A New Approach for RRR Determination of Niobium Single Crystal Based on AC Magnetic Susceptibility A. Ermakov, A. V. Korolev*, W. Singer, X. Singer presented by A. Ermakov Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany * Institute of Metal Physics, Ekaterinburg, Russia Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA OUTLINE Introduction Main principles of RRR determination Single crystal samples Equipment RRR data obtained by AC magnetic susceptibility Comparison with RRR obtained by DC method Summary Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA INTRODUCTION Residual resistivity ratio (RRR) value is an important characteristic of material purity. AC magnetic susceptibility of a number of single crystal niobium samples for different orientations of type <100>, <011>, <111> and treatments (BCP 70, 150 µm, annealing 800°C/2h) were measured. The RRR value was determined on base of these results using a relation between the imaginary part ’’ of AC magnetic susceptibility at low frequency f of AC magnetic field and resistivity ρ of the sample: ’’ = k*f/ρ. Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Main principles of RRR determination The AC susceptibility caused by eddy current can be expressed for spherical sample in terms of it radius α, and the skin penetration depth δ: AC i ' '' 9 sinh(2a / ) sin(2a / ) 3 4 a cosh(2a / ) cos(2a / ) 2 9 sinh(2a / ) sin(2a / ) 9 4 a cosh(2a / ) cos(2a / ) 4 a δ = 1/(πμ0μσf)0.5= (ρ/(πμ0μf)0.5 μ0 = 4π×10-7 H/m; μ - the relative permeability; ρ – resistivity; f - frequency. AC method: at low f - χ’’ can be expressed as χ’’=A1+A2*f. In homogeneous sample A1=0, A2=k*σ (k=const); σ =1/ρ ;1/A2=ρ/k; σ – electrical conductivity ’’ = k*f/ ρ RRR 300 K 4.2 K • Magnetic susceptibility of superconductors and other spin systems, Ed. By Robert A. Hein et. al., Plenum Press New York, 1991, page. 213 [A. F. Khoder, M. Gouach, Early theories of χ’ and χ’’ of superconductors for controversial aspects] Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 2 Single crystal samples Sample N1 (as delivered) Sample N2, BCP, 70 μm Sample N3, BCP, 150 μm (011) 800°C /2h The single crystal samples of company Heraeus have been used. The samples were cut out using EDM method. 1.3 - 2 mm 3 - 4.5 mm Magnetic field applied along directions of type <100>, <011>, <111> Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Equipment The Quantum Design MPMS 5XL SQUID Magnetometer uses a (SQUID) detector is extremely sensitive for all kinds of AC and DC magnetic measurements. Magnetic moments down to 10-8 emu (G*cm3) (10-11 Am2 ) can be measured. The MPMS has a temperature range between 1.9 K and 400 K, the superconducting magnet can reach magnetic fields up to 5 T. Multiple functions make possible in particular following: A supplement for measuring anisotropic effects of magnetic moments An addition for measuring electrical conductivity (magneto-resistance) and Hall constant AC susceptibility measurements which yield information about magnetization dynamics of magnetic materials Measuring contour magnetic field sample AC-method: h = hasin(2πf), h – intensity of AC magnetic field, ha – amplitude value of h, f - frequency ha = 0.1 – 4 Oe; f = 3 – 1000 Hz Squid response Superconducting solenoid for DC fields + copper coils for AC fields pick-up coil compensating coils Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Sample N1 (as delivered) magnetic field along <111> frequency extrapolation B=2 T B=1.5 T B=1 T Linear Fit 0.03 0.010 0.008 0.02 '' '' 0.006 B=5 T B=4.5 T B=4 T B= 3.5 T B= 3 T B=2.5 T Linear Fit 0.004 0.01 0.002 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.000 0 10 f, Hz 20 30 40 50 f, Hz Frequency dependencies of imaginary part of AC-susceptibility for different values of applied magnetic field. At low frequency at B < 3T observed the scattering of the points (left figure). At B ≥ 3 T change of the curve slope (right figure). Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 5000 frequency extrapolation 0.0005 T=2K B || <111> Linear Fit T=300K B=0 B || <111> Linear fit 0.0004 4000 0.0003 3000 '' 1/A2, Hz Sample N1 (as delivered) magnetic field along <111>, <110>, [100] 0.0002 2000 0.0001 1000 0 0.0000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Magnetic field dependence of coefficient 1/A2 At B 3 T – Kapitza linear law - R=K*f(B) (normal conducting state): 1/A2 [RRR] (T=2K, B=0) = 3532, at Т = 300 К: RRR(T=300K, B=0) = 1095290 <111> B=0 RRR = 310; <110> B = 3 T: RRR = 270; B = 0 RRR 280 – 300; [100] B = 3 T: RRR = 260; B = 0 RRR 280 – 300; 0 100 200 300 400 500 f, Hz Imaginary part of AC susc. versus f RRR (4-point DC method, I || [110], as delivered) = 269 RRR (4-point DC method, I || [111], as delivered) = 280 - good correlation with current results RRR Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 1/ A2 1/ A2 300 K 2K Sample N2, 70μm BCP 800°C/2h annealing, magnetic field along [100], <011>, <111> T=300 K B=0T B || [100] T=300 K B=3T Linear Fit 0.0005 frequency extrapolation T=2 K B || [100] B=3T Linear Fit 0.003 0.0004 0.002 '' '' 0.0003 0.0002 0.001 H=0: A2= 9.38617E-7(1.02402E-9) H = 30 kOe: A2 = 9.69203E-7(8.29842E-10) 0.0001 0.000 0.0000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 2 4 6 8 f, Hz f, Hz Frequency dependencies of imaginary part of susceptibility at B=0; 3T (T=2K; 300K). Angle between the curves at B=0; 3T (T=300K) shows the small magnetoresistivity. 10 12 14 16 18 20 B=3 T; B || RRR [100] 169 (207 B=0T) <011> 198 <111> 226 Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Sample N2, 70μm BCP 800°C/2h annealing, magnetic field along [100] B=3T B || [100] f=33Hz 0,000160 8000 B || [100] B=3T f=33 Hz Linear Fit 7600 1/A2, Hz 0,000152 A2, 1/Hz temperature extrapolation 0,000144 0,000136 7200 6800 0,000128 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 6400 T, K 0 RRR=166 (B || [100]) by temperature extrapolation method RRR=169 (B || [100]) by frequency extrapolation method 1000 2000 3 T,K 3000 3 1/A2 dependence of T3 correlation of RRR values obtained by frequency and temperature extrapolation Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Sample N3, 150μm BCP 800°C/2h annealing magnetic field along [100] 0 1000 Nb fine grain (1400 C annealing) 14000 12000 N3 T=2K B|| [100] Linear Fit 1/A2, Hz 10000 U, arb.units 800 600 without BCP - No effect 0.5 m BCP - No effect 200 0 6000 2000 80 m BCP Hc=0.29 T 400 8000 4000 20 m BCP Hc=0.33 T 0,0 0,5 , T At B≥1.5 T curve 1/A2 vs B follows the Kapitza law: R=K*f(B) 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 0H, T B || [100]: RRR (Т=2K, B=0)= 205 B || [100]: RRR (Т=2K, B=3T)= 181 0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 1,0 Similar bend at definite magnetic fields was observed on DC magnetic resistance. This bend is probably caused by transition from SC to normal conducting state of niobium Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Summary One more approach for determination the RRR values by means of AC- susceptibility examined RRR values for main crystallographic orientations of Nb single crystals are obtained Good correlation with results for RRR obtained by 4 point DC method The magnetic field dependence of value R follows to the Kapitza law R=K f(B) The advantage of this method is possibility to measure simultaneously the different magnetic and transport properties such as a very small values of resistivity. Determination of resistivity can be done by taking into account the size and the shape of the sample. Symposium on the Superconducting Science and Technology of Ingot Niobium September 22-24, 2010, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA