Microbicides 2008 - Microbicide Trials Network

Overview of Tenofovir’s

Anticipated Adverse Events and Resistance Concerns

Devika Singh, MD, MPH

Protocol Safety Physician

VOICE Training

July 2010

Today’s Discussion

 How does tenofovir work against HIV?

 What human body systems does it affect?

 What adverse events can we anticipate when tenofovir is used?

HIV Life Cycle

How does HIV enter the cell, and copy itself?

How do drugs exploit this process?

Key Concepts: Anti-retroviral (ARV)

ARVs are drugs to treat HIV designed to interfere with virus’s ability to replicate

They are best used in combination, i.e., anti-retroviral therapy (ART)

Different ARVs target different steps in the HIV life cycle

Generally, ARVs are safe and effective

Approved Antiretrovirals (ARVs)

Nucleoside / tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors:

 Zidovudine

 Didanosine

 Zalcitabine

 Stavudine

Lamivudine

Abacavir

 Emtricitabine

 Tenofovir

Protease inhibitors:

Indinavir

Saquinavir

Nelfinavir

Amprenavir

Fosamprenavir

Lopinavir

Atazanavir

Darunavir

Tipranavir

Ritonavir

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors:

 Delavirdine

 Nevirapine

 Efavirenz

 Etravirine

Integrase Inhibitors:

Raltegravir

These drugs were approved in 2007/2008

Fusion / Co-receptor inhibitors:

Enfuvirtide

Maraviroc

2 keys are needed to “open the door”

CD4 & chemokine receptors are required for viral entry

Fusion /

Entry

Inhibitors

Viral RNA is released (yellow strands)

Reverse transcription occurs

Genetic data is copied backwards from viral RNA to DNA

(Viral RNA yellow, DNA blue) www.cellsalive.com

Reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Work by blocking this process

Tenofovir

 Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor

(NRTI) drug used to treat HIV-1 infection in adults

Interferes with HIV’s ability to reproduce itself by inhibiting reverse transcriptase

Reverse

Transcriptase

Inhibitors

Fusion /

Entry

Inhibitors

Reverse

Transcriptase

Inhibitors

Fusion /

Entry

Inhibitors

Reverse

Transcriptase

Inhibitors

Fusion /

Entry

Inhibitors

Viral DNA integrates into the host chromosome DNA www.cellsalive.com

HIV uses the CD4 cell as a virus producing machine

 Cell operates like a photocopier

 Viral RNA coming off the photocopy is packaged in an `envelope`

 Eventually runs out of toner www.cellsalive.com

Viral Protease is an enzyme that cuts up proteins

 These new virions are now mature www.cellsalive.com

Protease inhibitors (PIs) block protease and inhibit replication www.cellsalive.com

Fusion /

Entry

Inhibitors

Protease Inhibitors

Reverse

Transcriptase

Inhibitors

Release of new HIV virions

 Mature virions are now available to infect new

CD4 cells. This is how CD4 cells are profoundly depleted as HIV infection progresses

Tenofovir

Dose: one 300 mg tablet taken once a day, with or without food

Used in combination with other oral drugs

Safety profile comparable to placebo

Resistance emerges slowly

Also called Viread® or TDF

Truvada

 Combination drug - tenofovir and emtricitabine

(FTC)

Both are NRTI’s

 One tablet contains 200 mg of FTC and 300 mg tenofovir taken once a day

 Safety profile similar to tenofovir

Also called Truvada®, FTC/TDF or tenofovir+FTC

Oral Tenofovir: How It’s Handled

 Oral bioavailability ~25%

 After taking 300 mg orally, maximum serum concentrations are achieved in about 1 hour (+/- 0.4 hours)

 Half-life is 17 hours; persists in peripheral blood cells much (PBMC) longer

 Must be taken up by cells to be activated

Tenofovir Diphosphate

Cellular kinase

Cellular kinase

Tenofovir

(TDF; inactive)

Tenofovir monophosphate

(inactive)

Tenofovir diphosphate

(active)

Intracellular

Extracellular

TDP: tenofovir diphosphate is active form; 2 phosphates added inside cells

TDF: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Inactive prodrug; only active after modification inside cells

Potential adverse effects/events

What body systems does tenofovir affect?

