Manipulating the fatty acid composition including CLA content of animal products Professor, Dr. Peter Buttery Division of Biochemistry & Nutrition Biosciences School The University of Nottingham UK Why Manipulate the fatty acid composition of animal products? • To reduce the intake of “bad” fatty acids by the consumer • To increase the intake of “good” fatty acids by the consumer • To increase sales of such products by improving their “image” Dietary Reference Values for Fatty Acids Population averages (% total energy) 1991 Saturated Fatty Acids Cis polyunsaturated fatty acids Cis monounsaturated fatty acids Trans fatty acids Total Fatty Acids 10% 6% 12% 2% 30% Further Recommendations 1994 Population average consumption of long chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids should double (from 0.1g/day to 0.2g/day (not going to discus this here but is important) Saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake in Great Britain percent energy from SFA 18 16 14 12 10 target 8 6 4 2 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Source: National Food Survey 2000 Contribution of Animal Products to Saturated Fatty Acid (SFA) Intake in Great Britain National Food Survey 2000 other meat poultry pork lamb beef eggs butter cheese milk & cream Meat 22% Other 39% SFA per day (g) Dairy 39% 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 • Meat contributes about 22% of total and saturated fat intake in the human diet • Lamb has a high stearate content which gives a waxy texture, producing poor organoleptic properties • Red meat, as part of a balanced diet, is an important source of protein and iron Possible Approaches • Change fatty acid profile of diet ~ low fat diet ~ biohydrogenation of unsaturated fat • Protected fatty acids • Manipulation of de novo fat synthesis that is reduce the fat content of the carcass Reduction of fat • • • • • Breeding Diet Growth Hormone * Beta agonists* CLA? • *Not legal in Europe but are in many parts of the world----China? Fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat in pigs fed different oils Fatty acid (g/100g total) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 LF HF (SO) HF (RO) C14:0 C16:0 C18:0 C18:1 C18:2 C18:3 Entire male Landrace*Large White Pigs (3 per group) were grown from 55kg to 120kg LF diet: no added fat SO diet: 43.5g/kg sunflower oil + 31.5g/kg rape seed oil RO diet: 75g/kg rape seed oil Budd, Salter, Buttery & Wiseman, unpublished data THE RUMINANT • Fats over 10% cause problems with rumen function • Unsaturated fats are hydrogenated in the rumen so difficult to alter the diet. Adipose Tissue Fatty Acid Deposition in Ruminant Adipose Tissue DIET DE NOVO SYNTHESIS C18:1/C18:2/C18:3 C16:0 C18:0 C18:0 Rumen C18:1 Adipose Tissue Fatty acid composition abomasal fluid and adipose tissue of sheep fed on grass nuts 70 fatty acid (g/100g FAME) diet abomasum subcutaneous 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 14:0 16:0 16:1 18:0 c18:1 t18:1 18:2 18:3 Sources of Ruminant Milk Saturated Fatty Acids Mammary Gland Acetate/ -OH Butyrate C16:0 C4:0-C14:0 C18:0 C18:1 Diet Adipose Tissue Comparison of the fatty acid composition of duodenal fluid and milk from cows 60 Fatty acid (g/100g total) 50 duodenum milk 40 30 20 10 18:3 18:2 c18:1 t18:1 18:0 16:1 16:0 14:1 14:0 12:0 <12 0 Fatty acid synthesis in adipose tissue & mammary gland MAMMARY ADIPOSE Acetyl CoA Acetyl CoA Malonyl CA Acetyl CoA Carboxylase (ACC) Malonyl CA Fatty Acid Synthase (FAS) C16:0 C16:0 Elongase C18:0 C18:0 C18:1 Stearoyl CoA Desaturase (SCD) C18:1 Correlation between SCD mRNA and oleate content of omental adipose tissue of growing sheep Effect of insulin on SCD gene expression & oleate synthesis in ovine adipose tissue explants Ins: 20nM Insulin Dex: 10nM Dexamethosone 4000 MUFA 2.5 acetate incorp (nMoles) SCD mRNA (arb units) 3 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 