Electric Storage Water Heaters: Consultation Regulation Impact Statement Stakeholder Consultation - Australia and New Zealand, 20 – 22 January 2014 Michael Whitelaw, Department of Industry Paul Ryan, EnergyConsult On behalf of the E3 Committee A joint initiative of Australian, State and Territory and New Zealand Governments. Contents of Presentation • • • • • • • Introduction RIS – Scope and Rationale The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy Standards and Requirements Problems and Objectives of the RIS Policy Options and Impacts Conclusions Contents 2 Introduction 3 E3 Overview • E3 = Equipment Energy Efficiency – A committee jointly run by Aust federal, state & territory, & NZ governments • Aims to improve energy efficiency in coordinated manner – Energy efficiency impacts productivity, demand levels and patterns, energy bills, greenhouse gas emissions etc. – Use national legislation and standards to ensure consistent requirements – Tools include information, energy standards and labels Introduction 4 The consultation process and next steps • Consultation – Physical sessions – ask preliminary questions – Submissions – comments must be formally submitted – Jurisdictional E3 representatives – consider and recommend – Ministers – consider any recommendations – Other – Standards Australia or other consultation as required Introduction 5 The consultation process and next steps Submissions received E3 makes recommendation(s) Project cancelled Minor changes Other / Direction change Ministers consider Submissions Changes to Standards Implementation and compliance Post implementation review Introduction 6 RIS – Scope and Rationale 7 Why electric storage water heaters? • Water heating is a significant contributor to the residential sector’s energy use • Appears to be subject to market failures • Potential scope for: – Simplification/harmonisation – Energy efficiency improvements RIS – Scope and Rationale 8 Energy Consumption of Water Heaters in Australia and New Zealand • Australia – 25% of energy use in homes for water heating • 45% of this is electric water heating • New Zealand – 33% of energy use in homes for water heating • 80% of this is electric water heating • Options considered in this RIS are estimated to save almost AU/NZ $0.5 Billion over 10 years RIS – Scope and Rationale 9 Scope • Products coverage includes most water heaters with storage tanks and electric boost/heating elements, i.e. – Conventional electric storage water heaters (ESWH) – Solar (electric) Water Heaters (SWH) – Heat Pump Water Heaters (HPWH)* – Excludes gas water heaters or renewable preheat systems RIS – Scope and Rationale 10 Reason for Review • Ensuring regulations remain relevant and effective – Regulatory consistency – Regulatory effectiveness – Net-benefits • Current options could save almost half a billion dollars over 10 years RIS – Scope and Rationale 11 The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 12 Projected Sales of all ESWH – AU/NZ Figure 2: Forecast sales of electric storage water heaters in Australia and New Current regulatory settings Zealand 300,000 250,000 Annual Sales 200,000 Electric Storage: Aust Solar-Electric: Aust 150,000 Heat Pump: Aust Electric Storage: NZ Solar-Electric: NZ Heat Pump: NZ 100,000 50,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 13 Projected Stock of all ESWH – AU/NZ Figure 3: Forecast stock of electric storage water heaters in Australia and New Current regulatory settings Zealand 5,000,000 4,500,000 4,000,000 Installed Stock 3,500,000 3,000,000 Solar-Electric: Aust Heat Pump: Aust 2,500,000 Electric: Aust Solar-Electric: NZ 2,000,000 Heat Pump: NZ Electric: NZ 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 14 NZ Projected Sales Figure 20: Forecast sales of electric storage water heaters in New Zealand by technology NZ Sales of ESWH 60,000 50,000 Annual Sales 40,000 Solar-Electric: NZ 30,000 Heat Pump: NZ Electric Storage: NZ 20,000 10,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 15 NZ Projected Stock Figure 21: Forecast stock of storage water heaters in New Zealand by NZ ESWH Stock technology 1,400,000 1,200,000 Installed Stock 1,000,000 800,000 Electric Storage: NZ Solar-Electric: NZ 600,000 Heat Pump: NZ 400,000 200,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 16 Energy Consumption of Water heaters Figure 4: Total annual energy consumption of all electric storage water heaters Current regulatory settings 16,000 14,000 Energy Use (GWh p.a.) 12,000 10,000 8,000 Australia New Zealand 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 17 Greenhouse Emissions of all ESWH – AU/NZ Figure 5: Annual greenhouse gas emissions of electric storage water heaters by technology Current regulatory settings 12,000 Greenhouse Emissions (kt CO2-e p.a.) 10,000 8,000 Solar-Electric: Aust Heat Pump: Aust 6,000 Electric: Aust Solar-Electric: NZ Heat Pump: NZ Electric: NZ 4,000 2,000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Year The Market – Sales, Stock and Energy 18 Standards and Requirements 19 Testing Standards • Current AS/NZS 4692.1 – Electric water heaters- Part 1: Energy, consumption, performance and general requirements • Legacy – AS 1056 or AS 1361 in Australia – NZS 4602 or NZS 4606.1 in NZ Standards and Requirements 20 Current MEPS and Other Related Standards • Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for AU and NZ is AS/NZS 4692.2:2005 – Electric water heaters Part 2: Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) requirements and energy labelling • Solar and Heat Pump – AS 4234 Solar water heaters—Domestic and heat pump—Calculation of energy consumption – AS/NZS 5125 Heat Pump Water Heaters Standards and Requirements 21 MEPS Exclusions • SWHs and HPWHs are provided an exclusion from the AU/NZ MEPS standard (AS/NZS 4692.2) if • electric-resistive heating provides less than 50% of the energy supplied in a typical year (e.g., heat pump and solar water heaters) when simulated to AS 4234 under Climate Zone 3 with an energy delivery of 22.5 MJ/day for an electric boosting heating unit and energization profile specified by the manufacturer Standards and Requirements 22 Difference in MEPS Basis and Levels • Multiple tables in AS/NZ 4692.2 depends on – In AU, standard used to measure and rated hot water delivery – In NZ, standard used to measure and nominal tank capacity • Comparison of MEPS levels between AU/NZ – AU MEPS levels vs delivery have been converted to equivalent capacity; based on ratios of capacity to delivery for registered units grouped by MEPS ‘step’. Standards and Requirements 23 Comparison of MEPS – AU to NZ Figure 6: Australian & New Zealand Minimum Energy Performance Standards levels and registered water heaters losses: unvented mains pressure water heaters Unvented WH - heat Heat Loss to ASNZS 4692.1 Equiv (TPR Allowance) 4.5 4 3.5 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 3 2.5 Current AU MEPS (Table A1) Current NZ MEPS (Table A5) 2 Models AU Models NZ 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Standards and Requirements 24 Compliance and Comparative Testing • E3 committee tested 14 Australian and five NZ registered ESWHs – Most Australian tanks meet the MEPS – Three NZ tanks had comparable heat loss levels to the Australian ESWHs • Further testing is being carried out to validate results Standards and Requirements 25 International ESWH MEPS • Both USA and EU are strengthening the MEPS requirements for water heaters – USA – effectively banning ESWH over 200 L from 2015 – European Commission – efficiency requirements from 2015, stringent heat loss from 2017 • Australia and New Zealand committed to following worlds best regulatory practice Standards and Requirements 26 Problems and Objectives 27 Market Failures • Split incentives – Builder/owner, plumber/owner, landlord/tenant • Information failures – Operating costs and payback – Consumer behaviour – Magnitude of these failures is discussed in RIS Problems and Objectives 28 Regulatory Shortcomings (1) • Usage of multiple test standards, different basis for MEPS (AU/NZ), information provide (delivery and capacity) – Difficult to compare and ensure compliance – MEPS ‘steps’ (17 AU vs 37 NZ) – Potentially reducing consumer choice and innovation • Harmonisation of MEPS levels may not be possible at this stage – non HCFC insulation vs HCFC Problems and Objectives 29 Regulatory Shortcomings (2) • Heat loss MEPS for SWHs and HPWHs – Exclusions based on modelled system results – SWHs and HPWHs may operate less effectively than modelled – Non-validation of claims – E3 Tested 10 models • All recorded lower measured vs claimed efficiency • Two models recorded Es < 50% – Compliance loop-holes • Solar ready and AS/NZS 4234 claims Problems and Objectives 30 