Tess of the D’Urbervilles Lecture 3 Phase the First – The Maiden (Chaps 1 – 6) Role of Phase I in the novel to set up the factors that lead to the Tess’s rape / seduction (feckless family, economic necessity, chance / random accident, Tess’s relationships with her parents and Alec; Tess’s personality) to present Tess as essentially a ‘pure’ woman despite her sexual violation / experience – against Victorian stereotypes To what extent can Tess’s plight be attributed to the following factors? By what means does Hardy show this? Factors leading to Tess’s downfall: - Bloodlines - Family - Money and Class Literary methods - Imagery (symbolism, metaphor) - Setting - Narrative voice and perspective Overview Plot construction: the chain of mishaps that forces Tess to claim kin with the D’Urberville family and puts her at the mercy of Alec begins with class and bloodlines and ends with impending financial disaster (‘Distress, if not penury, loomed in the distance’) Tess’s family situation and relationships also help drive the plot. Bloodlines, lineage The opening of the novel reveals an intense concern with bloodlines and ancestral lineages. Blood – a motif that runs through the novel. Draws attention to Tess’s ‘Norman blood’. The discovery of the Durbeyfield family’s ancient lineage sets the stage for the tragic string of events that will end with Tess’s death on the gallows. Contradictory attitudes towards family lineages further complicate the plot later in the novel. Bloodlines, lineage Family names and bloodlines are linked with wealth, reputation, breeding. ‘Our names are worn away to Durbeyfield’. Duality in the presentation of Tess (D’Urberville / Durbeyfield – noblewoman / commoner?) Alec’s family (the Stokes) append the D’Urberville name to their own to whitewash their dubious family history. The events that lead to Tess’s rape / seduction – based on deception Family Contrast between Tess’s relative maturity as the eldest child and her parent’s levity / silliness Seen in the actions of the characters, the images attached to them, and the use of dialogue. Joan Durbeyfield – ‘a happy child’, John Durbeyfield – ‘a slacktwisted fellow’. Husband and wife reinforce each other’s ‘shiftlessness’. Eg. Mrs D helps Mr D to bury Prince; their regular escapes to Rolliver’s. Family Use of dialogue continually emphasises the differences in education levels between Tess and her parents through the contrasting use of dialect and approximately standard English. Eg. “You zid somebody, I suppose?” vs “I saw her son.” (Ch 6) Because of her education, Tess has the potential for financial independence and social advancement through becoming a teacher. But this opportunity is denied her by her parents’ plans for her to ‘claim kin’ with the D’Urbervilles. Family In her relationships with both her parents, Tess is divided between an instinct to act as their guardian and to be skeptical of their ideas, and her perceived duty as daughter to obey. Repeated pattern of compliance motivated partly by guilt about not doing enough for her family. Her instincts prove her good sense; her sense of guilt for what may not be wholly her fault proves her conscience, and because she acts out of love and filial obedience, the folly of some of her decisions is mitigated / made to appear less severe. Family Structural pattern drives the plot forward and reveals Tess’s self-sacrificial tendencies that culminate in the final image of her lying like a human sacrifice on an altar at Stonehenge. Irony – Tess’s good intentions and virtues prove to be her undoing. Both visits to the D’Urbervilles are prompted by ‘the oppressive sense of the harm she had done’ in causing (as she sees it) Prince’s death, despite her misgivings. In each case, Tess’s decision to obey pushes her further towards the eventual disaster. Family Draws attention to the issue of women’s lack of economic power due to the stereotypes imposed on them by social expectations. Highlights class differences that drive the plot forward. Money and Class Class differences are presented as barriers to relationship between Tess and Angel. Contrast between the middle-class Clare brothers (‘of a superior class’) and the group of ‘country hoydens’ that Angel stops to dance with. Class - symbolically represented by clothing: note the formality of the eldest brother’s ‘white tie, high waistcoat, and thinbrimmed hat’. For Tess and Alec, however, class differences act as a catalyst for (a disastrous) relationship, with Tess and her family being financially dependent on the D’Urberville family. Money and Class Tess’s early contributions to the family’s finances (via haymaking, harvesting, milking, butter-making) are presented hyperbolically, often with adjectives that accentuate her positive character traits, sharpening the perceived difference between parents and daughter. “Tess became humanely beneficient towards the small ones, and to help them as much as possible she used, as soon as she left school, to lend a hand….. and being deft-fingered it was a kind of work in which she excelled.” Money and Class The decision to ask Tess to ‘claim kin’ with the D’Urbervilles is founded on the hope of gaining some financial benefit. There is also the hope that an alliance may be formed between the rich relatives and the Durbeyfields – through a hoped-for marriage for Tess. These strategies for economic advancement are seen by her parents as superior to Tess’s plan to look for work as a means of raising the income needed to buy a new horse after Prince’s death. Money and Class ‘…she could not understand why her mother should find such satisfaction in contemplating an enterprise of, to her, such doubtful profit’. Language of business and finance used to describe the project of ‘claiming kin’ with the D’Urbervilles, with Tess’s beauty (and body) being the items up for sale. Money and Class The metaphor of the family as a ship headed into desperate straits puts Tess (and her siblings) in a position of powerlessness – they are ‘captives under hatches’, like slaves trapped in a slave-ship (Ch 3) NB: Britain’s involvement in the slave-trade up to the early 19th century. Money