MAP sector of SEE: A general overview by SWOT analysis Prof. dr Zora Dajić Stevanović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture dajic@agrif.bg.ac.rs SWOT analysis • • • • STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS ↓ Recommendations Hypericum montbreti STRENGHTS • • • • • • • High biodiversity Available stocks of MAP Tradition and knowledge Good product quality Favorable conditions for cultivation Settled legislation framework Research potential Biodiversity Country No of vascular plant taxa (spec and subspec) No of MAP Croatia 5347 735 BiH 4498 700 Serbia 3662 700 (420) Montenegro 3136 659 Albania 3250 360 Kosovo 2500 300-400 Macedonia 3240 600 Available stocks of MAP Insufficiently used resources • • • • Number of species Quantities Areas Country Species Salvia spp. Origanum vulgare Thymus spp. Satureja montana Rosa canina Achillea millefolium Crataegus monogyna Juniperus spp. Urtica spp. Hypericum perforatum Vaccinium myrtillus ALB BIH CRO MAC MNG KOS SRB Tradition and Knowledge • • • • Long tradition of use Collector’s plant recognition Traditional production practices Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological knowledge Product quality • Good quality of plant drugs/products • • • Climate Soil Environment Favorable conditions for MAP cultivation • • • • Climate Soil Unpolluted soil, air and water Available land for farming In situ and Ex situ conservation legal framework • In situ • • • • Protected areas Signed/Ratified International Declarations/Directives National legal framework Ex situ • • • Established national Plant Gene Banks Signed/Ratified International Declarations/Directives National legal framework International legislation In situ conservation • • • • • CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992) Bern Convention (Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural habitats, 1979) CITES convention (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, 1973) EC Habitats, Fauna and Flora Directive (1997) Millennium declaration UN and Plan of Agenda 21 Implementation (UN Developmental Program, 2000) International legislation Ex situ conservation • • • GPA (Global Plan of Action for Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and agriculture, FAO 1996) International Treaty for Food and Agriculture (2004) EC Regulation No. 209/91 (1995) • Organic production and agricultural goods at EU level National Legislation Albania Law on protected areas, 2002, Law on biodiversity protection, 2006 Law on forests, 1992, Law on pastures and meadows, 1995 Law on the protection of medicinal, tannic acid and oil bearing plants, 1992 BiH Law on forests, 2002, Law on protection of nature, 2000,2008 Law on medicinal products, 2001, Law on national parks, 1996 Serbia Law on nature protection, 2009, Law on environment protection, 2004, Directive on control of use and trade of wild plant and animal species, 1996, 1999, 2005, 2011, Law on national parks, 2005, 2009, 2012, Law on forests, 2010 Croatia Law on environmental protection, 1994, 1999, Law on nature protection, 2005, The ordinance of proclamation of wild taxa as protected and strictly protected, 2009 Montenegro Law on nature protection, 2008, Law on environment, 2008, Law on national parks, 2009, Law on protection of rare, endangered, threatened and endemic species, 2006 Kosovo Macedonia Law on Kosovo forests, 2004, law on plant protection, 2007 Law on nature protection, 2004, Law on environment, 2005 Regulation of permitting the collection of endangered species, 2009 Research potential • Serbia • • • • Institute for Medicinal Plant Research “Dr Josif Pancic”, Belgrade Department for sorghum, hops and MAP, Backi Petrovac Faculties of Pharmacy, Biology, Agriculture, Technology, Forestry and Chemistry of Universities of Belgrade, Novi Sad and Nis Croatia • • University of Zagreb: Faculty of Agriculture and Faculty of Biology Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, Split WEAKNESSES • Collector problem • • • • • Structure, Number, Motivation (fair trade) Improper management of plant resources Insufficient added value Slow sector development (underutilized opportunities) Access information and public awareness Profile of MAP collector in SEE • • • • • Old people in rural areas Woman and man Unemployed Undereducated Other marginal groups • (Roma, refugees) Collectors loss Country Albania Current No of collectors 75.000 No of collectors in 1999s 150.000 BiH 50.000-100.000 150.000 Croatia ? 50.000-100.000 Serbia 50.000 5000-10.000 MAP 150.000 Montenegro 10.000-20.000 ? (50.000) Kosovo 9000 ? (50.000) Macedonia 60.000 ? (150.000 – 200.000) Impacts on biodiversity • Habitat alteration • • Loss of grasslands Deforestation • Habitat fragmentation • Over-harvesting • Endangered species Key Endangered MAP species in SEE Species Country Cause Gentiana lutea Arctostaphyllos uva ursi All SEE Overharvesting BiH, SRB, MAC, KOS Overharvesting Sideritis raeseri MAC, KOS, ALB Overharvesting Salvia officinalis ALB, MAC, BiH Overharvesting Paeonia officinalis CRO, MAC, SRB Various Orchidaceae All SEE Various Main threats to biodiversity • • • • • Habitat loss and degradation Habitat fragmentation Over-collecting Improper harvest practices Pollution • Management of plant resources Underdeveloped legislation • • • Weak enforcement • • Lack of capacities (control and inspection) Problems in PA management • • • • • Quotas Taxes and fees Centralized management Control of income from MAP collecting Regimes for MAP harvesting No relations with tourism and MAP harvesting Monitoring and resources assessment Insufficient added value • • • • • Lack of facilities for primary processing/primitive practices Lack of facilities for diversification of products Storage, packaging, labeling Quality control, standardization, certification Marketing and promotion Slow sector development underutilized opportunities • • • • • Access to foreign markets Small areas under cultivated MAP Weak professional associations Weak relations with research Poor regional collaboration Cultivated area (ha) COUNTRY EXPORT ALBANIA (million US $) 18 BiH ? About 5-6 500-600 CROATIA ? About 6-8 2500 SERBIA 19 (with spicy) 5,8 MAP ? 2000 KOSOVO MONTENEGRO ? 1-2 (NWFP) MACEDONIA ? more than 300 ? small ? small ? 5-7 (NWFP: 15) ? more than 300 • • • On average: 1500-2000 t of MAP exported Serbia: 5000 t out of MAP 2000 t Albania: over 7000 t STRUCTURE • • • Raw material (All SEE countries) Essential oils (Albania, about 40 t) Teas (Serbia, Croatia) – regional markets OPPORTUNITIES • • • • • • • Increasing demand for MAP Biodiversity conservation in relation to sustainable use of MAP Value-adding Cultivation Education, training, research Collaboration Increase of export Increasing demand for MAP (all in US $) • • • • • • • Global world trade: 60 billion EU – the biggest world market • import 150.000 t 300 million – annual rate increases for 10% US – average trade of about 31 million SEE export of near US $ 80 million Former Yugoslavia was key supplier of MAP into EU Serbia today only 2 % of EU market Period 2005-2007: increase of international trade of 22 % Global concepts in MAP conservation • In situ • • • • Ex situ • • • Protected areas Habitat directive • IPA • HNVF Ecological networks • Emerald • Natura 2000 Gene Banks Botanical Gardens and Arboretums Cultivation and Reintroduction Importance of Natura 2000 Protection of species and their habitats in EU independently on borders and politics Priorities of conservation based upon uniformed scientific methodology Strict state control Collaboration with land owners and farmers Supporting sustainable development Standards in MAP production (collection and cultivation) • Guidelines on good agricultural and collection practices (GACP) for medicinal plants (WHO, 2003) • Improvement of distribution, abundance, sustainable management and use of MAP • International Standard for Sustainable Wild Collection of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (ISSC-MAP, 2007 by BfN, WWF, TRAFFIC, IUCN) • Fair Wild Standards (FairWild Foundation of WWF and Traffic, 2011) MAP CULTIVATION • Many advantages • Land use and rural development Acquiring of cultivation technologies Endangered and economically important species • • • Standards implementation • • • • Common Agricultural Policy (CAP, 2003) Good Agriculture Practices (GAP, 2003) Good Agriculture and Collection Practices for MAP (GACP, 2003) Organic production standards THREATS • • • • • • Further depopulation of rural areas High fluctuations in demands and prices Loss of biodiversity Political instability Low investments Excessive credit indebtedness of SMEs Recommendations NATIONAL LEVEL REGIONAL LEVEL Legal framework improvement, enforcement Sustainable management and use of MAP Capacity building (PA management, processing) Standardization and certification Promotion of sector, increase of export Regional business association Regional certification Regional branding Trade missions, fairs, exhibitions Research Programs Project ideas for MAP in SEE • • • • • • Ethnobotany and traditional knowledge on MAP preservation MAP resources assessment in target areas Conservation of endangered MAP MAP endemics Development of cultivation technologies New products/processing technologies creation and promotion Good examples • National level • • • SERBIAN FLORA EPCA Regional level • • SEEDNet and ECPGR AMAPSEEC Contribution of international PGR programs to MAP conservation in SEE ECPGR MAP WG (2001) Biodiversity conservation of MAP resources • In situ, ex situ, on farm, sustainable use • Target species (10) • Development of descriptors and data bases • Collecting, characterization, documentation, evaluation of MAP PGR, research (oregano project) SEEDNet MAP WG (2003) • WG strategy on conservation of MAP in SEE • Descriptors development, target and mandate species • Research projects (yellow gentian and Dalmatian sage) TARGET species of ECPGR and SEEDNet Gentiana sp. Hypericum perforatum Origanum vulgare Tanacetum cinerariifolium Salvia ssp. Sideritis ssp. Achillea millefolium Arctostaphllos uva ursi Helichrysum ssp. Ocimum ssp. Satureja ssp. Vaccinium ssp. Foeniculum vulgare Carum carvi Thymus ssp. Primula sp. Mentha ssp. Melissa officinalis • • • • • Association for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of South East European Countries Established in 2000, registered in Belgrade 500 members, 400 participants from 50 countries in Turkey 6 Scientific Conferences (Serbia, Greece, Slovakia, Romania, Czech, Turkey) 7th Conference: 27-31 May, Subotica, Serbia www.amapseec.org