Stop Rules: Mood & Perseverative Thinking

advertisement

Stop Rules: Mood

& Perseverative

Thinking

Graham Davey

University of Sussex, UK www.papersfromsidcup.com

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/why-we-worry/

Follow me on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/GrahamCLDavey

Frances Meeten

Suzanne Dash

Fergal Jones

Benie MacDonald

Helen Startup

Gary Britton

Jack Hawksley

Jason Chan

Chris Brewin

Collaborators

Introduction

• Perseveration is a defining element of many psychopathologies

• Examples include worrying (GAD), checking (OCD), rumination (in major depression)

• Perseverative activities are usually ‘neutralizing’ activities

• Linked to meta-cognitive and global beliefs about how to deal with distressing emotions

What is mood-as-input?

• Stop Rules

• The Role of Mood as Information

• Vulnerability of Clinical populations to using

Mood as Information

What are ‘stop rules’?

• Relate to Task Motivation

• Performance Focused OR

Task Focused

• Decision Rules

• ‘As Many as Can’ (AMA) OR

‘Feel Like Continuing’ (FL)

Worry Stop Rule Check

List

AMA

• I must find a solution to this problem, so keep thinking about it.

• I must try and think about the worst possible outcome, just in case it happens

• I must think everything through properly

FL

• What’s done is done, so what’s the point in worrying?

• I don’t have time to think about this now

• Stop worrying, things always work out for the best.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

23.

The Catastrophizing

Interview

I

’ m worried about not being able to move

That I would be attacked in some way

That I would not be able to fight back

That I would not be able to control what other people did to me

That I would feel inadequate

That other people would begin to think I was inadequate

That in my relationship with those people I would not be respected

That I would not have any influence over others

That other people would not listen to me

That it would cause a loss of self-esteem

That this loss of self-esteem would have a negative effect on my relationships with others

That I would lose friends

That I would be alone

That I would have no-one to talk to

Because it would mean that I would not be able to share any thoughts/problems with other people

That I would not get advice from others

That none of my problems would be adequately sorted out

That they would remain and get worse

That eventually I would not be able to cope with them

That eventually my problems would have more control over me than I had over them

That they would prevent me from doing other things

That I would be unable to meet new people and make friends

That I would be lonely

What do we know about stop rules?

• Often not easily verbalizable

• Can often be derived from dispositional characteristics or meta-beliefs about emotional control strategies

• Stop Rules represent the way that metacognitive beliefs are operationalized

• Stop rule type is linked to mood

• Stop rules interact with mood to determine perseveration at a task (the ‘Mood-as-Input

Hypothesis’, Davey, 2006, Meeten & Davey, 2011).

Stop Rules &

Psychopathology

• High Worriers more likely to endorse AMA Stop Rules

(Davey et al., 2005)

• Deployment of AMA stop rules is increased with

Negative or Distressed Mood (Dash & Davey, 2012)

• Clinically Depressed individuals report preferential use of AMA stop rules for Rumination (Chan, Davey

& Brewin, 2013)

• BDI Scores are significantly associated with AMA use for Rumination (Vappling et al., unpub)

30

20

10

0

40

50

Dash & Davey (2012)

Mood & Worrying Stop

Rules

AMA

Negative Mood Neutral Mood Cognitive Priming

40

30

20

10

0

70

60

50

Britton & Davey (2011)

Mood & Checking Stop

Rules

Negative Mood

Positive Mood

AMA FL

Stop Rules & Depressive

Rumination

Chan, Davey & Brewin, 2013

Stop Rules &

Metacognitive Beliefs

• Positive Beliefs about Rumination predict AMA stop rule use (Chan, Davey & Brewin, 2013)

• Positive Beliefs (but not Negative Beliefs) about

Rumination predict Rumination length (Meeten et al., submitted)

• Positive Beliefs (but not Negative Beliefs) about

Worry are predicted by Negative Mood (Adams et al., unpublished)

Stop Rule interaction with

Mood stoprule

AMA

FL

12.00

10.00

4.00

2.00

0.00

8.00

6.00

POSITIVE MOOD NEGATIVE MOOD

Experimental Condition

Error bars: 95% CI

Hawksley & Davey, 2010

Mood-as-input & Clinical

Populations

• Negative moods and ‘perfectionist’ styles are common – so why don’t most people acquire perseverative psychopathologies?

• What is special about clinical populations that puts them at risk of developing perseverative psychopathologies?

Factors affecting the informational value of mood

• The discounting hypothesis (Schwarz & Clore, 1983)

• Knowledge & Expertise

• Cognitive Load (Siemer & Reisenzein (1998)

Knowledge & Expertise:

The Example of Worry

• Clinical Populations possess characteristics that potentially impair an objective assessment of solutions for worries: o Poor problem-solving confidence (Davey, 1994) o Feelings of Personal Inadequacy (Davey & Levy, 1998) o Possess an Intolerance of Uncertainty (Dugas et al., 2004) o Have a Narrow Negative Focus (Gasper & Clore, 2002) o Possess an Avoidance Coping Style (Davey, 1993)

Low Problem-Solving

Confidence & Worry

• Individuals low on Problem-Solving Confidence are more likely to deploy AMA Stop Rules

• Individuals low on Problem-Solving Confidence are more likely to show a strong correlation between mood and ratings of goal attainment in a social problem-solving task

Implications for

Interventions

• Socialization to the Mood-as-Input Model: Explain the Dynamics of how Stop Rules interact with Mood

• Identify any AMA Stop Rules and help the Client to change those Rules

• Help the Client to become aware of Negative

Moods and find ways to Manage those Moods

-5

-10

-15

-20

5

0

A brief 4-session intervention for high worriers

MAI 1 MAI 2 MAI+Bf Bf

10

Outcome

4-week follow-up

Dash et al., submitted

Conclusions

• Goal-Guided Stop Rules can be Identified in Many

Types of Perseverative Psychopathology

• Stop Rules are linked to Positive Metacognitive

Beliefs

• Stop Rules interact with Concurrent Mood to generate perseveration

• Clinical Populations possess characteristics that will tend them towards using Mood as Information

• Interventions that target Stop Rules and Negative

Mood can successfully reduce Symptoms

Download