Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Homeless Children in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey Elizabeth Ezratty, Policy Associate National Association for the Education of Homeless Children & Youth Conference November 3, 2013 Learning Objectives Understand the implications of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on lifelong health, risk taking behaviors, and mental wellbeing Understand the prevalence of neglect, abuse, and family dysfunction in homeless, at risk, and stably housed children’s lives Present policy initiatives that reduce adverse childhood experience exposures and identify children most at risk of childhood trauma Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs Stress & Child Development The National Scientific Council on the Developing Child at Harvard University distinguishes 3 types of stress: Positive: experiences that are part of every day life and cause brief and moderate physiological stress responses (immunizations, meeting a new person). Tolerable: non-normative experiences that are intense but bearable due to the presence of a supportive adult (death of a loved one, traumatic event or accident). Toxic: intense, frequent, and uncontrollable experiences during which a child lacks the support of a caring adult (child abuse or neglect). Can result in an altered physiological response to stress and diminished brain development. Finding Your ACE Score While you were growing up, during your first 18 years of life: 1. Did a parent or other adult in the household often or very often… Swear at you, insult you, put you down, or humiliate you? or Act in a way that made you afraid tha t you might be physically hurt? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 2. Did a parent or other adult in the household often or very often… Push, grab, slap, or thro w something at you? or Ever hit you so hard that you had marks or were injured? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 3. Did an adult or person at least 5 years older than you ever… Touch or fondle you or have you touch their body in a sexual way? or Attempt or actually have oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse with you? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 4. Did you often or very often feel that … No one in your family loved you or thought you were important or special? or Your family didn’t look out for each other, feel close to each other, or support each other? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 5. Did you often or very often feel that … You didn’t have enough to eat, had to wear dirty clothes, and had no one to protect you? or Your parents were too drunk or high to take care of you or take you to the doctor if you needed it? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 6. Were your parents ever separated or divorced? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 7. Was your mother or stepmother: Often or very often pushed, grabbed, slapped, or had something thrown at her? or Sometimes, often, or very often kicked, bitten, hit with a fist, or hit with something hard? or Ever repeatedly hit at least a few minutes or threatened with a gun or knife? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 8. Did you live with anyo ne who was a problem drinker or alcoholic or who used street drugs? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 9. Was a household member depressed or mentally ill, or di d a household member attempt suicide? Yes No If yes enter 1 ______ __ 10. Did a household member go to prison? Yes No If yes enter 1 Now add up your “Yes” answers: _______ This is your ACE Score. 092406RA4CR ______ _ Reproduced with permission from: Robert F. Anda, and Vincent J. Felitti, Centers for Disease Control and Kaiser Permanente. http://acestudy.org/ace_scor e Adverse Childhood Experiences Study Collaborative effort between the Centers for Disease Control and Kaiser Permanente in San Diego Retrospective study in the 1990’s involving more than 17,000 adults Explored relationship between experiences through 18 years old and adult health and wellbeing Respondents could have a possible ACE score of between 0 and 10 representing the number of ACEs experienced through 18 years old. 54% of respondents were women, average age was 57, 74% were white, 36% attended some college, and 50% were college graduates Adverse Childhood Experiences Study Abuse: Neglect: • Sexual • Physical • Physical • Emotional • Emotional Family Dysfunction: • Presence of domestic violence in home • Separation, divorce, or loss of a parent • Household member with depression or suicidal tendencies • Household member sent to prison • Household member with drug or alcohol issues Adverse Childhood Experiences Study Findings Incarcerated Relative 11% Mental Illness 19% Substance Use 28% Domestic Violence 13% Loss of a parent 23% Physical Neglect 10% Emotional Neglect 15% Sexual Abuse 21% Physical Abuse 28% Emotional Abuse 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and the Centers for Disease Control and Violence Prevention. 