Tension and Change Leith_sharp@harvard.edu Sharp.leith@gmail.com Vision Tension • The core emotional burden of facing the facts Earth Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Vision Tension • The core emotional burden of facing the facts • The internal tension of having a larger vision that exists in stark contrast to reality What is the Unique Leadership Challenge Posed by The Environmental Imperative? The global environmental imperative requires us to change the way in which we do almost everything. The end goal, environmental sustainability, is a moving target. Therefore our organizations must develop a greater capacity for change and the related processes of continuous improvement and organizational transformation. Philosophically speaking our core shift is to attend to what is between. To attend to the context in which individual elements interact. To tap the power of the generative capacity in the relationship between individual elements. To assume that the individual element is not fixed in its capacity or fully known in isolation. To embrace the emergent source that exists between individual elements and between systems. As a profession we are perhaps being called upon to midwife an awakening of the power and possibility that lies between all the people and processes that we have heretofore structured into isolation and fragmentation in the mistaken pursuit of mastery over. Perhaps a large part of our destiny is to help ourselves and others to grow back into the humbling life of ‘relationship with’ in place of ‘mastery over’. There is a joy in this reunion, some part of us hungers for it – we have this going for us right from the beginning. Vision Tension • The core emotional burden of facing the facts • The internal tension of having a larger vision that exists in stark contrast to reality • The internal tension of framing vision into components and selling points without losing the bigger and deeper vision Market Innovation (Technology, Products & Services) Conceptual and stylised representation of waves of innovation Source: TNEP (2005) Policy and Regulation (State, Local and Institutional) Climate Action Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets (20 states) Emissions Caps for Electricity (16 states) Climate Action Plans (36 states) Active Climate Legislative Commissions and Executive Branch Advisory Groups (23 states) Regional Initiatives (32 states) GHG Reporting and Registries (41 states) Transportation Sector Vehicle GHG Emissions Standards (17 states) Mandates and Incentives Promoting Biofuels (39 states) VMT-Related Policies and Incentives Low Carbon Fuel Standard Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Policies Plug-in Electric Vehicles Energy Sector Public Benefit Funds (20 states) Renewable & Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards (33 states) Net Metering Programs (52 states) Green Pricing Programs (12 states) Energy Efficiency Resource Standards (21 states) Financial Incentives for Carbon Capture & Storage (16 states) Building Sector Residential Building Energy Codes (38 states) Commercial Building Energy Codes (37 states) Green Building Standards for State Buildings (29 states) Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Programs….? Green Jobs (Re-training existing, creating new green jobs) New and Emerging Green Job Training Greater Demand for Existing Occupations Re-Training Existing Occupations State California Green Jobs as % of all Private and Public Sector Employment 3.4% Northern California 8.1% Oregon (Private only) 3.0% Michigan 3.0% Washington State 3.3% What is our “True North”, the direction in which we can keep resetting our compass as we travail the disorienting landscape along the path of change? Over time we have removed our senses further and further from the natural world. As we have left our sensual connection to the natural world, as individuals, communities and society – we have cut ourselves adrift from any feedback as to the effects of our choices. We have fallen out of relationship with the natural world and as a result almost every natural life support system is now in decline. Our core journey is a journey back into relationship with our living planet, with each other and with ourselves. Tensions of Working in Complex Systems • The scale of the task ahead, the enormous complexity of our organizations/communities and the relative lack of formal power and resourcing we have Tensions of Working in Complex Systems • The scale of the task ahead, the enormous complexity of our organizations/communities and the relative lack of formal power and resourcing we have • The emerging identity of our profession, the expectations of others Tensions of Working in Complex Systems • The scale of the task ahead, the enormous complexity of our organizations/communities and the relative lack of formal power and resourcing we have • The emerging identity of our profession, the expectations of others • Orienting ourselves to a diverse and ever changing array of personalities, agendas, power dynamics Seeing Our Role More Clearly • There is a degree of ongoing disorientation, feeling torn, feeling unclear about where the leverage is and generally feeling overwhelmed • Can we start developing more mental models (and continuously improving these) that will give us a greater conscious grasp of the landscape up front? Earth Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Energy supply & distribution Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Material supply & disposal Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Water supply & disposal Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building operations Food Supply Building construction Transportation Landscaping Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Climate systems Disturbance Leadership Culture Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Finance & Accounting Management Structures Policy