21-1 Chapter 21 Cost Allocation and Performance Measurement Modified from Publisher Provided Slides McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-2 Overhead Cost Allocation Methods One of the most difficult tasks in computing accurate unit costs lies in determining the proper amount of overhead cost to assign to each job. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Assigning overhead is difficult. I agree! © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-3 Activity-Based Cost Allocation Activity Based Costing Departmental Overhead Rates Plantwide Overhead Rate Overhead Allocation McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-4 Activity-Based Cost Allocation A B C McGraw-Hill/Irwin In the ABC method, we recognize that many activities within a department drive overhead costs. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-5 Activity-Based Costing Identify activities and assign indirect costs to those activities. Central idea . . . • Products require activities. • Activities consume resources. McGraw-Hill/Irwin A B C © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-6 Activity-Based Costing Benefits More detailed measures of costs. Better understanding of activities. More accurate product costs for . . . • Pricing decisions. • Product elimination decisions. • Managing activities that cause costs. Benefits should always be compared to costs of implementation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-7 Identifying Cost Drivers Most cost drivers are related to either volume or complexity of production. • Examples: machine time, machine setups, purchase orders, production orders. Three factors are considered in choosing a cost driver: • Causal relationship. • Benefits received. • Reasonableness. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-8 Activity-Based Costing Procedures Identify activities that consume resources. Assign costs to a cost pool for each activity. Identify cost drivers associated with each activity. Compute overhead rate for each cost pool: Estimated overhead costs in activity cost pool Rate = Estimated number of activity units Assign costs to products: Overhead × Rate McGraw-Hill/Irwin Actual Activity © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-9 Activity-Based Costing Let’s look at an example comparing traditional costing with ABC. We will start with traditional costing. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-10 Traditional Costing vs. ABC Example Pear Company manufactures a product in regular and deluxe models. Overhead is assigned on the basis of direct labor hours. Budgeted overhead for the current year is $2,000,000. Other information: First, determine the unit cost of each model using traditional costing methods. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-11 Traditional Costing Overhead = Estimated overhead costs Rate Estimated activity Overhead = $2,000,000 = $50 per DLH Rate 40,000 DLH McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-12 Traditional Costing ABC will have different overhead per unit. Direct Material Direct Labor Manufacturing Overhead $50 per hour × 1.6 hours $50 per hour × 0.8 hours Total Unit Cost McGraw-Hill/Irwin Deluxe Model $ 150 16 Regular Model $ 112 8 80 $ 246 $ 40 160 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-13 Activity-Based Costing Pear Company plans to adopt activity-based costing. Using the following activity center data, determine the unit cost of the two products using activity-based costing. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-14 Activity-Based Costing Activity Center Purchasing Scrap Rework Testing Machine Related Total Overhead Cost Driver Orders Orders Tests Hours Overhead Cost for Activity $ 84,000 216,000 450,000 1,250,000 $ 2,000,000 Units of Activity 1,200 900 15,000 50,000 Rate 400 deluxe + 800 regular = 1,200 total McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-15 Activity-Based Costing Activity Center Purchasing Scrap Rework Testing Machine Related Total Overhead Cost Driver Orders Orders Tests Hours Overhead Cost for Activity $ 84,000 216,000 450,000 1,250,000 $ 2,000,000 Units of Activity 1,200 900 15,000 50,000 Rate $ 70 per order $240 per order $ 30 per test $ 25 per hour Rate = Overhead Cost for Activity ÷ Units of Activity McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-16 Activity-Based Costing McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-17 Activity-Based Costing McGraw-Hill/Irwin Let’s complete the table. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-18 Activity-Based Costing McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-19 Activity-Based Costing Total overhead = $720,000 + $1,280,000 = $2,000,000 Recall that $2,000,000 was the original amount of overhead assigned to the products using traditional overhead costing. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-20 Activity-Based Costing McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-21 Traditional Costing vs. ABC Traditional Costing Deluxe Regular Model Model Direct labor $ 150 $ 112 Direct material 16 8 Overhead 80 40 Total cost $ 246 $ 160 ABC Deluxe Regular Model Model $ 150 $ 112 16 8 144 32 $ 310 $ 152 This result is not uncommon when activity-based costing is used. Many companies have found that low-volume, specialized products have greater overhead costs than previously realized. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-22 Costs and Cost Drivers in Activity-Based Costing Cost Materials purchasing Materials handling Personnel processing Equipment depreciation Quality inspection Indirect labor for equipment setups Engineering costs for product modifications McGraw-Hill/Irwin Exh. 21-6 Cost Driver Number of purchase orders Number of materials requisitions Number of employees hired or laid off Number of products produced or hours of use Number of units inspected Number of setups required Number of modifications © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-23 Departmental Expense Allocation Direct expenses are incurred for the sole benefit of a specific department. Indirect expenses benefit more than one department and are allocated among departments benefited. