AVS – Technology, IPR and Applications Prof. Huang Tiejun Audio and Video coding Standard Working Group of China Institute of Digital Media Technology, Peking University Oct.12, 2010 Video coding… • Compress high bit-rate digital video signal as low bit-rate stream – SD: from ~250Mbps to < 5Mbps – HD: for >1Gbps to < 20Mbps • is the reason makes DTV possible at 1994 • and always a core concern for Digital TV system and any other digital video applications Video coding Standards • ISO/IEC recommended MPEG series standards – MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 • ITU-T recommended H.26X series standards – H.261, H.262, H.263, H.263+, H.263++ 1G standards 2G standards H.264 / MPEG-4 AVC China MPEG-China AVS 3 MPEG-2: the 1st Generation • ISO/IEC 13818 / ITU-T H.262 @ 1994 – SDTV at ~5Mbps – HDTV at ~20Mbps • Makes DTV became reality – Europe DVB at 1997 – USA ATSC at 1997 – Japan ISDB at 1998 – China DTMB at 2006 AVS – one of the 2nd Generation • In Feb2006, AVS video issued as Chinese national standard – GB/T 20090.2-2006 – Effective from Mar2006 • In Aug2006, DTMB issued as Chinese national standard – GB/T 20600-2006 – Mandatory from Aug2007 5 5 2ndG Video – ITU-T IPTV Selection • ITU-T IPTV FG decided to recommended the following video format at May2007 – – – – H.264/ MPEG-4 AVC MPEG-2 (for Legacy) AVS – GB/T 20090.2 SMPTE VC-1 • ITU-T Q6-WP3-SG16 meeting at last week (10July09) decided to release upper document as the ITU Technical Paper on “Media coding toolbox for IPTV” 2015/4/9 6 Video Compression Performance Improvement Compression Ratio AVS-?/MPEG-?/others-? 250 HD: 6-8Mbps SD:1-2.5Mbps 150 AVS MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 VC-1 HD: 20 Mbps SD:4-6Mbps MPEG-2 50 MPEG-1 19911994 2003 2030 7 Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion Higher Performance, High Cost • Gold age is far away… – MPEG-1,MPEG-2 – H.261,H.262, H.263,H.263+/++ • Face to complicated situation nowadays – H.264,VC-1 MPEG Standards • 1991:MPEG-1 – Royalty Free • 1994:MPEG-2 – DVD, DTV, Emmy Award – 2.5$ per device • 1996:MPEG LA—A licensing agency • 1999:MPEG-4 SP (Part 2) – 0.25 $/device, coding time based charge (2 cents/ hours) – Objected by AOL-Times Warner • 2003:H.264/MPEG-4 Part 10 AVC – Nov. 17,2003: Licensing policy – title based licensing – Objected by EBU(EBU Technical Statement-D 96-2003) – May.20,2004: Policy finalized, little revision 10 First Effort to deal with patent issue for MPEG-2 • • • • • Leonardo Chiariglione《Patents and standards》 – http://www.chiariglione.org/ride/patents_and_standards.htm If Gutenberg had lived in a culturally more advanced city like Venice or Florence, which had already started issuing litterae patentes ("open letters", whence the word "patent" comes from) since a few decades, he could have protected his invention with a patent. Some time later, MPEG had to deal with MPEG-2 patents. Many companies had participated in the MPEG-1 development not so much because they necessarily had plans to make products in that space, but because they were keen to be around and help tune up the MPEG machine for the big MPEG-2 deal. In January 1993 I took the initiative to invite to the Rome meeting Mike Smith, head of the Information Technology Task Force (ITTF), the group inside the ISO Central Secretariat in Geneva looking after JTC1 matters. Mike provided advice on how this difficult issue could be treated without trespassing the limits set by the ISO/IEC directives. In the event, an MPEG-2 Patent Pool was