Instruments Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Energy supply & distribution Procurement systems Material supply & disposal Decision Making Processes Food Supply Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Human resources Water supply & disposal Planning Processes Building construction Regulatory, Market, & Community Context Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building operations Transportation Landscaping Information Systems Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Values Spirituality/Meaning Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Individual System Leadership Family Culture Financial Goals Finance & Accounting Culture/Community Management Structures Social Connections Policy Instruments Status Information Systems Occupation Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Energy supply & distribution Procurement systems Skills/Abilities Material supply & disposal Decision Making Processes Health Food Supply Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Human resources Water supply & disposal Planning Processes Building construction Regulatory, Market, & Community Context Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building operations Transportation Landscaping Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Values Spirituality/Meaning Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Individual System Leadership Family Culture Financial Goals Finance & Accounting Culture/Community Management Structures Social Connections Policy Instruments Status Information Systems Occupation Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Energy supply & distribution Procurement systems Skills/Abilities Material supply & disposal Decision Making Processes Health Food Supply Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Human resources Water supply & disposal Planning Processes Building construction Regulatory, Market, & Community Context Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building operations Transportation Landscaping Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Values Spirituality/Meaning Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Individual System Leadership Family Culture Financial Goals Finance & Accounting Culture/Community Management Structures Social Connections Policy Instruments Status Information Systems Occupation Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Energy supply & distribution Procurement systems Skills/Abilities Material supply & disposal Decision Making Processes Health Food Supply Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Human resources Water supply & disposal Planning Processes Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building construction Building operations Transportation Landscaping Regulatory, Market, & Community ContextA lot of tension emerges from the interdependence of these spheres We Need to Make Change Easier: We Need to Know How our Organizations Really Work Our organizations are limited in their capacity for rationality but they do still have patterns, rules and incentives that can be understood. O rg an izatio n s are sev erely lim ited in th eir cap acity to b eh av e ration ally d u e to inh eren t ch aracteristics su ch as: • co m p lex ity, • lim ited cap acities to calcu late all p aram eters, • th e tend en cy to w ard s ‘satisfycin g ’, • frag m en tatio n o f p roblem an d so lution elem en ts, • lim ited o rg an izatio n al rep erto ires, • sh ifting co alitio n s, • sh o rtag es o f tim e an d atten tion , • q u asi reso lution s to co n flict and • u n certain ty av o id an ce. (S im o n an d M arch 1 98 6 ) S aid another w ay, institutions like universities are generally ‘plagued w ith goal am biguity an d conflict, w ith poorly understood problem s that w ander in and out of the system , w ith a variable environ m ent and decision m akers w ith other things on their m inds ’. M ich a el D . C o h en and J am es G . M a rch . L ea d ersh ip and A m b ig u ity – T h e A m erica n C o lleg e P resid en t. 2 nd E d itio n. H a rva rd B u sin ess S ch oo l P ress. We Need to Make Change Easier: Like our own minds our organizations are largely unconscious. They will are revealed to us largely through the change process. 5% of what the individual does is consciously processed In large organizations most daily operations have become a habit, no longer done with awareness, no longer examined for the true costs/benefit. This is why READY, FIRE, AIM can be the right sequence in the early stages of catalyzing change. Tensions of Discovering How our Organizations Really Work • Dealing with the Image of Rationality, Hierarchy and Linear Decision-Making and the reality of how our organizations actually work • Recovering from the blame that is coming your way. • Walking the line between being honest, transparent and principled – and doing what you need to do to get progress and break through hierarchical gridlock (or other institutional barriers). The Great Challenge for ahead will be Navigating Interdependence in a Fragmented Organization & Society Interdependence between: Professional, departments, groups & organizations Capital, Finance & Accounting Leadership Technology, products & Services Information Capacity Building/Education Values and Culture Policy and more…. Interdependence Case Study: Changing Light bulbs at Harvard Simple Light Bulb Changing Project at Harvard University Full Process = 3 months of constant facilitation by change managers Barriers: Time + Capital + Policy + Training/Education + Values + Service/product School 4 Green Campus Loan Fund 20 19 8 1 2 7 My staff 6 14 Vendor Sales Rep Technician Finance Mgr (capital budget) 18 Finance Mgr (operating budget) 17 3 9 10 House Master 15 12 Univ. Ops 16 Facility Director 5 Building Manager (Superintendent) 13 Maintenance crew 11 House occupants (students) REP coordinator (student) Interdependence Case Study: Green Buildings at Harvard