Bactiquant Water Rapid Onsite Screening for Assessing Legionella

advertisement

Bactiquant Water

Rapid Onsite Screening for Assessing

Legionella Risk

Presented by Lisa Rogers

“Legionellosis emerged because of human alteration of the environment, since

Legionella species are found in aquatic environments, and thrive in warm water and warm, damp places, such as cooling towers”

Legionella and the prevention of legionellosis, WHO 2007

World Wide

• Since 1976, 35 outbreaks reported 2-800 cases

– 11 in NA (US/CA)

– 14 in AUS/NZ

– 10 in Europe

• Sources

– 13 Cooling towers

– 5 each, Spas/hot tub, DHW, AC, and 4 unknowns

– Misc include potting mix, fountain, industrial systems

Year

2012

2012

2012 Scotland

2012 Chicago , Illinois

SW of Edinburgh

JW Marriott Hotel

2012 Auckland, NZ Unknown

2012 Stoke-on-Trent , UK Warehouse, Fenton

2012 Pittsburgh, PA VA Hospital

2013

City

Québec City,

Canada

Calp , Spain

Queensland , AUS

Location

Lower Québec City

Cause

Possibly cooling towers

AR Diamante Beach Hotel

Possibly solar water heating system for spa and DHW

Wesley Hospital

Possibly

Hot tub unknown cooling towers

Decorative Lobby Fountain

Water Source and/or AC

18

99

10

11

19

22

NYD, probably hot water system. 2

Cases

Fatality rate

180 7 %

17%

3%

30%

9%

5%

27%

50%

2013 Memphis , TN 24-Hour Fitness NYD probably pool or spa.

3 0%

2013 Milwaukee , WI Not yet determined Not yet determined, ongoing 20

2013 Reynoldsburg, OH

Wesley Ridge Retirement

Comm

2013 Warstein , Germany Warsteiner Brewery

Potable water system, ongoing 44

Air conditioning, ongoing 165

2013 Florence, AL Glenwood Nursing Home

Unknown, still under investigation.

13

Concerns

• CDC estimates 8,000 to 18,000 people are hospitalized each year in the U.S. Mortality rate is approximately 15%

Legionella bacteria are found naturally in the environment

• French study found that L. pneumophila can travel airborne at least 6 km from its source

• Norway study found high velocity, large drift & high humidity in air scrubber… spread probably for >10 km

• WHO estimates the cost savings to implement preventive plans is $1-3M USD per life saved. (1200 x 1M= $1.2B)

Ideal Water Conditions

• Temperatures between 20° and 50°C (68° - 122°F)

• Optimal growth range is stagnant water 35° - 46°C [95° - 115°F]

• pH between 5.0 and 8.5

• Available iron and copper

• Sediment/scaling promote growth of commensal microflora

• Other micro-organisms including algae, flavobacteria, and Pseudomonas, which supply essential nutrients for growth of Legionella or harbor the organism (amoebae, protozoa)

• Low biocide concentrations

Water Sampling Guidelines

Table III:7-1. COLONY FORMING UNITS (CFU) OF LEGIONELLA PER MILLILITER

Action Cooling Tower Domestic Water Humidifier

1

2

100

1,000

10

100

1

10

Action 1: Prompt cleaning and/or biocide treatment of the system.

Action 2: Immediate cleaning and/or biocide treatment. Take prompt steps to prevent employee exposure.

Source : OSHA, 1999

CDC recently testified that there is no safe level !

Current Sampling Strategy

Culture Plate Analysis

• 3-5 days for HPC

• 7-10 days for Legionella

• Planktonic, highly variable, overloading, background interferences

PCR

• fast but expensive

How BQW can help

Rapid test can be performed in 15-30 mins

Easy Sampling and

Analysis

EPA ETV verified methodology

Enzyme substrate

Bacteria-enzyme

Fluorescent compound released

+

Principle Method

Why is Bactiquant Technology interesting ?