established, managed by MPEG LA. This organisation acts as a "one-stop shop" for MPEG-2 Video and Systems patents (Audio is not part of the licensing), but there are a few companies licensing their technology separately. The result is reasonable (4$ - 2.5$/device) 网址 http://www.mpegla.com AVC/H.264 licensing structure Participation Fees Where End User pays Subscription Codec Manufacturers Title-by-Title Internet Broadcast Free Television Participation Fees where Remuneration is from Other sources Source:AVC/H.264 license terms 2015/4/9 http://www.avs.org.cn 13 AVC/H.264 License Terms: Participation Fees • Where End User pays for AVC Video – Subscription (not limited by title) – 100,000 or fewer subscribers/yr = no royalty; > 100,000 to 250,000 subscribers/yr = $25,000; >250,000 to 500,000 subscribers/yr = $50,000; >500,000 to 1M subscribers/yr = $75,000; >1M subscribers/yr = $100,000 – Title-by-Title - 12 minutes or less = no royalty; >12 minutes in length = lower of (a) 2% or (b) $0.02 per title. • Where remuneration is from other sources – Free Internet Broadcast (not title-by-title, not subscription) – no royalty during first term (through 2010; not greater than free television thereafter) – Free Television - (a) one-time $2,500 per transmission encoder or (b) annual fee starting at $2,500 for > 100,000 HH rising to maximum $10,000 for > 1,000,000 HH • Enterprise cap: $3.5M/yr 2006-07, $4.25M/yr 2008-09, $5M/yr 2010 • Royalties begin January 1, 2006 Source:AVC/H.264 license terms 2015/4/9 http://www.avs.org.cn 14 Effort for 2G: RF JVT baseline AVS Strategy turned in 2003 For JVT baseline + essential enhanced tools To a dependent, compact, patent clear standard MPEG LA专利池构成与风险分析 AVS Mission • To develop a 2nd Generation video coding standard with same/better coding performance than others • Avoids licensing risk based on clearly analysis of related patents in last 50 years • To help DTV, IPTV and new media operators in China and out of China leave from more and more dangerous licensing mire • AVS was born at Mar.2002 2015/4/9 18 Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion AVS Working Group • Set up by MII (Ministry of Information Industry) in June of 2002 • In charge of national standardization of audio-video coding for Chinese A/V industry • Also in charge of organizing the delegation of China National Body to MPEG(ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11) 2015/4/9 AVS membership 180 160 140 120 Total New End 100 80 60 40 20 0 2015/4/9 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 国内企业 Local Members 2015/4/9 MNC or Out of China 外资企业和国外企业 2015/4/9 AVS Subgroups • • • • • • • • System Video Audio Digital Media Rights Management Requirement Conformance IPR Implementation 2015/4/9 AVS IPR Experts Group formation • Late 2003 the President of AVS asked that a group of experts be assembled to create a recommendation for an IPR policy for AVS • Create policies that: – – – – – – 2015/4/9 reflect and respect China law and culture reflect WTO requirements reflect successful global practices balance the rights of the inventor and needs of the implementers innovative and forward looking evolves with practice and law in China Mission of AVS IPR Group • Make a friendly environment for technical society (standard body), industry, and end user • Key issue to work out – Reforming the IPR policy making by only IP holder, to by IP holder + industry + consumer 2015/4/9 AVS IPR Experts Group • Experienced members:经验丰富的成员 – – – – Patent Attorneys专利律师 