Pilot Projects & Expand Change Attitudes Address Finance & Accounting Issues Engage & Develop Capacities Streamlining and Reforming processes Engage Executive Leaders to Formalize Commitment 2001 2002 2003 3 3 2004 4 4 2005 5 5 2006 12 12 2007 16 16 23 2008 2009 23 2011 50+ 50+ Rate of Growth re: Number of Green Building Projects on Harvard Campus Extensive Change Management Process Used to Foster Organizational Conditions Necessary for Wide Scale Engagement, Innovation, Learning, Leadership and Commitment 80+ Letting go of Control and Taking up the Role of Midwife 28 We Need to Make Change Easier Most people believe that humans are innately averse to change. This is not true. A more accurate assessment is that people have an aversion to instability and risk and they assume that change equals instability and risk. People are actually invigorated by change when it occurs with adequate stability and low risk. The most common source of unanticipated instability/risk is the failure to address interdependence. In other words ignoring the system and focusing only on certain parts. Group Intelligence Will Matter More in the Green Economy Than Individual Intelligence “When it comes to intelligence, the whole can indeed be greater than the sum of its parts. A new study co-authored by MIT, Carnegie Mellon University, and Union College researchers documents the existence of collective intelligence among groups of people who cooperate well, showing that such intelligence extends beyond the cognitive abilities of the groups’ individual members…. They discovered that groups featuring the right kind of internal dynamics perform well on a wide range of assignments, a finding with potential applications for businesses & other organizations.” http://web.mit.edu/press/2010/collective-intel.html Change Management Progression for Organizations Awakening Pioneering Transformation Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman Awakening Defining Awakening Awakening phase puts sustainability on the agenda for the organization. Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman Awakening a = wAttributes of a k e •This stage is about campus sustainability being moved onto the n organization’s agenda but with a low level of understanding as to i what it actually means or requires from the institution n g = There are a small number of early champions pushing forward often in a voluntary capacity (not part of their real job) • Some little victories help to break through the initial inertia with some early project and program successes and the numbers of people vocalizing support grows • It might eventually produce enough commitment to fund a sustainability professional to help organize and coordinate efforts • Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman Awakening a = wTransitioning a k e n The organization is ready to move into the PIONEERING phase i n when a threshold of top level commitment, dedicated g sustainability staff and engaged champions has been reached = Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman Pioneering a w a k e n i n g Defining Pioneering The Pioneering phase is when the institution is experiencing an acceleration of pilot projects and new initiatives . The institution is now working at the frontier, exploring how much change it can institute and how quickly. The work involves integrating sustainability into the small and large arena’s of organizational life. It is largely about improving procedures within the existing organizational framework. Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman attributes of Pioneering a w •Proliferation of projects and programs across the campus a k •Significant expansion of active engagement across the campus e n •Development of new capacities, attitudinal shifts and confidence. i •The above three factors makes it possible to drive new formal commitments, n g goals, policies and standards which in turn accelerate engagement across the institution •The sustainability staff are spending more time coordinating and supporting the leadership of others than advocating and cajoling. •The sustainability related governance structure of the institution is further developed to formalize leadership and engagement in sustainability decisionmaking •The organization is able to integrate a variety of new practices and procedures into existing organizational systems and structures. There is no real shift in power nor is there any process reform. Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman Pioneering a Transitioning w a k e At a certain point the organization begins to reach a plateau n whereby the capacity of the existing organizational systems and i structures to integrate new practices is tapped out. Pressing for n g additional progress begins to reveal deeper institutional limitations, barriers and resistance. At this stage we must positioning the organization to move into the TRANSFORMATION phase – by gaining enough formal power, leveraging leadership, fostering understanding of necessity for reform, building capacities to support the reform. Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman a wDefining = a k e institution is in the Transformation stage of the cycle when sustainability An n has i become a central organizing principle that is leading to deep n organizational reforms. g = Transformation The Pioneering stage was focused on integrating sustainability into the existing power structures, decision making processes and organizational systems. Transformation involves reforming these structures, processes and systems in order to better enable sustainability to be achieved. Produced by Leith Sharp in collaboration with Julie Newman attributes of Transformation Organizational Systems Attributes of an Organization in Transformation Leadership Deep & visible sustainability commitment, values/preserves trust, drives collaboration as well as individual performance, leverages influence & authority from bottom-up, horizontal, top-down Governance Distributed ownership and engagement, drives continuous improvement, enables systemic reform Management Structures Cross-departmental permeability, interdisciplinary collaboration, bottom-up and horizontal interactivity Finance and Accounting Financial drivers for innovation and systems efficiency, rewards performance, drives collaboration Capacity Building Empowered workforce that is engaged in life long learning, broad engagement in implementation cycles for continuous testing and learning Knowledge Effective prioritization, gathering and dissemination of knowledge Sustainability Viewed as Change management team embedded with senior report and Requiring a Change organization-wide connectivity with the capacity to undertake all Management Function core change management functions for sustainability Produced by Leith Sharp Green Building Design – Nathan Gauthier – 4.9.08 Owner Designer www.aangepastbouwen.nl Contractor Supplier Traditional Design Process www.hansa-klima.de Understand the Team Designer Green Building Design – Nathan Gauthier – 4.9.08 Owner Project Team Supplier Integrated Contractor Design Integrated Design Requires Process Understand Team an Integratedthe Team What standard will we answer to as a new profession? Is it enough to justify the existence of our profession? Is it enough to get our institutions into the latest top ‘green’ ratings? Is it enough to look good on our websites and to our students and alumni? Just these battles are hard won, exhausting and humbling. To look beyond the relative comfort and rewards of these achievements will take something deep from within enough of us. There may be just a window of time in which we build this depth into the foundation of our professional identity. We should ask ourselves these questions alone and together in the coming months/years. Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Values Spirituality/Meaning Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Individual System Leadership Family Culture Financial Goals Finance & Accounting Culture/Community Management Structures Social Connections Policy Instruments Status Information Systems Occupation Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Energy supply & distribution Procurement systems Skills/Abilities Material supply & disposal Decision Making Processes Health Food Supply Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Human resources Water supply & disposal Planning Processes Building construction Regulatory, Market, & Community Context Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Building operations Transportation Landscaping Examples of how the 3 systems are interdependent? Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Individual System Ecosystems and Species Extinction &toxicity Relationships Climate systems Disturbance Atmospheric systems Ozone depletion, pollution Oceanic systems Disturbance to sea levels, temperatures and currents, sea life depletion Geological and Soil systems Desertification, land pollution, mineral & resource depletion, depletion of soil quality, toxicity Hydrological systems Water pollution & scarcity Nutrient systems Disturbance of nutrient flows, toxicity Provide information, examples and support pilots of new technologies, practices and products Work to gain leadership Goals/Commitments Empathic connection Sustainability Plan Trust Sustainability staff Recognition Training existing staff Peer to peer modeling Social marketing and behavior change Ownership and shared determination Inclusion Leverage peer to peer influence to prove viability What are we already doing in these 3 system spheres? Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Individual System Ecosystems and Species Climate systems Atmospheric systems Oceanic systems Geological and Soil systems Hydrological systems Nutrient systems What traits might emerge at a university/college in a sustainable relationship with our living planet? Challenging conventional approaches to air change rates in laboratories Weld Hill Research Center Seeking LEED Gold Closed loop geothermal system for heating and cooling, ventilation rates for lab space designed to 6 air changes per hour with night time set-back Department: Arnold Arboretum Building Type: Labs and Offices Size: 45,000 square feet Integration Design and Systems Thinking Can Help Us Solve the Big Problems Building Name Leverett Towers F & G Department Faculty of Arts and Sciences Description Complex of 2 11-story towers Age Built 1959; renovations every 4 years Size 121,697 square feet Occupancy 158 suites, 20 tutor apartments; 300 residents Demographics Undergraduates, graduate tutors Lease format Academic year appointments; temporary summer housing Building systems and utilities Heat/ventilation: Steam to forced air and radiant heat; Hot water: steam Air conditioning: window units Electricity: tutor kitchenette appliances Natural gas: dryers (1990-2001 only) 2006 GHG emissions 1537 MTCDE Integration Design and Systems Thinking Can Help Us Solve the Big Problems Cost Neutral Climate Neutral Building Case Study Leverett Towers Investment Summary Component Energy Conservation Measures % of Energy Portfolio Investment Period MTCDE/yr 17% 2007-2009 255 3% 2007-2009 49 Fuel Switch 22% 2012-2020 345 Offsets 58% 2012-2020 888 ((2%)) 2007-2020 ((33)) Renewable Energy Technology (onsite) Behavior Program Business Modeling for Cost Neutral Climate Neutrality Cost Neutral Climate Neutral Building Case Study (Research provided by 2008 thesis student Debra Shepard) Leverette Towers Financial Summary for Climate Neutrality Net present value through 2020 Financial Category Investments (Energy Conservation Measures, Onsite Renewable Energy, Fuel Switching, Behavior change) Savings (Energy Conservation Measures, Fuel Switching, Behavior change) Carbon Offset Purchases ($1,068,958) $1,142,947 ($68,268) TOTAL PROGRAM Net Present Value (12yr