• Culture-independent technique

• Quantification of a naturally occuring hydrolase enzyme activity present in bacteria

• High specificity to bacteria, little background interference

• Use of fluorescence technology = high sensitivity

• Concentration Step = increased sensitivity and significant reduction in detection time

Laboratory Comparison BQW

10000000

1000000

100000

10000

1000

100

10

1

1 10 100 1000 10000

BactiQuant analysis result (fu/ml)

100000 1000000

EPA ETV Report Excerpt

Table 2: Linearity: BQ Value vs Concentration

Test

Organism

Concentration

Range

(CFU/mL)

Range of

Average BQ values

Lake Water

Indigenous

Bacteria

Lake Water

Indigenous

Bacteria without 1:5 dilution

3.7 x 10 2 to 6.0 x 10 3

3.7 x 10 2 x 10 3 to 3.0

1542 to

15607

1542 to

11106

P. aeruginosa

ATCC 27853

8.7 x 10 2 to 8.0 x 10 3

868 to 7655

Source Battelle / US EPA -2011

Slope

2.38

3.55

0.95

Yintercept

Coefficient of

Determination

(R 2 )

2243

739

-136

0.9138

0.9689

0.9923

Test Iteration

1

2

3

4

5

Average

Standard deviation

RSD (%)

Source Battelle / US EPA -2011

8.0 x 10 3

CFU/mL

11392

12332

11376

11513

11614

11645

396

3.4

EPA ETV Study Excerpt

High reproducibility

Adjusted Fluorescence (fu)

4.7 x 10 3

CFU/mL

2.1 x 10

CFU/mL

3 8.7 x 10 2

CFU/mL

6128

6074

6012

2799

2710

2559

1249

1247

1297

6508

6256

6196

2768

2945

2756

1437

1375

1321

196

3.2

140

5.1

83

6.3

EPA ETV Report Excerpt

Table 3. Bactiquant®-test Repeatability and Inter-Assay Reproducibility

Test Iteration

Average

BQV Fluorescence (flu)

Indigenous Bacteria from Lake

Water

(3.7 x 10 2 CFU/mL)

Analyst 1 Analyst 2

P. aeruginosa

(4.7 x 10

Analyst 1

3

ATCC 27853

CFU/mL)

Analyst 2

2363 2225 6888 6691

Standard deviation

RSD (%)

RPD (%)

152

6.4

6.0

57

2.6

333

4.8

2.9

93

1.4

Table 3 summarizes the repeatability and inter-assay reproducibility results for Bactiquant ® -test using two bacterial cultures in water. Two different people analyzed 4 samples of each culture, using different fluorometers .

CASE STUDIES

7

6

5

4

BQ value 1000

3

1

2

BQ value 100

BQ value 10

BQ

Legionella pneumophila serotype 2-14

0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69

Critical care facility, Courtesy of Clinical Microbiology Institute, Viborg Hospital, Denmark

2006.

X-axis Sample No. (1-70)

Y-axis Log10(adjusted fluorescence) and Log10(cfu) Legionella pneumophila serotype 2-14

Australia Case Study

• Wesley Hospital, Queensland: 2 cases, 1 death

• 5 Building, 560 bed facility

• Heat Treatment for 2 weeks @ 70C ( 158F)

• Over 3000 samples collected BQ, Legionella,

HPC

• 13 days to reopen, 29 days fully operational

• BQ used to screen, verify cleaning efficacy and validate post treatment

Comparison between Pre-Treatment (Blue), and Post Treatement samples collected on the 26/9 (Red) and the 30/9 (Green)

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

104 110 114 135 226 226 Dirty 237A 237B

Room Number

285 315 316 609 L6 Endo Int

2

Pre-Treatement

Post Treatement (26/9)

Post Treatement (30/9)

1200

1000

800

600

400

1600

1400

Mains water 1

Mains water 2

200

0

25.09 11:00 26.09 12:00 26.09 13:00 26.09 14:30 26.09 16:00 26.09 17:00 26.09 18:30 30.09 12:00 30.09 13:30 30.09 14:30 30.09 16:30 30.09 18:00

Sample

“CETEC made use of the Bactiquant® water technology for the rapid screening of total bacterial loading within the potable water network. This technology allowed CETEC in under an hour to obtain results superior to plate count for the network. The ability to obtain rapid results as compared to 4 to 10 day timeframe for conventional methods presented significant time, logistical and financial savings.”

Excerpt from: The Australian Hospital Engineer, September 2013

New Studies

The Danish Health

Institute has started a two year project now with multiple sites looking at pre-screening as well as post treatment efficacy.

Hopefully, some results from that study will be forthcoming later this year.

Pros and Cons

• Rapid onsite testing aids in identifying hotspots

• Validate the efficacy of cleaning methods

• Monitor for changes in system quickly

• HPC nor BQW a perfect predictor of Legionella

• Not a substitute for direct Legionella analysis

Do you have any questions?

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!

Lisa Rogers

Lrogers@mycometer.com

813-831-6511 www.mycometer.com

BOOTH ON AISLE 3000

Download