Back To Solutions of Schrödinger's equa. Particle in a Box Particle in a Box E4 Energy E3=9E1 E2=4E1 E1 E=0 Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) Using the momentum operator we can determine the avg momentum. Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) Using the momentum operator we can determine the avg momentum. P Pdx n ( )n dx i x 0 L * * Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) Using the momentum operator we can determine the avg momentum. P Pdx n ( ) n dx i x 0 L * * L 0 2 L sin nx L d i dx 2 L sin nLx dx Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) 2 n sin 2 iL 0 L n x L cos n x L dx Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) 2 n sin 2 iL 0 L n x L cos n x L dx Integrating by parts we get 2n L 2 P sin 2 iL 2n L nx L 0 Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) 2 n sin 2 iL 0 L n x L cos n x L dx Integrating by parts we get 2n L 2 P sin 2 iL 2n L 0 nx L 0 Particle in a Box (Quantization of Momentum) 2 n sin 2 iL 0 L n x L cos n x L dx Integrating by parts we get 2n L 2 P sin 2 iL 2n L 0 nx L Hence avg. momentum =0 0 Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The infinite potential is an oversimplification which can never be realised. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The infinite potential is an oversimplification which can never be realised. A more realistic finite square well is shown U E 0 L Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The infinite potential is an oversimplification which can never be realised. A more realistic finite square well is shown U Regions of interest are shown (1-3) E 1 2 0 3 L Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Practical, given enough energy a particle can escape any well. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Practically, given enough energy a particle can escape any well. A classical particle with E>U can enter the well where it moves freely with a reduced energy (E-U). Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Practically, given enough energy a particle can escape any well. A classical particle with E>U can enter the well where it moves freely with a reduced energy (E-U). A classical particle with E<U is trapped within the well (can not escape). Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Practically, given enough energy a particle can escape any well. A classical particle with E>U can enter the well where it moves freely with a reduced energy (E-U). A classical particle with E<U is trapped within the well (can not escape). Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) In QM there is a probability of it being outside the well. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) In QM there is a probability of it being outside the well. That is the waveform is nonzero outside the region 0<x<L. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) In QM there is a probability of it being outside the well. That is the waveform is nonzero outside the region 0<x<L. For stationary states (x) is found from the time independent Schrödinger’s equation. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) In QM there is a probability of it being outside the well. That is the waveform is nonzero outside the region 0<x<L. For stationary states (x) is found from the time independent Schrödinger’s equation. 2 d 2 U E 2 2m dx Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) In QM there is a probability of it being outside the well. That is the waveform is nonzero outside the region 0<x<L. For stationary states (x) is found from the time independent Schrödinger’s equation. 2 d 2 d 2 U E 2 2 2m dx dx 2 m U E 2 0 Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Therefore outside the well where 2 d U(x)=U, 2 2 0 dx Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Therefore outside the well where 2 d U(x)=U, 2 2 0 dx 2mU E where 2 2 Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Therefore outside the well where 2 d U(x)=U, 2 2 0 dx 2mU E where 2 2 Since U>E, this term is positive. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Therefore outside the well where 2 d U(x)=U, 2 2 0 dx 2mU E where 2 2 Since U>E, this term is positive. x ns Independent sol to the differential are e , x e Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) To keep the waveform finite as x and x Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) To keep the waveform finite as x and x Therefore the exterior wave takes the form ( x) Aex , x 0 ( x) Bex , x L Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) To keep the waveform finite as x and x Therefore the exterior wave takes the form ( x) Aex , x 0 ( x) Bex , x L The internal wave is given as before by ( x) C coskx D sin kx Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The coefficients are determined by matching the exterior wave smoothly onto the wavefunction for the well interior. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The coefficients are determined by matching the exterior wave smoothly onto the wavefunction for the well interior. That is, (x) and d dx are continuous at the boundaries. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The coefficients are determined by matching the exterior wave smoothly onto the wavefunction for the well interior. That is, (x) and d dx are continuous at the boundaries. This is obtained for certain values of E. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) Because is nonzero at the boundaries, the de Broglie wavelength is increase and hence lowers the energy and momentum of the particle. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The solution for the finite well is n 2 2 2 En 2 2mL 2 Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The solution for the finite well is n 2 2 2 En 2 2mL 2 As long as is small compared to L. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The solution for the finite well is n 2 2 2 En 2 2mL 2 As long as is small compared to L. 1 where 2mU E Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The solution for the finite well is n 2 2 2 En 2 2mL 2 As long as is small compared to L. 1 where 2mU E The approximation only works for bounds states. And is best for the lowest lying states. Particle in a Box (Finite Square Well) The Quantum Oscillator We now look at the final potential well for which exact results can be obtained. The Quantum Oscillator We now look at the final potential well for which exact results can be obtained. We consider a particle acted on by a linear restoring force F kx . The Quantum Oscillator We now look at the final potential well for which exact results can be obtained. We consider a particle acted on by a linear restoring force F kx . -A X=0 A The Quantum Oscillator We now look at the final potential well for which exact results can be obtained. We consider a particle acted on by a linear restoring force F kx . x rep. its displacement from stable equilibrium(x=0). The Quantum Oscillator We now look at the final potential well for which exact results can be obtained. We consider a particle acted on by a linear restoring force F kx . x rep. its displacement from stable equilibrium(x=0). Strictly F kx applies to any object limited to small excursions about equilibrium. The Quantum Oscillator The motion of a classical oscillator with mass m is SHM at frequency k m The Quantum Oscillator The motion of a classical oscillator with mass m is SHM at frequency k m If the particle is displaced so that it oscillated between x=A and x=-A, with 2 1 E kA total energy the particle can be 2 given any (nonnegative) energy including zero. The Quantum Oscillator The quantum oscillator is described by introducing the potential energy U ( x) 12 kx2 into Schrödinger's equation. The Quantum Oscillator The quantum oscillator is described by introducing the potential energy U ( x) 12 kx2 into Schrödinger's equation. 2 d 2 1 2 So that, 2 kx E 2 2m dx The Quantum Oscillator The quantum oscillator is described by introducing the potential energy U ( x) 12 kx2 into Schrödinger's equation. 2 d 2 1 2 So that, 2 kx E 2 2m dx d 2 2m 2 2 dx 1 2 kx2 E 0 The Quantum Oscillator The quantum oscillator is described by introducing the potential energy U ( x) 12 kx2 into Schrödinger's equation. 2 d 2 1 2 So that, 2 kx E 2 2m dx d 2 2m 2 2 dx d 2 2m 2 2 dx 1 2 1 2 kx2 E 0 m 2 x 2 E 0 The Quantum Oscillator We can consider properties which our wavefunction must and can’t have. The Quantum Oscillator 1. We can consider properties which our wavefunction must and can’t have. Exponential and trig forms will not work 2 because of the x in the equation. The Quantum Oscillator 1. 2. We can consider properties which our wavefunction must and can’t have. Exponential and trig forms will not work 2 because of the x in the equation. should be symmetric about x 0 . The Quantum Oscillator 1. 2. 3. We can consider properties which our wavefunction must and can’t have. Exponential and trig forms will not work 2 because of the x in the equation. should be symmetric about x 0 . should be nodeless, but approach zero for x large. The Quantum Oscillator Condition (2) requires that the 2 waveform be a function of x . The Quantum Oscillator Condition (2) requires that the 2 waveform be a function of x . Further, condition (3) dictates that function have no zeros (other than at infinity). The Quantum Oscillator The simplest solution is of the x ( x ) C e Gaussian form 0 2 The Quantum Oscillator The simplest solution is ofxthe Gaussian form ( x) C0e 2 So that d x 2 2xC 0 e dx The Quantum Oscillator The simplest solution is of the x ( x ) C e Gaussian form 0 2 So d x 2 2xC 0 e that dx d 2 2 2 4 x 2 2 and dx The Quantum Oscillator The simplest solution is of the x ( x ) C e Gaussian form 0 2 So d x 2 2xC 0 e that dx d 2 2 2 4 x 2 2 and dx 2m Therefore 4 x 2 2 2 2 1 2 m x 2 E The Quantum Oscillator Comparing coefficients we have that, 2m 1 4 2 m 2 2 2 The Quantum Oscillator Comparing coefficients we have that, 2m 1 m 2 4 2 m 2 2 2 The Quantum Oscillator Comparing coefficients we have that, 2m 1 m 2 4 2 m 2 2 2 2mE m and 2 2 The Quantum Oscillator Comparing coefficients we have that, 2m 1 m 2 4 2 m 2 2 2 and 2mE 2 m E 12 2 The Quantum Oscillator Therefore we find that the ground state for the harmonic oscillator has a m x 2 ( x ) C e 0 waveform 0 2 The Quantum Oscillator Therefore we find that the ground state for the harmonic oscillator has a waveform 0 ( x) C0e m x 2 2 C0is found after normalization. The Quantum Oscillator Normalising, * 0 ( x) 0 ( x)dx 1 The Quantum Oscillator Normalising, * 0 ( x) 0 ( x)dx 1 So that we have * 2 ( x ) ( x ) dx C 0 0 0e m 2 x dx 1 The Quantum Oscillator Normalising, * 0 ( x) 0 ( x)dx 1 So that we have * 2 ( x ) ( x ) dx C 0 0 0e dx 1 m 2 x We can show that e >0. ax 2 dx a for a The Quantum Oscillator Which can use to integral our integral. Hence 2 C 0e m 2 x dx 1 The Quantum Oscillator Which can use to integral our integral. Hence 2 C 0e m 2 x dx 1 C 2 0 1 m The Quantum Oscillator Which can use to integral our integral. Hence 2 C 0e m 2 x dx 1 C 2 0 1 m m C0 1 4 The Quantum Oscillator In summary we determined for the oscillator ground state E0 12 and 0 ( x) C0e m x 2 2 The Quantum Oscillator To determine the excited states a similar procedure is followed. The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) The first excited state must have the following properties: The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) 1. The first excited state must have the following properties: Should be antisymmetric about x=0. The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) 1. 2. The first excited state must have the following properties: Should be antisymmetric about x=0. Should be exactly one node. The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) 1. 2. The first excited state must have the following properties: Should be antisymmetric about x=0. Should be exactly one node. Because of antisymmetry the node must occur at x=0. The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) 1. 2. The first excited state must have the following properties: Should be antisymmetric about x=0. Should be exactly one node. Because of antisymmetry the node must occur at x=0. x 2 A suitable trial solution is ( x) xe The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) x 2 Substituting ( x) xe d 2 2m 2 2 dx 1 2 m 2 x 2 E 0 into The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) x 2 Substituting ( x) xe d 2 2m 2 2 dx 1 2 into m 2 x 2 E 0 3 E Gives the same and 1 2 The Quantum Oscillator(First Excited State) x 2 Substituting ( x) xe d 2 2m 2 2 dx 1 2 into m 2 x 2 E 0 3 E Gives the same and 1 2 Continuing in this manner gives higher energy levels. The Quantum Oscillator (Energy levels) However using a power series expansion we find that the allowed energies are defined by En n 12 The Quantum Oscillator (Energy levels) However using a power series expansion we find that the allowed energies are defined by En n 12 NB: there is uniform spacing of energy levels ( E ). The Quantum Oscillator (Energy levels)