The Merced River Chronosequence: A Natural Experiment for Understanding Weathering and Biogeochemical Cycling The Merced River Chronosequence: A Natural Experiment for Understanding Weathering and Biogeochemical Cycling • Geological history of the chronosequence • Soil chemical weathering studies • Ecosystem consequences of weathering • Importance of region for biogeodiversity River Terraces: “Escalators through time” QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Location and Formation • Sierra dominantly granitic • East SJ Valley is dominantly glacial outwash Q uickTime™ and a TI FF (Uncompress ed) decompressor are needed to see t his pic ture. Merced River : Alluvial fans (downslope) and inset terraces (reverse topography) upslope of apex of deposition. Apex erosion Present river profile deposition The Inset Fans of SJ Valley (on all major rivers) can be explained by oscillating cycles of variations in stream capacity and sediment delivery rates. China Hat mem Turlock Lake (ash) Post Modesto (floodplain)14C Modesto 14C Riverbank North Merced Gravels Landform Evolution and Mima Mounds/Vernal Pools • Presence of pools is largely related to landform age – As landforms age, soils become more impervious to water due to clay rich layers and Si-cemented horizons • Arkley and Brown (1954) hypothesized a pocket gopher origin coupled with soil development Mima Mounds •Actively (?) maintained mounds overlying impervious layer • Should disappear in ~104 yr via erosion •Are gophers a “keystone” species for the entire ecosystem? Hardpan or claypan Mounds on China Hat member of Laguna formation (> 2 Ma) Geochemical Changes in Soils vs. Time Mass Balance Model Mass gains/losses Brimhall et al. (1992) C Concentration of mobile element in soil j ,s C i,s 1 C j, p C i,s Concentration of immobile element in soil Concentration of mobile element in parent material Concentration of immobile element in parent material Using Zr as reference: Volumetric Changes V Vp Epsilon to 100 cm p C i, p sC i,s Merced Chronosequence 40 E psilo n to 100 cm 20 0 -20 y = 148.71 - 30.859log(x) R= 0.83407 -40 -60 1 10 100 1000 10 Age (yrs) 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 1. Initial volumetric expansion 2. Long term volumetric collapse (up to 60%) Epsilon to 100 cm Merced Chronosequence 40 Initial volumetric expansion due to: 20 E psilo n to 100 cm • organic matter accumulation 0 • bioturbation and reduction of BD - plants -20 - animals y = 148.71 - 30.859log(x) R= 0.83407 -40 -60 1 10 100 1000 10 Age (yrs) 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 • gains of structural water in hydrated minerals Elemental Losses with Time C •Silicon losses ≈ Al losses j ,s C i,s 1 C j, p C i,s •P large losses Tau P to 100 cm Tau Si to 10 0 cm Me rced Ch em ical Gr ap h Dat a 10 y = 108.37 - 25.34 5log(x) Me rced Ch em ical Gr ap h Dat a 20 R= 0.75 549 y = 75.013 - 17.144 log(x) R= 0.74 618 0 10 -10 T au P t o 1 00 c m T au Si t o 10 0 c m 0 -20 -30 -40 -10 -20 -50 -30 -60 -70 -40 0 5 10 5 1 10 6 1.5 10 6 2 10 6 Age (yrs ) 2.5 10 6 3 10 6 3.5 10 6 4 10 6 0 5 10 5 1 10 6 1.5 10 6 2 10 6 Age (yrs ) 2.5 10 6 3 10 6 3.5 10 6 4 10 6 Summary of geochemical data • Enormous losses of Si, Al, P, and major cations etc. with time (following initial period of rapid gains of C, N) • Short term volumetric expansion followed by long term volumetric collapse Consequences of Weathering to Ecosystem Processes • Plant chemistry is: C,H,O,N,S, P,… • Atmospherically derived elements – – – – H, O (water, …) C (CO2) N (atm deposition (NO3, NH4, org N) S (SO4) • Soil/rock derived elements – P (apatite) – metals • P is a key control on long term ecosystem productivity…. Model for N and P vs time: Walker and Syers (1976) N limited P limited Merced Soil N vs. P • Total Soil N (and C) decline with soil age • Total soil P is reduced by ~ 60% in old soils Harden, 1986 • Loss of apatite 1.2 Apatite (%) 1 A patite (% ) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 0.1 • 1 10 Age (Ka) 100 1000 Merced N • Nitrate increases in soil water with age • Increasing fraction of nitrate in total N loss drives soil 15N to higher values. • N becomes an “excess” element from biological perspective WHITE AND BRANTLEY(1995) Summary • Merced chronosequence is becoming one of most studied on Earth (after Hawaii) • Weathering ultimately affect biota – Reduction in P – Reduced NPP – Clay and silica cements induce mima mounds • Merced chronosequence is the complex geological foundation for unique vernal pool ecosystem…..and in a vastly reduced state…. Merced River Vernal Pools and Soil Preservation • Need old soils for Mima mounds/vernal pools • Old soils are rare --- and becoming rarer Q uickTime™ and a TI FF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see t