentrations among women with the MTHFR 677T allele

 Nested case-control study included 313 cases (age 55 –

73 y at baseline) with invasive breast cancer and 626 control subjects

 Malmö Diet and Cancer – 17,000 women followed 10 yr,

10% had mutation in MTHFR 677T allele

 Significant association of high plasma folate concentration with increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in carriers of the 677T allele

Am J of Clin Nutr, Vol. 90, No. 5, 1380-1389, November 2009

Vitamins & Cancer

 Norwegian Vitamin Trial and Western Norway B Vitamin

Intervention Trial

 6837 patients with ischemic heart disease

 1998 and 2005, and followed up through December 31, 2007

 FA 0.8 mg + B12 0.4 mg + Vitamin B6 40 mg (n = 1708)

 FA 0.8 mg/d + B12 0.4 mg/d (n = 1703)

 B6 alone 40 mg/d (n = 1705)

 Placebo (n = 1721)

Vitamins & Cancer

 FA + B12

– 10.0% Dx cancer vs 8.4%

4.0% Died-cancer vs 2.9%

16.1% Died-all cause vs 13.8%

HR 1.21; P = .02

HR 1.38; P = .01

HR 1.18; P = .01

 Most common cancer was lung cancer

 Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Treatment with Folic Acid and Vitamin B12

 JAMA. 2009 Nov 18;302(19):2119-26.

Food Fortification

 FDA started FA fortification in 1996

 All flour in US fortified with FA at a level of 140 μg/100 gr

 Estimated to supply an extra 100 μg daily to the average diet

Food Fortification

 Study of 1480 subjects

– FA intake actually increased by 190 µg/d

– Total folate intake increased by 323 DFE/d

 Folic acid intake above the UL seen only among those taking FA supplements as well as folic acid found in fortified grain products

 Some researchers have advocated that this be increased to double and even four times this amount

RDA

UL

Folic Acid

Women Pregnant

Women

Men

400 DFE 600 DFE 400 DFE

1,000 DFE 1,000 DFE 1,000 DFE

 Synthetic form ~2x bioavailable

– 1 DFE

1 mcg folate

 0.5 mcg folic acid (on empty stomach)

Folic acid fortification and public health:

Report on threshold doses above which unmetabolized folic acid appear in serum

 BMC Public Health 2007,

7: 41doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-41

 Electronic version of this article http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-

2458/7/41

Vitamins and Cancer: Take Home Message

Hickey and Roberts’ microevolutionary model for cancer describes how cells undergoing carcinogenesis respond to redox

(antioxidant/oxidant) signaling and changes in redox state

It predicts that nutritional doses of antioxidant supplements, required daily for maintenance of normal health, inhibit carcinogenesis

Vitamins and Cancer: Take Home Message

Once a cancer is established, however, the model suggests that nutritional or pharmacologic doses of antioxidants may be contraindicated as they could accelerate tumor growth

Large pharmacologic doses of nutrients, which produce specific physiologic or biochemical effects, are indicated for the treatment of cancer or other diseases

Vitamins and Cancer: Take Home Message

In the oxidizing environment of a developing tumor, nutritional doses of antioxidants could lower oxidation levels and inhibit cancer cell death

By contrast, pharmacologic doses of redoxactive substances that alter the antioxidant– oxidant balance, such as vitamin C (acting as a pro-oxidant), have been shown to destroy cancer cells in vitro and in animal experiments

Vitamins and Cancer: Take Home Message

People in good health should select only highquality, natural, antioxidant supplements, or molecularly identical counterparts avoiding synthetic forms such as DL-alpha-tocopherol

(synthetic vitamin E)

 In metastatic cancer, only those supplements that have been shown to provoke a differential redox response in cancer cells, are appropriate

– Vitamin C, R-alpha-lipoic acid, and Vitamin K3

Interaction b/w FA and B12

 FA can correct pernicious anemia from B12 deficiency

 FA does not correct the neurological impact

– 3 carbon to 2 carbon conversion affected

MMA accumulates

Mixed neuropathy

 FA over the UL (1 mg/day) can mask B12 deficiency

Obesity and Overweight

Establish diagnosis:BMI

 BMI = weight / height 2

 Correlates well with direct measures of adiposity

 Overweight child: BMI >85th and <95th percentile

 Obese child: BMI > 95th percentile

 If child < 3 years old, use weight for height

Medical Complications of Obesity

Pulmonary disease abnormal function obstructive sleep apnea hypoventilation syndrome