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-24 Illustration of Indirect Expense Allocation Exh. 21-7 Classic Jewelry pays its janitorial service $300 per month to clean its store. Management allocates this cost to its three departments according to the floor space each occupies. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-25 Illustration of Indirect Expense Allocation Exh. 21-7 Classic Jewelry pays its janitorial service $300 per month to clean its store. Management allocates this cost to its three departments according to the floor space each occupies. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-26 Illustration of Indirect Expense Allocation Exh. 21-7 Classic Jewelry pays its janitorial service $300 per month to clean its store. Management allocates this cost to its three departments according to the floor space each occupies. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-27 Bases for Allocating Service Department Costs Exh. 21-8 Service department costs are shared, indirect expenses that support the activities of two or more production departments. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-28 Service Department Costs Question ABCO allocates its $300,000 personnel cost to operating departments based on the number of employees in each department. The assembly department has 100 employees and the packing department has 150 employees. What amount of cost is allocated to assembly? a. $100,000 b. $120,000 c. $150,000 d. $180,000 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-29 Service Department Costs Question ABCO allocates its $300,000 personnel cost to operating departments based on the number of employees in each department. The assembly department has 100 employees and the packing department has 150 employees. What amount of cost is allocated to assembly? a. $100,000 Assembly percentage b. $120,000 = 100 ÷ (100 + 150) = 40% c. $150,000 40% of $300,000 = $120,000 d. $180,000 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-30 Preparing Departmental Income Statements Let’s prepare departmental income statements using the following steps: Direct expense accumulation. Indirect expense allocation. Service department expense allocation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-31 Step 1: Direct Expense Accumulation Direct expenses are traced to each department without allocation. Service Dept. One Operating Dept. One McGraw-Hill/Irwin Service Dept. Two Operating Dept. Two © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-32 Step 2: Indirect Expense Allocation Indirect expenses are allocated to all departments using appropriate allocation bases. Allocation Operating Dept. One McGraw-Hill/Irwin Allocation Allocation Service Dept. One Service Dept. Two Allocation Operating Dept. Two © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-33 Step 3: Service Department Expense Allocation Service department total expenses (original direct expenses + allocated indirect expenses) are allocated to operating departments. Operating Dept. One McGraw-Hill/Irwin Service Dept. One Service Dept. Two Allocation Allocation Operating Dept. Two © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-34 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Let’s examine this three-step allocation procedure for Owl Company. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-35 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Allocation Base Direct expenses Salaries Supplies Expense Allocation to Departments Sales Service Service Sales Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept. Total Two One Two Expense One $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 Payroll 700 400 300 100 1,500 Requisitions Step 1: Direct expenses are traced to service departments and sales departments without allocation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-36 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Of a total of 2,000 square feet, the service departments to Departments Allocation Expense occupy 200 square feet each, sales Sales Service Sales one Service department Dept. Dept. two Dept. Dept. department Total Allocationfeet, occupies 600 square and sales Two One Two Expense One Base occupies 1,000 square feet. Direct expenses Salaries Supplies Indirect expenses Rent Utilities Total dept. expenses $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 Payroll 700 400 300 100 1,500 Requisitions Floor space Floor space 5,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 500 300 100 100 1,000 $ 32,500 $ 2,200 $ 3,400 $ 9,700 $ 17,200 Step 2: Indirect expenses are allocated to both the service and the sales departments based on floor space occupied. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-37 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Step 3: Service department total expenses (original direct Expense Allocation to Departments expenses + allocated indirect expenses) are allocated to Service Service Sales Sales sales departments. Allocation Total Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept. Base Expense One Two One Two Direct expenses Salaries Payroll $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 Sales department one has1,500 $40,000100in sales sales 700 Supplies Requisitions 300 and 400 Indirect expenses department two has $48,000 in sales. Rent Floor space 10,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 5,000 Utilities Floor space 1,000 100 100 300 500 Total dept. expenses $ 32,500 $ 2,200 $ 3,400 $ 9,700 $ 17,200 Service dept. expenses Service Dept. One Sales (2,200) 1,000 1,200 Service Dept. Two Employees Total expenses $ 32,500 $ 0 $ 3,400 $ 10,700 $ 18,400 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-38 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Step 3: Service department total expenses (original direct Expense Allocation to Departments expenses + allocated indirect expenses) are allocated to Sales Sales Service Service sales departments. Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept. Total Allocation Base Expense One Two One Two Direct expenses $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 Payroll Salaries Sales department one has 28 employees sales 700 300 and 400 100 1,500 Requisitions Supplies Indirect expensesdepartment two has 40 employees. 5,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 Floor space Rent 500 300 100 100 1,000 Floor space Utilities $ 32,500 $ 2,200 $ 3,400 $ 9,700 $ 17,200 Total dept. expenses Service dept. expenses 1,200 1,000 (2,200) Sales Service Dept. One 2,000 1,400 (3,400) Service Dept. Two Employees $ 12,100 $ 20,400 $ 0 $ 32,500 $ 0 Total expenses McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-39 Departmental Expense Allocation Spreadsheet Allocation Base Direct expenses Salaries Supplies Indirect expenses Rent Utilities Total dept. expenses Service dept. expenses Service Dept. One Service Dept. Two Total expenses McGraw-Hill/Irwin Expense Allocation to Departments Sales Service Service Sales Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept. Total Two One Two Expense One $ 20,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 $ 11,000 Payroll 700 400 300 100 1,500 Requisitions Floor space Floor space Sales Employees 5,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 500 300 100 100 1,000 $ 32,500 $ 2,200 $ 3,400 $ 9,700 $ 17,200 (2,200) $ 32,500 $ 0 1,200 1,000 2,000 1,400 (3,400) $ 12,100 $ 20,400 $ 0 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-40 Departmental Income Statements Now that we have the costs, let’s do an income statement. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-41 Departmental Income Statements Sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit on sales Operating expenses Salaries Supplies Rent Utilities McGraw-Hill/Irwin Combined $ 88,000 38,000 $ 50,000 Sales Sales Dept. One Dept. Two $ 40,000 $ 48,000 20,000 18,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ $ 17,000 1,100 8,000 800 6,000 400 3,000 300 $ 11,000 700 5,000 500 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-42 Departmental Income Statements Combined $ 88,000 38,000 $ 50,000 Sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit on sales Operating expenses Salaries $ Supplies Rent Utilities Service Department One Service Department Two Total operating expenses $ Net income $ McGraw-Hill/Irwin 17,000 1,100 8,000 800 2,200 3,400 32,500 17,500 Sales Sales Dept. One Dept. Two $ 40,000 $ 48,000 20,000 18,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 $ 6,000 400 3,000 300 1,000 1,400 $ 12,100 $ 7,900 $ 11,000 700 5,000 500 1,200 2,000 $ 20,400 $ 9,600 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-43 Departmental Contribution to Overhead Departmental revenue – Direct expenses = Departmental contribution Departmental contribution . . . • Is used to evaluate departmental performance. • Is not a function of arbitrary allocations of indirect expenses. A department may be eliminated when its departmental contribution is negative. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-44 Eliminating an Unprofitable Department As a general rule, a department can be considered a candidate for elimination if its revenues are less than its escapable expenses. • Direct expenses are usually escapable. • Indirect expenses are usually inescapable. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-45 Departmental Contribution to Overhead Let’s recast Owl Company’s income statement using the departmental contribution approach where indirect expenses are not allocated. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-46 Departmental Contribution to Overhead Net income for the company is still $17,500. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-47 Departmental Contribution to Overhead Departmental contributions to indirect expenses (overhead) are emphasized. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-48 Departmental Contribution to Overhead Departmental contributions are positive so neither department is a candidate for elimination. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-49 Controllable Costs Costs are controllable if the manager has the power to determine, or strongly influence, the amounts incurred. I’m in control A manager’s performance evaluation should be based on controllable costs. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-50 Distinguishing Controllable and Direct Costs Direct costs are traced to departments, but may not be controllable by the department manager. • Example: Department managers usually have no control over their own salaries. Controllable costs are identified with a particular manager and a definite time period. • All costs are controllable at some level of management if the time period is long enough. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-51 Responsibility Accounting An accounting system that provides information . . . Relating to the responsibilities of individual managers. McGraw-Hill/Irwin To evaluate managers on controllable items. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-52 Successful implementation of responsibility Responsibility Accounting accounting may use organization charts with clear lines of authority and clearly defined levels of responsibility. Board of Directors President Vice President of Finance Vice President of Operations Vice President of Marketing Store Manager Department Manager McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-53 Responsibility Accounting Performance Reports Amount of detail varies according to level in organization. A department manager receives detailed reports. McGraw-Hill/Irwin A store manager receives summarized information from each department. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-54 Responsibility Accounting Performance Reports Amount of detail varies according to level in organization. Management by exception: Upper-level management does not receive operating detail unless problems arise. The vice president of operations receives summarized information from each store. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 21-55 End of Chapter 21 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005