SWH and HPWH Heat Loss Test Results Figure 11: Test results of heat losses for HPWH and solar electric boosted water heaters Test results for Solar & HPWH 4.5 4 3.5 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 3 2.5 Current AU MEPS (Table A1) 2 Solar Electric Water Heater Heat Pump Water Heater 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0 Nominal Capacity (L) Problems and Objectives 31 SWH and HPWH Heat Loss Declared Values Figure 10: Declared heat losses for solar electric and heat pump water heaters and Heat Pump Water Heaters by storage volume; currentSolar models Australia 6 5 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 4 Air Source Heat Pump 3 Solar Electic - Pumped Solar Electric - Thermosyphon Current AU MEPS (Table A1) Current NZ MEPS (Table A5) 2 1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Problems and Objectives 32 Objectives of Government Action 1. To streamline regulations and at the same time increase their effectiveness 2. To save consumers money by improving the energy efficiency Policy options considered: – Improve regulatory consistency – Improve regulatory effectiveness – Deliver strong net-benefits through addressing market failures Problems and Objectives 33 Policy Options and Impacts 34 Proposals Summary Measure Streamlining existing regulations Strengthening Australian MEPS Scheduling additional MEPS review All ESWHs to be treated consistently Appliance labelling Proposal 1 2 3 4 5 Policy Options and Impacts 35 Business-As-Usual (BAU): • Existing MEPS requirements, standards and definitions to continue to apply (with the period 2013-2033 modelled). The majority of conventional ESWHs would still be required to meet established heat loss requirements. Policy Options and Impacts 36 Proposal 1: Streamlining Existing Regulations: • Remove regulatory overlap by moving to a single (existing) test standard • Align the Australian and New Zealand MEPS basis • Mitigate against MEPS loopholes • Enable compliance-checking of existing HPWH and SWH MEPS and mitigate against loopholes Policy Options and Impacts 37 Removal of Australian ESWH sizing constraints Figure 12: Example smoothed MEPS for Australia and heat losses of registered Smoothed AU Line - TPR Australian models 4.50 4.00 3.50 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 3.00 2.50 Models Registered AS/NZS AU MEPS, Table A1 2.00 Proposed Smooth AU MEPS 1.50 1.00 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 ≤ 0.4 + 0.19 × 𝐿0.44 0.50 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Policy Options and Impacts 38 Removal of NZ ESWH sizing constraints Figure 13: Example smoothed MEPS for New Zealand and heat losses of registered New Zealand models NZ Smoothed MEPS 4.50 4.00 3.50 Heat Loss (kWh/24hr) 3.00 2.50 Models Registered Current NZ MEPS (Table A5) 2.00 Proposed Smooth NZ MEPS 1.50 For tanks with nominal capacity less than or equal to 90 litres Maximum heat loss ≤ (0.0084 × V + 0.40)/1.011 +0.06; and For tanks with nominal capacity greater than 90 litres Maximum heat loss ≤ (0.0048 × V + 0.72)/1.011 +0.06 1.00 0.50 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Policy Options and Impacts 39 SWHs and HPWHs Subject to Compliance Figure 14: Proposed reduced heat loss MEPS for solar electric and heat pump Heat Pump Water Heaters water heaters for AustraliaSolar andand current models 6 5 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 4 Air Source Heat Pump 3 Solar Electic - Pumped Solar Electric - Thermosiphon Current AU MEPS (Table A1) Proposed HPWH/Solar AU MEPS 2 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 ≤ 0.42 + 0.39 × 𝐿0.35 1 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Policy Options and Impacts 40 Proposal 2: Streamlining Regulations & Strengthening Australian MEPS: • Implement Proposal 1: Streamlining existing regulations; and • Strengthen the Australian MEPS – Not equivalent to NZ MEPS (as Product Profile suggested) – Next chart shows why MEPS works Policy Options and Impacts 41 Example that MEPS Drives Improvements Figure 8: New Zealand sales weighted average heat loss trends for conventional Sales Weighted Heat Loss (per unit per day) ESWHs 2.20 2.00 1.80 Heat loss (kWh/24hr) >180 litre 1.60 180 litre under 180 litre 1.40 1.20 1.00 2000 2001 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Policy Options and Impacts 42 Example of Proposal 2: Strengthening Australian MEPS Figure 15: Proposed new heat loss MEPS for conventional storage electric water heaters for Australia current models Unvented WH - and Heat Loss to ASNZS 4692.1 Equiv (TPR Allowance) 4.5 4 3.5 Heat Loss (kWh/24 hr) 3 2.5 AS/NZS AU MEPS, Table A1 AS/NZS NZ MEPS, Table A5 2 Models AU Proposed New AU MEPS 1.5 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 ≤ 0.42 + 0.16 × 𝐿0.45 1 0.5 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Nominal Capacity (L) Policy Options and Impacts 43 Proposal 3: Proposal 2 & Scheduling Additional MEPS Review • Implement Proposal 2; and • Scheduling Additional MEPS review – Conduct a market review of average efficiency levels in 2016, with view to harmonising MEPS levels – The review will enable E3 to vary each nation’s MEPS arrangements by up to 10% with the goal of full harmonisation of MEPS levels by 2017 – A 10% strengthening modelled – actual impact will differ – Only apply to conventional ESWH Policy Options and Impacts 44 Proposal 4: Streamlining regulations and all ESWHs to be treated consistently: • Implement Proposal 1; and • Fully close compliance loopholes and improve heat loss characteristics of SWH and HPWH by subjecting all ESWH to the same MEPS requirements – Would mitigate the market failure associated with inconsistent information on heat loss – But likely to shift sales to conventional ESWH at expense of SWH and HPWH Policy Options and Impacts 45 Proposal 5: Appliance Labelling • Investigate an energy rating label framework to apply to all water heaters (not just ESWHs) which provides both energy use and sizing information. • Consistency with existing international labelling explored as a priority • E3 has commenced a project to explore water heater appliance energy labels in general Policy Options and Impacts 46 Impact Analysis – Benefits and Costs Approach • Government benefits and costs – Costs of preparing RIS, managing and preparing regulatory changes, gazetting any changes, etc. – Costs of check testing, administration already incurred and not included • Business benefits and costs – Costs of compliance (where additional) – Costs of redesign and manufacture increase product costs • Consumer benefits and costs – Costs of more efficient product (passed on by supplier) – Benefits of reduction in water heating costs Policy Options and Impacts 47 Proposal 2: CBA Impact – Australia • Main assumptions • Increase in product costs is 10% for all updated models (~50% of market) – $20 for a small EWSH, $30 Med, $40 large • Average energy savings per ESWH is estimated to be $10 p.a Table 5: Proposal 2 Cost Benefit Analysis – Australia – 20 year period (various discount rates) Total Australia to 2033 Total Costs $M Total Benefits $M Net Benefits $M Benefit Cost Ratio NPV Low (3%) $26.9 $462.9 $436.1 17.2 NPV Med (7%) $20.7 $244.9 $224.2 11.8 NPV High (10%) $17.3 $160.1 $142.9 9.3 Policy Options and Impacts 48 Proposal 3: CBA Impact – Australia & NZ • Main assumptions • Increase in product costs is 10% for all updated models (~100% of market) – $40 for a small EWSH, $60 Med, $80 large • Average energy savings per ESWH is estimated to be $34 p.a Table 8: Proposal 3 Cost Benefit Analysis – Australia + NZ – 20 year period (various discount rates) Total Australia to 2033 Total Costs $M Total Benefits $M Net Benefits $M Benefit Cost Ratio NPV Med (7%) AUD $44.3 $497.9 $453.6 11.2 NPV Med (5%) NZD $9.6 $78.0 $68.4 8.2 Policy Options and Impacts 49 Initial Conclusions • Revised MEPS options combined with appliance labelling project is currently considered the most effective approach to meet all the stated objectives – Proposal 3 – (Proposal 2 & Scheduling Additional MEPS Review) is considered the most effective option but is based on a future market review – Proposal 2 – (Streamlining Regulations & Strengthening Australian MEPS ) could be considered as it appears to provide greater certainty • Proposal 5, an appliance labelling project, is recommended to decision makers as it will assist in addressing information failures 50 Providing a submission • Email energyrating@industry.gov.au by 14 February – NOTE CHANGE of EMAIL • No format or length requirements • Responding to the supplied questions is helpful • If you disagree with an element, explaining why will help us to better understand your position • Alternative suggestions/comments are welcome 51