Student Assessment Report 2012-2013 One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013 1 NYS ELA and Math Scores in Grades 3, 4 and 5 Cornwell Avenue and George Washington 2 New York State’s New Baseline Assessments (3-8 ELA and Math) aligned with Common Core State Standards Scale score change from 800 to 450 Commissioner King predicts 30-40% drop in students scoring at proficiency 3 English Language Arts – 3rd Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% 45% 40% 31% 28% 27% 28% GW District Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 20% 0% Cornwell Nassau NYS Public 4 English Language Arts – 4thGrade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% 43% 37% 40% 29% 33% 30% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 20% 0% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 5 English Language Arts – 5th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% 43% 40% 29% 20% 30% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 25% 19% 0% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 6 NYS ELA Scale Score Comparison 2013 Levels 3 and 4 2013 Mean Scale Score 2013 CA GW WH NC NYS CA GW WH NC NYS 3 28% 27% 28% 46% 31% 303 305 304 312 300 4 29% 37% 33% 43% 30% 302 308 305 310 299 5 19% 29% 25% 43% 30% 293 305 300 311 300 7 Math – 3rd Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 60% 45% 42% 44% 47% 40% 34% 20% 0% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 8 Math – 4th Grades Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% 48% 40% 38% 38% 38% 36% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 20% 0% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 9 Math – 5th Grades Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 60% 42% 40% 37% 31% 30% 23% 20% 0% Cornwell GW District Nassau NYS Public 10 NYS Math Scale Score Comparison 2013 Levels 3 and 4 2013 Mean Scale Score 2013 CA GW WH NC NYS CA GW WH NC NYS 3 45% 42% 44% 47% 34% 310 309 310 311 300 4 38% 38% 38% 48% 36% 305 305 305 310 300 5 23% 37% 31% 42% 30% 296 306 302 311 300 11 NYS ELA and Math Scores In Grades 6, 7, and 8 West Hempstead Middle School 12 English Language Arts – 6th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% MS Nassau 42% 40% 30% 27% NYS 20% 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 13 English Language Arts – 7th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% MS 60% Nassau 43% 40% NYS 31% 26% 20% 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 14 English Language Arts – 8th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% 60% 48% MS 40% 34% 31% Nassau 20% NYS 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 15 NYS ELA Scale Score Comparison 2013 Levels 3 and 4 2013 WHMS NC Mean Scale Score 2013 NYS WHMS NC NYS 6 27% 42% 30% 301 311 299 7 26% 43% 31% 294 310 299 8 31% 48% 34% 298 311 299 16 Math – 6th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% MS 60% Nassau 44% 40% 37% NYS 31% 20% 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 17 Math –7th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% MS 60% Nassau 40% 40% 28% NYS 28% 20% 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 18 Math – 8th Grade Percentage of Students Achieving Levels 3 and 4 100% 80% MS 60% Nassau 40% NYS 36% 27% 19% 20% 0% WHMS Nassau NYS 19 NYS Math Scale Score Comparison 2013 Levels 3 and 4 2013 WHMS NC Mean Scale Score 2013 NYS WHMS NC NYS 6 37% 44% 31% 307 311 300 7 28% 40% 28% 304 310 300 8 19% 36% 27% 299 309 300 20 Assessment Report West Hempstead High School 21 Cohort Graduation Rate 100% 90% 89% 93% 95% 96% 96% 96% 80% 2003 Cohort 2004 Cohort 2005 Cohort 2006 Cohort 2007 Cohort 2008 Cohort 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 22 Percentage of Graduates Earning Regents Diplomas 100% 91% 89% 90% 90% 90% 85% 84% 85% 89% 80% 70% 60% 50% 47% 50% 42% 40% 41% 40% 41% 39% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2005- 2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011- 201206 07 08 09 10 11 12 2013 Regents Diplomas Regents with Advanced Designation 23 Percentage Passing Regents