Law & Social Psychology Professor Victor D. Quintanilla Indiana University, Maurer School of Law May 23, 2013 Overview • Law & Social Psychology • A Social Psychological Study of Ashcroft v. Iqbal’s Effect on Claims of Race Discrimination Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 The Research Paradigm Law & Social Psychology • Draws on theory and methods from social psychology to understand jurisprudence and legal decision-making • Evaluates assumptions about human nature embedded within law • Draws on multiple methods: empirical legal studies & experiments Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal’s Effect On Claims of Race Discrimination Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009). • Pleading standards under Rule 8(a) • Federal courts now evaluate whether a complaint contains sufficient factual matter “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” • Plausible? Draw on “judicial experience and common sense” before evidence gathered • Applies to all claims, including claims of race discrimination Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 The Research Problem: Claims of Race Discrimination Can judges draw on “common sense” to decide whether Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination are plausible without the subtle effect of stereotypes and implicit bias? Has the dismissal rate increased for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination? Do White and Black judges decide these claims differently? Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Informed by Social Psychological Theories: Aversive Racism Lay Theories of Racism Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Aversive Racism • Old fashion vs. contemporary prejudice • Explicitly endorse egalitarian beliefs • But hold negative attitudes that are unintentional, subtle, indirect, “rational” (implicit bias) • In ambiguous situations, with unclear norms, where rationalization is possible, biases may appear. Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Lay Theories of Racism How observers interpret whether a stereotyped group member was the victim of racism or discrimination. Two lay theories of racism 1. Overt behaviors, not Subtle behaviors 2. Overt behaviors, and Subtle behaviors Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Hypotheses Shifting from Conley to Iqbal: 1. Increase dismissal rate for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination 2. Under Conley White and Black judges decide claims similarly. After Iqbal, they decide claims differently. Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 The Context of This Study • A Black employee sues an employer under Title VII (or Section 1981) claiming race discrimination or harassment. • The plaintiff properly exhausts the claim with the EEOC and timely files suit. • At the pleadings stage, the issue is whether, under Rule 8(a), the Black employee sufficiently pleaded a claim of race discrimination. Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Research Design and Method: Data Collection (i) Published and unpublished decisions available on Westlaw (ii) 24-months before Twombly and 24-months after Iqbal (iii) Black plaintiffs’ timely filed and properly exhausted claims of race discrimination under Title VII (or Section 1981) (iv) Federal district court cases deciding motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 8 Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Research Design and Method: Coding and Analysis Coded Independent Variables – Pre- vs. Post-Iqbal – Pro se vs. Represented party – Race of Judge (Black vs. White vs. Other) Coded Dependent Variable – Decision: Grant, Deny, Mixed Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Results Figure 1 Has Iqbal increased the dismissal rate for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination? Figure 2 Under Conley did White and Black judges decide motions to dismiss similarly? Figure 3 Under Iqbal are White and Black judges deciding motions to dismiss differently? Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Figure 1: Has Iqbal increased the dismissal rate for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination? 80 73.70 70 60 53.20 50 38.90 40 30 Conley Iqbal 23.20 20 10 3.00 7.90 0 Grant Law & Social Psychology Deny Mixed May 23, 2013 15 Figure 2: Under Conley Did White and Black Judges Decide Motions to Dismiss Differently? 80 74.7 70 69.2 60 50 40 30 20 White Black 30.8 21.5 10 3.8 0 Grant Law & Social Psychology Deny 0 Mixed May 23, 2013 Figure 3: Under Iqbal Are White and Black Judges Deciding Motions to Dismiss Differently? 80 70 60 57.1 56.5 50 30 White Black 36.2 40 26.1 17.4 20 6.7 10 0 Grant Law & Social Psychology Deny Mixed May 23, 2013 Results in Context How the increase compares to the increased grant rate in other federal actions. 80 70 56.00 60 50 46.00 Grant Rate 40 53.00 53.20 Conley Iqbal 42.00 30 23.20 20 10 0 All Federal Claims All Title VII Claims Black Plaintiffs' Claims Source: Patricia W. Hatamyar, The Tao Of Pleading: Do Twombly and Iqbal Matter Empirically?, 59 Am. U. L. Rev. 553 (2010). Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Summary Shifting from Conley to Iqbal: 1) Increased dismissal rate for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination 2) White and Black judges decided these claims similarly under Conley, yet under Iqbal White and Black judges are deciding these claims differently Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Future Directions • Examine summary judgment rates • Experiments--examine causality • Collaboration with Miguel Unzuetta & Benjamin Everly (social dominance orientation, implicit bias, lay theories, pleading rules and Iqbal) • Collaboration with Brenda Major & Cheryl Kaiser (diversity structures and Iqbal) Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Figure 4: Has Iqbal decreased the summary judgment grant rate for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination? 21 100 90 80 75.86 65.63 70 60 Conley Iqbal 50 40 30 21.88 20 13.79 17.24 12.5 10 0 Grant Law & Social Psychology Deny Mixed May 23, 2013 Many Thanks… • Robin West Georgetown University • Vicki Jackson Harvard Law School • Mary Murphy Indiana University • Jessica Salerno Arizona State University • Jennifer LaCosse Florida State University • Mind and Identity in Context Lab Indiana University Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Thank you! Professor Victor D. Quintanilla Indiana University, Maurer School of Law Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Thank you! Professor Victor D. Quintanilla Indiana University, Maurer School of Law Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 Figure 5: Has Iqbal increased the dismissal rate with prejudice for Black plaintiffs’ claims of race discrimination? Conley Iqbal Grant & Deny Grant with 3% prejudice 17% Grant with leave 6% Grant & Deny 8% Deny 39% Deny 74% Law & Social Psychology Grant with prejudice 42% Grant with leave 11% May 23, 2013 The Social Psychology of Judging Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences . . . our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging. Justice O'Connor has often been cited as saying that a wise old man and wise old woman will reach the same conclusion in deciding cases. I am not so sure Justice O'Connor is the author of that line . . . I am also not so sure that I agree with the statement. Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013 The Research Paradigm Critical Race Empiricism Law & Social Psychology Law & Social Psychology Critical Race Empiricism May 23, 2013 Why Law & Social Psychology? • Law is more than rules, it’s how judges, juries, prosecutors, lawyers, and officials make decisions • Interventions to improve legal decision-making • Social psychology can be harnessed to improve law Law & Social Psychology May 23, 2013