Chapter 5 HAPPINESS, UTILITY AND CONSUMER CHOICE © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 1 Economic Principles Happiness Total utility and marginal utility Law of diminishing marginal utility Relationship between the law of demand and the marginal-utility-to-price ratio Consumer surplus Producer surplus Difficulties with interpersonal comparison of utility © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 2 Happiness and Utility Economists measure happiness by creating the concept of the util. Util • It is a hypothetical unit used to measure how much utility a person obtains from consuming a good. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 3 Happiness and Utility Utility measures the satisfaction or enjoyment a person obtains from consuming a good. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 4 Happiness and Utility The implication of someone experiencing increasing marginal utility for pizza slices is: • When his stomach is full to bursting from eating so much pizza, the marginal utility from eating yet another slice would be higher than for any of the preceding slices. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 5 Happiness and Utility The implication of someone experiencing increasing marginal utility for pizza slices is: • It is not clear that someone could survive having increasing marginal utility! © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 6 Happiness and Utility It possible for marginal utility to become negative. • For example, if you overeat and feel ill, then the marginal utility for the last bit of food you ate is negative. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 7 Happiness and Utility A rational consumer will not knowingly pay to buy a unit of a good that generates negative marginal utility. • Presumably something else could be bought that generates positive marginal utility. • Buying something that generates negative marginal utility is not consistent with utility maximization. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 8 EXHIBIT 1 TOTAL UTILITY AND MARGINAL UTILITY DERIVED FROM CONSUMING T-BONE STEAKS (UTILS) © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 9 Exhibit 1: Total Utility and Marginal Utility Derived From Consuming T-Bone Steaks (utils) If marginal utility is declining, but is still positive, total utility is: • Total utility increases as long as marginal utility is positive. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 10 Exhibit 1: Total Utility and Marginal Utility Derived From Consuming T-Bone Steaks (utils) If marginal utility is declining, but is still positive, total utility is: • In Exhibit 1, total utility reaches its maximum at five t-bone steaks. Consuming more than five steaks will reduce total utility. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 11 EXHIBIT 2A TOTAL AND MARGINAL UTILITY © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 12 EXHIBIT 2B TOTAL AND MARGINAL UTILITY © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 13 Exhibit 2: Total and Marginal Utility In Exhibit 2, the curves in Panel a and b represent: • The curve in Panel a is the total utility curve for T-bone steaks. • Panel a depicts the number of utils, or the amount of utility, a person gains from consuming a certain number of steaks. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 14 Exhibit 2: Total and Marginal Utility In Exhibit 2, the curves in Panel a and b represent: • Total utility peaks at 81 utils, or 5 steaks. Each steak consumed beyond 5 reduces total utility. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 15 Exhibit 2: Total and Marginal Utility In Exhibit 2, the curves in Panel a and b represent: • The curve in Panel b is the marginal utility curve for T-bone steaks. • The curve depicts the change in total utility a person derives from consuming each additional steak. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 16 Exhibit 2: Total and Marginal Utility In Exhibit 2, the curves in Panel a and b represent: • When marginal utility is zero, total utility is maximized. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 17 Happiness and Utility If water is necessary for life, then the market price of water so much lower than for diamonds because: • Market price reflects marginal utility, not total utility. • Due to diminishing marginal utility and the abundance of water, the marginal utility of water is lower than for diamonds. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 18 Happiness and Utility A hypothetical circumstance in which the marginal utility of water might exceed the marginal utility of a diamond: • If you are lost in the desert and are severely dehydrated, then your marginal utility for a gallon of water might exceed your marginal utility for a diamond. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 19 French Cuisine and Marginal Utility Many courses, each with small portions of food (French cuisine), may generate more utility than one course with a large portion of food because: • One large portion drives down marginal utility. • Marginal utility is high for the whole meal. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 20 EXHIBIT 3 MARGINAL UTILITIES OF CLOTHES AND AMUSEMENT GOODS (UTILS) © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 21 Exhibit 3: Marginal Utilities of Clothes and Amusement Goods (Utils) Based on the utility data in Exhibit 3, a rational consumer will select the best combination of clothes and amusement goods: • By sequentially picking units of clothing and amusement goods that generate the largest MU/P. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 22 EXHIBIT 4 MARGINAL-UTILITY-TO-PRICE RATIOS OF CLOTHES AND AMUSEMENT GOODS (MU/P) © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 23 Exhibit 4: Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratios of Clothes and Amusement Goods (MU/P) If a unit of clothes and amusement goods both cost $10, and if you have $80 to spend, the rational consumer will spend her money: • MU/P is equal when three units of clothes and five units of amusement goods are purchased (MU/P = 1.4). © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 24 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio Marginal-utility-to-price ratio • The ratio is calculated by dividing the marginal utility of a good by the price of the good—MU/P. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 25 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio The MU/P equalization principle • A person’s total utility is maximized when the ratios of marginal utility to price for the last unit of each of the goods consumed are equal. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 26 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio The MU/P equalization principle: • MU/P measures marginal utility per dollar spent. • Total utility will be maximized (within the constraints of a limited budget) when each individual purchase generates the largest possible MU/P. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 27 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio The MU/P equalization principle: • A rational and fully-informed consumer will always shift a dollar from a good whose MU/P is lower to one whose MU/P is higher, if such a shift is possible. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 28 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio The MU/P equalization principle: • The principle is based on consumer behavior. • Consumers will always arrange their sequence of choices among goods starting with the highest MU/P and running down to exhaust an expenditure budget. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 29 Marginal-Utility-to-Price Ratio The MU/P equalization principle: • The consumer choice process is in equilibrium when: • There is no longer any incentive for the consumer to rearrange her purchases. • The MU/P is equal for the last unit of each good or service consumed. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 30 EXHIBIT 5 COMPARING MU/Ps AFTER A 20-PERCENTOFF SALE ON CLOTHES © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 31 Exhibit 5: Comparing MU/Ps After a 20 Percent Off Sale on Clothes The MU/P of clothes changes when there is a 20 percent off sale on clothes by: • MU/P for each unit of clothing rises when price is reduced by 20 percent. • This will cause a rational consumer to consume more clothes. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 32 EXHIBIT 6 COMPARING MU/Ps AFTER A 50-PERCENTOFF SALE ON CLOTHES © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 33 Exhibit 6: Comparing MU/Ps After a 50 Percent Off Sale on Clothes An additional reduction in the price of clothing will change all of the MU/Ps for clothing, and thus change a rational consumer’s consumption of clothing. • If the price of clothes falls again, from $8 to $5, the quantity of clothing demanded increases from four to six units. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 34 EXHIBIT 7 THE DEMAND CURVE FOR CLOTHES © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 35 Exhibit 7: The Demand Curve for Clothes When the price of clothing falls from $10 to $8 to $5, which of the following occurs: • Quantity demanded remains the same. • Quantity demanded falls from 6 to 4 to 3. • Quantity demanded rises from 3 to 4 to 6. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 36 Exhibit 7: The Demand Curve for Clothes When the price of clothing falls from $10 to $8 to $5, which of the following occurs: • Quantity demanded remains the same. • Quantity demanded falls from 6 to 4 to 3. • Quantity demanded rises from 3 to 4 to 6. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 37 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand Changes in the marginal-utility-toprice ratio are caused by: • A change in the marginal utility of a good or a change in the price of a good changes the marginal-utility-to-price ratio, and therefore changes quantity demanded. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 38 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand The relationship between the MU/P Principle and the Law of Demand: If the price of a good falls: • MU/P rises. • The rational consumer will increase her consumption of that good. • Increase in quantity demanded (movement along the demand curve). © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 39 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand The relationship between the MU/P Principle and the Law of Demand: If consumer preference for a good decreases: • MU/P declines. • The rational consumer will reduce consumption. • The demand curve shifts to the left (since consumer preference is a nonprice factor). © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 40 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand The relationship between the MU/P Principle and the Law of Demand: If consumer income increases: • The consumer can pursue a lower MU/P. • The consumer can afford to increase consumption. • An increase in the demand for normal goods. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 41 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand A downward-sloping demand curve is consistent with the law of diminishing marginal utility. • Diminishing marginal utility means that MU/P declines as quantity consumed increases. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 42 MU/P Equalization Principle and the Law of Demand A downward-sloping demand curve is consistent with the law of diminishing marginal utility. • A consumer’s willingness-to-pay falls as quantity consumed increases. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 43 Are White Rats Rational Consumers? There is evidence that lab rats make consumer choices based on MU/P. • Economists Battalio and Kagel found that white lab rats respond to price and income changes in a manner consistent with economic theory. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 44 The MU/P Guide to Auction Bidding MU/P can help guide auction bidding: • If a particular MU/P is guaranteed by buying something outside of the auction, and if the marginal utility from the auction good is known, then you can figure out your maximum auction price. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 45 Creating Consumer Surplus Consumer surplus • The difference between the maximum price a person would be willing to pay for a good or service, and the price the person actually pays. • Most consumers receive some consumer surplus from a transaction. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 46 Creating Consumer Surplus When market price falls, consumer surplus increases. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 47 Creating Consumer Surplus If the price of a good is greater than amount a consumer is willing to pay for that good, the consumer surplus will be negative if the consumer buys the good. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 48 Creating Consumer Surplus A rational consumer will not purchase a good that generates negative consumer surplus. • A rational consumer will prefer zero consumer surplus (no purchase) to negative consumer surplus. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 49 EXHIBIT 8 Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Lawn-Servicing Market © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 50 Exhibit 8: Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Lawn-Servicing Market This demand curve reflects the willingness —at each price—of consumers to buy lawn service. The concept of consumer surplus applies to lawn service: • At a price of $20, all consumers with a willingness-to-pay value of $20 or more will get their grass cut. • These consumers get consumer surplus. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 51 Exhibit 8: Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Lawn-Servicing Market Exhibit 8 depicts the demand and supply curves for lawn service. The concept of consumer surplus applies when: • Some consumer may be willing to pay $45 for a grass cut. • This consumer will receive $(45 – 20) = $25 of consumer surplus. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 52 Exhibit 8: Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Lawn-Servicing Market Exhibit 8 depicts the demand and supply curves for lawn service. The concept of consumer surplus applies when: A consumer who has a willingness-to-pay value less than $20: • Has a negative consumer surplus. • Will not choose to purchase a ride (a rational consumer). © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 53 EXHIBIT 9 CHANGES IN CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 54 Exhibit 9: Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus Kim’s consumer surplus from lawn service changes with the willingness to pay more as shown in both panels: • What was $25 ($45 – 20) before income increase, becomes … • $30 ($55 – 25) after income increase and stays at $30 when the price for lawn service decreases in panel b. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 55 Exhibit 9: Changes in Consumer and Producer Surplus What happens to Henry’s producer surplus when the supply of producers increases? • What was $15 ($25 – 10) per lawn in panel b becomes … • $5 ($15 – 10) after income increase. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 56 Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility An interpersonal comparison of utility • It is a comparison of the marginal utilities that different people derive from a good or a dollar. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 57 Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Is it actually possible to compare the satisfaction that different people derive from a good or a dollar? • It is not possible to make an exact comparison of different peoples’ utility. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 58 Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Is it actually possible to compare the satisfaction that different people derive from a good or a dollar? • Policies such as those aimed at poverty alleviation rely on society being able to make approximate or reasonable comparisons of utility across different people. © 2013 Cengage Learning Gottheil — Principles of Economics, 7e 59
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )