Capacity
Section 10 CA – ‘All agreements are contracts if they are
made by free consent of the parties competent to
contract for a lawful consideration and with a lawful
object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be
void.’
Section 11 CA – ‘Every person is competent to contract
who is of the age of majority according to the law to
which he is subject, and who is of sound mind, and is
not disqualified from contracting by any law to which
he is subject.’
Asril A. Zakariah
2
Who is competent?
A person who is at the age of majority
Authority: Age of Majority Act 1971, Section 2 provides that
all person in Malaysia attain the age of majority at 18.
Below 18, a person will be considered as a minor or an
infant.
History: Muslim at 18 and Non-Muslim at 21. But law has
been repealed.
Therefore a person of 18 years old can enter into a valid
contract.
Asril A. Zakariah
3
What if the agreement is entered
by a minor?
Answer: The agreement will not be considered as a
contract and it will be void. The effect will be that the
agreement cannot be enforced under the law.
Authority: Section 2(g) CA – ‘an agreement not
enforceable by law is said to be void’
Case: Tan Hee Juan v The Boon Keat [1934] FMSLR 96.
In this case the court held that a transfer of land
executed by an infant is void.
Asril A. Zakariah
4
Contract by Minor: Exception 1
Contract of necessities/necessaries.
Section 69 CA – ‘If a person, incapable of entering into a contract, or
anyone whom he is legally bound to support, is supplied by another
person with necessaries suited to his condition in life, the person
who has furnished such supplies is entitled to be reimbursed from
the property of such incapable person.’
ILLUSTRATIONS
(a) A supplies B, a mentally disordered person, with necessaries
suitable to his condition in life. A is entitled to be reimbursed from
B’s property.
(b) A supplies the wife and children of B, a mentally disordered
person, with necessaries suitable to their condition in life. A is
entitled to be reimbursed from B’s property.
Asril A. Zakariah
5
What are ‘necessaries’?
Not defined but the necessaries supplied must be suited
to his condition in life.
What is necessary differs in each and every case – as
mentioned in the judgment of Government of Malaysia v
Gurcharan Singh [1971] 1 MLJ 211
How to determine that a ‘thing’ contracted is necessary?
Answer: Apply the ‘test’ as to whether it is necessary.
Asril A. Zakariah
6
The Test
It depends on 2 factors:
1. Condition of the life on an infant
2. His actual requirements at the time of the sale and
delivery.
It is necessary when, the ‘thing’ is inevitable to the
infant’s life condition AND the ‘thing’ is so much
required (but not desired) by the infant.
Asril A. Zakariah
7
Cases:
Nash v Inman [1908] 2 KB 1 – a tailor sued for the price of
clothes supplied to an infant who is an undergraduate at
Cambridge. The court held that the action must fail because
the tailor had not adduced any evidence that the clothes were
suitable to the condition in life of the undergraduate and he
was not already adequately supplied with clothes.
Elkington v Amery [1936] 2 All ER 86 – It was held that a
holiday is a necessary if it were for recovery after an illness or
the minor’s condition of life is such that holidays spent in
hotels were the inevitable part of it.
Asril A. Zakariah
8
Contract by Minor: Exception 2
Is ‘education’ a necessary?
YES as was decided in the case of Government of Malaysia v
Gurcharan Singh [1971] 1 MLJ 211
Facts: The Government sued the first defendant as the promisor
and the second and third defendants as sureties for breach of
agreement in writing entered into by them with the plaintiff for
providing a course of training at a Malayan Teacher's Training
Institution. The claim was for $11,500 alleged to be actually spent
by the Government for educating the first defendant. At the time of
the contract being entered into the first defendant was an infant
and the defence was essentially that the contract entered into by
the first defendant was void and that consequently the second and
third defendants were not liable.
Asril A. Zakariah
9
There are two issues in this case:
1. Whether there is a breach of contract?
2. Whether the minor is liable to the claimed sum?
Answer:
1. There is no breach of contract because the agreement is
void due to lack of capacity. He was after all a minor.
2. He is liable to the claimed sum. This is because the
scholarship is for education and education is considered a
necessity.
Asril A. Zakariah
10
Effect: amendment of the law under section 4(a) of the
Contracts (Amendment) Act 1976. Now a scholarship
agreement entered into by an infant is valid when it is granted
by the government, a statutory authority or an educational
institution.
This can be seen applied in University of Malaya v Lee Ming
Chong [1986] 2 MLJ 148.
Asril A. Zakariah
11
Contract by Minor: Exception
3
Contracts of Insurance – section 153(1) and (2) of
Insurance Act 1996 provides: an infant over the age of
10 years old may enter into such contract.
HOWEVER, if he is below 16, he can do so with the
written consent of his parents or guardian.
Asril A. Zakariah
12
Contract by Minor: Exception
4
Contract of service/apprenticeship
The Employment Act 1955 and the Children and Young
Person (Employment) Act 1966
However neither damages nor indemnity can be
recovered from a child or young person for the breach
of any contract of service.
Asril A. Zakariah
13
Person of Unsound Mind
Any contract made by a person of unsound mind is void.
Who is ‘that’ unsound mind person?
Answer: Section 12(1) CA - A person is said to be of sound
mind for the purpose of making a contract if, at the time when
he makes it, he is capable of understanding it and of forming a
rational judgment as to its effect upon his interests.
Case: Sim Kong Sang Peter v Datin Shim Tok Keng [1994] 2
MLJ 517
Asril A. Zakariah
14
Can a person who is ‘sometimes’
unsound enter into a contract?
YES, if at the point he entered into the contract he is sound.
Section 12(2) CA - A person who is usually of unsound mind,
but occasionally of sound mind, may make a contract when he
is of sound mind.
Section 12(3) CA - A person who is usually of sound mind, but
occasionally of unsound mind, may not make a contract when
he is of unsound mind
Asril A. Zakariah
15
ILLUSTRATIONS
(a) A patient in a mental hospital, who is at intervals of sound
mind, may contract during those intervals.
(b) A sane man, who is delirious from fever, or who is so
drunk that he cannot understand the terms of a contract, or
form a rational judgment as to its effect on his interests,
cannot contract whilst such delirium or drunkenness lasts.
Asril A. Zakariah
16