and Class Suggests that Tess is a commodity about to be ‘sold’ for a profit, which in fact is what happens to her when she ‘sells’ her labour to contribute to the family finances, and later when Alec attempts to ‘buy’ her sexual surrender with gifts to her and her family. Metaphorical journey made by Tess and her family paralled in Tess’s literal journeys from place to place in the novel. Setting Use of setting as a symbolic structuring device to mark ‘phases’ in Tess’s life journey. Contrasting settings and Tess’s movements between Marlott and Trantridge show in rich concrete detail the dire economic circumstances of the Durbeyfield family and the contrasting wealth of the D’Urbervilles. Setting Marlott (Vale of Blackmoor / Blakemore) Trantridge Marlott Trantridge Draws attention to Tess’s vulnerability in relation to Alec, who cleverly exploits her family’s financial need to make Tess feel indebted to him. Setting The Vale of Blackmoor / Blakemore - Natural landscape coded as ‘feminine’ - Duality symbolically signalled in the use of names – Blakemore / Blackmoor. - Symbolically linked to the duality in Tess’s character: virginal (‘sheltered’, ‘engirdled and secluded’, ‘for the most part untrodden as yet’) yet sensual (‘fertile’, ‘languorous’, ‘every contour of the surrounding hills’). - Shelters Tess from the outside world: ‘The Vale of Blackmoor was to her the world’. Setting The Durbeyfield cottage - Concretises the poverty of the Durbeyfield family - Eg. ‘unspeakable dreariness’: stone floor, ‘the yellow melancholy of this one-candled spectacle’, cradle in the same room as the washtub, thatched outhouse Setting - - Represents the domestic sphere where women’s work like childrearing and household chores are done (or not done). Associated with drudgery and hardship - a place from which to escape. Tess’s temporary escape comes in the form of the May-Day dance; the Durbeyfield parents escape to Rolliver’s, the local alehouse. Setting Trantridge - The Slopes (the D’Urberville residence) - - Contrasts with the Durbeyfield cottage – concretises the wealth of the nouveau riche D’Urberville family: ‘acres of glass-houses’, stables, ‘extensive lawn’, ‘ornamental tent’ This newly-acquired wealth is highlighted by the simile, ‘Everything looked like money – like the last coin issued from the Mint.’ Setting - - - Represents modernity – ‘almost new’ The ‘family name’ is also newly-acquired – ‘Stoke D’Urbervilles’ Colour symbolism – the ‘rich red colour’ of the buildings is set in contrast against the subdued evergreens of the surrounding forest Contrast between nature and the artifice of the bogus D’Urberville family Narrative voice and perspective Narrator as a distinct character who tells Tess’s story ‘faithfully’ (ie. makes claims for the truth of the story) Omniscient narrator – intrusive comments that guide the reader’s response. Eg. “In the ill-judged execution of the welljudged plan of things the call seldom produces the comer, the man to love rarely coincides with the hour for loving.” Narrative voice and perspective Strength of feeling in telling Tess’s story Omniscient narrator shows readers Tess’s inner responses to her parents to highlight her conflict between duty (and guilt) and instinct. Heightens the reader’s sympathy / pity for Tess. Narrative voice and perspective The narrative locates the blame for the family’s economic hardship squarely on the Durbeyfield parents. In contrast, it absolves Tess of blame by presenting her as contributing to the family finances despite her youth. Pointed narrative comments about the Durbeyfield parents’ irresponsibility “The very shiftlessness of the household rendered the misfortune a less terrifying one… Nobody blamed Tess as she blamed herself.” (p.34) Narrative voice and perspective Use of comedy and commentary by the intrusive narrator – accentuate the ‘shiftlessness’ of the Durbeyfield parents Comedy and irony serve to poke fun at the Durbeyfield parents, accentuating their silliness / folly, and, by contrast, putting Tess in a better light. Eg: Use of bathos in the description of John Durbeyfield his attempt to elevate himself by claiming the name of ‘Sir John D’Urberville’ is set in comic contrast to his use of rural dialect and the ludicrous image of him lying ‘stretched… among the daisies’. Narrative voice and perspective Eg: Irony in John Durbeyfield’s refusal to sell Prince’s carcass for a few shillings on account of his family lineage. At times, Hardy’s humour approaches the slapstick. Eg. ‘… he was sufficiently unsteady to incline the row of three at one moment as if they were marching to London, and at another as if they were marching to Bath’ (p.28) Narrative voice and perspective Self-characterisation of narrator as being unique in his vision -eg. “Yet few knew, and still fewer considered this… to almost everybody she was a fine and picturesque country girl.” Self-conscious narrative - draws attention to the way the story is put together. Highlights points of uncertainty and limited knowledge. Eg. “The name of the eclipsing girl, whatever it was, has not been handed down.” Narrative voice and perspective Use of multiple perspectives (mediated through the 3rd-person omniscient narrator) to construct the character of Tess Tess’s PoV: her thoughts and experiences are presented in a way that heightens the reader’s sympathy for her situation / admiration for her character. Narrative voice and perspective Eg. Description of Tess’s anxious thoughts while waiting for her parents’ return from Rolliver’s (p.24) Highlights a) her sense of responsibility (“Tess began to perceive that a man in indifferent health, who proposed to start on a journey before one in the morning, ought not to be at an inn at this late hour”) b) her power of imagination (“took a mental journey”, “the village was shutting its eyes”). Narrative voice and perspective Mrs Durbeyfield’s view of Tess at Rolliver’s reminds readers that Tess is only a girl Heightens our sympathy for the way Tess is forced to grow up, too fast, too soon “Even to her mother’s gaze the girl’s young features looked sadly out of place amid the alcholic vapours…” (p.28)