Technical Experts技术专家 Contract Attorneys处理合同的律师 Previous experience in setting up patent pools具有建立专利池相关经 验的成员 • Members are from:成员来自 – Asia 亚洲 – Europe 欧洲 – North America 北美 • Members represent: 成员代表了 – Consumer Electronics 消费电子产品界 – Information Technology 信息技术界 – Microelectronics微电子产业界 2015/4/9 AVS IPR Experts group • Members – – – – – – – – 2015/4/9 Broadcom IBM Intel Matsushita/Panasonic Microsoft Nokia Sony Sun Microsystems Licensing Obligations Join AVS • Sign Member Agreement •Declare default option 2015/4/9 Non-Participant: • RAND RF • POOL • RAND • No License Participate in Subgroup • Commit to license • License options • RAND RF • POOL • RAND Submit Contribution • Disclose patents •Declare license option China Patent: • RAND RF • POOL Participant: • RAND RF • POOL • RAND Worldwide Patent: • RAND RF • POOL • RAND Disclosure Obligations • When making a contribution – Unpublished, published and granted patents • Ongoing – When a patent is discovered – When a Patent Application is published • During Final Draft Standard Review – 90 days to declare licensing option, OR: – Default applies 2015/4/9 http://www.avs.org.cn 31 AVS Licensing • 1 RMB concept – Only one charge, to device/software/chip – No charge to operator – No charge to end-user • Will be handled by AVS PPA – PPA is a non-profit organization – Founded By #1 institute of MII and ICT of CAS, in 2005 2015/4/9 http://www.avs.org.cn 32 Three Independent Organizations of AVS AVS Working Group Technical Evaluation Licensing principle IPR Principle AVS Patent Pool Council AVS Licensing Essential evaluation One-Stop license AVS Industry Alliance Cooperation & Development Applicatio Standard Better Implem. •AVS Industry Chain Public knowledge AVS Patent: Stand ards -Royalty Free -AVS Pool -RAND 2015/4/9 R&D AVS Patent Pool IPR •ICs,software •Device,System •Operating,Service •AVS Industry Cluster •HDTV •IPTV •DTH •MobileTV •…… Industry 33 AVS Industry Alliance – – – – – – – – 2015/4/9 Amoisonic Broadcom Changhong Haier Huaju Huawei Langchao NSCC – – – – – – – – http://www.avs.org.cn Panstar Semi SVA Skyworth Spectrum Communication Sunnywell TCL USstarcom ZTE 34 Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion AVS1 Family AVS Parts 国家标准计划号 STD Number 小组草案 (WD) 工作组 最终草 草案(CD) 案(FCD) 标准送审 稿(FD) AVS1-P1(系统-广播) 20051304-T-339 2003.10 2003.12 2006.10 2007.03 AVS1-P2(J-profile) 20032265-T-339 2003.10 2003.12 2004.4 2004.8 AVS1-P2(X-profile) 20032265-T-339 2005.9 2006.3 2007.12 AVS1-P2(S-profile) 20051305-T-339 2007.12 2008.3 2008.6 2008.9 AVS1-P3 (Audio-Stereo) 20051305-T-339 2004.12 2005.3 2005.12 2006.4 AVS1-P3(M-profile) 20051305-T-339 2005.9 2005.12 2005.12 2006.4 AVS1-P4(Conformance) 20051306-T-339 2006.9 1006.12 2007.3 AVS1-P5(Ref. Software) 20051307-T-339 AVS1-P6(DRM) 20051308-T-339 2005.3 2005.12 2006.12 2007.3 AVS1-P7(Mobility Video) 20051309-T-339 2004.6 2004.9 2004.12 2006.4 AVS1-P8.1(System-IP) 20074554-T469 2005.3 2005.9 2005.12 2006.3 AVS1-P8.2(System-IP) 20074554-T469 2006.1 2006.3 2007.6 AVS1-P9.1(File Format) 20074555-T-469 2005.3 2005.9 2005.12 2007.12 AVS1-P9.2(File Format) 20074555-T-469 2006.1 2006.3 2007.9 2007.12 AVS1-P10(Mobile Speech 2015/4/9 and Audio) TBD 2007.3 2007.11 2008.3 2007.6 国家标准发布 实施(GB) 2006.2 MPEG-2 Video Control Control Data Trans./ Quant - Coeff. IQ/IT Decoder Entropy Coding 0 Motion compensation Inter/Intra MV AVS Tutorial Motion estimation Oct.20, 2004 37 AVS Video Control Control Data Trans./ Quant - Coeff. IQ/IT Decoder Entropy Coding Intraframe Prediction