IPPIC 5 years anniversary at the IMO IPPIC 4th Global Marine Coatings Forum Singapore 6-8 November 2012 Ole Borring Sørensen Hempel A/S On behalf of IPPIC PSPC and Anti-fouling Working Groups 5 years anniversary November 2007: IMO granted consultative status to IPPIC November 2012: 4th Global Marine Coatings Forum IPPIC – a global organization The IPPIC network Anno 2012 How IPPIC can contribute to IMO Examples taken from IPPIC’s 2007 application: • IPPIC can provide global expertise on marine coatings formulation: • Independent from the chemical industry • Unique knowledge on R&D and application of marine coatings • Members made major investments in R&D for marine products • Members are the primary resource for information on the development and use of ingredients: • Environmental considerations relating to the use of antifouling systems • Support of the on-going IMO activity on the AFS Convention Continued on next slide How IPPIC can contribute to IMO Examples taken from IPPIC’s 2007 application: • IPPIC members possess a wealth of experience in: • Technical issues • Environmental issues • Safety issues associated with protective coatings. • This expertise is extremely valuable to MSC on performance standards for marine coatings. • IPPIC’s network of dangerous goods transport experts can provide IMO with resources on Specialized Product Shipments Anti-fouling activities prior to 2007 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 CEPE & JPMA: IMO discussions on the effect of AF use AFS Convention AFS implementation Various correspondence and working groups PSPC activities prior to 2007 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 PSPC Correspondence group PSPC WG IACS JWG IMO recognition First CEPE representation WG activities until today 2006 2007 2008 2009 Correspondence groups: Void spaces, PMA and COT 2010 2011 2012 IPPIC JWG PSPC WG AF WG Ballast water management IMO recognition IACS JWG/COT 2014 Was there a need for a PSPC WG? Yes, because: • We were involved too late in the PSPC process • The co-operation within the industry was not fully utilized • We have been few actors in IMO delegations and in working groups • No agreed mandate We looked for: • More networking – also with other interest groups within the IMO work • Thoroughly discussed policies to the benefit of everybody • More shoulders to bear the workload. IPPIC activities in IMO IPPIC has submitted 15 documents since 2007 – alone or together with other organizations IPPIC submissions Paper symbol DE 51/19/3 DE 52/14/1 MEPC 60/13 MEPC 60/4/21 MSC 87/INF.9 MSC 87/7/2 MSC 87/3/8 Sub-Title Draft Performance Standard for protective coating for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers Report of Industry JWG/COTCPS Development of Cargo Oil Tank Coating Performance Standard The generation of biocide leaching rate estimates for anti-fouling coatings and their use in the development of proposals to amend annex 1 of the AFS Convention The importance of using effective anti-fouling coatings in relation to greenhouse gas emissions from shipping Information on coating test development Comments on the report of the DE Sub-Committee Proposed entry into force dates for new SOLAS regulation II-1/3-11 on Corrosion protection of cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers IPPIC submissions Paper symbol Sub-Title Survey and certification under the AFS Convention – recognized MEPC 61/14 organizations' type-approval schemes for anti-fouling paints Amendment (36-12) to the IMDG Code and supplements Revision of DSC 16/3/5 provisions for allocation of segregation groups to mixtures, solutions or preparations shipped under N.O.S. entries DSC 16/3/11 Documentation of technical names for marine pollutants DSC 16/3/12 Documentation of aquatic and marine pollutants MEPC 63/INF.9 Information on coating test development DSC 17/3/1 Documentation of Marine Pollutants DSC 17/3/2 PP1 loads on roll-on/roll-off ships MEPC Considerations regarding testing to ensure compatibility between Ballast 64/INF.21 Water Management Systems and ballast tank coatings IPPIC finger prints on IMO documents Standard/guideline Adopted Enter into force MSC.215(82) PSPC for Dedicated Seawater Ballast Tanks in All Types of Ships and Double-skin Spaces of Bulk Carrier December 2006 1 July 2008 MSC.244(83) PSPC for void spaces on bulk carriers and oil tankers October 2007 Non-mandatory MSC.1/Circ.1279 Guidelines for corrosion protection of permanent means of access arrangements May 2008 Guidelines May-June 2009 Guidelines December 2010 May 2010 Mandatory MSC.1/Circ.1330 Guidelines for Maintenance and Repair of Protective Coatings MSC.1/Circ.1381. revised NACE standard SP0508-2010 as part of modified footnotes in MSC,215(82) and MSC.288(87) MSC.288(87) PSPC for Cargo Oil Tanks of Crude Oil Tankers MSC.1/Circ.1399 Guidelines on procedures for in-service maintenance and repair of coating systems for cargo oil tanks of crude oil tankers MEPC.207(62) Guidelines for the control and management of ships’ biofouling to minimise the transfer of invasive aquatic species Invited to apply on or after 1 January 2011 1 January 2013 June 2011 July 2011 Voluntary Joint Research Projects Comparison of The Effect of Hypochlorite Solutions on Different Ballast Water Tank Coatings, September 2012 Comparison of test methods on coatings for water ballast treatment systems using chlorine and proposal for test methodology, TÜV Rheinland Nederland, September 2012 DE 53, Agenda item 7, Cargo Oil Tank Coating and Corrosion Protection – Information on coating test development. Presentation given during IMO DE 53 meeting, 22 February 2010 Assessment of the influence of the different constituents in artificial crude oil mixtures (6 months), July 2010 Working group members PSPC WG members 2012 Chugoku Hempel International Paint Jotun Kansai Paint Nippon Paint Sherwin-Williams Sigma Coatings (PPG) Technically highly skilled professionals having the knowledge, experience and motivation to participate in the activities of the groups Working group members AFWG members 2012 Formulators Chugoku Hempel International Paint Jotun Kansai Paint Nippon Paint Sherwin-Williams Sigma Coatings (PPG) Suppliers: American Chemet, Bardyke, Dow, Janssen, Lanxess, Lonza, Nordox, Speiss-Urania Conclusions What have the working groups achieved? • Recognized in IMO as the coatings industry’s true representative • Contributed to IMO correspondence-, working- and drafting groups • Contributed to the interpretation of performance standards for coatings • Contributed to Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ Biofouling Continued on next slide Conclusions • Contributed to maintenance and repair guidelines for ballast tanks and cargo oil tanks • Obtained acceptance for technically more relevant test standards for void space coatings • Obtained an extended implementation period for PSPC/COT allowing more time for developing and testing complying coatings • Established co-operation between GESAMP and NACE as regards corrosion tests for Ballast Water Management systems 5 years anniversary Thank you to those that have supported us. Congratulations to the IPPIC organization and those companies and individuals dedicated to the work within IMO Paint – Recognised through ages Specification for Noah’s Ark: • • • • • Coating: Pitch inside and out LOA: 140 meter Breadth moulded: ~23 meter Draught: ~10 meter GT: ~15,000 tonnes •Pitch is black, and ballast tank coatings must be of a light colour •Pitch is not a hard coating such as epoxy •No specification for number of coats or thickness of the coating •Finally, there was nobody there to type approve the pitch and its manufacturer. So Noah’s Ark does not meet IMO Res. MSC.215(82)