Confirming the Nature of Transiting Candidates Spectroscopic observations are essential for transit searches: 1. Eliminate False positives 2. Derive stellar parameters essential for planet mass and radius (S/N > 100) 3. Derive the planet mass through Radial Velocity Variations (S/N > 10-20) Transit candidates without spectroscopic observations are of very limited use. Doppler measurements are required to get the true mass of the transiting planet and thus the density In general from Kepler‘s law: ( ( K= 2pG ⅓ Mp sin i P Ms ⅔ 1 (1 – e2)½ For circular orbits (often the case for transiting Planets): K= 28.4 Mp sin i P1/3Ms2/3 m/s Mp = mass of planet Ms = mass of star P = orbital period Where Mp is in Jupiter masses, P is in years, and Ms is in solar masses Radial Velocity Amplitude of Planets at Different a Radial Velocity (m/s) G2 V star Radial Velocity (m/s) A0 V star Radial Velocity (m/s) M2 V star Echelle Spectrographs camera detector corrector Cross disperser From telescope slit collimator Echelle grating dl Free Spectral Range Dl = l/m m-2 m-1 m m+2 m+3 y Dy ∞ l2 Grating cross-dispersed echelle spectrographs An echelle spectrum of the Sun What does the radial velocity precision depend on? 1. The spectral resolution (≡ l/dl) 2. The Signal to Noise Ratio (S/N) of your data. 3. Your wavelength coverage: the more spectral lines the more radial velocity measurements you have 4. The type of star you are looking at Spectral Resolution ← 2 detector pixels dl Consider two monochromatic beams They will just be resolved when they have a wavelength separation of dl Resolving power: l R= dl l1 l2 dl = full width of half maximum of calibration lamp emission lines For Doppler confirmation of planets you need R = 50000 - 100000 How does the radial velocity precision depend on all parameters? s (m/s) = Constant × (S/N)–1 R–3/2 (Dl)–1/2 s: error R: spectral resolving power S/N: signal to noise ratio Dl : wavelength coverage of spectrograph in Angstroms For R=110.000, S/N=150, Dl=2000 Å, s = 2 m/s C ≈ 2.4 × 1011 For a given instrument you can take its actual performance with real observations and scale accordingly A7 star K0 star Early-type stars have few spectral lines (high effective temperatures) and high rotation rates. Including dependence on stellar parameters s (m/s) ≈ Constant ×(S/N)–1 R–3/2(Dl)–1/2 ( v sin i f(Teff) ) 2 v sin i : projected rotational velocity of star in km/s f(Teff) = factor taking into account line density f(Teff) ≈ 1 for solar type star f(Teff) ≈ 3 for A-type star f(Teff) ≈ 0.5 for M-type star For RV work the useful wavelength coverage is no more than 1000-2000 Å For planet detection with radial velocity measurements you need a stable spectrograph. The traditional way of doing wavelength calibrations introduces instrumental errors. You need special tricks Observe your star→ Then your calibration source→ The classic method should work for RV amplitudes of more than 100 m/s Because the calibration source is observed at a different time from your star you can have instrumental shifts ... Short term shifts of the spectrograph can limit precision to several hunrdreds of m/s Method 1: Observe your calibration source (Th-Ar) simultaneously to your data: Stellar spectrum Thorium-Argon calibration Spectrographs: CORALIE, ELODIE, HARPS The iodine cell used at the CES spectrograph at La Silla Method 2: Iodine cell Spectrum of Iodine Spectrum of Iodine + Star Telescope 1-m MJUO 1.2-m Euler Telescope 1.8-m BOAO 1.88-m Okayama Obs, 1.88-m OHP 2-m TLS 2.2m ESO/MPI La Silla 2.5m NOT 2.7m McDonald Obs. 3-m Lick Observatory 3.8-m TNG 3.9-m AAT 3.6-m ESO La Silla 8.2-m Subaru Telescope 8.2-m VLT 9-m Hobby-Eberly 10-m Keck Instrument Hercules CORALIE BOES HIDES SOPHIE Coude Echelle FEROS FIES 