Promising Models of Care Coordination/Care Management for

advertisement

Promising Models of Care Coordination for

Beneficiaries with Chronic Illnesses

Presented by:

Paul Shelton, EdD

Goals of Presentation

Identify promising care coordination/management interventions for beneficiaries with chronic illnesses

Transitional Care

Comprehensive Care Coordination

Describe internal and external evaluation

Describe key distinguishing features of these programs

Policy Implications

2

Care Coordination

A person-centered, assessment based, interdisciplinary approach to integrating health care and social support services cost-effectively in which:

 an individual’s needs and preferences are assessed,

 a comprehensive care plan is developed, and services are managed and monitored by utilizing an evidence-based process and an identified Care

Coordinator (New York Academy of Medicine, National

Coalition on Care Coordination).

3

The Problem

Most healthcare dollars are spent on a small percentage of beneficiaries who have complex chronic conditions

Causes of high utilization and costs:

Deviations from evidence-based care

Poor communication among primary providers, specialists, health and community providers, patients and families

Failure to catch problems early/patient compliance

Failure to address psychosocial issues

Lack of coordinated, longitudinal management

Ineffective transitional management (hospital - home, hospital nursing home, nursing home - hospital, nursing home - home)

4

What is Effective Care Coordination?

Intervention with rigorous evidence that:

Improves patient outcomes

Reduces total health care expenditures for participating patients

Improved satisfaction or clinical indicators not sufficient

Net savings require reduced hospitalizations

5

Promising Interventions

Promising care coordination interventions:

1.

Transitional Care

Coordination (Coleman et al.

2006; Naylor et al. 2004; Perry et al. 2011)

6

Promising Interventions, cont.:

2.

Comprehensive Care Coordination

Medicare/Duals - (Boult et al. 2008; Leff et al. 2009; Dorr et al. 2008; Counsell et al. 2007; Medicare Coordinated Care

Demonstration: Best Practice Sites, Brown

2009).

7

Transitional Care

These programs:

Engage patients with chronic illnesses while hospitalized

Follow patients intensively post-discharge

Teach/coach patients about medications, selfcare, and symptom recognition and management

Remind/encourage patients to keep follow-up physician appointments

8

Transitional Care Intervention:

Coleman et al. (2006)

Care Transitions: Coleman

Patient-centered intervention designed to improve quality and contain costs for patients with complex care needs as they transition across care settings

Target Population

Inclusion:

A) Patients being discharged from the hospital with: stroke, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias, COPD, diabetes, spinal stenosis, hip fracture, peripheral vascular disease, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism

B) 30 day Medicare readmission for HF, MI, PNE

C) Risk algorithm for readmission drawn from administration data

Exclusion:

Dementia with no caregiver, primary psychiatric diagnosis, with psychotic elements, active drug or alcohol use

9

Transitional Care Intervention:

Coleman et al. (2006)

Staffing

APN or RN or social worker or occupational therapist

Caseload: 1 care coordinator (CC) per 40 patients

Duration: 30 days following hospitalization

Focus

Continuity of care by helping family maintain a personal

 health record

Help family understand how/when to obtain timely follow-up care

Coach patients to ask the right questions to the right health

 care providers

Help patients/families be more active in managing condition and in developing/implementing self-care skills (i.e. medication management, increased awareness of symptoms, recognizing “red flags” and warning signs for care, along with instructions on how to respond

10

Transitional Care Intervention, cont.:

Mary Naylor et al. (2004)

Care Transitions: Naylor

Patient-centered intervention designed to improve quality of life, patient satisfaction, and reduce hospital readmissions and cost for elderly patients hospitalized with CHF

Target Population

Inclusion:

A) Elderly patients (aged 65+) admitted to 6 Philadelphia, PA,

 hospitals with diagnosis of CHF

(DRG 127)

B) Live in the community within a

60 mile radius service area

Exclusion:

Could not have ESRD, non English speaking

11

Transitional Care Intervention, cont.:

Mary Naylor et al. (2004)

Staffing

Advanced Practice Nurses (3)

Caseload: 1 care coordinator (CC) per 39 patients

Duration: 3 months following index hospitalization

Focus

Continuity of care at hospital discharge to optimize patient’s health status and arrange for needed home care services

After patients discharged home, prevention of medication and other medical errors

Help patients/caregivers with early symptom recognition, management of chronic conditions, and recommendations for future care.

12

Comprehensive Care

Coordination Programs

Implement evidence-based guidelines for care management

Conduct a comprehensive assessment

Collaboratively develop and implement a plan of care

Teach/coach patients about proper self-care, medications, how to communicate with providers

Monitor patients’ symptoms, well-being and adherence between office visits

Advise patients on how to talk with and when to see their physician

Apprise patients’ physician and other providers of important symptoms or changes

Arrange for needed health-related support services

Coordinate communication among physicians, health/community providers and patient/family

13

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

Medicare/Duals

Guided Care

Care Management Plus (CMP)

Medicare Coordinated Care

Geriatrics Resources for Assessment and

Care of Elders (GRACE)

14

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

Guided Care

Guided Care: Boult

A model of comprehensive health care provided by nurse-physician teams for patients with several chronic conditions

15

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

Guided Care

Target Population

Inclusion Criteria

Older patients (65+) at high risk of using health services during the following year, as estimated by

Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) predictive model

High risk was equated with HCC scores of 1.2 or higher

Exclusion Criteria

Low HCC scores

16

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

Guided Care

Staffing

Registered nurse based in primary care practice working with 3-5 physicians

Caseload: 1 care coordinator (CC) per 50-60 patients

Duration: Ongoing

Focus

Enhance primary care by infusing the operative principles of all seven chronic care innovations

Comprehensive patient evaluation

Individual care planning

Promote adherence with evidence-based guidelines

Empower patient

Promote healthy lifestyle

Coordinate care of multiple conditions

Coordinate care across provider settings

Caregiver support and education

Access to community resources

Make evidence-based, state-of-the-art, chronic care available continuously from teams of professionals that patients trust

17

Care Management Plus (CMP)

CMP: Dorr

Patient-centered intervention designed to reduce mortality and hospital admissions for elderly patients of primary care physicians.

