15-Competition

advertisement

Exploitation vs. interference competition

Lotka-Volterra Competition equations

Assumptions: linear response to crowding both within and between species, no lag in response to change in density, r , K , a constant

Competition coefficients a ij

, i is species affected and j is the species having the effect

Solving for zero isoclines, resultant vector analyses

Point attractors, saddle points, stable and unstable equilibria

Four cases, depending on K / a ’ s compared to K ’ s

Sp. 1 wins, sp. 2 wins, either/or, or coexistence

Gause ’ s and Park ’ s competition experiments

Mutualism equations, conditions for stability:

Intraspecific self damping must be stronger than interspecific positive mutualistic effects.

Diffuse competition: N i

* = K i

Alpha matrices, N and K vectors

Matrix Algebra Notation:

S a ij

N = K – AN

N j

Partial derivatives, ∂ N i

/∂ N j sensitivity of species i to changes in

Jacobian matrix (community matrices), Lyapunov stability j

Evidence for competition in nature

Resource partitioning among sympatric congeneric pairs

Resource Matrices, food, place, time niche dimensions

Complementarity of niche dimensions

Galapagos finches, beak depth, seed size

Character displacement

Hydrobia mud snails

Hutchinsonian ratios

Corixids, musical instruments, knives, pots, trikes, bikes

Accipter hawks, monitor lizards

Evidence of Competition in Nature

often circumstantial

1. Resource partitioning among closely-related sympatric congeneric species

(food, place, and time niches)

Complementarity of niche dimensions

2. Character displacement

3. Incomplete biotas: niche shifts

4. Taxonomic composition of communities

Complementarity of Niche Dimensions, page 276

Thomas Schoener

Prey size versus predator size

Prey size versus predator size

Ctenotus skinks Hawks

Character Displacement, Galápagos finches

Peter R. Grant

David Lack

Character Displacement in Hydrobia mud snails in Denmark

Snail shell length, mm

Corixid Water Boatman

G. E. Hutchinson

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Bob May

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Limiting Similarity

Bob May

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Limiting Similarity

Bob May

Recorders

Wind Instruments

Kitchen

Knives

Kitchen Pots

Tricycles

Bikes

Hutchinsonian ratios among short wing Accipiter hawks

Thomas W. Schoener

Nicole hugs

A komodo monitor

Hutchinsonian ratios among Australian Varanus lizards

25

Expected

Observed (R)

Observed (L)

20

15

10

5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5

Hutchinsonian Ratio

6 7 8 9

The ecological niche, function of a species in the community

Resource utilization functions (RUFs)

Competitive communities in equilibrium with their resources

Hutchinson ’ s n -dimensional hypervolume concept

Fundamental and Realized Niches

Resource matrices

Niche Breadth (vector)

Niche Overlap (matrix)

Ecological Niche = sum total of adaptations of an organismic unit

How does the organism conform to its particular environment?

Resource Utilization Functions = RUFs

Within-phenotype versus between-phenotype components of niche width

Within Phenotype Between Phenotype

Individuals are generalists More specialized individuals

n -Dimensional Hypervolume Model

Fitness density

Hutchinson ’ s Fundamental and Realized Niches

G. E. Hutchinson

Euclid

Euclidean distance d jk

= sqrt [

S

( p ij

p ik

) 2 ] where j and k represent species j and species k, the p ij and p ik

’ s represent the proportional utilization or electivities of resource state i used by species j and species k , respectively and the summation is from i to n.

n is the number of resource dimensions

Robert H. MacArthur

Geographical Ecology

Range of Available Resources

Average Niche Breadth

Niche Overlap

MacArthur, R. H. 1970. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theoret. Population Biol. 1: 1-11.

Species Packing, one dimension

Resource Utilization Functions = RUFs

Species Packing , one dimension, two neighbors in niche space

Three generalized abundant species with broad niche breadths

Nine specialized less abundant species with with narrow niche breadths

Niche Breadth

Jack of all trades is a master of none

Robert H. MacArthur

MacArthur & Levin

’ s

Theory of Limiting Similarity

Richard Levins

Specialists are favored when resources are very different

Robert H. MacArthur

Niche Breadth

Jack of all trades is a master of none

MacArthur & Levin ’ s

Theory of Limiting Similarity

Richard Levins

Generalists are favored when resources are more similar

Niche Dimensionality

1 D = ~ 2 Neighbors

2 D = ~ 6 Neighbors

3 D = ~ 12 Neighbors

4 D = ~ 20 Neighbors

NN = D + D 2

Diffuse Competition dN i

/dt = r i

N i

( K i

N i

-

Sa ij

N j

) dN i

/dt = 0 when N i

= K i

-

Sa ij

N j

Niche Overlap Hypothesis

Download