LHC

advertisement

Operation of the LHC Cryogenics system and interface with beam & machine operation

S. Claudet (CERN, Geneva) on behalf of the “Cryogenics Group”

Technology Department

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

Outline

• Introduction to LHC Cryogenics

• Operation, organisation and results

• Availability and interaction with beam operations

• Summary

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 2/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

LHC accelerator

p-p collision 10 34 cm -2 .s

-1 , 14 TeV, 0.5 GJ stored energy

Machine operation

Technology

24 km of superconducting magnets @1.8 K, 8.33 T

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 3/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Layout of LHC cryogenics

P t 5

P t 4 P t 6

8 x 18kW @ 4.5 K

1’800 sc magnets

P t 3

P t 7

LHC cryogenics is the largest, the longest and the most complex cryogenic system worldwide

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

130 t He inventory

P t 2

Magnets

Distribution

P t 8

C r yogeni c pl ant

P t 1. 8 P t 1

4/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

How does it compare ?

180

160

LHC, ATLAS, CMS

LHC

140

120

Before LHC: existing experience for design, safety, controls, operation, availability, …

100

LEP2+

80

ITER

LEP2

60

40

20

OMEGA,

BEBC,

ISR Low-Beta

ALEPH,

DELPHI,

LEP Low-Beta

0

Tevatron, RHIC, Jlab,

SNS, HERA, Tristan, …

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

Year We did not start from scratch!

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 5/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

LHC compressor station (x8)

4.2MW input power

Bldg: 15m x 25m

Oil/Helium Coolers

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

Compressors

6/30

Motors

LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

18 kW @ 4.5 K Refrigerators (x8)

33 kW @ 50 K to 75 K - 23 kW @ 4.6 K to 20 K - 41 g/s liquefaction

LHe: 3’600 l/h

4m diam, 20m long, 100tons

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 7/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

1.8K Units with cold compressors (x8)

Active magnetic bearings

Outlet

Pressure ratio

2 to 4

Inlet

Cold Compressor

3-phase induction

Electrical motor

(rotational speed:

200 to 800 Hz)

Fixed-vane diffuser

Spiral volute

Axial-centrifugal

Impeller (3D)

125 g/s GHe from 15 mbar to P atm with 3 or 4 stages

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 8/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Electrical feed boxes for current leads

48 Boxes, 1200 leads

LSSL2 of the LHC

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 9/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

One LHC sector: production-distribution-magnets

Total for 8 sectors:

Compressors: 64

Turbines: 74

Cold Comp.: 28

Leads: 1’200

I/O signals: 60’000

PID loops: 4’000

• Extremely large installed cooling capacity

• Complexity associated with 1.8K units

• Extremely large distribution system

=> Recovery from failures can last from few minutes to 20 hrs, exceptionally 2-3 days x 13.5

From LHC Magnet String test

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

3.3km

10/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Voltage change

[%]

Interfaces: follow-up electrical perturbations

EL perturbations and their impact on our LHC Cryo system

Electrical systems recover in ms

Cooling systems recover in min

Cryo systems recover in hrs

=> A big incentive to be as tolerante to glitches as possible

Duration

[ms]

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

Typical tolerance envelope

11/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Main reasons to superconducting

For accelerators in high energy physics

• Compactness through higher fields

E beam

[Gev]

≈ 0.3 . B . r

[T] [m]

E beam

[Gev]

E . L

[MV/m] [m]

Be sure that at design stage, working at higher temperature was considered, but not selected to maximise LHC beam energy

=> Cryogenic systems takes longer to recover from failures than conventional ones (but we work on it!)

• Saving operating energy

Electromagnets:

Resistive: P input

Superconducting: P input

≈ E beam

≈ Pref

Acceleration cavities

P input

R s

≈ Rs.L.E

≈ R

BCS

+ R o

2 /w

R

BCS

≈ (1/T) exp(-BT c

/T)

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 12/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Interactions between LHC systems

Powering OK or interlock

Static and Dynamic heat loads

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

Beam related

Dynamic heat loads

13/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Outline

• Introduction to LHC Cryogenics

• Operation, organisation and results

• Availability and interaction with beam operations

• Summary

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 14/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Key factors for operation

• Equipment architecture:

– Central liquefier to intermediate buffer, distribution decoupled

– Cooling capacity production in line with demands

On-call adapted

• Type of operation

– Transients (cool-down / warm-up) or various recovery

– Alarm monitoring, simple reset actions, calling for experts

– Detection of process degradation and curing action

– HW checks and preventive treatment of slow evolving problems

• Frequency of required actions:

– Once per month, once per week

– Once per 1-2 days

LHC: A huge and complex system without significant buffer and frequent operator actions required

Dedicated 24/7 required so far !!!