Deblock Motion compensation Inter/Intra MV AVS Tutorial Motion estimation Oct.20, 2004 38 AVS Video Control Control Data Trans./ Quant - Coeff. IQ/IT Decoder Entropy Coding Intraframe Prediction Deblock Motion compensation Inter/Intra MV AVS Tutorial Motion estimation Oct.20, 2004 39 Periods of key video coding tools contributed DPCM Macroblocks Transform Coding P-frames B-frames DCT 1950 Huffman Coding Video Object Planes Variable Blocksize Motion Compensation Multiple Reference ~1988 Hybrid Coding Block Motion Estimation Scene Adaptive Coder Interlace Motion Vector Prediction ObjectBased Scalabilit y 1999 Generic B-pictures Integer Transfor m Advanced Deblockin g Filter Error Resilienc e Modified from C Reader, 2002 2015/4/9 http://www.avs.org.cn 40 Coding tools and its contribution Entropy coding ME and MC Transform and bit allocation Color space Conversion 1st G 2 * 3 * 3 * 3 ≈ 50 2nd G 2 * 3 * 6 * 3 ≈ 100 2015/4/9 41 AVS Video Tools • AVS1 video accepted 42 technical proposals from more than 200. • Major tools – – – – – – – • Transform – 16bit-implemented 8x8 integer transform Quantization and scaling - scaling only in encoder Intra prediction – 5 modes Motion compensation – 16x16/16x8/8x16/8x8 modes Quarter-pel interpolation – 4-taps interpolation filter Deblocking Entropy coding Minor tools – Motion vector prediction – Skipped mode and Coded block pattern – Adaptive scan AVS Tutorial Oct.20, 2004 42 Spatial Coding Tools 1970s 1960s Andrews, 1968 Fourier Transform Huang 1966 Statistical Coding Max, 1960 Non-Uniform Quantizer Fano 1949 Huffman 1952 Pratt, 1969 Hadamard Transform Chen, 1973 Slant Transform Ahmed, 1974 Cosine Transform Pratt 1969 Zonal Coding Habibi, 1971 Block Classification Huang 1963 Block Quantization Tasto 1971 Adaptive Block Coding Seyler 1962 VariableLength Coding VLC Chen 1981 Scene Adaptive Coder VLC Video Woods 1969 Dead-Zone Quantizer Uniform Quantizer Pratt 1969 Threshold Coding Tescher, 1976 Pratt, 1970 Run-Length Coding Tescher, 1975 ZZ-RunLength Coding Zigzag Scan Tescher, 1977 C Reader, 2002 2015/4/9 Rate Buffer 43 173 184 190 198 194 192 192 192 Y RGB 180 187 182 189 193 191 194 196 180 180 181 182 184 189 196 199 178 174 174 175 180 186 175 177 U 173 167 170 176 178 181 179 177 V YUV DCT 170 171 176 184 185 175 172 181 165 167 165 168 174 171 175 181 162 163 163 158 162 169 172 175 VLC/ CABAC 179 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 1430 -32 0 0 0 0 0 00 .587 0.114Quant Y -1 00.299 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 . 169 0 . 332 0 . 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 128 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 00.500 00 .419 0.0813 B 128 -4 -1 4 -4 0 -2 -2 -9 -4 -1 0 -3 -3 0 -7 3 -6 -6 0 -4 0 7 3 -16 -3 5 1 -2 -1 -12 8 -8 -2 -1 -1 4 -1 -3 0 0 2 -2 0 2 0 3 -4 2 0 -4 6 3 0 5 -4 -1 -10 4 -1 -3 2 011010001011101... 7 7 8 8 16 1619 1922 2226 2627 2729 2934 34 16 16 11 11 10 10 16 16 24 24 40 40 51 51 61 61 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 C(h,v)=C(v)C(h)ΣΣ[P(x,y)COS{πv(2y+1)/16}COS{πh(2x+1)/16}] 17 17 18 18 24 24 47 47 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 18 18 21 21 26 26 66 66 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16x=0 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 y=0 16 1616 1622 2224 2427 2729 2934 3437 37 12 12 12 12 14 14 19 19 26 26 58 58 60 60 55 55 24 24 26 26 56 56 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 19 1922 2226 2627 2729 2934 3434 3438 38 14 14 13 13 16 16 24 24 40 40 57 57 