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease steatosis steatohepatitis cirrhosis

Gall bladder disease

Gynecologic abnormalities abnormal menses infertility polycystic ovarian syndrome

Osteoarthritis

Skin

Gout

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Stroke

Cataracts

Coronary heart disease

Diabetes

Dyslipidemia

Hypertension

Severe pancreatitis

Cancer breast, uterus, cervix colon, esophagus, pancreas kidney, prostate

Phlebitis venous stasis

Complications of Childhood Obesity

Relationship Between Weight Gain in

Adulthood and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

6

5

Men

Women

4

3

2

1

0

-10 -5 0 5 10

Weight Change (kg)

Willett et al. N Engl J Med 1999;341:427.

15 20

Diagnosing the Metabolic Syndrome

Risk Factor

Abdominal obesity

Men

Women

Defining Level

>40 in

>35 in

150 mg/dL TG

HDL-C

Men

Women

Blood pressure

Fasting glucose

Diagnosis =  3

<40 mg/dL

<50 mg/dL

130/

85 mm Hg

110 mg/dL

Defining Cardiometaboilc Risk

 What is Abdominal Obesity ?

 Can be defined by Waist Circumference

ATP- III IDF

Male:

> 42 Inch

Male :

> 37 Inch

Female :

> 35 Inch

Female :

> 31.5 Inch

Better Method ?

Waist < ½ Height

BMI Categories

A BMI of:

– <18.5

18.5-24.9

25-29.9

30-34.9

35-39.9

40-49.9

Classifies one as:

Underweight

Normal weight

Overweight

Obesity Class I

Obesity Class II

Obesity Class III

50 and above Super Obesity

Morbid Obesity

 BMI > 35 plus >2 Comorbidities

– HTN, DM, Lipids, OSA, CAD, CVA, OA, SUI, GERD

 BMI > 40

 > 100 lb over Ideal weight

Morbid Obesity Examples:

BMI > 40

 5’0” person > 204 lb

 5’6” person > 247 lb

 6’0” person > 294 lb

Morbid Obesity Examples:

BMI > 35

 5’0” person > 170 lb

 5’6” person > 216 lb

 6’0” person > 258 lb

Obesity is a BIG problem…

1.7 billion worldwide are overweight or obese

The US has a higher percentage of overweight and obese people than any country in the world

And the numbers are growing…

US Incidence of Obesity

 2/3 is overweight

– 50% are obese

 5% of the US population is morbidly obese

 BMI subgroups growing the fastest

– 35+ 40+

Why Are We So Fat

&

What Can We Do About It?

Obesity Treatment Pyramid

Surgery

Pharmacotherapy

Lifestyle Modification

Diet Physical Activity

Guide for Selecting Obesity Treatment

BMI Category (kg/m

2

)

Treatment 25-26.9

27-29.9

30-34.9

35-39.9

>40

Diet,

Exercise,

Behavior Tx

+ + + + +

Pharmacotherapy

With comorbidities

+ + +

Surgery

With comorbidities

+

The Practical Guide: Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. October

2000, NIH Pub. No.00-4084

 “Hey Doc, I am fat because my hormones are out of whack. I know I don’t eat too much. Can’t you check out what’s wrong with me and give me a pill to fix it?”

Hormonal Causes of Obesity

Cushings Syndrome

Most treatments for Diabetes Mellitus

 NOT

Hypothyroidism

Very few (less than 1%) of patients are obese due to hormonal problems, but a substantial number are obese in part due to diabetes treatment or treatment with glucocorticoids

Medications That Can Cause Weight Gain

 Psychotropic medications

– Tricyclic antidepressants

– Monoamine oxidase inhibitors

– Specific SSRIs

– Atypical antipsychotics

– Lithium

– Specific anticonvulsants

Older

-blockers

 Diabetes medications

Insulin

Sulfonylureas

– Thiazolidinediones

 Highly active antiretroviral therapy

 Tamoxifen

 Steroid hormones

Glucocorticoids

Progestational steroids

 “Yea, I know about balancing food and activity, but I don’t don’t eat that much.”