his picture. Mima Mounds used to cover > 500,000 acres in Great Valley Q uickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed t o see this pict ure. Agricultural Encroachment and Loss of Mima Mounds • leveling and dynamite • modern farm implements Q uickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) dec ompressor are needed t o see this pict ure. Now a rare and highly fragmented ecosystem Q uickTime™ and a TI FF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see t his picture. Newest threat: urban expansion • “Farming on the Edge” hotspots of prime farmland loss Q uickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) dec ompressor are needed t o see this pict ure. San Joaquin soil is made “state soil” in 1997 Q uickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed t o see this pict ure. Soil Diversity in the United States: soil series = biological species Rare soils < 50,000 ha, Endangered soils = rare soils w/ > 50% use, Extinct soils = 100% use Soil Diversity and Conservation Planning • • • • • Not all soils are equal Rare soils appear to harbor rare plants The Great Valley is an endangered soil hotspot Role of pocket gophers as “keystone” species?? Merced River chronosequence is a scientific, and a biogeodiversity, treasure Atacama: hyperarid Atacama: hyperarid Atacama: arid Merced Hawaii: arid Mendocino Hawaii: humid Hawaii: hyperhumid 600 y = 25.033 + 25.033log(x) R= 1 y = 20.852 + 20.852log(x) R= 1 y = -0.22413 - 0.22413log(x) R= 1 y = 32.307 - 22.339log(x) R= 0.8516 y = 243.41 - 96.72log(x) R= 0.85315 y = 56.548 - 33.381log(x) R= 0.94594 y = 99.317 - 55.793log(x) R= 0.9794 y = 663.93 - 217.33log(x) R= 0.98633 50 y = 58.202 - 51.785log(x) R= 0.80085 Atacama: north 500 S lop e of C o llap se (lo g m od el) 0 400 E psilo n to 100 cm (% ) Atacama: central 300 200 100 Atamcama: south Merced -50 Hawaii:humid Hawaii:arid -100 Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x -150 -200 0 8 + M9*x 9 M0 -6.6079 M1 M2 -0.014048 -8.7495e-06 R 0.87487 Hawaii:Hyperhumid -100 -250 0.1 1 10 100 Soil Age (Kyr) 1000 10 4 1 10 100 Annual Rain (mm) 1000 10 4 Geochronology of Terraces • Weathering Rate = total weathering/time • Generally poorly known – Post Modesto, Modesto constrained by 14C (few dates though) – Turlock Lake dated by one ash – U-trend ages, though used, are now not considered credible by U-series community • 10Be was used in 1980’s Geochronology of Terraces • Weathering Rate = total weathering/time • Ages poorly known – Post Modesto, Modesto constrained by 14C (few dates though) – Turlock Lake dated by one ash – Correlations based on fossils, etc • 10Be was used in 1980’s 10Be • • • • (“garden variety”): Pavich et al. (1986) GCA. Produced via cosmic rays in atmosphere Half-life = 1.5 x 106 years Delivery rate to soils ~ .5 to 1.5 x 106 atoms cm-2 yr-1 Considered highly immobile in soils (attaches to negatively charged clays) • Has z/r (ionic potential) similar to Al (~ 6), indicating it should form sparingly soluble oxides in aqueous solutions • Can be used for various dating or transport studies Interpretation of Merced Terrace 10Be - assumed assigned age are correct - determined if measured 10Be = amount that should be there - authors needed erosion to reconcile data • Constant input, no physical loss dN q N dt N q(1 e t )/ • Constant input, erosional loss dN q N Em dt N (q Em )(1 e t )/ • Constant input, chemical loss dN dt q ( kw )N N q(1 e ( k )t ) /( k w ) Trends in 10Be: • total amount increases with age • depth trends and amount correlate with clay content • modern river alluvium ~100x106 at/gm Analysis of Data Assuming Chemical Loss Rationale for Chemical Loss: • Nearly 60% of Al is lost from upper 1m of soils • Significant losses of Ti • Assume 10Be loss is proportional to amount present (first order reaction) Interpretations of Chemical Loss Model 1. Young terraces (where little erosion or chemical loss might occur), should give reasonably accurate ages a. Modesto fm yields older ages than U trend 2. Assuming chemical losses, China Hat fm. yields ages within reasonable ranges a. Turlock Lake, with high physical erosion history, can not be reconciled. terrace M12 WITH LOSS W/O LOSS corrected Be accepted age calculated age calculated age atom cm-2 (yrs) (yrs) (yrs) 40000 61021.36782 60451.74998 R9 31000000000 1.31E+11 250000 279935.4107 267830.6257 R10 1.09E+11 250000 228522.0757 220472.0979 T6 1.48E+11 600000 321100.7089 305148.9964 T11 1.35E+11 600000 289505.0835 276553.7104 CH1 5.39E+11 3000000 2066319.763 1410771.458 CH2 4.78E+11 3000000 1591850.624 1196616.653 Topography of Fans/Terraces and Erosion China Hat fm • level w/ enormous Mima Mounds Turlock Lake fm • highly undulating Riverbank fm Modesto fm level •Levelundulating •Mima mounds • lots of gravel