69 69 56 56 22 2222 2226 2627 2729 2934 3437 3740 40 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 C(0)=1/2√2 C(v)=C(h)=1/2 [v,h≠0] 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 22 2226 2627 2729 2932 3235 3540 4048 48 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 47 47 66 66 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 14 14 17 17 22 22 29 29 51 51 87 87 80 80 62 62 18 18 22 22 37 37 56 56 68 6810910910310377 77 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 26 2627 2729 2932 3235 3540 4048 4858 58 24 24 35 35 55 55 64 64 81 8110410411311392 92 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 26 2627 2729 2934 3438 3846 4656 5669 69 49 49 64 64 78 78 87 87103103121121120120101101 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 27 2729 2935 3538 3846 4656 5669 6983 83 72 72 92 92 95 95 98 9811211210010010310399 99 DCT-based Compression AVS Innovation Example(1) DCT Transform Matrix in AVS Differs from the one in MPEG-2 (floating value) and H.264 (4X4 and 8X8) that was patented with similar performance (or even better in some cases ) 2015/4/9 45 Temporal Coding Tools 1960s 1970s Seyler 1962 Temporal Statistics PRA Motion Estimation Candy 1971 Conditional Update (Spatial; Pixel) DPCM Netravali 1979 Motion Measurement Motion Modeling Seyler 1962 Harrison 1952 Limb 1975 Brofferio 1970 Netravali 1979 Motion Compensated DPCM (Pixel) 3D (Temporal) DPCM Rocca 1969 Conditional Update (Spatial; Block) Taki 1974 BMA Motion Estimation Motion Compensated DPCM (Block) Giorda 1975 Variable – Size BMA Motion Est. Jain 1979 Schroeder 1970 Transform in DPCM Loop with MC Hybrid Coding Pratt 1968 Transform Coding (Intra) H.120 Koga 1981 Reader 1973 Conditional Update (Transform) Roese 1975 H.261 MPEG1 MPEG2 Etc. Netravali 1979 Motion Compensated Transform Hybrid Coding (Transform) Jones 1978 C Reader, 2002 Interlaced Field/Frame Coding MPEG2 46 Skip, Direct and Symmetry Modes in B-frame • Same: – Use both forward and backward reference frame to predict • Different: MV forward Time t-1 Time t MV backward Time t+1 – Skip: no coded MVD, no coded coefficient – Direct: no coded MVD, with coded coefficient – Symmetry: with 1 coded MVD and coded coefficient 47 AVS B-frame Compared with Other Standards • Other Standards • AVS – Bi-prediction – Bi-prediction • Skip, direct • Skip, direct – No motion vector • Other cases – 2 coded motion vector – No motion vector • Symmetric – 1 coded motion vector • Higher compression ratio 48 AVS vs. H.264 vs. MPEG-2 tools AVS1-P2 H.264 MPEG-2 Intrainterpolation 8x8, 5 modes for Y prediction, 4 modes for UV prediction 4x4, 9 modes for Y prediction, 4 modes for UV prediction Prediction only to DC coefficient Reference frame <=2 <=16 <=2 Block-size for MC 16x16, 16x8, 8x16 8x8 16x16, 16x8, 8x16 8x8,8x4,4x8,4x4 16x16, 16x8(interlace) B frame micro-block bi-direction prediction Coding front motion vector, and computing back motion vector Coding two motion vectors Coding two motion vectors AVS vs. H.264 vs. MPEG-2 (cont’d) tools AVS1-P2 H.264 ½ pixels 6-tap ¼ pixels 2-tap MPEG-2 ¼ pixel MC ½ pixels 4-tap ¼ pixels 4-tap Transform and quantizatio n 8x8 integer transform, 4x4 integer transform, 8x8 float DCT encoding site both encoding and normalization only decoding sites need to normalize Entropy coding Adaptive 2D VLC CAVLC CABAC VLC Loop filter 8x8 based Less boundaries Less BS-levels (0..2), Less pixels filtered (p0, p1,q0, q1) 4x4 based N/A More boundaries More BS-levels (0..4), More pixels filtered (p0..p3,q0..q3) ½ pixels 2-tap AVS Video Profile and Level • JiZhun (基准) Profile (Dec. 2003) – 4 levels • • • • 4.0 : up to Standard Definition with 4:2:0 4.2 : up to Standard Definition with 4:2:2 6.0 : up to High Definition with 4:2:0 6.2 : up to High Definition with 4:2:2 • AVS Zengqiang Profile (2008) – for Storage media such as movie • AVS Shensuo Profile (2008) – for video surveillance AVS Tutorial 51 AVS1 Video Subjective Testing • April-Sept., 2005, AVS subjective testing has been executed by SARFT testing center • The testing is based on GY/T 134-1998 standard as well as related ITU testing standard Compressed testing video SD resolution stream bit-rate (625/50i) HD resolution (1125/50i) MPEG-2 typical bit-rate (Mbps) 4~6 20 AVS bit-rate (Mbps) 3 1.5 10 6 Testing result A B A A- Performance- HD (1280 x720) PSNR(dB) Harbour 41 39 37 35 33 31 29 1000 H.264 Main H.264 Baseline AVS MPEG-4 MPEG-2 6000 11000 16000 21000 26000 31000 36000 Bitrate(kbits/s) Performance- HD (1280 x720) PSNR(dB) Flamingo 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 10000 H.264 Main AVS MPEG2 40000 70000 Bitrate(kbits/s) 100000 130000 Performance – SD (720x576) Basketball PSNRY(dB) 38 35 32 29 26 23 4000 9000 14000 19000 24000 Bitrate(kbits/s) H.264 Main AVS MPEG-2 29000 34000 Performance – SD (720x576i) Flower garden PSNRY(dB) 38 35 32 29 H.264 Main 26 23 1900 AVS 4900 7900 Bitrate(kbits/s) 10900 MPEG-2 13900 Performance – CIF (352x288) News 38 PSNRY(dB) 36 34 32 H.264 BaseLine 30 H.264 Main MPEG-4 28 AVS 55 105 155 205 255 Bitrate(kbits/s) 305 355 Performance – CIF (352x288) Mobile 40 PSNR(dB) 37 34 31 28 H.264 BaseLine H.264 Main MPEG-4 AVS 25 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Bitrate(kbits/s) 5000 6000 Complexity analysis Tools Multiple reference Variable block-size MC Quarter pixel Entropy coding Deblocking filter Total 2015/4/9 Estimated increasing AVS H.264 1 2 1 2 3 3 0.5 1 0.5 1 6 9 http://www.avs.org.cn 59 Review: MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264(2001~09) Review: AVS(2002~) • At Jan.26-Feb.5,Geneva, ITU-T SG16 Q6(VCEG)Meeting • During the discussion on the requirements of H.265/H.NGC, Multiple MNC insisted on the new standard show be compact at technology side and lower complexity at implement side. Their proposal on new standard is very similar with AVS • This is the road AVS selected 8 years ago. Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion AVS DTV End-End Solution Professional AVS Encoders in the Market • PowerCoder AE200MC • PowerCoder AE100SD/HD • CoderStar AE1001 • CoderStar AC1001 • 4Caster C4 • SUMAVISION 9210 • Telarity Professional AVS Encoders from SVA (Shanghai) SVA Coderstar Series Codestar AC1001-L for MobileTV (1,2,4 channels) Codestar AC1001 for SDTV (1,2,4 channel) Codestar AE1001-H for HDTV Professional AVS Encoders UniAV (Beijing) Powercoder AVS Encoders for CIF,SD and HD Envivio (USA) 4caster For CIF and SD AVS decoding Chips in the Market • China Companies – – – – – Spreadtrum SV6111 / SV6100 / SV6600V Penstar DS-1000 HD / DS-1000 SD NationalChip GX3203 / GX3101 Celestial CSM1208 Haier Hi2830(HD)/Hi1260(SD) • MNC – – – – Broadcom BCM7405B / BCM7466 ST STi520x/710x NXP STB222 SigmaDesign SMP8654 AVS decoder Chips in the Market AVS + MPEG-2 SD&HD (Beijing) AVS SD&HD (Shanghai) AVS + MPEG-2 SD & CTTB (Hangzhou) AVS+MPEG-2+AVC+VC-1 SD&HD (Europe) AVS + AVC + MPEG-2 SD&HD (Beijing) AVS+MPEG-2+AVC+VC-1 SD&HD (USA) AVS+MPEG-2+AVC+VC-1 SD (USA) AVS decoding Chips in the Market AVS End Devices USB Dangle + PC STB and TV Set AVS STBs AVS End Devices AVS receivers in car and bus AVS TV Set SVA AVS TV Set 获得2008年上海国际工业博览会创新奖 AVS in Car 车载移动终端 >7”屏 AVS in CBHD (China Blu-ray High-definition Disc player) 双拼双视 ( Stereo Interleaving Video) • 时分双拼 – 左视和右视以奇偶场双拼 • 空分双拼 – 左右 – 上下 • 与现有标准关系 * Images from www.stereo3d.com – 现有视频编码标准可以支持这种双拼视频 – 增加信令,沟通采集表示环节与立体显示器 AVS 3D TV Plan to live broadcast the Asia Games at Guangzhou at Nov. of this year Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion AVS Terrestrial TV Deployment Commercial Operating Testing before Operating AVS Terrestrial TV in Operating Shanghai Oriental Pearl digital TV Co., Ltd. 16 SD in 1 Channel Sichuan Province StarMedia Broadcasting Co.,LTD 36 SD in 3 Channels Hang Zhou City Culture Radio Television Group 21 CIF in 3 Channels Shanxi Province Mobile Television Qingdao City Mobile Digital TV Co., LTD, 20 SD & 10 CIF in 2 Channels 9 CIF in 1 Channel Shaanxi Province Mobile Digital Television 20 CIF in 1 Channel Hebei Province Mobile Digital Television Co. LTD 20 CIF in 1 Channel The State Development and Reform Commission (Responsible for DTV Policy) Digital TV Development Project (2009) (1) Digital Terrestrial TV Standards Family (2) Single Frequency Digital Terrestrial TV System Deployment (3) Key DTV Products: AVS, DRA and DTMB Chips, STB, Encoder, etc 2015/4/9 81 Outline • • • • • • Licensing problem for AV standards AVS approach for dealing with IPR AVS Video technologies AVS Products AVS Applications nowadays Conclusion and Discussion Conclusion • 2nd Generation Video coding standards can double the efficiency of terrestrial frequency • There are three choices for 2ndG video coding standards – ISO/IEC MPEG-4 AVC/ITU-T H.264 (2004) – AVS (China, Feb2006) – SMPTE VC-1 (leads by Microsoft, Apr2006) ISO/IEC MPEG-4 AVC/ITU-T H.264 • Already being adopted in some countries and area • But high royalty cost and risk – Operators should pay MPEG LA for commercial services (e.g. PPV), about 5 million USD per year – Patent holders outside of MPEG LA Patent Pool are waiting for collecting money (the licensing policy still under table) AVS Technologies • Much compact designed 2ndG standard – based on analysis on method & patents in last 50 yrs – without many complicated but small performance contribution tools in international standards – Technologies • Free methods and tools in public domain • Self-innovation patents (~50 Chinese patents for video) – Similar performance with lower complexity • Very low cost – 1 RMB ( 1/6 USD) per device – Royalty free for operators AVS Products and Deployments • Most international video decoder chip vendors provide AVS-compatible SD&HD chips • 4 China local companies provide low cost chips – e.g. Current price for a AVS+MPEG-2 SD Terrestrial Box is about 30USD • Enough AVS products in the market • Shanghai deploys first AVS based Terrestrial broadcasting system with 16 AVS SD programs, 7 provinces/cities provide commercial broadcasting • AVS will be the unique mandatory format for all TV set and STB from next year Comments • 2nd G video coding standards is correct choice, but please consider – MPEG LA licensing policy @ www.mpegla.com – Potential patent holders especially who in MPEG-2 pool but not in MPEG-4 AVC pool • AVS is a better choice for long-term commercial operating – Commercial operating experience from multiple cities and provinces – Cooperation on development on AVS1 and research on AVS2 Thanks! AVS Working Group:http://www.avs.org.cn Tiejun Huang:tjhuang@pku.edu.cn