Bradford Children’s Centre Market Engagement Event 3rd October 2014 Our priorities – giving children the best start in life Agenda • • • • • • Ambition for Children Proposed Model Integrated Working Outcomes, Inputs & Measures Break Overview to the potential Children’s Centre procurement process Our Priorities • Improving – Early communication – Health and well being – Personal and Social development – Bonding and attachment • Supporting those in greatest need Process of Decision • Executive to decide • Delivery Body Options – Mixed – All external – All in house • Size of clusters Present arrangements • 41 centres • Mixed economy of providers Delivery Model proposal • 7 to 12 clusters • £7.9 million allocated by formula • Serving over 40,000 children 0-5 Proposed 7 Clusters 1 Reach 6190 Current Centre Name Proposed Cluster Reach Bierley Farcliffe/Lilycroft Holme Wood Heaton Frizinghall Midland Road 5 Tyersal 7277 Woodside Wyke Baildon Farnham Little Lane Lidget Green Menston & Burley Princeville CLUSTER Thornton 3 CLUSTER 6 7325 3578 Trinity 5 Rise Woodroyd 7570 Mortimer House Fagley Gateway Parkland Bingley Rural Strong Close Canterbury Communityworks Owlet Hirst Wood Burnett Fields Barkerend 4 CLUSTER Crossley Hall Daisy Chain CLUSTER CLUSTER Allerton 2 Reevy Hill Victoria Hall St Edmund's 5462 Current Centre Name Abbey Green CLUSTER CLUSTER Proposed Cluster 7 Highfield 4426 Low Fold Rainbow Treetops Proposed 12 Clusters Proposed Cluster Abbey Green CLUSTER Frizinghall Midland Road Farcliffe/Lilycroft 3090 Heaton St Edmund's CLUSTER 3100 Current Centre Name 8 Reach Crossley Hall Thornton Farnham 2833 2865 Burnett Fields Canterbury Reevy Hill 9 4412 4074 Communityworks Mortimer House Fagley 3496 Gateway Parkland Victoria Hall Woodside Wyke Baildon 10 3534 Little Lane Menston & Burley Owlet Bingley Rural 11 3791 Hirst Wood Strong Close Trinity 5 Rise Woodroyd Barkerend Holme Wood Tyersal Lidget Green Princeville 3578 CLUSTER 2629 Current Centre Name Bierley Allerton CLUSTER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Reach Daisy Chain CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER CLUSTER Proposed Cluster 12 Highfield 4426 Low Fold Rainbow Treetops Integrated working in Bradford • Integrated Care Pathway • Family Support Pathway Our Approach • Integrated services - Holistic approach • Early Help • Targeted services to those in greatest need. • Community involvement • Smooth and streamlined pathways • Evidenced based interventions • Effective use of available resources Making a difference District endorsed/evidence based programmes • HENRY • Family Links • Bookstart Validated Tools and Measures Examples: • Outcomes Star for family support • EYFS • Ages and Stages Questionnaire Outcomes Star Children’s Centre Specification Outcomes, Inputs and Measures 3rd October 2014 Department of Children’s Services Aims of session • To review outcomes for new specification • To review proposed measures • Inputs for specification Specification Background Based on: • • • • • “Measuring what Matters” Core Purpose Ofsted Schedule Integrated Care Pathway Family Support Pathway Outcomes 1 1) Effective outreach and sustained engagement with the wider community with a particular focus on the most disadvantaged families. 2) Children are developing well and improving school readiness Outcomes 2 3) Parents / carers and unborn children experience a healthy pregnancy and fewer children born with low birth weight 4) More children have a healthy BMI centile 5) Fewer children are exposed to tobacco smoke ante and post-natal 6) More mothers breastfeed 7) Children have improved dental health 8) Children’s health protected through vaccinations Outcomes 3 9) More Parents / carers develop a bond, attachment with their children, are positive role models and are able to demonstrate affectionate, but authoritative parenting 10) Parents / carers ensure that children are safe and secure within the home and community 11) More parents are experiencing lower levels of stress in their home and in their lives, so more parents with good mental wellbeing Outcomes 4 12) More parents have greater levels of support when required 13) More parents are accessing work at or above the living wage or developing the skills needed for employment Input and Measures Exercise 10) Parents / carers ensure that children are safe and secure within the home and community – Task 1 comment on outcomes Inputs: Task 4): Please list Children’s Centre inputs that you think must be specified in the contract Validated Tools: Task 3) Please suggest any validated tools that you think would be cost effective. Universal: Undertaking a home safety check within 12 weeks of a new birth Targeted/Family Support: Provide 1 to 1 family support where risks identified KPI/Measures: Task 2) Please comment on the proposed KPIs and measures 100% of registered families have a home safety check within 12 weeks of a new birth. Outcomes Star 100% of targeted families are assessed using the Bradford Thresholds of need and supported through the family support pathway Last Questions 1) In your experience what do Local Authorities under specify/ over specify? 2) What type and level of staff qualifications do you think the following should have e.g: • Cluster Manager • Family Support An overview to the potential Children’s Centre procurement process 3rd October 2014 Programme for presentation • Brief description of the tender documentation and evaluation of tendered bids • Proposed Timeline Invitation to Tender (ITT) • This ITT comprises of three main parts (Parts A, B & C) along with other supporting documentation that may be issued for either information or completion and return: Part A: Summary • Provides specification to enable Part B & C to be completed • Instructions to Tenderers • Terms & Conditions • Award and Selection Criteria • Timetable ITT Part A:Instructions to Tenderers • Read in full and comply with instructions • Seek clarification if unclear • Answer to questions circulated to all interested parties • If you have problems completing, contact the council prior to question deadline ITT Part A: Award Criteria • Outlines our strategy for evaluating your bid • What elements are priorities or most important to us • How should you pitch your bid, what areas you should focus on. ITT Part A Standard Terms and Conditions • Read thoroughly • Request interpretation if you are unsure through YorTender Part B: Summary • Part B contains the questions which tenderers are required to answer. Part B: Short list by testing: • Organisational Profile • Integrity & Probity (mandatory & discretionary) • Policies: e.g. Equal Opportunities • Financial standing • Insurances Part B: Pre Qualification (PQQ) ‘Open’ procedure - two stages in one Responses assessed to confirm your relevant experience and capacity This is a backward look against selection criteria Evaluation panel will draw up a short list of organisations whose tender submission will be evaluated ITT Part B: Tender Questions • Answer all questions as fully as possible in the boxes provided • Your opportunity to tell us how you will provide the service (forward looking) • Don’t assume that an earlier answer will count in a different question Part B: Other • • • • • Declining a tender FOI Declaration of non-collusive tendering Form of Tender Checklist Part C: Summary • Part C is where the pricing information for this Contract will be sought. – Break down of spend against defined criteria – Unit costing Timetable Estimated Timescales ITT issue November – January 2015 Tender return deadline 6 weeks (time added for Christmas) Interviews, evaluation and 6 to 8 weeks vetting of tender submissions Preferred bidders identified 2 weeks and voluntary standstill period Clarification 2 weeks. Contract Award n/a Mobilisation to Contract Start 8 to 12 weeks Any Questions? Thanks for attending