Department of Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment
Defense Communities
Town Hall
June 5, 2014
BRAC Downsizing
Legend
BRAC
(Exclusive of Guard and Reserve Sites)
Grand
Forks AFB
Fort
Lawton
Chanute
AFB
Newport
Chem
Depot
Brunswick
Naval Air
Station
Niagara
Falls
USARC
Newport
Naval
Station
Umatilla
Chemical
Depot
Fort
Monmouth
Willow Grove
NAS/JRB
Walter
Reed
AMC
Buckley
Annex
Fort
Monroe
Pueblo
Chemical
Depot
Kansas
AAP
Concord
NWS Seal
Beach
Fort
McPherson
Riverbank
AAP
Fort
Gillem
AF
Research
Lab Mesa
Lone
Star AAP
Red River
Army
Depot
NSA New
Orleans
Roosevelt
Roads Naval
Station
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
Base Realignment and Closure
• Community Assistance
 $115,149,644 in OEA grant assistance has been provided to BRAC 2005
• Property Disposal (as of 09/30/13)
 75,000 BRAC 2005 excess acres
 43,418 acres disposed (58%)
 11 Economic Development Conveyances totaling 30,804 acres have been
approved to support projected creation of 20,550 new jobs
 Success stories
• Challenges
 HUD approvals
 Transition from OEA assistance
 Federal partners have limited funds
 Environment
 Property transfer delays
 Benchmark local experiences
Legend
Compatible Use (JLUS)
JLUS
Fort William
Harrison
Kitsap NB
Ethan Allen Firing Range
Lewis-McChord JB
Auburn TS
Camp Rilea
Minot AFB
Mass.
MR/JBCC
Stones Ranch MR
Aberdeen Proving
Ground
Andrews NAF/
Washington JB
Patuxent River NAS
Klamath Falls
ANG
Ellsworth AFB
Fallon NAS
Fort Indiantown
GAP ARNG
Camp Ashland
Sacramento
Greenlief
TS
Travis AFB
Fort Riley
Camp Clark
Nevada
MTA
Hampton Roads
NW Annex NSA
Fort
Leonard
Wood
Camp
Williams TS
Camp
Roberts
Maneuver TS
Fort Pickett
Boone NGC
Camp
Crowder
Seymour Johnson
AFB/MTRs/MTAs
Redstone
Arsenal
Ventura County NB
El Centro NAF
Seal Beach
NWS
Point Loma NB
Shaw AFB
Columbus
AFB
Sheppard
AFB
San Diego
Metro Region
Charleston JB
Dobbins
ARB
Dyess AFB
San Diego NB
Coronado NB Yuma Proving Phoenix
Ground
San Antonio
JB
Fort
Wainwright/
Eielson AFB
South Potomac NSA/
Indian Head NSF
Quantico MCB
South Potomac NSA/
Dahlgren NSF
Wallops Island SCSC
Fort A.P. Hill
Yorktown NWS
Dare County Range
Cherry Point MCAS
Crane
NSA
Offutt AFB
White Sands Missile
Range/ Holloman
AFB/ Fort Bliss
NAS
Meridian
NAS
JRB Fort
Worth
Camp Swift
Lackland AFB
Kingsville NAS/
Orange Grove NALF
Beaufort MCAS/
Parris Island MCRD
Fort Gordon
Maxwell
AFB
New
Orleans
NAS JRB
Raleigh
Kings Bay
NSB
Tyndall AFB
Keesler AFB
Gulfport
NCBC
Randolph
AFB
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
Compatible Use
• Community Assistance
 $12,019,663 in assistance across 70+ projects (17 nominations in FY14)
• Partnering to Preserve Our Military Presence
 Prevent further encroachment of our local military operations
 Only program where local military sits down with the local community (with
Federal funds) to address compatibility issues
• Challenges
 Climate change adaptation
 Energy siting decisions
 Multi-jurisdictions
 Environmental preservation
 Benchmark local experiences
Legend
Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA)
DIA
University of Michigan,
Ohio State University,
Purdue University
Oshkosh
Commonwealth of
Massachusetts
Allen
County
Solano
County
State of
Connecticut
Commonwealth
of Virginia
Texarkana
Anniston
Army
Depot
State of
Arizona
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
DoD Industry Adjustment Response
• Program Access
– Communities self-identify and request assistance
• May 20, 2014 Federal Funding Opportunity
announcement
• Eligibility
– Job loss of 2,500 in an MSA, 1,000 outside MSA, or 1% of
local workforce
– Direct and significant adverse impact on a community or its
residents
• Funding
– $48.6M budgeted for FY14
– $58.1M requested for FY15
Public Schools on Military
Installations (PSMI)
Legend
PMSI
JB Lewis
McChord
JB McGuire – Dix
– Lakehurst
Fort
Belvoir
Travis AFB
NSA HR/
Norfolk
Dugway
Proving
Ground
NAS Lemoore
NAWS
China Lake
Fort Riley
Edwards
AFB
Kirtland
AFB
Fort Sill
USMC Camp
Pendleton
San Diego
NB
Fort Bliss
Fort Polk
Wheeler/
Schofield AAF
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
Public Schools on Military Installations
Funding
(in Millions)
 Funding – OEA was provided
$770M (FY2011: $250M;
FY2012: $250M; FY2013:
$270M) to construct, renovate,
repair, or expand elementary and
secondary public schools on
military installations to address
capacity or facility condition
deficiencies identified on the
Secretary’s Priority List.
 Sequestration – $43.9M reduction
due to FY13 sequestration. While
there was no FY14 sequestration
impact, unobligated funds remain
subject to future sequestration
reductions.
 Obligations to Date – $371.3M
 Average DOD Investment –
$24.7M/project
Legend
Roads Program (RP)
RP
JB Lewis
McChord
Walter Reed
NMMC – Bethesda
Fort
Belvoir
JB San
Antonio
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
Transportation Infrastructure Improvements
• Transportation infrastructure improvements associated with medical
facilities related to BRAC 2005 recommendations - $300M
(available until expended)
• Program authority - Section 8110, P.L. 112-10
• Executed $290.13M, using competitive process, through grants to
local and state governmental entities and Federal interagency
arrangements with Department of Transportation
• 8 projects across several bases: Walter Reed Military Medical
Center, Bethesda, MD; San Antonio National Military Medical
Center, TX; Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, VA; and Madigan
Army Medical Center, JB Lewis-McChord, WA
• OEA’s construction grant implementation and monitoring activity
will extend beyond 2017
11
Total OEA Programs
Legend
BRAC
JLUS
MG
DIA
RTA
PSMI
RP
Guam
Richmond
Tinian
(North
Field)
Saipan
Northern Mariana
Islands
NCTS
Finegayan
Alaska
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
Guam
Andersen
AFB
OEA GRANTS ADMINISTRATION
• Revised Federal Grant Guidance
 OMB consolidated 8 Federal grants circulars into one “super circular”, effective 12/26/13
 DoD issuance of implementation regulations targeted for 12/26/14
 2 CFR part 200, “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards”
• What This Means for OEA Grantees
 Changes ahead
 Grantees need to be informed of the revised requirements (see OEA website)
 Anticipate additional requirements and processes
 Prior to grant award: pre-award risk assessment, grantee internal controls
 Post-award: on-site monitoring visits, compliance documentation
• OEA Response
 OEA organization and personnel changes
 Information and updates on OEA’s website and through Project Managers
 “Kick-off meetings” with grantees to review grant award terms and conditions
 Planned: webinars and tutorials on OEA’s website; improved user-friendly guidance, dropdown menus and templates in EADS II