Kidney Bone Liver

Adverse Events That May Lead to Product Hold

Hypophosphatemia

Decreased creatinine clearance

Nausea

Dipstick abnormalities

Clinical experience with Tenofovir:

>12,000 in expanded access programs

Clinical Trial Experience

 3 large published clinical trials in HIV+; N = 1,544

(Gilead 903, 934, 907)

 Incidence >10%, Grades 2-4

Rash

Diarrhea

Headache

Pain

Depression

Nausea

Oral Tenofovir: Elimination

 Tenofovir is eliminated by the kidney at two sites and using two mechanisms

 Glomerular filtration

 Active tubular secretion

The Nephron, Basic Unit of the Kidney

 Glucose , water, salts & small metabolites are filtered through glomerulus & pass through to tubule

 Reabsorbed there

Protein is filtered at glomerulus (kept in blood)

TDF effect on kidney function

• Can affect the proximal tubule

• Accumulates in the proximal tubule

• “Spilling” of glucose and phosphate in urine

(glucosuria, hypophosphatemia)

TDF effect on kidney function

• Can also affect the glomerulus, making it

“leaky”

• Protein in urine

• Lowered creatinine clearance

• Elevated serum creatinine

TDF effect on kidney function

• Accumulates in the proximal tubule

• “Spilling” of glucose and phosphate in urine (glucosuria, hypophosphatemia)

• Can also affect the glomerulus

• Protein in urine

• Lowered creatinine clearance

(creatinine, CrCl and proteinuria)

• Tubular effects more common

( cohort studies suggest ~2% incidence)

• Also a small, stable increase in creatinine

Summary

 Tenofovir accumulates in the proximal tubule cells and can be toxic

Causes “spilling” of glucose and phosphate in urine

 Look for glucosuria and hypophosphatemia in VOICE

 Tenofovir can also affect the glomerulus

 Protein in urine is due to damage at glomerulus

 Why we look for changes in creatinine and proteinuria in VOICE

Tenofovir Kidney Toxicity: Summary

 Cohort studies suggest ~2% incidence of tubule problems in HIV patients treated with TDF

 Small, stable increase in creatinine

 Normal renal response to acidemia is to reabsorb all of the filtered bicarbonate and to increase hydrogen excretion primarily by enhancing the excretion of ammonium ions in the urine

 Impairment of this can lead to renal tubular acidosis

(RTA)

Tenofovir effect on liver

Liver enzymes (AST, ALT) = hepatitis

Lactic Acidosis / Severe

Hepatomegaly with steatosis

(fatty infiltration of liver)

Can occur with tenofovir use alone or in combination anti-HIV therapy

May not have increases in liver enzymes (transaminitis)

Majority of cases in women

Obesity and prolonged concomitant nucleoside use may be risks

Pre-existing liver disease not necessary

Tenofovir & Hepatitis B

Tenofovir is a treatment for hepatitis B infection

Worsening of chronic hepatitis B has been observed after stopping tenofovir abruptly

 Black box warning in package insert

Flares typically self-limited, but some reports of more serious liver damage

For this reason, VOICE will exclude women with chronic hepatitis B (HBSAg+) and encourage immunization for women vulnerable to future infection

Tenofovir: Post-Marketing Experience

 Renal insufficiency, renal failure, acute renal failure, Fanconi syndrome, proximal tubule problems, protein loss in urine, increased creatinine, acute tubular necrosis (severe damage), nephrogenic DI (diabetes insipidus), polyuria, interstitial nephritis

 liver enzymes (AST, ALT) --> hepatitis

Hypophosphatemia, lactic acidosis

Myopathy, osteomalacia (both associated with proximal renal tubulopathy)

Allergic reaction

Dyspnea

Abdominal pain,

 amylase, pancreatitis

Rash

Asthenia

Tenofovir: Precautions

 New onset or worsening renal impairment, including acute renal failure & Fanconi syndrome

Assess creatinine clearance pre-initiation; dose adjust if <50

Monitor creatinine clearance and phosphate in patients at risk

Avoid drugs that might damage the kidneys

*Package insert

Tenofovir: Precautions

 Decreases in bone mineral density in HIV+ persons

Consider monitoring if h/o pathologic fracture or osteopenia risk

Osteomalacia (softening of bones) can also result from Fanconi syndrome (loss of important minerals from kidney tubule)

 Lipodystrophy - redistribution/accumulation of body fat

 No data on setting when tenofovir is used as the only anti-HIV drug

*Package insert

Truvada: Anticipated AE’s

 Essentially contained in information already presented about Tenofovir information (and in its drug description/package insert) EXCEPT for:

 Skin discoloration

Hyperpigmentation (darkening of skin) primarily on palms and soles

Generally mild and asymptomatic

Implications for product hold?

 None discontinued for this reason in clinical trials

Oral PrEP:One Completed Trial

West Africa Phase II PrEP Trial (FHI/BMGF) in

HIV-negative women (n=936) in Ghana,

Cameroon, Nigeria

RCT: daily TDF 300 mg and placebo

Conducted June 2004 - March 2006

No evidence of increased clinical or laboratory adverse effects

Peterson L, et al. PLoS Clinical Trials 2007

Phosphate

In FHI PrEP study, one grade 3 hypophosphatemia was seen in 428 p-y followup (Peterson 2007)

Partners PrEP study & MTN001 to date:

Not uncommon

Several grade 2 and one grade 3 hypophosphatemia

Nearly all NOT found to be persistent with repeat testing; phosphate levels may vary in normal, healthy people

