PNG
Assembly of
Disabled
Persons
ADDC Inclusive Research Symposium
28 August 2014
Benson Tegia, PNG
Assembly of Disabled
Persons
Kathryn James, CBM-
Nossal Partnership for
Disability Inclusive
Development
DFAT funded participatory research project, from May
2010 - April 2013, addressing access by people with disabilities to road infrastructure and road planning processes in PNG.
Research partners:
• Unimelb Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning
• Nossal Institute for Global Health
• PNG Assembly of Disabled Persons
• Cardno Emerging Markets
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prioritize appropriate responses to access needs of people with disabilities (PWD) in PNG
Contribute to the evidence base for disability inclusive infrastructure development
Develop guidelines to support disability inclusive infrastructure consultation, planning & development
Develop a training package on disability inclusive road planning and development, for use by PNGADP and other agencies.
PWD have ownership of the research and capacity to use findings.
Up to 15% of PNG population are people with disabilities
Road are vital for accessing services, social networks, economic opportunities
People with disabilities often have additional access needs to other road users:
Do not get visual or aural cues from traffic
Cannot move quickly or navigate obstacles easily
Need space and ramps for wheelchairs
Accessible roads are more accessible for everyone: children, older people, pregnant women
Stretches of roads in five sites: some completed roads and some under maintenance/re-development
2 urban sites (Port Moresby & Goroka)
3 rural sites (Lae, Madang & New Ireland)
Research tools:
Interviews with local road decision-makers
Group discussions with people with disabilities
“Moveabouts” or access audits of sections of roads
Photographs and poster making
Roads facilitate access to services for people with disabilities, mainly by walking
BUT use of services is severely limited by inaccessible and dangerous roads
Improved roads bring more traffic and faster speeds, and people fear being hit by vehicles
Roads and infrastructure are often not accessible for people with a variety of disabilities
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
Footpaths are difficult to navigate
Too narrow or steep for wheelchairs
Blocked by parked cars, people socialising, market stalls
Flooded due to blocked or absent drains; overgrown
Road verges can be steep or too high; loose gravel and rocks
People are forced to walk on dangerous roads
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
Lack of marked crossings
No or inadequate crossings at busy areas like schools and markets (especially rurally)
No clear signs in approach to crossings: too close to the crossing, not maintained
Traffic does not slow down through villages; hard to cross safely
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
Narrow bridges with limited pedestrian access
Bridges with no footpaths force pedestrians onto the road
Overgrown, narrow footpaths
Steps rather than ramps are unsuitable for wheelchair users
Lack of railings make bridges hard to navigate
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
Poor road drainage and maintenance
Flooding blocks roads and footpaths and leads to damage
Open drainage ditches are hazards for vision impaired
Potholes and unsealed roads
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
No bus stops and poor bus access
Lack of proper bus stops, no seats or shade: unsafe or uncomfortable
No locations marked on buses: people with hearing impairments can’t hear driver announcements
Buses inaccessible
What prevents people with disabilities accessing roads?
Lack of Public Awareness
Vehicle drivers and other road users do not realise that people with disabilities use the roads, and have different needs
Disabilities can be invisible e.g. hearing impairment, intellectual impairment
Communities do not maintain footpaths etc
No evidence that consultation with people with disabilities was taking place
Little consultation with communities in general; emphasis on informing people rather than involving them
Interviewed Road Decision-Makers did not have info on accidents or injuries on the roads that they were responsible for maintaining: info from police, traffic authorities, hospitals not shared with road planners and engineers
•
•
People with disabilities can inform about their needs and road usage
Participatory & inclusive processes are inexpensive: focus group discussions, moveabouts, photographs
• Many recommended changes can be incorporated at minimal expense. Others save money in the long run – some can mobilise community
Tools and Guidelines
In-country workshops with Road Decision-Makers
Guidelines on Making Roads Safer and more
Accessible
For Policy and Decision-Makers
For Road Planners and Engineers
Advocacy Workbook for use by PNGADP
Dissemination
Australian Aid Policy Brief and Working Paper
Articles: Journal of Transport Geography, Development
Bulletin
Presentations: Transed 2012, ADB Transport Conference,
ACFID University Linkages, World Report on Disability
Symposium etc
Research methodology – strategies for inclusion of people with disabilities, including tools
Research findings – the need for improved road access for people with disabilities; low-cost and simple solutions available
Use of findings and tools & guidelines to inform DFAT
& partners in the region:
Regional DFAT Post training on disability inclusion
(e.g. Tonga, Kiribati)
Kiribati Post promoting guidelines to Managing
Contractors and Dept of Transport
Interest from Asian Development Bank as they develop universal access guidelines for ADB projects
Appropriate responses to improve access
Evidence base for disability inclusive infrastructure development
Develop guidelines (action for govt.)