18

Care Management Plus (CMP)

Target Population

Inclusion:

A) Elderly (65+), chronically patients of primary care physicians served by Intermountain Health Care, a large health care system in Utah

Medicare Part B for at least 11 months prior to enrollment

Multiple comorbidities, diabetes, frailty, dementia, depression, other mental health needs

Physician referral

Exclusion:

Patient declined to participate

19

Care Management Plus (CMP)

Staffing

All care managers are RNs, generalists, located in primary care clinics

Caseload: 1 care coordinator (CC)/350-500 patients

Duration: 24 months

Focus

Continuity of care through specialized information technology system

Education for specific diseases and problem-solving skills

Emphasis on evidence-based treatment plans and protocols

Flexibility of care planning and treatment plans

20

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

MCCD Best Practice Sites

MCCD

Provide care coordination services to high risk Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions to improve quality and reduce total cost of care

Evidence

Intervention patients in the 4 best practice sites had:

Lower re-hospitalization rates by 8% to 33% among high-risk enrollees

Lower total Medicare expenditures combined 4 sites of $157 per member per month (2010 dollars)

21

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

MCCD Best Practice Sites

Target Population (portion of study in each promising practice program)

Inclusion Criteria

Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

(COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF) or coronary artery disease

(CAD) and at least on hospitalization in the prior year and any of the 12 chronic conditions and two or more hospitalizations in the prior two years

Exclusion Criteria

Enrolled in hospice, reside in nursing home or have end stage renal disease (ESRD)

22

Comprehensive Care Coordination:

MCCD Best Practice Sites

Staffing

Registered nurses trained in comprehensive care coordination

Washington University and Health Quality Partners had staff primarily located in community offices (not hospital, clinic, home health); Mercy Medical Center staff located in hospital and primary care clinics and Hospice of Valley staff located in Hospice

Agency

Caseload

Wash U: 1 CC per 85-95 patients

HQP: 1 CC per 75-85 patients

Mercy: 1 CC per 80 patients

Hospice: 1 CC per 45 patients

Duration: Ongoing

Focus

Improved self-care

Improved symptom recognition and management

Improved medication management

Implementation of evidence-based practices

Improved transitional care

23

Internal Evaluation

How to achieve fidelity to model:

Comprehensive and ongoing training of care coordinators

Established and updated evidence based guides for practice

Regular feedback to care coordinators on whether patients are receiving care consistent with guidelines

Tracking of and feedback to care managers on established contacts (monthly visits, visits within 24 hours of hospital discharge, etc.)

Feedback on implementing self-management and evidencebased guidelines with patients

Tracking and reporting amount of time care coordinator spends on tasks (assessing, planning, monitoring, educating, coaching, documenting, supporting, and coordinating)

Need web-based care management system to measure fidelity and generate feedback

24

External Evaluation: What we Need to Evaluate to Judge Success

Effect on hospital admissions and readmissions

Effect on medical costs (by service type, total)

Whether savings exceed intervention costs

Effects on quality of care indicators (e.g., screening tests, preventive care, ED visits, infections, falls, mortality, etc.)

Effects on patients’ quality of life

25

What Distinguishes Successful Comprehensive

Care Coordination/Care Management?

Targeting

 Patients with select chronic conditions including co-occurring serious mental health diagnoses and substance abuse.

 Those who were hospitalized in previous year or at time of enrollment

Caseload

 Small enough caseload size (e.g. 40-80)

Training and Feedback CC

 Initial comprehensive training of care coordinators

 Deliver effective patient education and coaching

 Providing a strong, evidence based patient education/coaching intervention for managing health, symptoms, medications

 Performance feedback to care coordinators

26

What Distinguishes Successful Comprehensive

Care Coordination/Care Management?

Primary Care Provider

 Strong rapport with primary care provider/specialist/hospital

 Face-to-face contact through co-location, regular hospital rounds, accompanying patients on physician visits

 Assign all of a physician’s patients to the same care coordinator when possible

Contacts

 Frequent face-to-face contact (home, office) with patients

(~1/month)

Intervention

 Conduct comprehensive in-home initial assessment

 Develop a mutually agreed to “action plan” with goals

27

What Distinguishes Successful Comprehensive

Care Coordination/Care Management?

 Interventions follow evidence-based practices/guidelines for care management

 Address psychosocial issues: Staff with experts in social supports and community resources for patients with those needs

 Being a communications facilitator: Care coordinators actively facilitating communications among health and community providers and between the patient and the providers

 Implement self management, coaching and support with patient/family

 Implement effective medication management plan

 Manage care setting transitions: Having a timely, comprehensive response to care setting transitions (esp. from hospitals and skilled nursing facilities)

28

Policy Implications

 Best short run opportunity for reducing costs is improving transition from hospital to home

 Need payment reform to incentivize hospitals and primary care practices to implement these programs

 Medicare and Medicaid incentives to reduce readmissions

 Tying physicians’ compensation to quality and efficiency scores

 Medicare and Medicaid should consider separate reimbursement for care managers implementing proven interventions with target groups

 Special training programs for care coordinators and managers are needed

29

Contacts – Questions or Additional

Information

Paul Shelton, EdD

Email: pshelton@illinois.edu

Phone: 1-205-748-0050

Cheryl Schraeder, RN, PhD, FAAN

Email: cheryls@uic.edu

Phone: 1-217-586-6039

30

Download