Grammars - Columbus State University

advertisement

Grammars

CPSC 5135

Formal Definitions

• A symbol is a character. It represents an abstract entity that has no inherent meaning

• Examples: a, A, 3, *, - ,=

Formal Definitions

• An alphabet is a finite set of symbols.

• Examples:

A = { a, b, c }

B = { 0, 1 }

Formal Definitions

• A string (or word) is a finite sequence of symbols from a given alphabet.

• Examples:

S = { 0, 1 } is a alphabet

0, 1, 11010, 101, 111 are strings from S

A = { a, b, c ,d } is an alphabet bad, cab, dab, d, aaaaa are strings from A

Formal Definitions

• A language is a set of strings from an alphabet.

• The set can be finite or infinite.

• Examples:

A = { 0, 1}

L1 = { 00, 01, 10, 11 }

L2 = { 010, 0110, 01110,011110,

…}

Formal Definitions

• A grammar is a quadruple G = (V, Σ, R, S) where

1) V is a finite set of variables (non-terminals),

2) Σ is a finite set of terminals, disjoint from V,

3) R is a finite set of rules. The left side of each rule is a string of one or more elements from V U Σ and whose right side is a string of 0 or more elements from V U Σ

4) S is an element of V and is called the start symbol

Formal Definitions

• Example grammar:

• G = (V, Σ, R, S)

V = { S, A }

Σ = { a, b }

R = { S → aA

A → bA

A → a }

Derivations

R = S

→ aA

A

→ bA

A

→ a

• A derivation is a sequence of replacements , beginning with the start symbol, and replacing a substring matching the left side of a rule with the string on the right side of a rule

S → aA

→ abA

→ abbA

→ abba

Derivations

• What strings can be generated from the following grammar?

S → aBa

B → aBa

B → b

Formal Definitions

• The language generated by a grammar is the set of all strings of terminal symbols which are derivable from S in 0 or more steps.

• What is the language generated by this grammar?

• S → a

S → aB

B → aB

B → a

Kleene Closure

• Let Σ be a set of strings. Σ* is called the

Kleene closure of Σ and represents the set of all concatenations of 0 or more strings in Σ.

• Examples

Σ* = { 1 }* = { ø, 1, 11, 111, 1111, …}

Σ* = { 01 }* = { ø, 01, 0101, 010101, …}

Σ* = { 0 + 1 }* = set of all possible strings of 0’s and 1’s. (+ means union)

Formal Definitions

• A grammar G = (V,Σ, R, S) is right-linear if all rules are of the form:

A → xB

A → x where A, B ε V and x ε Σ*

Right-linear Grammar

• G = { V, Σ, R, S }

V = { S, B }

Σ = { a, b }

R = {

S → aS ,

S → B ,

B → bB ,

B → ε

}

What language is generated?

Formal Definitions

• A grammar G = (V,Σ, R, S) is left-linear if all rules are of the form:

A → Bx

A → x where A, B ε V and x ε Σ*

Formal Definitions

• A regular grammar is one that is either right or left linear.

• Let Q be a finite set and let Σ be a finite set of symbols. Also let δ be a function from Q x Σ to

Q, let q

0 be a state in Q and let A be a subset of Q.

We call each element of Q a state, δ the transition

function, q

0 the initial state and A the set of

accepting states.

Then a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) is a 5tuple < Q , Σ , q

0

, δ , A >

• Every regular grammar is equivalent to a DFA

Language Definition

• Recognition – a machine is constructed that reads a string and pronounces whether the string is in the language or not. (Compiler)

• Generation – a device is created to generate strings that belong to the language.

(Grammar)

Chomsky Hierarchy

• Noam Chomsky (1950’s) described 4 classes of grammars

1) Type 0 – unrestricted grammars

2) Type 1 – Context sensitive grammars

3) Type 2 – Context free grammars

4) Type 3 – Regular grammars

Grammars

• Context-free and regular grammars have application in computing

• Context-free grammar – each rule or production has a left side consisting of a single non-terminal

Backus-Naur form (BNF)

• BNF was used to describe programming language syntax and is similar to Chomsky’s context free grammars

• A meta-language is a language used to describe another language

• BNF is a meta-language for computer languages

BNF

• Consists of nonterminal symbols, terminal symbols (lexemes and tokens), and rules or productions

• <if-stmt> → if <logical-expr> then <stmt>

• <if-stmt> → if <logical-expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

• <if-stmt> → if <logical-expr> then <stmt>

| if <logical-expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

A Small Grammar

<program>  begin <stmt_list> end

<stmt_list>  <stmt>

| <stmt> ; <stmt_list>

<stmt>  <var> = <expression>

<var>  A | B | C

<expression>  <var> + <var>

| <var> - <var>

| <var>

A Derivation

<program>  begin <stmt_list> end

 begin <stmt> end

 begin <var> = <expression> end

 begin A = <expression> end

 begin A = <var> + <var> end

 begin A = B + <var> end

 begin A = B + C end

Terms

• Each of the strings in a derivation is called a

sentential form.