 “I don’t eat more than other people”

 “I only eat salads.”

Discrepancy Between Reported and Actual

Energy Intake and Expenditure

3000 Energy Intake

*

Energy Expenditure

2500

2000

1500

*

1000

500

0

Reported Actual

* P <0.05 vs reported.

Lichtman et al. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1893.

Reported Actual

“My problem is my metabolism is slow. Everything

I eat turns straight to fat.”

3000

Relationship Between Resting Energy

Expenditure and Fat-free Mass

Lean females

Obese females

Lean males

Obese males

2000

1000

0

0 30 40 50 60 70 80

REE = Resting energy expenditure

Owen. Mayo Clin Proc 1988;63:503.

Fat-Free Mass (kg)

90 100

 “Any time I try to lose weight, my metabolism slows down so much that I can’t lose weight.”

Energy Metabolism Before & After Weight Loss

Mean BMI Reduced from 31 to 23 kg/m 2

3500

3000

2500

2000

Resting Energy

Expenditure

1500

1000

* *

500

0

Before After Predicted

* P <0.05 vs before weight loss

Amatruda et al. J. Clin Invest 1993;92:1236.

Total Energy Expenditure

*

*

Before After Predicted

 “So obesity is all genetic.

There’s nothing I can do.”

50

40

Gene-Environment Interaction in the

Pathogenesis of Obesity

P <0.0001

Pima Indians

30

20

10

0

Maycoba, Mexico

Ravussin E et al. Diabetes Care 1994;17:1067-1074.

Arizona

Effect of Portion Size on Energy Intake

500

400

300

200

100

0

500 625 750 1000

Amount of Macaroni and Cheese Served (g)

Rolls et al. Am J Clin Nutr . 2000 Dec;76(6):1207-13.

Prevalence of Obesity by Hours of Daily TV

NHES Youth Aged 12-17 in 1967-70 and NLSY

Youth Aged 10-15 in 1990

Prevalence

(%)

20

15

10

5

0

40

35

30

25

NHES 1967-70

NLSY 1990

0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5

TV Hours Per Day (Youth Report)

>5

“I don’t think I need to change what I am eating.

I am going to work out and lose it that way.”

*

Physical Activity Alone Results in Minimal

Weight Loss

Control Group

Exercise Group

*

-3.0

*

*

-7.0

-5.0

* P <0.05 vs control group

Weight loss (kg)

Duration of each study ranged from 4 to 12 months.

Wing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31(suppl):S547.

-1.0

1.0

Stefanick 1998

Stefanick 1998a

Anderssen 1995

Hammer 1989

Verity 1989

R önnemaa 1988

Wood 1988

Wood 1983

Relationship Between Physical Activity and Maintenance of Weight Loss

P <0.001

100

80

60

40

20

0

Not Maintained Maintained

Weight Loss Pattern

Kayman et al. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:800.

 “Isn’t there some popular diet I can follow? One that makes it easy.”

Popular Diets

 Succeed short term because restriction in food choice reduces calories

 Fail long term because restriction of food choices becomes unacceptable

 Promote a cycle of euphoria and despair that discourages belief in the possibility of success

“Why can’t I just take a pill?”

Pharmacotherapy

 Used as an adjunct to diet/exercise

 Reserved for those with BMI>30 or those with BMI>27 and Comorbidities

Drugs Approved by FDA for

Treating Obesity

Generic Name

Orlistat

Sibutramine

Diethylpropion

Phentermine

Phendimetrazine

Benzphetamine

Trade

Names

Xenical

Meridia

Tenulate

Adipex, lonamin

Bontril,

Prelu-2

Didrex

DEA

Schedule

None

IV

IV

IV

Approved

Use

Long-term

Long-term

Short-term

Year

Approved

1999

1997

1973

Short-term 1973

III

III

Short-term

Short-term

1961

1960

Additive Effects of Behavior and Diet Therapy with

Pharmacotherapy for Obesity

0

Medication alone

-5

Medication and behavior modification

-10

*

-15

-20

Medication, behavior modification and meal replacements

-25

0 2 4 6

Time (months)

* P <0.05 vs medication alone.

Wadden et al. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:218.