SFA 3000 2000 1000 0 cont ins dex ins + dex cont ins dex ins + dex Effect of feeding forage or concentrate-based diets on acetyl CoA carboxylase(ACC) & stearoyl CoA desaturase(SCD) mRNA concentrations of subcutaneous adipose tissue in sheep P<0.001 mRNA (arb. Units/g tissue) 80 forage conc (150) conc (350) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ACC SCD Effect of feeding forage or concentrate-based diets on fatty acid composition of subucateous adipose tissue in sheep 35 30 fatty acid (g/100g) grass conc (150) conc (350) 25 20 15 10 5 0 14:0 16:0 16:1 18:0 c18:1 t18:1 18:2 18:3 PROTECT FAT FROM RUMEN • Coat the fat so that it escapes the action of the rumen bacteria • The coat is then broken down in either abomasum or the duodenum Effect of feeding rumen- protected fish oil on the muscle fatty acid content of lot-fed cattle Ashes et al (2000) Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, 129-140 40 fatty acid (g/100g) 35 30 25 control Max-EPA 20 15 10 5 0 14:0 16:0 18:0 c18:1 t18:1 18:2 18:3 20:5 22:6 (n-6) (n-3) (n-3) (n-3) Trans-10, cis 12-CLA Cis- 9, trans 11-CLA Linoleic acid Why interested in CLAs? Suggested health benefits to humans • Altered nutrient partitioning and lipid metabolism • Antiatherogenic • Anticarcinogenic • Antidiabetic (type II diabetes) • Immunity enhancement • Improved bone mineralization Production of CLAs in the rumen Linoleic Acid cis-9, cis-12 18:2 cis-9, trans-11 CLA trans-11 18:1 trans-10, cis-12 CLA trans-10 18:1 Stearic acid Production of CLA Rumen Adipose tissue Linoleic acid Linoleic acid c9, t11 c9, t11 SCD t11 C18:1 t11 C18:1 Stearic acid Stearic acid Effect of feeding forage or concentrate-based diets on the CLA content of abomassal fluid, subcutaneous adipose tissue & L. dorsi muscle of sheep cis 9, trans 11 trans 10, cis 12 1.4 1.4 abomassal abomassal 1.2 1.2 subcut subcut muscle muscle 1 FAME (g/100g) FAME (g/100g) 1 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 forage conc (150) conc (350) forage conc (150) conc (350) Seasonal variation in cis 9, trans 11-CLA content of milk 1.8 1.6 fame (g/100g) 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 feb mar april may june july aug sept oct nov dec SCD ACTIVITY • There is some evidence that there is genetic variation • Some cows seems to produce more CLA in the diet than others.Polymorphisms in the SCD gene? • We have not been able to find much variation in adipose tissue and liver of sheep Production of CLA-enriched butter Ip et al (1999) J Nutr 129: 2135-2142 Cows fed 5.3% sunflower oil and selected for CLA production 30 control enriched g/100g total FA 25 20 15 10 5 0 <12:0 12:0 14:0 16:0 18:0 c18:1 t18:1 18:2 CLA Effect of CLA on development of Mammary Cancer in rats Treatment Group Dietary CLA Tumour g/100g incidence (%)* Control 0.1 93 CLA-enriched Butter+ 0.8 43 *30 rats per group were treated with a chemical carcinogen. Values represent the number of animals with tumours adapted from Ip et al (1999) J. Nutr 129:2135-2142 + primarily cis-9, trans-10 isomer Could it be used in humans? • Rats were fed 20% (w/w) butter • Rats weighed 180g and would probably consume about 10g of food a day (2g) butter • This is equivalent to 11g butter/kg body weight/day • Thus a 70kg man would have to consume 770g butter/day to get the same amount • More research is needed • Professor Bauman in the USA working in the area Manipulating supply of CLA to sheep tissues • Rumen saturates fatty acids therefore need to protect CLA supplement (containing equal levels c-9,t-11 and t-10,c-12) from ruminal degradation to absorption in small intestine Protected Not protected CLA C18:0 CLA CLA Rumen protected CLA Proportion of ingested CLA reaching Duodenum % reaching duodenum 70 60 50 c9,t11 t10,c12 40 CLA-80 protected by Trouw Nutrition: Used matrix of saturated fat of vegetable origin and final product produced by prilling, spray drying and spray chilling. 