2dcoude Hamilton Echelle SARG UCLES HARPS HDS UVES HRS HiRes Wavelength Reference Th-Ar Th-Ar Iodine Cell Iodine Cell Th-Ar Iodine Cell Th-Ar Th-Ar Iodine cell Iodine cell Iodine Cell Iodine cell Th-Ar Iodine Cell Iodine cell Iodine cell Iodine cell Transit Discoveries HAT: 31 exoplanets V=8.7-13.2 WASP: 66 exoplanets V=8.3-12.6 Kepler: 24 exoplanets V=11-14 CoRoT: 24 exoplanets V=11.7-16 OGLE: 8 exoplanets V=14-15.8 Last discovery: 2007 Is doubtful that any more spectroscopic observations follow-up observations will be made of OGLE candidates because they are too faint. Groups will either observe Kepler/CoRoT targets (best possible light curves) or WASP/HAT candidates (bright) In an ideal world with only photon noise: RV error SOPHIE Period (days) RV Error/Amplitude Jupiter Neptune RV error HARPS and HIRES RV error ESPRESSO (VLT) V-magnitude Superearth 7 (MEarth) CoRoT-1b As a rule of thumb: if you have an RV precision less than onehalf of the RV amplitude you need 8 measurements equally spaced in phase to detect the planet signal. SOPHIE V 0.5MJup MNep 8 HARPS Superearth (7 ME) V 16 8 0.5MJup MNep Superearth (7 ME) 9 10 40 9 1 2 10 25 100 10 1 5 11 64 250 11 4 15 600 12 8 30 12 3 150 13 4 400 13 20 80 14 6 1000 14 50 200 15 24 15 0.5 125 500 16 54 16 3 300 17 136 17 8 800 Time in hours required (on Target!) for the confirmation of a transiting planet in a 4 day orbit as a function of V-magnitude. RV measurement groups like bright stars! Stellar activity can decrease your measurement precision !!! Radial Velocity (m/s) HD 166435 10 -10 0 Radial velocity variations due entirely to spots 0 0 0 . . . Rotation Phase 4 6 2 0 . 8 Stellar Activity can be the dominant noise source f is filling factor (photometric amplitude) in percent) vsini (V in figure) is rotational velocity in km/s Saar & Donahue (1996): ARV (m/s) = 6.5 f0.9 vsini f=0.5%, vsini=2 km/s → ARV = 7 m/s Hatzes (2001): ARV (m/s) = (8.6 vsini – 1.6) f0.9 Two expressions agree to within 20% f=0.5%, vsini=2 km/s → ARV = 8.3 m/s Comparison of HARPS predicted RV error as a function of activity for a 10th magnitude star Quiet SunLike Modest Activity (vsini=2 k/s, f=2%) Active (vsin=10, f=3%) Active (vsin=30, f=5%) 1 m/s 4 m/s 25 m/s 175 m/s 800 m/s If you are looking at young active stars your RV precision will be signficantly worse and these will require more telescope resources In some cases it is possible to use „tricks“ to reduce the noise due to activity. See CoRoT-7b at end of lecture. A Tool for confirming planets: Bisectors Bisectors can measure the line shapes and tell you about the nature of the RV variations: Curvature Span What can change bisectors : • Spots • Blends • Pulsations Correlation of bisector span with radial velocity for HD 166435: Spot Spectroscopic binaries can also produce line profile changes The Cross-Correlation Function (CCF) is a common way to measure the Radial Velocity of a Star: 1. The CCF of your observation can be taken with a template of a standard star, a mask (0 values in the continuum and 1 in spectral lines) or with one observation of your star (relative velocities). 2. The centroid of the CCF gives you the Radial Velocity 3. An assymetric CCF → blend 4. The CCF represents the mean shape of your spectral lines. Measuring the bisector of the CCF can reveal line shape variations In IRAF: rv package → fxcor Confirming Transit Candidates Radial Velocity measurements are essential for confirming the nature (i.e. get the mass) of the companion, and to exclude socalled false postives: It looks like a planet, it smells like a planet, but it is not a planet 1. Grazing Eclipse by stellar companion 2. Giant Star eclipsed by a main sequence star 3. Background Eclipsing Binary (BEB) 4. Hiearchical Triple System 