Science, Technology and Society Revisited: What is Happening to Anthropology and Ethnography? Marietta Baba Science, Technology and Society Revisited: What’s Happening to Anthropology and Ethnography Marietta L. Baba 19th Century Anthropology Anthropology was a 19th century project focused on human and cultural evolution Anthropological texts and ethnographic practices were distinct Anthropologists drew upon the ethnographic writings of other professionals Ethnographic Tradition in Anthropology: Bronislaw Malinowski Long term observation and participation in the field Detailed recording and description of microprocesses of everyday life Interpretation of the point of view of people being observed Production of a monograph offering a holistic account of their practices The Rise of Academic Anthropology: 1920-1960 Ethnography became part of anthropology as positivist social science grew in academia Anthropology arose as a unified intellectual endeavor that combined empiricism and theory Scientific legitimacy of anthropology validated British claims of economic development in its African colonies American Anthropology “Four fields” united by question: What is the nature of humanity? The “most scientific of the humanities and most humanistic of the sciences” Materialist vs. mentalist theories diverge (1960s) Interpretive Theory of Culture: 1960-1990 Metaphor of culture as text – Clifford Geertz Culture could be “read” for meaning by the observer The observed also interprets the culture The anthropologist works from interpretations of the observers Led to critical reflections on ethnographic practices Postmodernism A set of critical and rhetorical practices that tend to destabilize epistemological certainty Called into question some of anthropology’s most fundamental conceptual architectures Loosened the bonds entwining anthropology and ethnography Colonial Critique Anthropology does not acknowledge the history of global inequality that has produced the subject of ethnography Anthropology distances itself from history by “essentializing” selected traits of observer and observed Crisis of Representation Ethnography embeds a dyadic relationship with a less powerful person who is a co-producer of knowledge but receives no recognition or voice Ethnography also embeds an unacknowledged relationship with a reader On what grounds does the anthropologist assume authority for representing the Other? Crisis of Representation The most public form of such criticism was Derek Freeman’s re-study of Margaret Mead’s Coming of Age in Samoa Freeman charged Mead with misrepresenting Samoan society based on her youth, lack of access to key members, and romanticizing naiveté Devastating criticism for anthropologists at the time Ontological Status of Culture An “essentialized” unchanging and integral set of traits ascribed to the subject became suspect Anthropologists were caught in a dilemma of “salvaging” such traits in societies that their own countries might be trying to “develop” Anthropologists could no longer represent “cultures” as pristine isolates with integrated features in an equilibrium state Anthropology as Cultural Critique Anthropology had lost its raison d'être Public no longer fascinated with exotic cultures and weren’t sure they mattered A new vision for anthropology: Cultural critique -social criticism of the contemporary with a cross-cultural twist Anthropology as Cultural Critique Two potential pathways to cultural critique: 1) de-familiarization by epistemological critique 2) de-familiarization by cross-cultural juxtaposition Unfortunately, no one had as yet accomplished either of these feats Enter Foucault Foucault introduced to American anthropology by Paul Rabinow Foucault’s method of analysis and language have been widely adopted Responds to Marcus and Fischer The Foucault Phenomenon Foucault’s brand of “problematization” Second order observation Analytics elevated over theory Flexible and contingent methods Foucault’s Language and Vision Biopower Power/knowledge Governmentality A post-theoretical vision of social science Boutique-like exposition and critique of singularities Anthropology and Ethnography: Quo Vadis? Ethnographicallyinformed design Techno-ethnography in corporate branding Data analytics or (“Big Data”) Ethnography Anthropology Diaspora and the Institutional Anthropologies Laura Nader: “Study Up” Diaspora and the “Institutional Anthropologies” Anthropology at Xerox PARC Work Practice and Technology Group Ethnographic Practice and Participatory Design Participatory design practices at PARC gained through collaboration with Scandinavians Collaboration with civil engineers on site developed prototypes through cooperative design-in-use Ethnographically Informed Design Ethnography is a resource for the design industry Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference – EPIC Critical reflection is an aspect of this practice Ethnography-Branded Firms Rise of branding and the ethnographybranded firm Brand distinctions based upon technoethnography Fast technology keeps brand fresh Cut out the “middle man” observer •Techno-ethnography Re-naming ethnography in terms of technology Connect self-aware consumers directly to client without “bias of outside observer” Consumers monitor, organize and assess their own thoughts Why Eliminate the Observer? Firms reify a vision of social relations based on technology, progress and innovation Commodification of ethnography “Problematization” of technology as an object of inquiry National Science Foundation: SBE 2020 Initiative Call for papers on future of social sciences 252 “white papers” Topic extraction http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ sbe_2020_ Predicting data intensive research Data Analytics or “Big Data” Increasing volume and detail of digital information Health care, retail, manufacturing, personal location, public sector EU Aggregate, analyze, interpret (includes access, sensitivity) Electronic Health Records Analyzing large data sets to identify patterns and trends could reduce costs To what extent are cultural assumptions encoded in these data? Potential role for anthropology Literature on EMR/EHR Ethnographers are well represented in the emerging literature There is a scarcity of anthropologists Foucault’s concept of power/knowledge should be taken seriously Science, Technology and Society Revisited: What’s Happening to Anthropology and Ethnography? DISCUSSION