Nitrous oxide and the NZ ETS Prof. Tim Clough New Zealand’s specialist land-based university IPCC AR4 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Comparison of annual N2O ODP-weighted emissions from the 1990s [IPCC, 2007 (18, 23)] with emissions of other ozone-depleting substances in 1987, when the emissions of chlorine- and bromine-containing ODSs were near their highest amount, and for 2008. (Ravishankara et al. 2009, Science) N2 O → N 2 + O N2O + O → 2NO NO + O3 → NO2 + O2 O + NO2 → NO + O2 net: O + O3 → 2O2 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Between 1860 to 2005 Davidson (2009) suggests that roughly 2.0% of annual manure-N production and 2.5% of fertilizer-N production have been converted to N2O…these percentage contributions explain the entire pattern of increasing nitrous oxide concentrations over this period Nature Geoscience 2, 659 - 662 (2009) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Wrage et al. 2001 Soil Biol. & Biochem. Nitrification New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Wrage et al. 2001 Soil Biol. & Biochem. Nitrifier-Denitrification New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Need to reduce agriculture’s impact on climate change Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions: Agriculture accounts for 50% of NZ’s total GHG. Nitrous oxide (N2O) has a global warming potential 298 times greater than CO2 over a 100 year period. New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Nitrous oxide emissions from Agricultural soils Greenhouse gas emissions as a percentage of New Zealand's total Agricultural Greenhouse gas emissions in 2003 from NZ agriculture Nitrous Nitrous oxide oxide (34.9% ) 34% Methane 64% (10%>1990) Methane (63.4% ) (27% > 1990 levels) Other (1.7% ) In grazed pastures urine patches are the main sources of nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching 1,000 kg N/ha in urine patch ( = 2 t Urea/ha) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Urea fertiliser only applied at 30 kg N/ha What can we do about N2O? New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Covered feed & loafing pad (Cecile De Klein, AgResearch) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university • • • • Low-nitrogen pasture plants A major new research programme is among the first to be funded by the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre. Led by Dr Susanne Rasmussen, it focuses on the feasibility of growing high-yielding pasture species with a lower nitrogen content. If results prove that growing the species will be viable, this would open up the possibility of farmers being able to maintain pasture productivity while reducing the amount of nitrogen excreted. The outcome would be multiple environmental benefits, for example a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Lownitrogen plants would also address the problem of nitrogen leaching into waterways, helping to improve water quality New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Nitrification rate is related to Ammonia Oxidising Bacteria (AOB) population (Di et al., 2009. Nature Geoscience: 2: 621-624 ) (a) NO 3--N (mg N kg -1 soil) 1000 800 600 y = 847.9 - 739.6EXP(-0.018x) R 2 = 0.56; P < 0.001 400 200 Fitted curve Observed values 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 AOB amoA gene copy numbers (million copies g-1 soil) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 140 Nitrification inhibitor temporarily blocks the active site of a specific enzyme (ammonia monooxygenase) inhibitor New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Nitrification inhibitors can reduce nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching N 2O NH4+ ---Cation exchange Nitrification inhibitor slows down the rate of nitrate production and thus reduces the nitrogen New Zealand’s specialistlosses land-based university NO3- Nitrification inhibitor thus restricts ammonia oxidising bacteria (AOB) population growth in soil (Di et al., 2009. Nature Geoscience: 2: 621-624 ) (a) Copy numbers g -1 soil 5.0E+07 Control Urine Urine + DCD 4.0E+07 3.0E+07 2.0E+07 1.0E+07 0.0E+00 0 20 40 60 Days since start of treatments New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 80 100 AOB activity data show response to urine and inhibition by DCD nitrification inhibitor RNA copy numbers µg-1 RNA (Di et al., 2009. Nature