Parenting in South African mothers with a history of family violence Shereen Moolla and Catherine L. Ward Department of Psychology University of Cape Town UCT’s Safety and Violence Initiative (SaVI) Engineering and the Built Environment: Humanities: Anthropology; linguistics; film & media studies; psychology; religious studies; social development; sociology Health sciences: Town planning Forensic medicine; Gender, Health & Justice Research Unit; primary health care directorate; psychiatry; public health; surgery Law Law, Race & Gender Research Unit; criminology; public law This presentation Some background on intimate partner violence and child maltreatment in South Africa Family violence and parenting Methodology for our study Findings: Demographics Mothers’ histories of family violence Mothers’ parenting Children’s behaviour Risk and protective factors Relationships among variables Interpretations and implications Thanks to: Nicia de Nobrega, Abigail Miles and Inge Wessels The Saartjie Baartman Centre, REACH, the New World Foundation, Self-Help Mannenberg, Carehaven, the Westlake Community Centre, Place of Hope, Village Care, and the Islamic Resource Foundation of South Africa The UCT University Research Committee and the National Research Foundation Intimate partner violence in SA 8.8% of men working in the Cape Town municipality report IPV against a partner in the last year (Abrahams et al., 2006) At least half of female homicide victims are killed by their intimate partners (Seedat et al., 2009): In 1999, this was therefore at least 1,899 women, or 12.4 per 100,000 The rate of homicide for women (all causes) is 6x the average rate worldwide Child maltreatment in South Africa 44.6% of the homicides due to CAN 35.7% of these due to abandonment in the first week after birth 74% of the CAN homicides among children aged 0-4 Mathews et al., 2012 Consequences of family violence Increased depression and anxiety Increased substance misuse Internalised problems model of violence as a way to solve Risk and protection for parenting Risk factors Protective factors Intimate partner violence Social support Parent’s own child maltreatment Higher maternal education Substance misuse Older maternal age Parental mental illness Parental competence Poverty Parental stress Child behavioural problems Methodology Mothers were recruited from NGOs serving women across Cape Town Inclusion criteria: Women with a child aged 3-8 The child’s behaviour concerned mother Had not received any parenting intervention Interviewed 215 women, excluded 12: 4 had children > 8 6 had too much missing data 2 had either a “yes” or a “no” response set Measures Demographics CTS-2 - intimate partner violence ICAST-R - history of childhood abuse PC-CTS - parent/child conflict ECBI - child behaviour problems PSOC PSI - parent competence - parental stress GHQ - maternal mental health ASSIST - substance misuse Duke Social Support Scale Demographics Mean age: 32.4 years old. Marital status: mostly single (46.80%). Language: mostly Afrikaans and isiXhosa (38.42 % and 42.37%) respectively. Children: 65% had more than one child 82.76% were unemployed Education: 62.56% of the participants had not completed high school Housing: 53.21% participants lived in formal housing 16.26% l in outbuildings in someone’s backyard 8.87% in shacks 20.20% in flats 13% of the women interviewed were living in shelters for abused women at the time of the interview. Poverty Access to electricity, a phone, a television and a private motor-car: 12.32% had access to all four commodities. Food security: 72.91% had ‘run out of money to buy food at least once that year’ 34.48% 81% ‘had to go to bed hungry sometimes’ received the child support grant Mothers’ history of IPV Subscale % n Psychological Abuse - minor 83.74 170 Psychological Abuse - severe 66.51 135 Physical Abuse - minor 73.40 149 Physical Abuse - severe 53.69 109 Sexual Abuse - minor 43.35 88 Sexual Abuse - severe 22.17 45 Injury - minor 54.19 110 Injury - severe 39.41 80 Mothers’ history of child abuse Type of child abuse n % Hit, punched or kicked 81 39.9% Beaten with an object 92 45.3% Stabbed or cut 20 9.9% Exposure to other’s genitals 30 14.8% Forced to pose naked 1 0.5% Unwanted touching of genitals 30 14.8% Forced to touch other’s genitals 18 8.9% Forced sexual intercourse 18 8.9% Ever told anyone about unwanted sexual experiences 14 6.9% What parenting techniques did parents use? n % Mean SD Non-Violent Discipline 194 95.57 6.07 3.09 Psychological Aggression 192 94.58 5.87 3.45 Minor Assault 190 93.60 5.22 3.36 Severe Assault 80 39.41 1.14 1.86 Very Severe Assault 34 16.75 0.37 1.01 Children’s behaviour Above cut-off Intensity Problem n % n % 56 27.6 85 41.9 Other factors Risk/protective factor n % High parenting stress scores 196 96.6% Achieved ‘caseness’ on the GHQ 139 68.5% Risky use of tobacco 107 52.7% Risky use of alcohol 47 23.2% Risky use of cannabis 15 7.4% Risky use of cocaine 1 0.5% Risky use of amphetamines 13 6.4% Risky use of inhalants 1 0.5% Risky use of sedatives 10 4.9% At least moderate social support 126 62.1% Moderate-high parental incompetence 178 87.7% Relationships among variables Higher maternal age was associated with child behaviour problems Running out of money for food was associated with child behaviour problems Getting income from work was associated with child behaviour problems Mothers’ histories of family violence were significantly associated with child behaviour problems This relationship is mediated by parental stress, parent-child conflict and parental competence But not by maternal mental health, substance misuse, or social support Implications If women seek help for parenting, ask about their histories of family violence If women seek help for family violence, ask about their children’s wellbeing Prevent child maltreatment and intimate partner violence Programmes that boost parental competence – parent training programmes – may well reduce parental stress and improve child behaviour