• If the leftmost non-terminal is always the one selected for replacement, the derivation is a

leftmost derivation.

• Derivations can be leftmost, rightmost, or neither

• Derivation order has no effect on the language generated by the grammar

Derivations Yield Parse Trees

<program>  begin <stmt_list> end

 begin <stmt> end

 begin <var> = <expression> end

 begin A = <expression> end

 begin A = <var> + <var> end

 begin A = B + <var> end

 begin A = B + C end

<Program> begin <stmt_list> end

<stmt>

<var> = <expression>

A <var> + <var>

B C

Parse Trees

• Parse trees describe the hierarchical structure of the sentences of the language they define.

• A grammar that generates a sentence for which there are two or more distinct parse trees is ambiguous.

An Ambiguous Grammar

<assign>  <id> = <expr>

<id>  A | B | C

<expr>  <expr> + <expr>

| <expr> * <expr>

| ( <expr> )

| <id>

Two Parse Trees – Same Sentence

<assign>

<id> = <expr>

A <expr> + <expr>

<id> <expr> * <expr>

B <id> <id>

C A

<assign>

<id> = <expr>

A <expr> * <expr>

<expr> + <expr> <id>

<id> <id> A

B C

Derivation 1

<assign>  <id> = <expr>

 A = <expr>

 A = <expr> + <expr>

 A = <id> + <expr>

 A = B + <expr>

 A = B + <expr> * <expr>

 A = B + <id> * <expr>

 A = B + C * <expr>

 A = B + C * <id>

 A = B + C * A

Derivation 2

<assign>  <id> = <expr>

 A = <expr>

 A = <expr> * <expr>

 A = <expr> + <expr> * <expr>

 A = <id> + <expr> * <expr>

 A = B + <expr> * <expr>

 A = B + <id> * <expr>

 A = B + C * <expr>

 A = B + C * <id>

 A = B + C * A

Ambiguity

• Parse trees are used to determine the semantics of a sentence

• Ambiguous grammars lead to semantic ambiguity - this is intolerable in a computer language

• Often, ambiguity in a grammar can be removed

Unambiguous Grammar

<assign>  <id> = <expr>

<id>  A | B | C

<expr>  <expr> + <term> | <term>

<term>  <term> * <factor> | <factor>

<factor>  ( <expr> ) | <id>

• This grammar makes multiplication take precedence over addition

Associativity of Operators

<assign>

<id> = <expr>

<id>

A | B | C

<expr>

<expr> + <term> |

<term>

<term>

<term> * <factor> |

<factor>

<factor>

( <expr> ) | <id>

Addition operators associate from left to right

<assign>

<id> = <expr>

A <expr> + <term>

<expr> + <term> <factor>

<term> <factor> <id>

<factor> <id> A

<id> C

B

BNF

• A BNF rule that has its left hand side appearing at the beginning of its right hand side is left recursive .

• Left recursion specifies left associativity

• Right recursion is usually used for associating exponetiation operators

<factor>  <exp> ** <factor> | <exp>

<exp>  ( <expr> ) | <id>

Ambiguous If Grammar

<stmt>  <if_stmt>

<if_stmt>  if <logic_expr> then <stmt> | if <logic_expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

• Consider the sentential form: if <logic_expr> then if <logic_expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

Parse Trees for an If Statement

<if_stmt>

<if_stmt>

If <logic_expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

If <logic_expr> then <stmt>

<if_stmt>

<if_stmt> if <logic_expr> then <stmt> if <logic_expr> then <stmt> else <stmt>

Unambiguous Grammar for If

Statements

<stmt>  <matched> | <unmatched>

<matched>  if <logic_expr> then <matched> else <matched>

| any non-if statement

<unmatched>  if <logic_expr> then <stmt>

| if <logic_expr> then <matched> else <unmatched>

Extended BNF (EBNF)

• Optional part denoted by […]

<selection>  if ( <expr> ) <stmt> [ else <stmt> ]

• Braces used to indicate the enclosed part can be repeated indefinitely or left out

<ident_list>  <identifier> { , <identifier> }

• Multiple choice options are put in parentheses and separated by the or operator |

<for_stmt>  for <var> := <expr> (to | downto) <expr> do <stmt>

BNF vs EBNF for Expressions

BNF:

<expr>  <expr> + <term>

| <expr> - <term>

| <term>

<term>  <term> * <factor>

| <term> / <factor>

| <factor>

EBNF:

<expr>  <term> { (+ | - ) <term> }

<term>  <factor> { ( * | / ) <factor>

Download