Dr Mohammed Sherriff 1905-1972
•
Dr Naseem Ahmed 1936-2000
A
WISH
A Memorium
The Latent Treasure
Clinical Experiences
My Self
Dr Ijaz Naseem
MBBS DHMS DIHom LFHom ( med )
Licensed Associate-Faculty of Homoeopathy – UK
GP – Homoeopathy – UAE
Tuberculinum Bovinum
In
Practice
Dr. Naseem Ahmed
Dr. Ijaz Naseem
M.B.B.S, D.H.M.S, D.I.Hom, LFHom [med]
Associate Member, Faculty of Homoeopathy (UK)
G P Homoeopathy - UAE
www.sherriffshomoeopathy.com
sherriffshomoeopathy@hotmail.com
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
 Efficacy evaluation
 Tuberculinum Bovinum
 Recurrence
Methodology
 Patient Inclusion Criteria
– Recurrence
– C/o Sore Throat, Sneezing, Bronchial Asthma
– General Characteristics of the Patients
• (F - 1) (T - A)
– Remedies Prescribed & Follow-up
 Data Collection
– Scoring
• (T- 1 & 2)
 Data Analysis
– HSA
• (F - 2-4) (T - 3)
• (F - 5) (T - 4)
– Software
FIG 1
Patient representation in age groups
11
3
37
12
15
31
1.4-10 years: 37
21- 30 years :15
41- 50 years : 11
11- 20 years: 31
31- 40 years : 12
51 + years : 3
Methodology
 Patient Inclusion Criteria
– Recurrence
– C/o Sore Throat, Sneezing, Bronchial
Asthma
– General Characteristics of the Patients
• (F - 1) (T - A)
– Remedies Prescribed & Follow-up
REMEDIES
S
N
E
E
Z
E
9
14%
14
70%
6
30%
55
86%
Tuberculinum
5
35%
9
65%
Others
Asthma
T
O
N
S
I
L
Methodology
Data Collection
– Scoring
• (T -1 & 2)
Data Analysis
– HSA
• (F – 2 - 4) (T -3)
• (F - 5) (T - 4)
– Software
Scoring for the frequency of symptoms
Score
Frequency
0
None
1
1 attack / year or less
2
2-6 attacks / year
3
1-3 attacks / month
4
1-6 attacks / week
5
Daily attacks
Scoring for the severity of symptoms
Score
Severity
0
None
1
Little inconvenience
2
Some inconvenience
3
Severe
4
Disabling
Table 6
Scores
Frequency table for tonsillitis
Tonsillitis pre treatment
frequency
Count
%
Tonsillitis post
Tonsillitis pre treatment
treatment frequency
severity
Count
%
Count
%
.00
Tonsillitis post
treatment severity
Count
%
1
1.6%
1.00
10
15.6%
35
54.7%
4
6.3%
33
51.6%
2.00
37
57.8%
29
45.3%
16
25.0%
27
42.2%
3.00
17
26.6%
41
64.1%
2
3.1%
3
4.7%
1
1.6%
4.00
Table 7
Scores
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Frequency table for sneezing
Sneezing pre
Sneezing post
treatment frequency treatment frequency
Count
%
Count
%
5
25.0%
1
5.0%
13
65.0%
9
45.0%
2
10.0%
6
30.0%
4
20.0%
Sneezing pre
treatment severity
Count
%
8
11
1
40.0%
55.0%
5.0%
Sneezing post
treatment severity
Count
%
14
70.0%
6
30.0%
Table 8
Frequency table for asthma
Asthma pre treatment
Scores
frequency
Count
Asthma post treatment
Asthma pre treatment
frequency
%
Count
severity
%
Count
severity
%
.00
1.00
2.00
6
42.9%
3.00
6
4.00
2
Asthma post treatment
11
78.6%
3
21.4%
1
7.1%
42.9%
7
50.0%
14.3%
6
42.9%
Count
3
%
21.4%
8
57.1%
3
21.4%
Fig 2
Tonsillitis mean pre & post treatment
frequency & severity scores
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Pre Treat Freq & Severity
2.1
2.67
Post Treat Freq & Severity
1.45
1.51
Fig 3
4
Sneezing mean pre & post treat
frequency & severity scores
3
2
1
0
Pre Treat Freq & Severity
Post Treat Freq & Severity
3.65
1.85
2.65
1.3
Fig4
4
Asthma mean pre & post treat
frequency & severity scores
3
2
1
0
Pre Treat Freq & Severity
2.71
3.35
Post Treat Freq & Severity
1.21
1
Fig 5
Table 4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Aggregate Mean Scores of the pre and
post treatment frequency and severity
Pre Treat
Frequency
2.82
Pre Treat
Severity
2.89
Post Treat
Frequency
1.5
Post Treat
Severity
1.27
Methodology
 Data Analysis
– HSA
• (F – 2 - 4)
• (F – 5 & T - 4)
– Software
Cases
1. Frotteurism
2. Hay Fever
3. VHD
4. Fistula lung
Statistical Inference
(T – 6 - 8) (T - A) (F – 5)
Table
-A
Showing the total patient number in each
group, % of significant and
insignificant change, group wise and the
total mean
Diagnosis
Total
M
F
Insignificant Change % Significant Change %
Tonsillitis
101
39
25
37 = 36.63 %
64 = 63.36 %
Sneezing
50
13
18
19 = 38 %
20 = 62 %
Asthma
25
9
5
11 = 44 %
14 = 56 %
Mean 39.54 %
Mean 60.45 %
Tonsils Operated
2
Tuberculinum Bovinum
39.54%
60.45%
Significant
Non - Significant
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Asthma post
treatment
frequency
Asthma Pre
treatment
frequency
Asthma post
treatment
severity
Asthma
Pretreatment
severity
Std.
Deviation
N
Std. Error
Mean
1.2143
14
.4258
.1138
2.7143
14
.7263
.1941
1.0000
14
.6794
.1816
3.3571
14
.6333
.1693
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair
1
Pair
2
Asthma post
treatment
frequency &
Asthma Pre
treatment
frequency
Asthma post
treatment
severity &
Asthma
Pretreatment
severity
Correlation
Sig.
14
.462
.096
14
-.179
.541
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
-1.5000
.6504
.1738
-1.8756
-1.1244
-8.629
13
.000
-2.3571
1.0082
.2695
-2.9393
-1.7750
-8.748
13
.000
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Asthma post
treatment
frequency Asthma Pre
treatment
frequency
Asthma post
treatment
severityAsthma
Pretreatment
severity
95% Confidence
Interval of the Difference
Lower
Upper
t
Sig.
(2-tailed)
df
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Sneezing
post
treatment
frequency
Sneezing
pre
treatment
frequency
Sneezing
post
treatment
severity
Sneezing
pre
treatment
severity
Std.
Deviation
N
Std. Error
Mean
1.8500
20
.5871
.1313
3.6500
20
.8751
.1957
1.3000
20
.4702
.1051
2.6500
20
.5871
.1313
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair
1
Pair
2
Sneezing
post
treatment
frequency
&
Sneezing
pre
treatment
frequency
Sneezing
post
treatment
severity &
Sneezing
pre
treatment
severity
Correlation
Sig.
20
.302
.195
20
.210
.375
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Sneezing
post
treatment
frequency
- Sneezing
pre
treatment
frequency
Sneezing
post
treatment
severity Sneezing
pre
treatment
severity
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval of the Difference
Lower
Upper
t
Sig.
(2-tailed)
df
-1.8000
.8944
.2000
-2.2186
-1.3814
-9.000
19
.000
-1.3500
.6708
.1500
-1.6640
-1.0360
-9.000
19
.000
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
frequency
Tonsillitis
pre
tretament
frequency
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
severity
Tonsillitis
pre
treatment
severity
Std.
Deviation
N
Std. Error
Mean
1.4531
64
.5017
6.272E-02
2.1094
64
.6453
8.066E-02
1.5156
64
.6665
8.331E-02
2.6719
64
.6680
8.350E-02
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Pair
1
Pair
2
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
frequency
&
Tonsillitis
pre
tretament
frequency
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
severity &
Tonsillitis
pre
treatment
severity
Correlation
Sig.
64
.531
.000
64
.350
.005
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
frequency
Tonsillitis
pre
tretament
frequency
Tonsillitis
post
treatment
severity Tonsillitis
pre
treatment
severity
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval of the Difference
Lower
Upper
t
Sig.
(2-tailed)
df
-.6563
.5696
7.120E-02
-.7985
-.5140
-9.218
63
.000
-1.1563
.7605
9.506E-02
-1.3462
-.9663
-12.163
63
.000
Discussion
Generals
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Treat the person, for their miasms and inhereted tarits , before they become parents.
Like for a like abnormal condition
Symptoms – Language of the disease –Grasp them ,Instead of Maismatic names.
Single remedy
Repetition
Know what is in your store house.
Repertorization
Characteristic Total – not the mathematical total
What is Curable and what is not - timely medication, extent of disease
Disease – layer by layers
Failures
Family History – Indications of the right remedy
Diagnosis without remedy – consolation to the pt.
Steroids
Cases – Valvular heart problems, Lyss, hypericum, Fistula Chest, Lymphoma , Ca PR,
Foto Cases
Liver or spleen primary problem +Pthisis –Treat liver,spleen first
Not for the lazy and dullard.
Homoeopathy to be Mixed with brains
Lymphocytes Increased
A Good patient.
Articles