Climate Change Science, politics, policies Rich Conant Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University Irrefutable truths about climate change: 1. CO2 is a greenhouse gas a. CO2 absorbs long-wave radiation – that’s physics 2. CO2 concentrations are increasing a. CO2 occurs naturally b. [CO2] has risen and fallen in the past c. [CO2] is currently increasing rapidly d. Human activities are driving current increases in atmospheric [CO2] 3. All else equal, more CO2 warmer temperatures a. Historical correspondence b. Recent changes What about the climate of the future? 1. How do we make forecasts? a. Climate models – not based on simple extrapolation b. Challenges: diverse, complex drivers of climate system CO2 emission growth rates Fossil fuels, deforestation 10000 Fossil fuel emissions Tropical LUC Temperate LUC 8000 MMt C 6000 4000 2000 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 What about the climate of the future? 1. How do we make forecasts? a. Climate models – not based on simple extrapolation b. Challenges: diverse, complex drivers of climate system 2. What are people doing? a. CO2 emission growth rates b. Deforestation rates CO2 concentrations are increasing: Human activities are driving increases in atmospheric CO2 (IPCC AR4 SPM) Irrefutable truths about climate change: A metaphor for CO2 build-up Dangerous anthropogenic interference w/ the climate system: 450ppm Human emissions: 8.4 GtC/yr and growing; 12 GtC per year in 2030; US currently emits 1.7 GtC, 2.2 GtC expected 2030 Atmospheric concentrations of >380 ppm, today, increasing by about 1-2 ppm/year A natural removal of about 2 GtC per year POP QUIZ! #1 In order to stabilize atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide requires that net global emissions be reduced from today’s levels: A. to 1990 levels B. by 20% C. by half D. by nearly 100% The Kaya identity: Driving forces for CO2 emissions CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Number of people GDP per person Energy per unit of GDP (energy efficiency of the economy) Carbon intensity CO2 per unit of energy (emissions from energy production and use) The Kaya identity: Population CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Number of people GDP per person Energy per unit of GDP (energy efficiency of the economy) Carbon intensity CO2 per unit of energy (emissions from energy production and use) The Kaya identity: Limiting population to reduce greenhouse gas emissions Problems • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Increased populations Procreation Motherhood Large families Immigration Medicine Public health Sanitation Peace Law and order Scientific agriculture Accident prevention (drive 55) Clean air Ignorance of the population problem Solutions • • • • • • • • • • • Decreased populations Abstention contraception/abortion Small families Stop immigration Disease War Murder/violence Famine Accidents Pollution (smoking) The Kaya identity: Population CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Carbon intensity # of people declining as we grow richer The Kaya identity: Prosperity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Carbon intensity # of people declining as we grow richer GDP per person The Kaya identity: Prosperity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Carbon intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow The Kaya identity: Energy intensity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow Energy per unit of GDP (energy efficiency of the economy) Carbon intensity 17 While the global economy grew since 1980, the world also became more energy efficient. This gain in efficiency is illustrated by a significant decline in “energy intensity” – a measure that reflects global energy demand divided by global GDP. For perspective, in 1980, it took over 2.5 barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) energy to generate $1000 of economic output. Over the past 25 years, gains in efficiency helped lower energy intensity by about 1.0 percent per year. From 2005 to 2030, the rate of improvement is likely to increase to about 1.6 percent per year on average reflecting advances in development and deployment of new technologies. As a result, energy intensity in 2030 will be almost 50 percent below the level of 1980. What are all of the technologies to be developed and deployed, independent of climate policies? IPCC 2007 19 Sheehan (2007) The Kaya identity: Energy intensity (IPCC AR4 SPM) The Kaya identity: Energy intensity (IPCC AR4 SPM) Actual emissions growth rate 2000-2006 = 3.3% per year (Raupach et al. 2007) Frozen Technology Baseline 57.5 Billion tonnes carbon dioxide @ 3.0% 38.5 Billion tonnes carbon dioxide @ 1.2% 2007 Assumptions of The Effects of Technological Change on Future Emissions in the SRES Scenarios and IPCC AR4 7000 6000 GtC 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 A1B A1FI A1T A2 B1 Scenario B2 n=6 n=35 AR4 The Kaya identity: Energy intensity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow Happening in developed world (but not in developing – where the real growth is!) Carbon intensity The Kaya identity: Carbon intensity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow Happening in developed world (but not in developing – where the real growth is!) Carbon intensity CO2 per unit of energy (emissions from energy production and use) http://www.exxonmobil.com/corporate/images/enlarged_primaryenergy.jpg The Kaya identity: Carbon intensity (IPCC AR4 SPM) The Kaya identity: Carbon intensity (Pielke et al. 2008: Nature) The Kaya identity: Energy intensity CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow Happening in developed world (but not in developing – where the real growth is!) Carbon intensity happening slowly; takes major investment The Kaya identity: Summary CO2 emissions = people GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity # of people declining as we grow richer we want GDP per person to grow Happening in developed world (but not in developing – where the real growth is!) Carbon intensity happening slowly; takes major investment What about the climate of the future? 