Examinations (at or above 65%) 100% 97% 97% 96% 94% 90% 90% 88% 85% 84%84% 80% 95% 91% 75% 73% 81% 81% 85% 91% 83% 82% 80% 82% 77% 71% 70% 71% 70% 88% 88% 89% 83% 81% 77%75% 74%73% 63% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 2009 10% 2010 0% . Sc i th Ea r En v. in g iv H i st or y S lo ba l G ry et eo m G Al ge br a t. En gl ish 2011 2012 24 2013 Percentage Reaching Mastery on Regents Examinations (at or above 85%) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 2009 2010 65% 57% 51% 46% 49% 43% 37% 40% 40% 37% 34% 31% 30% 20% 2011 53% 50% 17% 10% 25% 21% 21% 20% 21% 17% 18% 11% 40% 20% 30%31% 30%29% 21% 23% 2012 2013 9%9% 2%3% En v. Sc i. Ea rt h H S U Li vi ng ist or y lo ba l G et ry eo m G lg eb ra In t. A En gl ish 0% 25 Advanced Placement Data Students who took at least one AP course and test had higher college GPAs and graduation rates than students who took at least one AP course but no tests. Klein, University of Texas, 2007 286 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 245 221 183 121 102 187 195 199 197 131 108 111 104 AP Students 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AP Exams 26 Advanced Placement Data % of Students Scoring 3 + 86% 85% 83% 79% 78% 77% 73% 69% 62% 80% 74% 75% 74% 80% 56% 47% 79% 79% 72% 75% 61% 57% 53% 56% 56% 46% 46% H is t 37% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 U S is t H ro Eu La ng g En C he m is t s C al cu lu lo g B io ry 39% y 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 27 One Goal: Support Student Success How? Improve Instruction by Focusing on Best Practice Monitoring Intervening Assessing 28 Strategic Plan 2011-14 Academic Excellence Use of Data To Improve Instruction Educational Equity Supporting Student Success Educational Technology Community Relations 29 What have we done? 2012-2013 Initiatives Selection of Common Core-aligned math program in K-8 Math professional development K-5 Building, department and grade level meetings to review data 30 What have we done? 2012-2013 Initiatives Vocabulary program—Greek and Latin roots in grades 3-12 Fundations pacing guide and purchase of updated teacher resource materials STELLAR program proposal and curriculum development 31 What have we done? 2012-2013 Initiatives Ongoing curriculum projects K-5 Report Cards aligned with Common Core 32 What do we plan to do? 2013-2014 Initiatives Align instruction and assessments with Common Core Standards Utilize ELA and Math modules on engageny Monitor fidelity of program implementation 33 What do we plan to do? 2013-2014 Initiatives Analyze data through Building-Based Inquiry Teams, Department Meetings, Staff Meetings and Leadership Meetings (ongoing) Electronic planbooks made available to encourage horizontal and vertical sharing of best practice Target areas for instructional improvement 34 What do we plan to do? 2013-2014 Initiatives Identify and share best practices Carefully monitor student progress Maximize all resources to support student success Mobilize parents as partners 35 Improving Instruction: Strategies for 2013-2014 Benchmark each student Analyze data Provide quality intervention 36 Improving Instruction: Strategies for 2013-2014 Monitor progress regularly Promote best practice Professional Development—Common Core, ELA, new Math programs, and instructional strategies 37 Improving Instruction: Strategies for 2013-2014 Mobilize all members and resources of the school community to support student success Work with PASSION and PERSISTENCE 38 Goal 2013-2014 Increase district performance on all New York State Assessments at levels of proficiency by supporting student success. Teamwork starts Day 1! 39 Every day in every setting every person must ask: What have I done to support student success? 40 Five Steps to Reach Our Goal: Know each student—academically and personally Believe in each student Carefully monitor progress Promote best practices Mobilize the school community 41 West Hempstead UFSD Student Assessment Report 2012-2013 We are committed to supporting the success of every student. 42