timeframe) Leverett Tow ers: Climate Neutral Portfolio at 2020 17% 3% ECMs RETs Fuel Sw itch 58% 22% Offsets 51 $5,721 Capital Budget Managers Utility Budget Managers Maintenance Budget Managers Barrier: Accounting structures are driving inefficient design and operations by limiting the appropriate movement of investments and savings Human Resources Managers Harvard’s Green Campus Initiative 2000 Onwards Green Campus Loan Fund Green Campus Loan Fund: $12 million interest-free capital for conservation projects Existing Buildings New Construction Full capital cost covered Cost delta funded 5 year payback maximum 10 year payback maximum Simple payback used Lifecycle costing used $14.5+ million lent since 2001 180+ projects 27+% average return on investment Common Practices: 1. Capital Budget Managers Utility Budget Managers No capital budget consideration of operating costs implications and opportunities 2. No efficiency funding in annual maintenance/operating budgets 3. No way to return savings to the people that achieve them 4. Reduced annual operating budgets when energy costs reduced 5. No funding for piloting and testing new practices Maintenance Budget Managers Human Resources Managers Transformation is about context A finance and accounting context that would energize green economic growth….. Provide champions with timely access to funds for good paybacks Allow for savings to be captured and reinvested Share savings with the people making it possible Provide seed funds for pilot projects Consider the costs over the life of the project not just first cost Savings exist within whole systems not just the parts Produced by Leith Sharp Transformation is about context An organizational context to empower the full potential of people as change agents………… Stable experiences of innovation and success Context of institutional commitment and management support Peer to peer interactions Rewards, incentives and recognition Removal of barriers and disincentives Proper inclusion in decision-making processes Ongoing training and opportunities to learn Access to expertise I am fully engaged in working on my part of the solution in every way possible! Produced by Leith Sharp Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Individual System Scienctific, technical knowledge Picking the right focus Finding early champions, and determining who to focus your relationship building on (and who to leave until later) Active listening skills Engaging them in processes like AI and other democratizing processes to gather input Sales and communications Learning a inventory of techniques for getting the middle majority to give attention and become engaged/empowered Research – market innovations Creating some early victories, Benchmarking Getting symbolic leadership signal of support and evolving that to fully engaged executive leadership Setting goals Cost benefit analysis Experimentation/piloting Project management Peer to peer core relationship building (building trust and mutual understanding, conflict mediation, having difficult conversations) Learn about the cultures (student, admin, faculty, other sub groupings) Identify the influential people and build alliances. Knowing your policy and regulatory environment and leveraging this to your advantage Campus sustainability planning process Social marketing and behavior change programs Social technologies Establishing mutual empathetic connections How to maintain respect in the face of difference, resistance Understanding personalities Authentic presence Sustaining good will, trust Appreciation and acknowledgement Acknowledging our own biases/traits/strengths and weaknesses Earth Systems Infrastructure Systems Organizational Systems Individual System Scientific, technical knowledge Understanding what their job is Great meeting planning/ management/facilitation Knowing thyself, manage thyself and continuously learn! And acknowledge what they have done already and defusing Social technology for engagement tendency of feeling that we are Organization development & learning theory Defining some of the trying to tell them how to do abstract words (what Understanding org charts, informal power, their job is leadership?) who the listens to who, where are the Tracking, metric, evaluation alliances – learning to conduct the voices Celebrating, giving credit Learn about successful programs/a Elevating, giving a platform Getting a seat at the table Leverage points and organizational analysis, systems analysis, relationship and power mapping vocabulary of successful programs and projects: eco rep programs, green office programs, green building programs, green cleaning program Learning how to manage student volunteers, staff etc Leveraging student power/minimizing student risk Leveraging faculty power and minimizing faculty risk Learning from existing leadership development resources/programs Understand the emerging executive leadership roles/demands/needs Modes for Professional Development (how can we access this) Modes Better promotion existing courses/resources (Harvard extension school – shorten if possible) Regional sustainability professional development workshops Formal mentorship and/or buddy system programs/systems Intensive workshops for targeted dilemmas (small groups, intensive, long) Webinars – practitioners sharing best practices, perhaps organized by institutional types, different regions Core insights, frameworks Practice learning opportunities Visiting scholars program – we go for a term to work on other campuses Engaging other experts from other professional arenas/tiers to help train us Characteristics: 2-3 hours/wk – up to 10 weeks $500ish Travel – keep to minimum Understanding that face to face is a foundation for online/virtual County/regional wide – build regional networks/relationships. Campus based 1-1.5 days We need to develop an easy way to host regional meetings – recipe/resource/expertise (could use dilemmas from host institution)