1. How do we make forecasts? a. Climate models – not based on simple extrapolation b. Challenges: diverse, complex drivers of climate system 2. What are people doing? a. CO2 emission growth rates b. Deforestation rates c. Kyoto Protocol d. US legislation Perspective Climate policy timeline 2008-2012: 1st Kyoto compliance period 10000 Fossil fuel emissions Tropical LUC Temperate LUC 8000 2000-present: US legislation 2005: Kyoto into effect MMt C 6000 2001: Marrakech accords 4000 1997: Kyoto Protocol 1992: US Energy policy act; incl. Section 1605(b) 2000 1992: Rio Treaty – establishes UNFCCC 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 Perspective Emissions, science, policy 10000 Fossil fuel emissions Tropical LUC Temperate LUC 8000 MMt C 6000 4000 2000 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 What is being done?: Multilevel governance International National Sub-national • Kyoto Protocol • Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development • EU Emissions Trading System • Wal-Mart • Pew Business Environmental Leadership Council • Cities for Climate Protection Network • Carbon tax in France • Land use/ag regulations in NZ • Waxman-Markey Bill (US) • China’s National Climate Change Programme • Japan’s efficiency program • Chicago Climate Exchange • Evangelical Climate Initiative • US Climate Action Partnership • Fort Collins Climate Action Taskforce • Colorado Climate Action Plan • Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative • Carbon Rationing Action Groups • Climate Wise • New Belgium’s Sustainability Program • Personal actions Public Private What is being done?: The Kyoto Protocol • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992/1994) • • Objective: “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” Commitments • Industrialized countries aim to stabilize GHG emissions at 1990 levels by 2000. • Reporting (emissions and policies) What is being done?: The Kyoto Protocol • Created in1997 / took effect in 2005 • Industrialized countries shall reduce aggregate GHG emissions 5.2% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012. • Flexible Mechanisms • • • Emissions trading Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)/ Joint Implementation (JI) Sinks What is being done?: The Kyoto Protocol Country Target (1990** - 2008/2012) EU-15*, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Monaco, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland -8% US*** -7% Canada, Hungary, Japan, Poland -6% Croatia -5% New Zealand, Russian Federation, Ukraine 0 Norway +1% Australia +8% Iceland +10% What is being done?: Policies 2009 (2011?): US climate/energy policy 10000 Fossil fuel emissions Tropical LUC Temperate LUC 2009: Copenhagen 8000 “We understand the gravity of the climate threat, we are determined to act, and we will meet our responsibility to future generations.” MMt C 6000 4000 2007: Bali action plan -Pres. Obama, last Tuesday 2000 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 What is being done?: Kyoto Protocol successor • The “Bali Roadmap” on post-2012 • • Ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action to address climate change by enhancing implementation of the Convention Further commitments for industrialized Parties under the Protocol (“Kyoto successor”) Photos courtesy of IISD What is being done?: In-class assignment For your country: • Determine whether your country is likely to be for or against the Kyoto Successor • Explain the main components of a FAIR international agreement • Explain how your country will reduce emissions in terms of the (1) the bath tub and (2) the Kaya Identity Group1US Group2China Group3Major European country Group4Brazil CO2 emissions = people Group5Oil exporter Group6Small Island Nation Group7Latin America Group8,9,0Any country of interest GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy What is being done?: Important criteria for negotiations For your country: • Likely impacts of climate on nation • Population growth rates (now + future) • Economic growth rates (now + future) • Resoures available • Past emissions • Land use sinks What about the climate of the future? 1. How do we make forecasts? a. Climate models – not based on simple extrapolation b. Challenges: diverse, complex drivers of climate system 2. What are people doing? a. CO2 emission growth rates b. Deforestation rates c. Kyoto Protocol d. US legislation 3. What else can be done to mitigate emissions? a. What can you do? What can you do?: What have you done this morning? The Kaya identity: Personal emissions CO2 emissions = people CO2 emissions = people spending energy CO2 person spending energy GDP person energy CO2 GDP energy Just four factors govern the outcome: Population Economic prosperity Energy intensity Number of people GDP per person Energy per unit of GDP (energy efficiency of the economy) Carbon intensity CO2 per unit of energy (emissions from energy production and use)