5. Star not suitable for radial velocity measurements 6. Unsolved cases Before you start: Use what you know about transits! Transit phase = 0 If it is really a transiting/eclipsing body, then you expect the radial velocity to be zero at photometric (transit= phase zero, minimum at phase 0.25 and maximum at phase 0.75. RV variations must be in phase with the light curve. OGLE-TR-3 is NOT a transiting planet. You know this immediately because the RV is not in phase with the transit 1. Grazing eclipse by a main sequence star: The shape of the light curve is the first indication of a binary star These are easy to exclude with Radial Velocity measurements as the amplitudes should be tens km/s (2–3 observations) This turned out to be an eclipsing binary 2. Giant Star eclipsed by main sequence star: G star Giant stars have radii of 10-100 Rsun. This results in an eclipse depth of 0.0001– 0.01 for a companion like the sun This scenario can be resolved with relatively little cost in telescope resources: 1. A longer than expected transit duration is the first hint that you have a large star. For example a transiting planet in a 10 day orbit will have a duration of 4 hrs. Around a 10 Rsun star (planet still outside of the star) the duration will be 39 hrs 2. A low resolution spectrum will establish the luminosity class of the star 3. Two radial velocity measurements taken at minimum and maximum will establish binarity Low resolution spectra can easily distinguish between a giant and main sequence star for the host. This star was originally classified as a K0 main sequence star with photometry CoRoT: LRa02_E2_2249 Spectral Classification: K0 III (Giant, spectroscopy) Period: 27.9 d Transit duration: 11.7 hrs → implies Giant, but long period! Mass ≈ 0.2 MSun CoRoT: LRa02_E1_5015 Spectral Classification: K0 III (subgiant, photometry) Period: 13.7 d Transit duration: 10.1 hrs → Giant? Mass ≈ 0.2 MSun 3. Eclipsing Binary as a background (foreground) star: Fainter binary system in background or foreground Total = 17% depth Light from bright star Light curve of eclipsing system. 50% depth Difficult case. This results in no radial velocity variations as the fainter binary probably has too little flux to be measured by high resolution spectrographs. Large amounts of telescope time can be wasted with no conclusion. High resolution imaging may help to see faint background star. 4. Eclipsing binary in orbit around a bright star (hierarchical triple systems) Another difficult case. Radial Velocity Measurements of the bright star will show either long term linear trend no variations if the orbital period of the eclipsing system around the primary is long. This is essentialy the same as case 3) but with a bound system Spectral Classification: K1 V (spectroscopy) Period: 7.4 d Transit duration: 12.68 hrs Depth : 0.56% CoRoT: LRa02_E1_5184 Radial Velocity (km/s) Radial Velocity Bisector Photometric Phase s = 42 m/s Error: 20-30 m/s The Bisector variations correlate withthe RV → this is a blend 5. Companion may be a planet, but RV measurements are impossible Period = Period: 4.8 d Transit duration: 5 hrs Depth : 0.67% No spectral line seen in this star. This is a hot star for which RV measurements are difficult 6. Sometimes you do not get a final answer Period: 9.75 Transit duration: 4.43 hrs Depth : 0.2% V = 13.9 Spectral Type: G0IV (1.27 Rsun) Planet Radius: 5.6 REarth Photometry: On Target CoRoT: LRc02_E1_0591 The Radial Velocity measurements are inconclusive. So, how do we know if this is really a planet. Note: We have over 30 RV measurements of this star: 10 Keck HIRES, 18 HARPS, 3 SOPHIE. In spite of these, even for V = 13.9 we still do not have a firm RV detection. This underlines the difficulty of confirmation