Develop a training package
Ownership and capacity to advocacy and rights-based work with the PNG government and development partners
Check: Yes/No
Full participation of people with disabilities in every phase
Accessibility
Capacity development
Inclusion of all groups
Partnership building
BIG RED
5/5 =100%
•
•
•
•
•
Massive country with 8m + people
80% very remote, 15% PWDs
Basic roads & service delivery infrastructure are run down or non-existent
Urban drift creating huge social problems, unemployment, law & order,
HIV/AIDS, overcrowding & poverty
Ratified UNCRPD Sept 2013
•
•
•
•
•
Total PNG 2014 budget: K13 b (AUD$6 b) focused on building an inclusive, sustainable PNG
Dept of Works highest allocation: K1.6 b priority road construction with aim to improve accessibility to basic services for the remote rural population
2014 used up K414 m (but what portion are accessible?)
PWD have access on 36% of good roads (e.g. town roads)
Economic boom by LNG, major infrastructure development going on including sporting facilities for
2014 PNG Games & 2015 South Pacific Games: very busy traffic, difficult accessing roads, unsafe and dangerous
Launch of guidelines during
International Day for PWD
(Dec 3) and delivered to
Dept of Works: was a highlight
A formal submission was made to Dept of Transport for inclusion in the National
Transport Strategic Policy
(Dec 14)
•
•
•
•
Key departmental decision makers, planners and designers recognize & appreciate the partners, making commitments to support the initiative
Highlights the role Government plays to cater for disability accessible road development as equally important
Involvement and participation by Governments, community leaders & development partners (must increase for real change to take place)
Government take ownership and improve the situation consistent with UNCRPD
•
•
PWD leaders have been trained to be better researchers, strengthening confidence base and improve leadership skills mostly in:
- phases, data collection and analysis
- dissemination & application of finding
- partnership consultation & networking
- Evidence based advocacy & policy submission and negotiation
Appreciate the process of identifying barriers that hinder progress in community life
•
• Developed advocacy tools for DPO use for ongoing awareness activities
Confidently link up with concerned government departments for policy decisions
• Present a strong case for integrated policy inclusion
• Importance of involvement and participation in decision-making at all levels
•
•
• National Transport Strategic Policy committed to include sections of guidelines during scheduled review
Department of Works have considered inclusive road planning and designs manual for provincial works, submission with technical manuals development committee aimed at improving designs
National Capital District has already catered for guidelines & adjustment of planners & designers protocols.
•
•
Advocacy work continues at National
& DPO level. Done 4 follow up visits to
DoT & DoWs
• DPO not actively involved for various reasons but more so capacity wise
Key agencies technical consultative team been established as a ground work to set up the National
Infrastructure Development Authority
(NIDA) DoWs: we are seeking membership
• National Capital Division DPO has a contract submission negotiation to build accessible foot paths, street ramps, crossing marks and safety signs
• The DPO advocacy toolkit is in its final stage for launching during 2015 National Day on Disability (Mar)
•
• National & Provincial DPO capacity remains depleted
Advocacy/awareness work has been inconsistent those targeting decision makers
•
•
•
Not part of government priority therefore no coverage
PWDs not being able to actively involve and participate at decision making level
• Data collection: lack of information about people with disabilities; need to look for ways to gather this
Need centralised storage of collected data to allow analysis and usage by DPOs and others
1.
2.
3.
4.
Build DPO capacities (advocacy/follow up)
Be on various boards & committees
Work with government to understand and devise Enabling legislative framework to implement UNCRPD (Article 9) and take full ownership (rights to access are denied)
Ensure that policies & legislation cover all aspects of infrastructure plans and designs