100% Connection between ACEs and Health & Behavior Outcomes 1= no additional risk Source: Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and the Centers for Disease Control and Violence Prevention. Life Expectancy of people with 0 & 6+ ACEs 0 ACEs 80 Years 60 Years 6+ ACEs Source: Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and the Centers for Disease Control and Violence Prevention. Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Largest health and behavior surveillance system in the world Implemented in all 50 states and territories through State Departments of Health ACE module has been implemented in 22 states thus far Excludes questions on neglect Prevalence of ACEs in 5 State BRFSS Data from: Arkansas Louisiana New Mexico Tennessee Washington 4+ ACEs 15% 3 ACEs 9% 0 ACEs 41% 2 ACEs 13% 1 ACE 22% Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Adverse Childhood Experiences Reported by Adults – Five States, 2009,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Vol. 59, no. 49 (2010). Risk of Health & Behavior Outcomes in Minnesota BRFSS 1 = no additional risk Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Adverse Childhood Experiences in Minnesota: Findings & Recommendations Based on the 2011 Minnesota Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, January 2013. Risk of Adult Health & Behavior Outcomes in Washington BRFSS 1 = no additional risk Source: Source: Anda and Brown, Adverse Childhood Experiences and Population Health in Washington: The Face of a Chronic Public Health Disaster, Results from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), July 2, 2010. Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey Background Fragile Families Sample Cities Birth cohort longitudinal dataset Children born between 1998-2000 Five waves: birth, age 1, 3, 5 & 9 Data collected in 20 large (pop > 200,000) U.S. cities Nationally representative of births between 1998-2000 in large U.S. urban centers Detailed variables at each wave Demographics Family composition Labor market behavior Fertility Relationships Health & well-being Housing status Parenting practices Disciplinary approaches Here’s what we did: If any one of the questions that comprised an ACE indicator was answered then a family was included Likely under-represents ACEs Surveys and in-home assessments analyzed for ACE indicators based on the original ACE survey ACE indicators constructed from multiple questions in each wave Not every question is asked each year Respondents are caregivers Likely under-represents ACEs A total of 2,410 families were included Here’s what we did: Questions cover the first 9 years of the subject child’s life Questions were included if they inquired about the subject child’s experiences of abuse or neglect, or the presence of family dysfunction in the home Used the BRFSS as guidance on how to define “often or very often” May under or over-represent ACEs Frequencies used Emotional Abuse: “swore or cursed at” 3 or more times in the last year “shouted, yelled, screamed, swore, or cursed” a few times a week Called the child “dumb or lazy” or some other similar name 6 or more times in the last year Emotional Neglect: “said you would send child away/kick out of the house” 6 or more times in past year “you're caught up with own problems-not able to show love to child” 6 or more times in past year Physical Abuse: hit the child “on the bottom with a belt” or similar object or hit the child “with a hard object like a brush” on the bottom 3 or more times in the last year slapped the child on the “leg, arm or hand” 11 or more times in the last year Any questions related to spanking were excluded Housing Status definitions Ever homeless or doubled up includes families that lived in shelters or other places not meant for human habitation or were living doubled up with family or friends but not paying rent Ever at risk includes families reported having troubles paying essential bills such as rent or mortgage, phone, or utilities, that they moved more than twice in the last year, or had ever been evicted Always stably housed includes families who reported none of these issues Fragile Families Demographics Housing Status: Mother’s Education at baseline Ever Homeless/Doubled up: 27% <HS: 28% At Risk of homelessness: 40% HS/GED: 31% Always stably housed: 33% Some College/Technical School: 19% College/Graduate School: 22% Mother’s Race/Ethnicity: Black: 24% Mother’s Relationship at Baseline: White: 35% Single: 20% Hispanic: 33% Cohabitated: 21% Other: 9% Married: 59% Mom’s Mean Age at birth of focal child (baseline): 27 years old Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs Cumulative Number of ACEs in Fragile Families 6+ ACEs 5 ACEs 3% 7% 0 ACEs 10% 0 ACEs 11% 4 ACEs 1 ACE 23% 1 ACE 2 ACEs 3 ACEs 4 ACEs 18% 5 ACEs 3 ACEs 6+ ACEs 2 ACEs 28% Individual ACE-indicators in Fragile Families Prison 18% Mental Illness 56% Substance use 15% Domestic Violence 10% Loss of a parent * * 29% Physical Neglect 3% Emotional Neglect * 6% Sexual Abuse 1% Physical Abuse 30% Emotional Abuse 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% * Constructed from fewer questions in Fragile Families 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%* Number of Cumulative ACEs by Housing Status 40% 36% 34% 35% Percentage of Children 30% 27% 25% 22% 18% 20% 15% 15% 10% Homeless (n=861) 25% 20% 17% 16% 14% 10% 9% 6% 16% 10% 3% 5% 1% 0% 0 ACEs 1 ACEs 2 ACEs 3 ACEs Number of Cumulative ACEs 4 ACEs 5+ ACEs At Risk (n=1065) Stably Housed (n=484) Presence of Child Maltreatment by Housing Status 70% Percentage of Children 60% 63% 60% 57% Homeless (n=861) 50% 38% 34% 40% At Risk (n=1065) 30% 17% 20% 10% 2% 2% 0% 0% Emotional Abuse Physical Abuse Sexual Abuse 5% 8% 4% Emotional Neglect Type of Child Maltreatment 4% 3% Stably Housed (n=484) 1% Physical Neglect Presence of Household Dysfunction by Housing Status 80% 72% 70% 58% Percentage of Children 60% Homeless (n=861) 50% 41% 40% 35% 34% 29% 30% 20% 24% 18% 10% At Risk (n=1065) 22% 15% 14% 11% 5% 8% 4% 0% Loss of a parent Domestic Drug, Alcohol Mental Illness Violence Use Type of Family Dysfunction Prison Stably Housed (n=484) Inter-relatedness of childhood traumas Emotional Abuse Emotional Neglect Living with a Substance Abuser • 3x odds of physical abuse • 2x odds of emotional abuse • 2.4x odds of physical neglect • 2x odds of emotional neglect • Nearly 2x odds of physical abuse • 1.4x odds of a household member suffering from mental illness • Almost 5.5x odds of physical neglect • 2.4x odds of living with domestic violence Living with Domestic Violence • Slightly higher odds of emotional and physical abuse • 2.4x odds of living with a substance abuser • 2.5x odds of a household member reporting mental illness Summary ACEs are common for children in Fragile Families Housing status is associated with differential levels of ACEs ACEs are inter-related Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs Poverty and ACEs in Fragile Families Split group into Poor (below 130% of federal poverty line) and Not Poor (above 130% of FPL) $24,817 for a family of 3 in 2012-2013 Ensures that comparisons between groups reflect differences in housing status rather than poverty Total number of families in Poor subsample is 1,103 Homelessness among Poor and Not Poor Children 60% 48% Percentage of Children 50% 40% 44% 37% 35% 30% Poor 21% Not Poor 20% 15% 10% 0% Homeless/ DU At Risk Housing Status Stably Housed Number of ACEs among Poor and Not Poor Children 35% 29% Percentage of Children 30% 24% 25% 21% 20% 15% 25% Poor (n=1103) 20% 17% 15% 13% 9% 10% 6% Not Poor (n=1307) 9% 6% 5% 5% 1% 0% 0 ACEs 1 ACE 2 ACEs 3 ACEs 4 ACEs Number of ACEs 5 ACEs 6+ ACEs Individual ACEs among Poor Children in Fragile Families Prison 31% Mental Illness 63% Substance use 22% Domestic Violence 16% Loss of a parent * Physical Neglect * Emotional Neglect * 32% 5% 7% Sexual Abuse 1% Physical Abuse 29% Emotional Abuse 55% 0% 10% 20% 30% * Constructed from fewer questions in Fragile Families 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Number of Cumulative ACEs by Housing Status among Poor Children 60% 56% 50% Homeless (n=510) 40% At Risk (n=484) 31% 30% 22% 20% 10% 16% 12% 17% 22% 20% 14% 8% 5%6% 21% 13% 12% 9% 6%6% 4% 0% 0% 0 ACEs 1 ACEs 2 ACEs 3 ACEs 4 ACEs Stably Housed (n=109) 5 Aces 0% 6+ Aces Presence of Maltreatment among Poor Children 70% 61% Percentage of Children 60% 50% 54% Homeless (n=510) 44% 40% At Risk (n=484) 33%31% 30% Stably Housed (n=109) 20% 12% 7% 10% 2% 0% Emotional Abuse Physical Abuse 0% 0% Sexual Abuse 10% 6% 5% 4% 0% Emotional Type of Maltreatment Neglect Physical Neglect Presence of Household Dysfunction by Housing Status among Poor Children 80% 76% 70% 59% Percentage of Children 60% 50% 44% 43% Homeless (n=510) 41% 40% 30% 20% 30% 30% At Risk (n=484) 24% 17% 20% 19% 16% 11% 10% 10% 5% 0% Loss of a parent Domestic Violence Substance Use Mental Illness Household Dysfunction Indicator Prison Stably Housed (n=109) Limitations Fragile Families questions were not the same as ACE survey ACE indicators constructed from multiple questions Not all ACE indicators were asked in every year Original ACE survey questions ask if maltreatment occurred “often” or “very often” Most Fragile Families questions are directed to a caregiver rather than the child Summary Poor children experience more ACEs than those who are Not Poor Poor homeless and doubled up children experience more cumulative ACEs than other housing groups Differential rates of household dysfunction, abuse, and neglect exist between housing categories Questions cover the first 9 years of life Results are conservative Presentation overview Explain the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study and adverse childhood experiences (ACE) framework Ongoing ACE research through Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Introduce Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Survey (Fragile Families) and ICPH research approach Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among children in Fragile Families Present and explain the prevalence of ACEs among Fragile Families after controlling for poverty Discuss policies and approaches that buffer against ACEs Prevention Approaches Parental Engagement Home Visiting programs Early Childhood Education School Based Health Centers Parental Engagement Home Visiting Programs Send qualified professionals to visit expecting parents or parents with children up to age five This professional could be a nurse, a social worker, a