8 10 12

*

“What about surgery?”

Role of Surgery

Evidence for long term effectiveness

Is approved by most payers

Requires life long committment

What are The Operative

Results?

 80% excess weight loss in 18 months

 Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass the most widely accepted and best results

 Higher volume centers and surgeons have best results. Still risk and complications

 10 year weight loss maintenance best with surgery

Gastric Bypass

Lap Band

Who Qualifies for Surgery?

 BMI greater than 40

 BMI greater than 35 with obesity co-morbidity

 Attendance in a plausible structured program for some period of time, without sustained and significant degree of weight loss

 Not impaired psychiatrically?

 BMI greater than 60?

Effect on Comorbid Conditions

Diabetes

– 76.8% - Completely resolved

– 86.0% - Resolved or improved

Hyperlipidemia

– 70% - Improved

HTN

– 61.7% - Resolved

– 85.7% - Resolved or improved

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

83.6% - Resolved

85.7% - Resolved or improved

Buchwald H, et al. Bariatric Surgery:

A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. JAMA, 14:1724-37, 2004

Long-Term Changes: Weight

Regain

One study of 342 gastric bypass pts showed excellent long-term weight maintenance:

– % weight loss at:

 1 year (89%)

 2 years (87%)

5 years (70%)

10 years (75%)

 However, potential for pouch stretch, selfsabotage, etc. leading to weight regain over time.

 Surgery relatively new, will have to wait and reanalyze data in a few years.

Malabsorption

 Flintstones “Complete”

 Women who still have menstrual periods need iron. All women need calcium!

 Common deficiencies: Iron, Folate, B

12

,

Calcium, Vitamin D

Long-term implications

 Patient must commit to lifetime monitoring of height, weight, and nutritional status

 Women should not become pregnant up to

18 months after surgery

 Encourage patient to join a support group to celebrate and cope with weight loss

Other issues

 Depression

Many expect things to get better post-op

Pre-existing depression exacerbated by stress of surgery

– Suicides increased post operatively in some series

– Ask about mood post-op

 Too much weight loss too fast

Look for signs of volume depletion

Puts at risk for infection

Screening Recommendations

 First Year:

@3 months: CBC, Glu, Cr

@6 months: CMP, Ferritin, TIBC, B12, Folate, Ca

[PTH] (if Ca elevated or to ensure Ca stable)

[Vit D] (possibly to ensure adequate Ca)

 Every year thereafter:

– All of the above

 Postmenopausal women: BMD Screening

– Variable recommendations, probably worth screening and ensuring maximum calcium / vit D tx if low BMD

Impact of Weight Loss on Risk Factors

~5%

Weight Loss

5%-10%

Weight Loss

HbA1c

1 1

Blood Pressure

2 2

Total Cholesterol

3 3

HDL Cholesterol

3 3

Triglycerides

4

1. Wing RR et al. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1749-1753. 2. Mertens IL, Van Gaal LF. Obes Res. 2000;8:270-278. 3.

Blackburn G. Obes Res. 1995;3 (Suppl 2):211S-216S. 4. Ditschunheit HH et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56:264-270.

Conclusions

 Obesity is a chronic disease

 Modest weight loss (5% -10% of body weight) can have considerable medical benefits

 Lifestyle change (diet and physical activity) is the cornerstone of therapy

 Pharmacotherapy can be useful in properly selected patients

 Bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for obesity

Metabolic Syndrome Treatment in the Overweight or Obese

Weight loss induced by diet and increased physical activity is the cornerstone of therapy

Weight loss induced by drug therapy can also improve specific features of the metabolic syndrome

Bariatric surgery is the most effective weight loss therapy for extremely obese subjects and improves all features of the metabolic syndrome

Obesity-Related Resources

Professional Associations

North American Association for the Study of

Obesity (NAASO)

American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)

American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)

American Diabetes Association (ADA)

American Dietetic Association (ADA)

American Gastroenterological Association (AGA)

American Heart Association (AOA)

American Obesity Association (AOA)

American Society for Bariatric Surgery (ASBS) www.naaso.org

www.aafp.org

www.acsm.org

www.diabetes.org

www.eatright.org

www.gastro.org

www.americanheart.org

www.obesity.org

www.asbs.org

Download