Do quantum state oscillations in
natural drinking water benefit
human health?
Benny Johansson
Akloma Bioscience AB
Water Conference October 9-12, 2014
1
The Vincent Profile – Loss of system
energy calculated from the level of
entropy in water
Zone 2
Sweetacidic
Fungus
Zone 3
Sweet
Virus
Zone 1
Bitter
Green algae
Zone 4
Salt
Brown algae
Alkaline
Analysis of the electromagnetic flow in life obtaned from pH, Redoxpotential
in relation to the resistance of the system
Louis-Claude Vincent/www.eautarcie.org
2
The clustering model of liquid water
and origin of water anomalies
The emergence of highly ordered structures in Nature from unordered independent
atoms/molecules is addressed in modern science along two pathways;
 thermodynamics of irreversible processes, explicitly dissipative structures
selforganisation
decrease in entropy
 quantum field theory
extended regions of non-local correlation
Ordinary non-coherent
water
Formation of water clusters of different sizes
Coherent domains of water (reductive/acidic)
(0,1 µm, 5,5 million molecules, thermal/EMF oscillation couples)
Pauling, Robinson, Chaplin, Preparata, Huang, Pollack
3
The Vincent Factor (QV) – An estimate
of ”stored” energy within in a ”living”
system
rH2 = ORPx33,8+2pH
QV =
rH2
Rresistivity
rH2 = Electronification/
reductivity of a
water solution
QV depends on the entropy of the system – a low entropy state a low energy and high state of organisation that keeps its energy over time
4
Studied Tap and Spring Water
in Skåne
Spring water
Tap Water
5
Bioelectrochemical coordinates of
spring water
Water
pH
ORP
rH
rH2
Conductivity Resistivity QV
DFA
FD
Gorkekälla
Control
Conditioning*
7,33
7,44
311
308
25,03
25,15
25,17
25,29
519
524
1927 0,013064
1908 0,013252
0,77
0,86
1,77
1,85
Dammåkra källa
Control
Conditioning*
7,15
7,86
309
291
24,60
25,42
24,74
25,56
311
311
3215 0,007695
3215 0,007948
0,85
0,87
1,85
1,89
St Olof källa
Control
Conditioning*
6,53
6,59
360
370
25,06
25,51
25,23
25,69
263
207
3802 0,006635
4831 0,005317
0,85
0,95
1,79
1,82
Tjockebjärs källa Control
Conditioning*
7,56
7,55
328
329
26,05
26,07
26,21
26,22
351
350
2849 0,009198
2857 0,009177
0,78
0,94
1,83
1,76
Jernkällan
Control*
Conditioning*
5,910
5,915
391
398
24,85
25,10
25,04
25,28
45,4
46,8
22026 0,001137
21368 0,001183
0,80
0,99
1,83
1,80
Kulla källa
Control*
Conditioning*
6,275
6,278
332
364
23,62
24,69
23,77
24,86
99,4
104,3
10060 0,002363
9588 0,002593
0,85
0,93
1,87
1,84
Skäppeboda källa Control
Conditioning*
7,45
7,444
329
338
25,87
26,15
26,02
26,31
453
458
2208 0,011787
2183 0,012051
0,84
0,89
1,83
1,83
* quantum oscillations
Low relative hydrogen and high electronification
Low Vincent factor QV = low entropy and high state of organization
Large difference in DFA close to 1,0 shows that the conditioned state of water ia a real fractal.
6
Bioelectrochemical coordinates of tap
water
Water
pH
ORP
rH
rH2
Conductivity Resistivity QV
DFA
FD
Ystad
Control*
Conditioning
8,11
8,00
258
266
24,82
24,87
24,94
24,99
758
757
1319 0,018905
1321 0,018918
0,85
0,91
1,70
1,79
Malmö Bolmen
Control
Conditioning*
8,32
8,35
269
266
25,61
25,57
25,73
25,69
368
367
2717 0,009469
2725 0,009429
0,79
0,89
1,61
1,82
Lund Bolmen
Control
Conditioning*
7,85
8,00
283
280
25,13
25,33
25,27
25,46
173
173
5780 0,004371
5780 0,004405
0,77
0,94
1,87
1,85
Sövde
Control
Conditioning
7,64
8,08
326
293
26,15
25,93
26,30
26,06
517
513
1934
1949
0,01360
0,01337
0,81
0,98
1,88
1,84
Simrishamn
Control*
Conditioning*
7,866
7,833
319
316
26,37
26,20
26,51
26,35
604
611
1656 0,016015
1637 0,016098
0,82
0,83
1,74
1,81
Kristianstad
Control
Conditioning*
8,179
8,142
306
307
26,56
26,52
26,70
26,66
487
491
2053 0,013003
2037 0,01309
0,83
0,87
1,84
1,83
S. Mellby
Control*
Conditioning*
7,682
7,665
337
334
26,60
26,46
26,75
26,62
461
463
2169 0,012334
2160 0,012325
0,81
0,92
1,78
1,76
Klippan
Control
Conditioning*
7,890
7,919
326
327
26,65
26,74
26,80
26,89
173
194
5780 0,004636
5155 0,005217
0,80
0,90
1,78
1,82
Landskrona
Control
Conditioning*
8,116
8,122
323
325
27,00
27,08
27,15
27,23
216
218
4630 0,005864
4587 0,005936
0,79
0,95
1,87
1,86
* quantum oscillations
Low Vincent factor QV = low entropy and high state of organization
Large difference in DFA close to 1,0 shows that the conditioned state of water ia a real fractal.