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 15/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Structure - Coordination - Outils

Management

Coordinations:

• Team Leaders + Management (1/wk)

• Performance panel (1/2wks)

• Operation / Maintenance panel

• Methods & Tools panel

Tools (web interface DB oracle):

• e-logboog operation for any change of configuration (wanted or not) or observation and diagnostic request

• Diagnostic tables, work-orders, intervention reports

• Asset & spares management, intervention procedures

• Maintenance plan

• Scheduling

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 16/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Staff & team evolution

People should be able to quit, newcomers should be integrated

• High level requirements for recruitment (Bachelor & Masters)

• Formalised induction process:

Academic training - On the job training - Shadow shifts

=> Certification after ≈ 10 months as shift operator (alone!)

• Senior operator (>3 yrs):

Able with all sub-systems, ability to optimise production-needs-time

• Certification diploma:

Written - Site - Simulator - Improvement study (report + presentation)

• If selected for indefinite contract:

– Operation for 5 to 10 years

– Ability to become “production Eng.” as site responsible

– Ability to switch to support teams or another activity at Cern

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 17/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Cryo operator in Cern Central Control room

Shift 24/7

Fixed displays

Tendancy curves (summary)

Process synoptics and orders

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 18/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Operation, indicators

Alarms Powering

Global availability

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 19/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Outline

• Introduction to LHC Cryogenics

• Operation, organisation and results

• Availability and interaction with beam operations

• Summary

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 20/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Availability: a signal Yes/No is required

T2 = Achieved up time during required time / Required time x 100 (operational availability)

CM

CS

Cryo Maintain: Few important conditions checking integrity of HW, with slow power abort in case this signal is lost (leading to beam dump !)

SP set-point

CS

CM

Cryo Start: set of conditions to allow powering of concerned sub-sector, with no action if powering started (illustrates good stability of process)

T2 indicator w.r.t

EN 15341

CM

CS CM

Sum CM 8 sectors:

Global availability

Possibility to treat thousands of channels in a structured way to match at best the LHC powering sub-sectorisation and the cryo sub-sectorisation

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 21/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

2011

2010

2009

100

90

80

LHCCryo global availability 2012

Target 2012

95%

70

60

50

40

30

20

L7

TT891

2xP8

CCs

P18 oil ice

P4

CCs

- Excellent 1st part to TechSTop

- Heavy works done during

Technical Stop #1, and cabling weakness caused difficult recovery

- Very moderate impact from High

Luminosity operation in 2012

10

SEU?

P8+R5

0

27-Feb 26-Mar 23-Apr

Scheduled Stops

21-May 18-Jun

Daily 2012

16-Jul

Weekly 2012

13-Aug 10-Sep 8-Oct

Between TS 2012

5-Nov 3-Dec

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 22/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Performance and origin of downtine

100

98

96

94

92

90

88

86

LHCCryo - Average of 8 sectors

(Between TS)

0.5

Global availability as seen by LHC during beam operation periods

2.66

3.51

3.5

Others according to relative ratio of their average for the 8 sectors

5.21

0.66

91.47

4.20

2.46

0.15

89.68

94.5

Supply (EL, CV, IT)

Cryo

Cryo SEU

Users

Global availability

2010 2011

(260 days) (271 days) (137/290)

(Full days, Mondays & Fridays of

Technical Stops not counted here)

Evolution:

- 2010: Correcting early Cryo bugs

- 2011: Adapting to SEU (corrected @Xmas)

- 2012: So far rewarding !!!

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 23/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Availability: from global to single plant

Considering 8 independent sectors

2010-2011

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 24/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Indicators: recovery categories & tendency

Nb stops

150

125

100

75

50

+ Better global control/tuning

(operation, instrumentation)

- ! SEU !