measurements on faint stars. LRa01_E2_0286 turns out to be a binary that could still have a planet But nothing is seen in the residuals Results from the CoRoT Initial Run Field 26 Transit candidates: Grazing Eclipsing Binaries: 9 Background Eclipsing Binaries: 8 Unsuitable Host Star: 3 Unclear (no result): 4 Planets: 2 → for every „quality“ transiting planet found there are 10 false positive detections. These still must be followed-up with spectral observations BLENDER Analysis: Confirming planets without RV measurements 1. Generate the brightness variations of an eclipsing binary 2. Include limb darkening, gravity darkening, reflection, oblateness, etc. 3. Use stellar isochrones to get stellar parameters (effective temperature, size, etc). 4. Search in parameter space 5. Assign probabilities to the best „blend scenario“ solution. You have a good estimate of mass, luminosity of Star 1 Star 1 Planet candidate Star 2 Star 3 Star 2 and 3 are the test binary Take possible masses, luminosity, etc for the binary components Move them to different distances If they are too close, you will see them in a spectrum If they are too far, they will not contribute enough light 2) 1) The light curve shows a nice transit. There are RV variations consistent with a brown dwarf, but the CCF bisector shows variations Map of possible binary masses that can reproduce the light curve of OGLE-TR-33: 1) Star 1 is the bright star in the binary 2) Star 2 is the „secondary“ in the binary Fit to the light curve using the blended binary scenario With TODCOR one can measure both components of the binary The luminosity ration of the binary stars from the RV curve is consistent with the BLENDER analysis Kepler-9b Red line is the best fit binary blend model (not good) Note: Primary is the main star, secondary is the brighter component of the binary, tertiary the fainter component Kepler-9c The blend model is indistinguishable from the planet model. One can then use probabilty arguments to promote the planet hypothesis The „Sherlock Holmes Method“ of Confirming the Nature of Transiting Planets Or How to Confirm Planets Without a Radial Velocity Curve „When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth“ – Sherlock Holmes (Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) Case Study: CoRoT-7b Can we prove that CoRoT-7b is a Planet without a RV curve? R = 1.58 REarth P = 0.85 d 44 Hypothesis #1: The transit is caused by a contaminant On-off photometry established that nearby stars could not account for transit depth of CoRoT-7 Hypothesis #2: The star is really a giant star No, it is a G8 Main Sequence Star Hypothesis #3: There is a faint very nearby background eclipsing binary star that causes the eclipse Adaptive Optics Imaging shows no very close companions Hypothesis #4: A Hiearchical Triple system with 2 eclipsing M-dwarfs, Short period M dwarfs are very active and we would have seen Ca II emission from the binary stars and X-ray emission Hypothesis #5:The transit is caused by a background (or binary companion) M dwarf with a transiting Hot Jupiter 1. Giant planets to M dwarfs are rare 2 The M dwarf is bright in the Infrared. High resolution infrared spectral observations show no evidence for an M dwarf companion. There are only two astronomical bodies that have a radius ~ 1.5 REarth: 1. White Dwarf 2. A terrestrial planet White Dwarfs have a mass of ~ 1 Solar Mass, so the radial velocity amplitude should be ~ 100s km/s. This is excluded by low precision radial velocity measurements. Also photometry can exclude the white dwarf scenario CoRoT-1b OGLE-TR-133b CoRoT-3b CoRoT-3b : Radius = Jupiter, Mass = 21.6 Jupiter CoRoT-1b : Radius = 1.5 Jupiter, Mass = 1 Jupiter OGLE-TR-133b: Radius = 1.33 Jupiter, Mass = 85 Jupiter For companions that are the size of Jupiter you can have a planet, brown dwarf, or star. Modified From H. Rauer Can We Get the Mass of CoRoT-7b? The Challenge: Dealing with the Activity Signal Prot = 23 d Expected activity related RV variations: Dflux ≈ 1.6% (spots) Saar & Donahue: 18 km/s Hatzes: 22 m/s Rotational veloctiy = 1.8 km/s 44 RV (m/s) HARPS RVs for CoRoT-7b: 104 Measurements! JD RV spot „jitter“ ≈ 20 m/s Amplitude of transting planet ≈ 5 m/s 44 Mass Determinations for CoRoT-7b Is it 3.5 ± 0.6 MEarth (Queloz et al. 2009)? → Harmonic Filtering Is it 6.9 ± 1.43 MEarth (Hatzes et al. 2010)? → Fourier Pre-whitening Is it 8.0 ± 1.2 MEarth (Ferraz-Melo al. 2010)? → High pass filtering Is it 5.65 ± 1.6 MEarth (Boisse al. 2010)? → Harmonic Filtering Is it 2.26 ± 1.83 MEarth (Pont al. 2010)? → Activity modeling The mass you get depends on how you filter out the activity signal. Pont et al. Using activity models: Radial Velocity (m/s) Spots, long period planets, systematic errors K = 5 m/s Orbital Phase Radial Velocity (m/s) Try K = 2 m/s Orbital Phase Poor fit at phase 0.8-0.1 Radial Velocity (m/s) Try K = 8 m/s Orbital Phase Poor fit at phase 0-0.4 Two simple and reasonable assumptions: 1) A 0.85 d period is present in the RV data Reasonable given Leger, Rouan, Schneider et al. (2009) 2) RV Variations from other phenomena (activity, other planets, systematic errors) over DT < 4 hours is small. Dfrot = 0.01, DRV < 0.5 m/s DRVplanets = 0 ± 0.9 m/s Trick: Exploit the fact that the RV period from the planet is much shorter than the period expected from spots and stellar rotation Use a Subset of the 106 HARPS RV measurements (Less is More!) • 10 Nights with 3 measurements DT=4 hours (Dforbit = 0.2) • 17 Nights with 2 measurements DT=2 hours (Dforbit = 0.1) • Total 66 Measurements • Consider each night an „independent“ data set that has its own zero point offset caused by the contribution of activity jitter that should be constant for that night • Find the best fit sine curve with P = 0.85 d Best fit circular orbit: sO–C = 1.7 m/s sRV = 1.8 m/s K = 5.15 ± 0.94 m/s M = 7.29 ± 1.35 MEarth Zero point offsets and phase are the only free parameters. The RV phase agrees with transit phase to within 0.01 phase Top: the RV amplitude as a function of the number of points used. The dashed line is the final amplitude using all data. Note that the correct RV amplitude can be measured with only 15 measurements over 5 nights. Bottom: simulations of a fake orbit with „input“ amplitude versus the amplitude found by the method Sanity Check: Periodogram of the nightly offsets nrot (P=23 d) Amplitude of variations ≈ 10 m/s Kepler-10b versus CoRoT-7b: Inactive versus Active Inactive Active s = 3.07 m/s s = 1.68 m/s cred2 = 4.3 cred2 = 1.5 Mstar = 0.895 ± 0.06 Msun Rstar = 1.056 ±0.02 Rsun MPl = 4.56 ±1.23 MEarth RPl = 1.416 ±0.025 REarth rPl = 8.8 ±2.5 cgs Mstar = 0.91 ±0.03 Msun Rstar = 0.82 ±0.04 Rsun MPl = 7.29 ±1.35 MEarth RPl = 1.58 ±0.10 REarth rPl = 10.2 ±2.7 cgs Strategy for confirming Transit Candidates around Faint Stars (V>10) 1. Make sure that your star is on target and that another star in the aperture is not causing the transit. 2. Do you see a secondary eclipse? Ellipsoidal variations? → Binary 3. Use low resolution spectra to get the spectral type of the star and to be sure it is not a spectroscopic binary 4. Use a blender-like analysis to establish what kind of binary stars can reproduce the observed transit. 5. Use low precision RV measurements to exclude a binary companion 6. Use adaptive optics/high resolution imaging to exclude a close background/foreground object 7. Get Infrared spectral observations to exclude an M-dwarf companion 8. Ask your RV friends to observe this star