Bioelectrochemical coordinates of
bottled drinking water
Water
pH
ORP
rH2
Conductivity Resistivity
QV
DFA
FD
Malmbergs
Conditioning
6,221
309
22,7
385
2597
0,00874
Imsdal*
Conditioning*
7,620
7,490
329
342
26,4
26,5
62,2
62,2
16077
16077
0,00164
0,00165
0,80
0,91
1,860
1,876
Aqua Terrena
Conditioning*
8,612
8,801
254
248
25,8
26,0
614
549
1629
1821
0,01585
0,01427
0,85
0,93
1,850
1,841
Ramlösa
5,845
338
23,0
825
1212
0,01898
Loka
5,875
333
22,9
1033
968
0,02366
Blue Keld
7,537
313
25,5
487
2053
0,01242
Stenkulla
Conditioning
8,105
8,078
312
310
26,8
26,6
398
395
2513
2532
0,01065
0,01052
0,82
0,91
1,77
1,76
* quantum oscillations
Low Vincent factor QV = low entropy and high state of organization
Large difference in DFA close to 1,0 shows that the conditioned state of water ia a real fractal.
Distribution of the Vincent factor in tap,
spring and bottled drinking water
Tap water
Spring water
Bottled water
Reduction rH2 Oxidation
Health index according to Vincent
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
5,5
5,7
5,9
6,1
6,3
6,5
6,7
6,9
7,1
7,3
7,5
7,7
7,9
8,1
8,3
8,5
8,7
8,9
pH
Most drinking waters are unsufficent for drinking according to the the Vincent factor
Correlation between fractal ordering
(DFA) and Vincent factor (QV)
Tap and bottled water
Spring water
Correlation between QV and DFA - Control
Spring water
Correlation between DFA and QV - Control
Tap and bottled water
0,86
0,86
0,85
0,85
y = 3,6099x + 0,7737
R2 = 0,6588
0,84
0,84
0,82
DFA
DFA
Control
y = -2,5625x + 0,839
R2 = 0,1036
0,83
0,83
0,81
0,82
0,81
0,8
0,8
0,79
0,79
0,78
0,78
0,77
0,77
0,76
0,76
0
0,005
0,01
0,015
0
0,02
0,002
0,004
0,006
0,008
0,01
0,012
0,014
QV
QV
Correlation between DFA and QV - Conditioning
Tap and bottled water
Correlation between QV and DFA - conditioning
Spring water
1
1
0,98
0,98
0,96
y = -8,201x + 0,9789
R2 = 0,635
0,96
0,94
DFA
Conditioning
DFA
0,94
0,92
0,9
0,92
0,9
0,88
y = -1,823x + 0,9307
R2 = 0,0609
0,86
0,88
0,84
0,86
0,82
0,84
0
0,005
0,01
QV
0,015
0,02
0
0,002
0,004
0,006
0,008
0,01
0,012
0,014
QV
A high DFA and low QV value equals a low entropy and fractal ordered state
Thermal IR imaging and reduced IR
emission in coherent water
Coherent water
Control water
Hydrophobic
cells
1000 µm
REDSHIFT
The temperature is 0.3-0,4 C lower in coherent water and the ordering state
extends the bulk volume of water. Fractality: 0,91 (Control) and 0,97 (Coherence)
11
Thermal IR imaging and reduced IR
emission in human urine
Drinking Mineral water
Drinking conditioned mineral water
Control Urine
Experimental Urine
Mean Temperature 22,3 °C
Mean Temperature 21,9 °C
The temperature is 0,4 °C lower in experimental urine and the ordering state
extends the bulk volume of urine.
12
IR thermal imaging and DFA change in
healthy volunteers after consumption
of coherent mineral water
IR imaging in urine
Monofractal order in urine
Difference in IR temperature between experimental and
control urine samples (p<0,021)
DFA in healthy volunteers (p<0,040)
Valid
fractal
1,2
0,06
-0,54
15
-0,01
130
1
-0,17
0,8
-0,05 11
0,32
9
-0,01
7
-0,19
DFA
-0,17
5
DFA Control
0,03
0,2
-0,37
3
-0,21
-0,09
-0,32
-0,4
DFA Cond
0,4
-0,36
-0,6
0,6
0
1
-0,2
1
0
Difference in IR temperature (°C)
0,2
0,4
2 3
4
5 6
7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
-0,2
Volunteer no.
A coherent water state induces a fractal ordering of urine in healthy volunteers
Reduced heart rate implies physiological
restoration and emergent metabolism
due to a coherent state of water
Change in Heart rate in healthy voluteers (p<0,027)
15
13
11
Mean Heart rate (Bpm)
9
Control
64,22 ± 9,82
7
5
Experimental 62,24 ± 8,80
3
Difference
1,98
1
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Change in heart rate (Bpm )
The significant decrease in heart rate indicates besides restoration a more
efficient metabolism
Conclusion
• Tap water - not convenient for drinking according to the Vincent factor
• Negative correlation between QV and DFA in spring water - indicating
a similar low entropy and low energy state (quantum correlation)
• Positive correlation between QV and DFA in tap and bottled water –
the two factors measure different aspects of water ordering
• IRI of urine in healthy volunteers shows significant change in
IRT and DFA values – physiological fractal ordering in ”body water”
• Significantly reduced heart rate – physiological recovery and
more efficient metabolism
• Quantum state oscillations in drinking water are of importance for
human health
15