Geoscience: 2: 621-624 ) 5.0E+04 4.0E+04 3.0E+04 2.0E+04 1.0E+04 0.0E+00 Control Urine Urine + DCD Control AOB AOA Treatments New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Urine Urine + DCD Nitrification inhibitor reduces the nitrate concentration in soil (Di et al., 2009. Nature Geoscience: 2: 621-624 ) (c) NO 3--N (mg kg -1 soil) 1200 Control Urine Urine + DCD 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0 20 40 60 Days since start of treatments New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 80 100 Inhibitor is applied in April/May and July because most leaching occurs in the winter/early spring CHRISTCHURCH: Mean Soil Temperature (at 10cm) and Estimated Drainage (mm) 50 20 Estimated Drainage (mm) inhibitor 18 inhibitor 16 35 14 30 12 25 10 20 8 15 6 10 4 5 2 0 0 0 40 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Months New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Soil Temperature 45 Drainage (mm) Soil Temp (C) Nitrous oxide gas emissions from gas chambers placed on lysimeters for a standard 40 minutes each day. New Zealand’s specialist land-based university DCD reduced N2O emissions by 81% in the Waikato Horotiu soil (Di et al., 2010) 1600 Urine Urine + Eco-N Control Daily N2O flux (g N2O-N ha-1 d-1) 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 3/05/06 23/05/06 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 12/06/06 Sampling date 2/07/06 22/07/06 Soil Location of soil irrigation (mm/y) DCD EF3 (%) in EF3 (%) Di & Cameron (2002) Spring Lismore Canterbury 1,360 No 3.8 - Soil Use & Management 18, 395-403. Lismore Canterbury 1,360 Yes 0.7 82 Lismore Canterbury 850 No 2.2 - Autumn Autumn Autumn Spring Spring Spring Spring Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes 0.6 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 73 73 82 73 73 87 Di & Cameron (2006) Autumn Lismore Canterbury 1,050 No 1.9 - Autumn Autumn Spring Spring Autumn Autumn Autumn Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Lismore Templeton Templeton Templeton Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050 Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes 0.7 0.6 0.5 2.6 0.7 3.1 1.2 1.4 65 70 73 73 61 56 Winter Templeton Canterbury 1100 No 2 Winter Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Spring Spring Templeton Lismore Lismore Horotiu Horotiu Taupo Taupo Canterbury Canterbury Canterbury Waikato Waikato Taupo Taupo 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.02 Lismore Lismore Mataura Mataura Harihari Harihari Lismore Lismore Mataura Mataura Harihari Harihari Canterbury Canterbury Southland Southland West Coast West Coast Canterbury Canterbury Southland Southland West Coast West Coast 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 1100 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes 3 1.4 2 0.9 1.9 0.8 3.9 1 1.5 1 1.4 0.4 Reference Season Spring Di & Cameron (2003) Autumn Soil Use & Management 19, 284-290 Biology & Fertility of Soils 42, 472-480. Autumn Di et al. (2007) Soil Use & Management 23, 1-9. Di et al. (2009) in press Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn Autumn 73 63 67 80 54 55 58 74 33 71 New university Average EF3Zealand’s reductionspecialist (%) for all land-based trials 68% (s.e. = 2.5) 57% ( 3.1) •A consolidated table of all NZ published data on N2O reductions by DCD (de Klein et al. 2011) . •Data from over 45 New Zealand trials under a wide range of soil, environment and management conditions. •The average N2O reduction with DCD was 57% ( 3.1). “The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Expert Review Team commended New Zealand for incorporating the effect of the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD), into its country-specific emissions factors, as DCD represents a potentially significant mitigation option that may gain increased use over time” http://www.maf.govt.nz/news-resources/news/more-accurate-science-improvesagriculture%E2%80%99s-green New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Nitrate leaching losses New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Soil lysimeter facilities in different regions Waikato: Horotiu soil New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Canterbury: Templeton and Lismore Taupo pumice soil DCD reduced nitrate leaching from a Canterbury Lismore soil (Di et al., 2009) NO3--N concentration (mg L-1) 