• Less Cryo induced failures,

. (but 3 VERY LONG ones!)

- More Supply (EL) failures

- ! SEU !

+ No longer recurrent Cold

Compressors particular issues

(Leaks, electronics)

25

Cryo SEU

Cryo down

0

2010 2011 short(<8h)

From the books:

Immediate effect of

(good!) practice

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

2010 2011

Medium(8h-30h)

Annoying if frequent, to be kept low with moderate efforts

2010 2011

Long (>30h)

Serious cases requiring specific monitoring and significant efforts

25/30

Nice tendency, promising for

2012 or new surprises to come up?

LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Operation structure & approach

• 2007/2008 cool-down & HWC: Control rooms: site - CCC- office

Per site, one experienced engineer with agreed minimum protocol to guide a local team of operators, with help of support teams (instrumentation, experts, controls)

• Since 2009 and operation with beam:

One operator in shift 24h/7d, more transverse structure site/CernControlCenter, procedures & operation tools

• For machine controls (temperature, level, pressure):

Basic interlocks and simple PID loops with generic tools for fast orders, now completed with automated sequences & procedures

• Indicators:

From temperature stability to daily availability on-line cool-down curves to on-line cryo-status

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 26/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Power Consumption for LHC Cryogenics

45

40

35

30

25

Installed power

Stop

Cryoplant

Tests

Operation with 8 plants

Net gain ≈ 50 GW.h per year

(3 MCHF / year !!!)

Cryo optimized power

Gain

≈ 8MW

(20% of installed power)

20

15

10

Cool down

5

0

03-Jul-

2009

HWC

2009

01-Jan-

2010

02-Apr-

2010

Cryo unavailability breakdown

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC

LHC physics

6200 h

91% Cryo Availability

LHC physics

6500 h

90% Cryo Availability

2010

1

3 5

01-Oct-

2010

31-Dec01-Apr-

Cryo

2010 2011

Cryo

2011

Utilities

3

Utilities

Users or Beam

3

Users or Beam

4

27/30

30-Sep-

2011

Cryo

Utilities

Users or Beam

LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

145

143

141

139

137

135

133

131

129

127

125

123

121

119

117

115

159

157

155

153

151

149

147 en tonne

Helium inventory follow-up

Total masse He 2012 Livraison camion He

TS1 -0.65 T

Remplissage DEWAR Transfert SM18 Transfert CAST Transfert CMS

6

Technical Stop

• Now < 30kg/day en tonne

5

• With 50kg/day in 2011 and better control @Xmas, tendency to be confirmed

4

• @50 CHF/kg 3

- 50kg/day # 2’500 CHF/day

- 150 t # 7.5 MCHF

45

2

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Xmas

Tech Stop

Operation

1

0

-1

2010 2011

-2

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 28/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Interfaces with Beam-OP

• HW signals:

– Cryo Start and Cryo Maintain towards Powering Interlock module

• SW panels:

– Cryo web page

• People in Control Room (LHC):

– 1 Eng in charge + 1 operator

– 1 Cryo operator

– 1 operator for technical infrastructure

Text zone

Possible evolutions ?

Closer discussions with Eng. In charge in case of cryo problem

Other operators involved to help diagnostics/recovery

No longer cryo operators at night (on call only)

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 29/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Summary

• LHC cryogenics is the largest, the longest and the most complex cryogenic system worldwide. We could achieve a reasonable availablity

(> 90 %) so far with beams.

This demonstrates that there are no big issues in concept, technology or global approach for operation.

• Despite all our efforts, we had very hard time and lengthy commissioning to learn how to tune all these sub-systems together while permanently consolidating what was not conform. Experience has been converted into automatism, procedures, tools, training

• Cryogenics operation is well integrated in central control room with LHC main systems, but operated/supported independently (about 50 people)

• Maintenance is as well reaching an efficient preventive/corrective ratio, with efforts to be made for non-standard cases. We have to prepare for higher energies and intensities with continued gain in reliability !

Workshop Accelerator Operation 2012, SLAC 30/30 LHC Cryogenics, interface with beam operation

Download