Few holds for phosphate abnormalities

Adverse Events That May Lead to Product Hold

Hypophosphatemia

Decreased creatinine clearance

Nausea

Dipstick abnormalities

1% Tenofovir Vaginal Gel

Active ingredient is tenofovir (also called PMPA)

Provided in pre-filled applicators (40 mg TFV in 4 ml)

Leads to low levels of drug in the blood

 Most levels below 5 ng/mL

 Detectable in 79% of HPTN059 participants

Low frequency of side effects

Tenofovir 1% Gel: Clinical Experience

 HPTN 050: Phase I study with 14 days of product exposure

 PMPA gel safe and acceptable in HIV-infected and uninfected women (Mayer, AIDS 2006)

 Male tolerance study (CONRAD)

 No complaints

 HPTN 059: Expanded safety study of 200

HIV-uninfected women in India and US

(Hillier, Microbicides 2008, New Delhi)

HPTN-059 Lessons Learned

Safety: Daily or coitally dependent 1% tenofovir gel no different from placebo

Adherence: Coitally dependent adherence within 2 hours of sex: 80%; 83% of daily doses reported used

PK: 79% of women reporting gel use in past 12 hours had low but detectable plasma tenofovir supporting self reported adherence data

Acceptability: Daily and coital use highly acceptable to women and they would use it if found to be effective at preventing HIV

Key Concepts: Resistance

Definition: ability of a microorganism to survive and multiply in the presence of drugs that would normally kill or weaken it.

 For HIV, drug resistance means the virus is no longer sensitive to one or more ARV

HIV is “resistant” to a medicine if it keeps reproducing even while a person is taking that medicine

Key Concepts: Resistance

How does it happen?

 The enzyme HIV needs to replicate

(reverse transcriptase) is error prone, resulting in mistakes (mutations)

 Some mutations make the virus not sensitive to a drug

 The drug-resistant virus can now replicate and take over other drug-sensitive virus

Resistance

 Resistance is common in HIV-infected people being treated with ART

 Where ART is widely used, 5-20% of new HIV infections can involve drug-resistant virus

 Can be managed when detected early

(suppressed by other ARV combinations)

 However, treatment options may be limited for some types of resistance

Will resistance be a problem?

We don’t know

Very little scientific or clinical information is available about the nature or incidence of resistance among those using ARV-based microbicides or oral ARVs for prevention, however

Limited modeling data suggest circulating drug resistance in the community won’t limit

PrEP effectiveness (Van de Vijver, JID, 2009)

Resistance with PrEP?

 Impact on future care for people infected while on

PrEP is unknown

 FHI trial in 936 HIV-negative women in Ghana

(primarily), Cameroon and Nigeria with daily tenofovir:

 Tenofovir safe – no serious side effects

 8 seroconversions occurred: 2 in the active arm and 6 in placebo arm

 HIV infections too few to draw conclusions on efficacy

Moving Forward

 Resistance will be a risk associated with being in a study like VOICE

 At the same time, much more research is needed because we know very little

 The risks are not considered high enough to think that PrEP studies should not be done

Summary: Implications

 Non-specific, generalized complaints occur commonly with tenofovir

Most will not necessitate product hold

However, presentation of severe AEs (ARF, lactic acidosis), require balance between high index of suspicion for immediate laboratory evaluation & prudent watchful waiting

Clinical judgment will be critical!

We are carefully monitoring for HIV resistance and want to minimize use of study products in established HIV infection

Acknowledgments

 Jeanne M. Marrazzo

 Jane E. Hitti

Questions?

Serologic markers of acute hepatitis B with recovery

HBV detectable by PCR

Source: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/slideset/index.htm

Serologic diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B

HBV detectable by PCR

Source http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/slideset/index.htm

Hepatitis B serology interpretation (Appendix IV of protocol)

HBsAg

Test anti-HBs

Result

Negative

Negative

Interpretation & Management

 HBV susceptible (offer vaccination)

 Flag chart & set up vaccination tracking log

 If declined, counsel about infection risk & potential for flares if ppt becomes infected

 Revisit need for vaccination regularly & test annually, at PUEV & 6mths after PUEV (oral).

HBsAg anti-HBs

Negative

Positive

“Immune” possibly due to prior infection or vaccination

Flag chart as “HBV Immune”. No further action needed

HBsAg anti-HBs

Positive

Negative

 HBV infected. Not eligible if at screening.

 If detected during follow up, permanently stop product & refer for care (per local standard)

 AST/ALT at 1,2, 3 months after initiation of product hold (Section 7.6.2)

Timing matters

Resistant virus is overtaken by sensitive virus within weeks of stopping ARVs

Monkey studies: virus initially transmitted is usually not drug-resistant, but resistance is more likely with time if the PrEP ARV is continued

Mothers who took single dose nevirapine for pMTCT and developed nevirapine resistance: no decrease in response to ARV treatment if initiated after 6 months

(Mashi Study)

For this reason, we are testing frequently for new

HIV infection, and stopping study product immediately if it’s detected (or strongly suspected)