Primary Frequency Control Free Governor Mode of Operation Boiler-Turbine-Generator System Units with different Ratings and Same Governor Droop of 3% Frequency in Hz Governor Regulation 52.5 52 51.5 51 50.5 50 49.5 49 48.5 48 47.5 U1:200MW3% U2:400MW 3% U3:200MW 3% U4:400MW 3% 0 100 200 300 Unit Loading in MW 400 500 Governor Regulation with different ratings and different droop constants Frequency in Hz Governor Regulation 50.5 50 49.5 49 48.5 48 47.5 47 46.5 U1:200MW 3% U2:200MW 6% U3:400MW 3% U4:400MW 6% 0 100 200 300 Unit Loading in MW 400 500 Two Units : Same Rating, same droop Two Units : Different Ratings, Same droop Two Units : Same Rating, Different Droops Three Units : One unit Regulating Three Units: Two Units Regulating Two machines of capacity 200MW with 6% Governor droop and 500MW with 3% Governor droop are operating in parallel with 150MW and 300MW loads to meet a total demand of 450MW at 50Hz in an isolated system. If the total load increases by 100MW to 550MW, what is the resultant load shared by each unit and the resultant frequency of the system. The increase in load of a unit with P1 MW Rating and R1%droop is P1 (P1 / R1 ) P1 = K (P1 / R1 ) Similarly P2 (P2 / R 2 ) , P2 = K (P2 / R 2 ) Total load change = P1 + P2 = 100MW P = 100 MW = P1 + P2 = P1 K R1 =100MW = P2 R 2 200 K 6 500 3 Example contd. 200 1000 100 MW K 6 K 1200 6 K P1 K P2 K K (200 ) 100 100 200 P1 1 R1 2 F 2 1 2 200 6 X 200 12 50 3 16.66 P2 R2 1 2 X 50 3 250 3 50 3 1 200 3 0.25 Hz 1 500 1.5 0.25 Hz P P1 P 2 F1 P1 F1 P1 P 2 F2 P2 250 3 500 3 300 3 250 83.33 3 100 FGMO in Integrated Systems: Two Units Shifting Load by changing the Reference System FGMO in Integrated System: Droop Characteristic showing Load Limit Less than Full Load Governor Action in an Integrated System Governor Response to Sudden Loss of Generation Governor Response: Boiler-Turbine-Generator System Temporary Increase in Droop Due to Boiler Effects Response Characteristics for Boiler-TurbineGenerator Control Systems Bibliography 1. Cohn, N.. Control of Generation and Power Flow on Interconnected Systems, WHey, New York, 1961. 2. Miller, II.. Power System Operation. McGraw-Hill, New York1970. 3. Weedy, B., Electric Power Systems, Wiley, New York. 1967. 4. Woodward Governor Co., “Role of Governors in System Operated Unified Control of Hydro Units, Prime Mover Control”