300 Urine Urine + DCD 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 Cumulative drainage (mm) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 250 300 350 NO3--N leaching loss (kg ha-1) Nitrate leaching losses reduced in a range of South Island soils (Di et al. 2009) 56% 600 67% 71% 44% 56% Urine only 500 Urine plus eco-n (May + Aug) 400 300 200 100 0 Urine Urine + DCD Canterbury Urine Urine + DCD Southland Urine Urine + DCD West Coast 1100 mm rainfall New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Urine Urine + DCD Southland Urine Urine + DCD West Coast 2200 mm rainfall Treatments Nitrate leaching losses reduced in North Island Soils Data from Shepherd et al. 2009 (AgResearch). FLRC Conference Proceedings. 700 Urine only NO3- - N leaching loss (kg ha-1) 31% 35% 55% 600 33% Urine plus eco-n (May + Aug) 500 400 300 200 100 0 urine urine+DCD urine Waikato urine+DCD Northland 1100mm rainfall New Zealand’s specialist land-based university urine urine+DCD Waikato urine urine+DCD Northland 2200mm rainfall Treatments AgResearch study showed DCD reduced nitrate leaching lost by between 21 and 56%, depending on the year of study (P < 0.05) New Zealand’s specialist land-based university (Monaghan et al. 2009. NZJ Agricultural Research 52; 145-159) FertResearch Fact Sheet #11 “Nitrification Inhibitors” Paddock scale reduction in nitrate leaching PER HECTARE PER YEAR 10-30% 25-40% North Island South Island http://www.fertresearch.co.nz/code-of-practice/factsheets New Zealand’s specialist land-based university DCD degradation and soil temperature 160 NZ data Half life, days 120 80 40 International literature (4 studies) 0 0 10 20 Temperature, deg C Kelliher & Clough et al. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 30 Inhibitor effects on other soil microbes? AgResearch study concluded that: • “DCD had little impact on the overall soil bacterial activity. • In contrast the microbes targeted by DCD, the ammoniumoxidising bacteria, were significantly affected by DCD with reductions in population size and altered activity. • The results suggest that application of DCD to pasture is a relatively benign intervention that has an important role to play in mitigating the environmental hazards imposed by ongoing land use intensification.” New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Pasture Production New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Retaining more nitrogen in the soil can produce more pasture growth Lincoln University Lincoln University Control plot: no ‘eco-n’ ‘eco-n’ plot New Zealand’s specialist land-based university National Trial Series shows significant increases in pasture growth from dicyandiamide. (132 data sets from 37 large on-farm grazed pasture trials) Increase in DM response (%) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% North Island South Island NZ overall Carey et al. (2011). New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Thank you New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Calculating DCD emission factors (EF) EF1 ' plusDCD ' ( IPCC default EF1) ( IPCC default EF1 50% 5 months ) 0.0099 100% 12 months kg N2O/kg fertiliser-N EF 3PRP ' plus DCD n' ( IPCC default EF 3PRP) ( IPCC default EF 3PRP 50% 5 months ) 0.0079 100% 12 months kg N2O/kg excreta-N (Clough etspecialist al. 2007 land-based Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. New Zealand’s university 78:1-14. ) Table 8 Module Submodule Worksheet Sheet Pasture, range and paddock AWMS PRP nil DCD PRP plus DCD 2003 Agriculture (New Zealand) Agricultural soils 4.5 (3 of 5) Direct nitrous oxide emissions from animal production (grazing animals) N excretion Emission Total direct Total direct for AWMS factor for animal prodn. animal PRP AWMS (EF3 emissions prodn. (kg N) of N2O-N (Gg) emissions PRP) (kg N2O-N/kg of N2O (Gg) N) 1,386,897,313 143,375,290 #Assumes 25% of dairy cattle under eco-n regime New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 0.0100 0.0079 13.869 0.836 21.794 1.314 Effect of eco-n on N2O inventory nil eco-n N2 O emissions relative to 1990 (%) eco-n 5 month effective period eco-n 5 month effective period but weighted emissions of 84% 130 128 126 124 122 120 118 116 114 0 10 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university 20 30 40 50 60 % dairy cattle under eco-n regime 70 80 New Zealand’s specialist land-based university