International Seminar Education and International Development 29th and 30th of September 2011. Education and Conflict: What place for humanitarianism in resilient systems of education? Impact of armed conflict on primary education: What local responses in Côte d’Ivoire? Dr. François Joseph AZOH Ecole Normale Supérieure Educational Research Network for West And Central Africa GENERAL CONTEXT Conflict period : 2002 - 2011 2002 : Split of the country North: Teaching staff & educational officials called back South Gradual reopening (12% stayed + volunteers) Schools de-linked from MoE until assessment (sept.03) Setup of a minimal administration in early 2004 Issues related to the sitting of national examinations South: Set-up of parallel structures to absorb the displaced Relocation of staff EDUCATION CONTEXT • Enrolment rate in 2001 : 74,2% • Since 2002, enrolment rate = 47,3% (2003) ; 59,5% (2004) ; 59,6% (2005) ; 74% (2006) and 74,3% (2007) • At the beginning of the war in 2002 : 700 000 pupils left school • Only 16% of teachers stayed in conflict area • Before crisis, MoE contribution to educational structures (DREN) = 6 million FCFA • Through crisis, State interrupted subsidies in rebel areas RESEARCH QUESTIONS • • • • What are local initiatives taken during the crisis to ensure the continuity of education ? What are the communities involvement to substitute the lack of State contribution? How communities contribute to ensure the continuity of education ? Beyond the financial aspects, what have been the other factors that have impeded - or hampered - the adequate functioning of the schools? How have these factors been mitigated at the local level and at institutional level (by both central and decentralized administrations)? RESEARCH APPROACH Data collect from different actors: MoE, Conseil General, Mairie, DREN, IEP, EPP (schools), COGES, teachers, pupils and community/parents Interview guide designed for each ‘type’ of respondent A combination of individual interviews & focus groups Criteria for choosing schools: - no significant disruption during conflict School director already in function before/during/after the conflict Fieldwork location : - North = War affected areas in the North South = governmental area Period : 2009 (fieldwork and workshop 1), 2010 (workshop 2) and 2011 (new cases) FIELDWORK LOCATION North = War affected areas Odienne and Bouaké : 4 schools in each site South = government area : Daloa and Guiglo : 4 schools in each site MAIN RESULTS Strategies to reduce the financial gap ? Alternative funding (outside MoE): – – – – – District authorities (Conseil Général et Mairie): built & rehabilitated schools, canteens, teachers housing, provided basic materials and equipment (furniture, kits), paid (some) volunteer teachers (DREN Guiglo & Odienné); Communities/Parents: more pressed in rebel areas COGES: raised additional subsidies from parents for running the schools (between 1.5 and 3 million FCFA/year) COGES: purchasing basic didactic materials in the absence of State donations (chalk, books for teachers, , etc.), basic equipment (tables, benches, desks, etc.) and for paying some of the volunteering teaching staff NGOs, INGOs & development partners : providing local NGOs with cash to pay volunteering teaching staff, then progressively moving away towards in-kind contributions (school rehabilitation, basic equipment) MAIN RESULTS What hampered basic functioning ? Local initiatives to mitigate these factors Absence of administration in rebelcontrolled areas Lack of skilled teaching staff in waraffected areas which resulted in the recruitment of less-skilled staff ; Overrepresentation of skilled teaching staff in areas hosting displaced populations (Daloa); Degradation of equipment and infrastructures; Lack of school kits, or their late arrivals in the schools; A changing perception of the communities with regards to the school: lack of skilled staff resulting in lack of credibility, insecurity, increased poverty and financial pressure… Demotivation of students who prefer opting for income-generating activities In government-controlled areas, functioning of schools mainly driven by the State. For ensuring the schooling of the displaced students and the redeployment of the displaced teaching staff, 3 initiatives : ‘écoles relais’, ‘double vacation’ & ‘classes passerelles’ In rebel-controlled areas, functioning of the schools mainly driven by communities (via COGES), supported by external interventions led by local or international organizations. 4 main pedagogical modes of functioning :‘classes passerelles’, ‘classes multigrades’, ‘jumelage de classes’, or grouping of pupils from different schools in a same site. Teaching organization and sensitization of parents to send back their children to school Contributions for humanitarianism Many donations to support school during crisis • Unicef : recreation and school kits for students, motobikes to pedagogical supervisors • Pam : foods for canteens • Save : fuel for administration, school kits to students, training for COGES managers However, many dysfunctionings limited actions’ impact • Weakness in organisation : no participative approach to identify community members needs • Unequal distribution of actions on sites : some site lack attention whereas others were overdonated • Weakness in coordination created "Cluster Education" EDUCATION AND ELECTORAL CRISIS (November 2010 –April 2011) The current state of education in our study sites ? DREN schools opened Students back to school 93.3% Teachers present 83,4% Pre crisis Current teacher to teacher to pupil ratio pupil ratio 1/34 1/38 War Bouaké 1 affected area Bouaké 2 99.1% (326/329) 97.1% (306/315) 88.5% 78,7% 1/31 1/34 Odienne 78.2% (215/275) 69.9 52,1% 1/42 1/56 Gouvnt Daloa area 100.0% (583/583 78.5 98,1% 1/45 1/36 Guiglo 99.3% (134/135 96.3 95,6% 1/43 1/43 LESSONS LEARNED 1. Resilient schools as illustrating community cohesion instead of community divisions; 2. Community members involvement (via COGES) to save and manage education; THANKS TO SAVE THE CHILDREN NETHERLANDS UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Questions ??