counselor, or a culturally competent peer community member Teach skills that promote positive child-parent relationships and improved child and maternal health and wellbeing Home Visiting Evidence Home Visiting programs impact: Increased birth spacing Child health Parental self-sufficiency Reduced incidence of abuse and neglect reports Improved positive parenting techniques Source: Olds et. al, “Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial,” JAMA (1997); Duggan et. al., “Evaluation of Hawaii’s Healthy Start program,” Future of Children, (1999); U.S. DHHS, Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness; New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Bureau of Evaluation and Research, Healthy Families New York: Reflections, 2011. Barriers for homeless families & providers Home visitors struggled with family transience and programs often operate using geographic zones Staff possessed limited knowledge of the homeless system Staff were not adequately trained to deal with families in crisis Strict program guidelines leave little or no option to conduct meetings in public spaces Low levels of parent engagement Privacy issues with families who double up Source: Carie Bires, Heartland Alliance, FACT Project, Heartland Health Outreach, Partnering to Serve Homeless Children, Presented at the National Alliance to End Homelessness Conference, February 2013. Parental Engagement Early Childhood Education Parent engagement or positive experiences in high quality early childhood education can moderate many negative child behavior and cognitive outcomes from: Domestic violence Having a household member in prison Maternal depression Substance use Source: Administration for Children and Families, US DHHS, Head Start FACES 2000: A Whole-Child Perspective on Program Performance, Fourth Progress Report, (2003). Barriers for homeless families Waiting lists Family transience Cost Poor outreach and awareness Transportation difficulties Time Barriers for service providers Lack of trust of and fatigue with social services Child absenteeism Parent involvement Evaluation compliance Parent Engagement Promising Initiatives Washington authorized parent participation in voluntary home visiting programs, Head Start or other parent child development activities, or volunteering at their child’s day care, pre-school, or school to count as part of a parent’s TANF mandatory work requirements Massachusetts parenting workshops fulfill the activity requirement to receive a subsidy under the Child Care and Development Fund Maryland Since 2002, all four year olds living at or below 185 percent of the federal poverty threshold are entitled to early learning services Montgomery County created “parent academies” for all student families Oklahoma Since 1998, every 4-year-old in Oklahoma gets free access to a year of highquality pre-k. School Based Health Centers School based health centers: Improve access to medical care Improve access to mental health counseling increased use of hormonal birth control Increased use of mental health services Source: Soleimanpour et.al., “The Role of School Health Centers in Health Care Access and Client Outcomes,” American Journal of Public Health, (2010); Ethier et.al., “School-based health center access, reproductive health care, and contraceptive use among sexually experienced high school students,” Journal of Adolescent Health, (2011). School based health centers & trauma The inter-connectedness of childhood traumas should act as a blue print for screening of other ACEs. Under the Affordable Care Act, health plans will have to provide behavioral health screenings for children for free. Counseling may help children cope with the stress associated with housing instability Forum to identify and prevent other childhood traumas for which homeless and doubled up children have greater risk Source: The White House Blog, “The Affordable Care Act and Expanding Mental Health Coverage,” August 21, 2013. Summary Adverse Childhood Experiences have real long term consequences Poor children experience more ACEs than non poor children Homeless and double up children report the most ACEs Home visiting programs and early childhood education programs with parental engagement lower risk of or mediate effects ACEs School Based Health Centers are logical venues to help identify and treat ACEs Learning Objectives Understand the implications of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on lifelong health, risk taking behaviors, and mental wellbeing Understand the prevalence of neglect, abuse, and family dysfunction in homeless, at risk, and stably housed children’s lives Present policy initiatives that reduce adverse childhood experience exposures and identify children most at risk of childhood trauma Discussion questions What steps can you take to help educate others about the long term effects of ACEs? Are there any programs or initiatives in your communities that address ACEs? How does the research presented here compare to what you see in your community? Does the research presented on childhood trauma help you to look at children in your classrooms or schools differently? Elizabeth Ezratty eezratty@icphusa.org Thank you