30 Determined to be ~ 70 % protected in cannulated sheep by dual-phase markers 20 10 0 CLA-80 pCLA-80 How much do we feed? • Ostrowska et al., (1999) • Growing pigs fed CLA-55 (mixture of both isomers) 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10g CLA/kg diet • Fat deposition decreased with increasing CLA • Fat:lean decreased with increasing CLA • Av 80 kg pig @ highest dose = 0.19 g CLA/kg body weight/day How much do we feed? • PCLA ~ 66 % effective at bypassing rumen biohydrogenation • High levels lipid adversely affect rumen function • Max amount PCLA supplied daily to small intestine of av. 40 kg lamb calculated = 0.28 kg CLA/kg BW • Predicted that lambs would consume 1 kg DM/day therefore highest PCLA inclusion was 100 g/kg DM • 25 and 50g/kg DM groups for dose response Trial Outline • 36 ewe lambs 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Control (n=6) Low PCLA (n=5) Med PCLA (n=5) Hi PCLA (n=5) Low Megalac (n=5) Med Megalac (n=5) Hi Megalac (n=5) Inclusion g/kg feed 25 50 100 21.7 43.3 86.6 GE/day (MJ) 18.42 19.42 19.86 21.30 19.14 19.86 21.30 • Megalac controls for lipid coating of PCLA • Fed for 10 wks, control group designed to grow at 180 g/d Sample analysis • Fatty acid composition – Did the CLA get into the animals tissues? • Carcass characteristics – Repartitioning effects of CLA? Subcutaneous CLA content trans-10, cis-12 2.5 2.5 2 2 moles/100 moles moles/100 moles cis-9, trans-11 1.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 0 pCLA Meg 1.5 0 Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 Omental CLA content trans-10, cis-12 2.5 2.5 2 2 moles/100 moles moles/100 moles cis-9, trans-11 1.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 Perirenal CLA content trans-10, cis-12 2.5 2.5 2 2 moles/100 moles moles/100 moles cis-9, trans-11 1.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 L. dorsi CLA content trans-10, cis-12 2.5 2.5 2 2 moles/100 moles moles/100 moles cis-9, trans-11 1.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 Liver CLA content trans-10, cis-12 2.5 2.5 2 2 moles/100 moles moles/100 moles cis-9, trans-11 1.5 1 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 0 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 pCLA Meg Control 25 50 Amount of supplement 100 Effect of dietary CLA on carcass fat 300 Fat (g/kg) 250 200 150 pCLA Meg 100 Control 25 50 Amount supplement 100 Carcass characteristics • No change in carcass composition Carcass cold weight Back fat thickness Omental and perirenal depot whole weights Muscle weight (L. Dorsi, V. Lateralis, S. Tendenosus) Eye muscle depth or width Liver weight BUT definite incorporation of CLA into tissues Accumulation of CLA(t10,c12) in subcutaneous adipose tissue CLA(t10,c12)g/100g FA 0.8 pig sheep 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 Dietary CLA(t10,c12) (g/kg diet) Pig data: adapted from Ostrowska et al (2003) 2.8 5.6 Effect of dietary CLA on carcass fat PIGS SHEEP 350 300 300 pCLA Meg 250 Fat (g/kg) Fat (g/kg) 250 200 200 150 150 100 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 dietary CLA(t10,c12) (g/kg) 100 0 1.4 2.8 5.6 dietary CLA(t10,c12) (g/kg)* Adapted from Ostrowska et al (2003) *Corrected for protection Conclusion • Tissue CLA content increased but no effect on carcass • Maybe ruminant adipose tissue responds differently to monogastrics? Conclusions • Animal products continue to supply a major proportion of dietary saturated fatty acids • SCD plays a major role in determining the nature of fatty acids synthesized in tissues • It is possible to increase the concentration of “healthy” fatty acids (e.g. n-3 PUFA & CLA) in meat & dairy produce but whether the changes can be great enough to have a significant impact on human health remains to be established Acknowledgement • • • • Professor Andrew Salter Dr Sean Richards Dr Zoe Daniel Dr Richard Wynn