Violence and the Sacred An Introduction to the Work of René Girard Robert W Stead Background Born in Avignon on December 25, 1923 1943 to 1947 - studied medieval history at the Ecole des Chartes, Paris 1947 - Indiana University teaching French literature 1953 to 1957 - Duke University and Bryn Mawr College 1961 - full professor Johns Hopkins University Background 1961 - Mensonge Romantique et Verite Romanesque (Deceit, Desire and the Novel, 1966) 1972 - La Violence et Le Sacre (Violence and the Sacred, 1977) 1978 - Des choses cachees depuis la fondation du monde (Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World, 1987) 1978 - To Double Business Bound: Essays on Literature, Mimesis, and Anthropology Background 1981 - Andrew B. Hammond Professor of French Language, Literature, and Civilization at Stanford University 1982 - Le Bouc émissaire (The Scapegoat) 1985 - La route antique des hommes pervers (Job, the Victim of His People 1987) 1991 - A Theatre of Envy: William Shakespeare 1995 - Retires from Stanford University Background 1990 - Colloquium on Violence and Religion (COV&R) founded Purpose: explore, criticize, and develop the mimetic model of the relationship between violence and religion in the genesis and maintenance of culture Yearly conference devoted to topics related to mimetic theory, scapegoating, violence, and religion. René Girard - Honorary Chair of COV&R. Question What makes great literature great? The Journey Begins... With Don Quixote Mimesis The Imitation of Desire External Mediation – Great Distance between Model and Disciple Internal Mediation – Little Distance between the Two Rivalry – Inversely Proportional to Distance Greater the Distance the Lesser the Rivalry Desire is Triangular Beyond the Novel Girard studies texts of persecution Exploration of religious myths A look at the Oedipus myth 4 Stereotypes in Myths Loss of difference (plague) Crimes that eliminate difference (parricide, incest) Mark of the victim (physical/social defect [limp, foreigner, different class]) Violence (destroy or banish the victim) In a sentence... Communal chaos is created by “crimes” caused by a “criminal” who must be crushed. GMSM Generative – produces differences that delineate culture Mimetic – driven by desire Scapegoating – prevents runaway mimetic rivalry by means of a surrogate victim Mechanism – operates mechanically rather than deliberately (thanks to Robert G. Hamerton-Kelly [The Gospel and the Sacred (1994)] GMSM Mimetic Desire (Acquisitive Mimesis) Mediation (external, internal) Rivalry The Model/Obstacle (scandal, envy, hatred) Transcendence (deviated [idolatry]) Substitution Acquiistive Motivation Mimetic Desires Roots in Phylogeny GMSM The Surrogate Victim – Scapegoat (Conflictual Mimesis) The Crisis of Differentiation The Emergence of the Surrogate Victim (Scapegoat) The Generation of Differences GMSM The Double Transference The Nature of the Double Transference (rivalry/peace) The Victim as Transcendent Signifer GMSM The Products of the Double Transference The Sacred Prohibition Ritual Myths The Bible Exposes the violence of GMSM The voice of the victim The only voice of Truth is the voice of the innocent victim Cain and Abel Story of Joseph Mimetic Predicament-Mimetic Liberation Paul's Conversion Christ- Servant/Leader/Model Must There Be Scapegoats? The work of Raymond Schwager The move away from sacrifice ( ex: Ps 51) The human dimension of the wrath of God Scapegoat Mechanism – Unity (simplicity) Holy Spirit – Community (multiplicity) In final analysis: “The Word makes possible the inner personal relationship that we call faith, trust, love” Girard's Influence Biblical Hermaneutics Raymond Schwager Robert Hamerton-Kelly Gil Bailie Psychology – Jean-Michel Oughourlian Eric Gans – Generative Anthropology COV & R Can We Escape Mimesis? What Kind of Mimesis? Creative Mimesis – Desire for the Good (non-rivalrous) Christ – The Cornerstone A Personal Note Girard's Approach to Substitution and the Medieval (Anselmic) Approach The use of scientific method to approach texts and to relate texts to one another The implications of mimetic theory for interpersonal relations Look within and between