MnDOT Road Research Update Maureen Jensen January 17, 2014 TERRA Vision “A dynamic partnership of government, industry, and academia that continuously advances innovations in road engineering and construction.” Board Members Industry • • • • • • • • • • • • • State and Local Aggregate & Ready Mix Association of MN • Minnesota DOT American Concrete Pavement Association • Minnesota Local Road Research Board Associated General Contractors of MN • Iowa DOT Concrete Paving Association of MN • Michigan DOT MN Asphalt Pavement Association • New York State DOT American Engineering Testing • North Dakota DOT Caterpillar Global Paving • Wisconsin DOT Mathy Technology and Engineering Services University RMC Research and Education • Iowa State University Foundation • Michigan Tech University Road Science • University of Minnesota Braun Intertec • National Center for Pavement Flint Hills Preservation Midstate Reclamation National • Norwegian Public Roads Administration • United States Federal Highway Association Benefits of the TERRA Alliance Improved collaboration between public, private, industry, and academic stakeholders Capacity to anticipate future needs and trends Research and Implementation partnership expansion Leverage funds to meet common goals Quicker adoption of innovations Initiatives Annual Pavement Conference being held in conjunction with National Dust Control Conference MnROAD 2016 Priorities, Partnerships SHRP 2 Pavement Preservation Workshop State Transportation Innovation Council Funding to be managed by TERRA Focus on Implementation MnROAD Office of Materials and Road Research A long-term accelerated pavement testing facility that gives researchers a unique, real-life laboratory to study and evaluate the performance of materials used in roadway construction. Interstate 94 Low Volume Road Mainline Whitetopping Design Tool Warm Mix Asphalt Stabilized Full Depth Reclamation Quiet Diamond Grind Low Temperature Cracking Performance Test Thin Concrete Overlays Pervious Pavements for cold climates Effect of Farm Vehicles on low volume roads Recycled Unbound Bases ◦ Thinner, no dowels ◦ Larger Panels (6X6) ◦ UBOL: Use of fabric as the bond breaker Thickness (thin vs thick) - Anchoring Method Water Transport ◦ Whitetopping: Seal vs. No Seal UBOL – Low Vol Road Whitetopping – Mainline 3” PCC Overlay Fabric 7” PCC 7” PCC 4” and 5” PCC 4” and 5” PCC 5” CL 5 5” CL 5 7” HMA 7” HMA Clay Clay Clay Clay Existing Cell Proposed Cell Existing Cell Proposed Cell ◦ Recycled concrete back into PCC mix (75% CA) ◦ Use of a Geotextile drain under joints (Tensar Partnership) ◦ Thin neoprene joint sealants (DS Brown Partnership) PCC Design 6.0” PCC 7.5” PCC Fabric/Grid 4” CL 1 4” RCA 3.5” CL 5 3.5” CL 5 Clay Clay Existing Cell Proposed Cell Mainline (I-94) DOT Trial Mixing Started Longitudinal Tined Surface 13ft x 15ft Panels 1” Round Dowels Sealed Joints How does pavement texture, stiffness and roughness effect fuel economy? Measured RR in 2011 (MIRIAM device) ◦ over 20 concrete and asphalt surfaces ◦ Poor correlation to MPD Working with FuelMiner on instrumented vehicle for fuel use measurements UC Davis (John Harvey) on model comparison, validation, including Swedish VETO Ground Penetrating Radar Existing Equipment (single frequency) ◦ Asphalt Density ◦ Tie Bars ◦ Layer Thickness, consistency New Step Frequency-GPR ◦ FHWA transferring to us ◦ Advantages Wide detection range Full coverage of a traffic lane in 2 passes at higher speed 2-D and 3-D imaging capability Continuous calibration Norwegian Exchange Anne Lelague – PhD. Student, spent 9 months in Minnesota Comparison of GPR tools and interpretations Detection of ice lenses, frost heave Tunnel Maintenance Residual Salt Measurements Benefits to MnDOT: ◦ Experience with 3D GPR ◦ Exposure to new potential uses Whitetopping –final version delivered for testing yesterday Unbonded Overlays – pooled fund will deliver tool by 2015 Concrete pavements- tool based on MEPDG by end of the year Optimal Timing of PM (pooled fund) ◦ Test to measure aging as it impacts performance ◦ Best to seal first year Bio-Oils for fog seal, additive ◦ Field trial of product (TERRA – Bit Roadways) ◦ Research to determine how to evaluate and approve National Workshop on Pavement Preservation for high volume roads this September ◦ SHPR 2 funded ◦ September 2014 at MnROAD 6” HMA+ 33” CL 4, 1993 Severe transverse & Longitudinal wheel path 2006 Right lane:1½ inch mill & fill PG 52 – 34 IRI 126, 190 Goal: Find a better “cheap fix” for worn out pavements ◦ Tack coat – Scratch Coat - Final surface ◦ Granite Type II ◦ 6 % Kraton polymer modified base asphalt ◦ Base PG 49-34 instead of PG 64-22 Immediately after construction ◦ Right lane 95 in/mi ◦ Left lane 96 in/mi September 2012 ◦ Right lane 100 in/mi 21% improvement in ride ◦ Left lane 99 in/mi 48% improvement in ride September 2013 ◦ Some Reflective Cracking Disc-shaped Compact Tension Test ◦ Fracture Energy Performance test – low temperature cracking, fatigue Impact of binder grade, aggregate and recycled asphalt Testing samples Became aware through these meetings, trip to Norway Public complaints about centerline, edgeline rumble strip noise in certain locations Installed at MnROAD, county and state roads for testing Local Road Research Board evaluating Beginning to Plan for 2016 Working with Research Partners & Customers Interested in your input WWW.Pooledfund.org