US 220 @ I-68 Exit 42 & Greene St

advertisement
US 220 @ I-68 Geometric Improvements
Project # AL419 Update
Stephen A. Bucy
Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA)
Overview
• Project Background
• Current Project
• Schedule
• Questions
Project Background
• Issue: Safety Concerns with Undersized Merge Area onto EB I-68
from combined NB US 220 and Fletcher Dr high-speed ramp
– NB US 220 and Fletcher Dr Ramps are < 1,000 ft apart
– Curbed grass separation adjacent to I-68 required to combine the merge
area for both ramps
Safety Issues with
Small Merge Area
Fletcher Dr Ramp
US 220 NB Ramp
Project Background
• Issue: Direct access from SB US 220/Greene St to EB I-68 is NOT
provided at the interchange
– Traffic must take a circuitous route on local residential streets to get to the
Fletcher Dr Ramp
No Left Turn
Ramp to EB I-68
Project Background
• 2006: Determined the Way Ahead
– Change the Fletcher Dr ramp to restricted access
– Eliminate a section of the grass median, which allows the ramp merge area to
be extended significantly
– Provide direct access from SB US 220/Greene St to EB I-68 at the interchange
• 2007: SHA initiated a engineering concept study
• 2008: Final report came in with 2 primary interchange alternatives
– 1: Roundabout
– 2: Left/U-Turn Lane (Included Signal)
• 2008: Roundabout Alternative was chosen
– SHA initiated a design contract
– SHA Roundabout Design Team made improvement recommendations
Project Background
• 2008: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Concurs
• 2009: Project design progress temporarily halted due to statewide
funding issues
• 2010: Concrete interchange area transferred from City to SHA
• 2010: Project design funding restored
– Final Design Review Meeting in Dec 2010
• Project to include full depth pavement to replace concrete pavement through interchange
• Project to include paving below the interchange to a point near the Industrial Park entrance
• 2010: Project construction funding secured
• 2011: Project design completed
Current Project
• Extended Merge Area
– Large section of grass median eliminated
– Allows the ramp merge area to be extended significantly
New End
of Curb
New Gate
Grass Median
Eliminated
Current Project
• Roundabout  “U-About” Concept at the interchange
Current Project
• Project Benefits:
– Addressed the safety issues at the EB I-68 Exit 42 on-ramp
•
•
•
•
Remove large section of grass median  Extends merge/acceleration area
Better operation of the merge
Reduces back-ups on ramp that are currently observed during peak periods
Removes the conflict point between Fletcher Dr ramp movement and the
US 220 ramp
– Provides access from SB US 220/Greene St to EB I-68 at the interchange
• Simplifies access to the Interstate
• Provides access for all types of vehicles at Exit 42 from West Side
• Reduces traffic on local residential streets (Fayette, Gephart, and Fletcher)
Current Project
• Project Benefits:
– Full depth replacement of all the problematic concrete pavement
– Pavement job extends south to a point near the Industrial Park
– Interchange
lighting upgrades
– Drainage
improvements
– Signage upgrades
– Traffic Calming
Current Project
• Project Questions:
– Will emergency vehicles
and/or the Armory have
access to the old ramp?
New Gate
– Yes
– The gate will be padlocked and
applicable emergency services
organizations as well as the
Armory personnel will be
issued keys for emergency use
Current Project
• Project Questions:
– Will there be any problems
accessing the City Pump
Station?
New Gate
– No
– The gate will be located below
the pump station entrance, so
there will be no access issues
Current Project
• Project Questions:
– Will residents in Fletcher Dr
area have access to the old
ramp?
– No
New Gate
• The old ramp will be closed to
public access
• Do Not Enter and “For Use of
Authorized and Emergency Use
Vehicles Only” signs will be
installed
• Residents will have to travel to
one of the other EB I-68 onramps
– Note: This also means less
overall traffic on the local
residential streets
Current Project
• Project Questions:
– Why is the “Passing lane” on NB
US 220 before the interchange
being eliminated?
• The second lane was never a
“Passing lane,” but the start of the
divide where one lane would go to
EB I-68 and the other to WB I-68
• Today’s tractor trailers have
sufficient power to compare with
the climbing power of passenger
vehicles
• Note: There will still be a separate
left turn lane into the Park & Ride
facility
Current Project
• Project Questions:
– Was consideration given to NB US 220 vehicles having to yield on an
upgrade?
• Yes
• There may be slight back-ups during peak traffic periods of the day
• The yield scenario is preferred over coming to a complete stop, many times
unnecessarily, at a traffic signal
– How does this project relate to the future US 220 Corridor?
• The 2 issues are independent
• This project meets an immediate need & is managed by SHA’s District 6 office in LaVale
• City officials and local SHA staff were recently updated on the status of the US 220
Corridor Tier One Planning Study, led by the state of West Virginia
• Although there is progress on the US 220 Corridor, there is still much work to be done
• Project Questions:
Current Project
– Why are we installing another roundabout?
• Addressed the left turn at a
severe angle that previously
could not be navigated
• The engineering study showed
that a roundabout offered a
better level of service than a
signal at this specific location
• Other advantages:
–
–
–
–
–
Improves intersection safety
Keeps traffic moving
Reduces unnecessary stops
Reduces air pollution
Minimal maintenance required
after construction
Project Schedule
• Spring 2011: Project goes out for bid
• Summer 2011: Project will be awarded
• Fall 2011: Site preparation work to begin
• 2012: Majority of construction activity will occur
– “U-About” opened
– Fletcher Dr ramp changed to restricted access only
Other Questions?
Download
Related flashcards

Micronesian languages

21 cards

Oceanography

35 cards

Polynesian languages

33 cards

Fisheries

25 cards

Submarines

24 cards

Create Flashcards