Research Methodology Session 11 Research Design Sampling Latest Schedule (1) Date 19 - 23 April 26 – 30 April 3 – 7 May 10 – 14 May Tuesday/ Friday Wednesday RP Academic Writing Presentation 9.00 Sampling Lit Review due Ethical Clearance IBM Awards Presentations Evening RP due Lecture on EC TEDx Latest Schedule (2) Date RM 17 - 21 May EC (19 May) 24 - 28 May HRMG (24 May) MIS (27 May) SE (2 June) Medical (4 June) 31 May - 4 June 7 - 11 June Exams EC Corrections (11 June) Recap Assignments Language feedback Language self-reflection Structural PS -> RO -> RQ Sub-problems => hypotheses / research questions Presentation Participation Feedback Preview Sekaran Ch 10 Sampling Final research proposal assignment Ethical Clearance assignment Preparation for 3 – 7 May session Proposal presentation Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Sampling Techniques Probability Sampling Simple Random Sampling Systematic Random Sampling Proportional Sampling Stratified Random Sampling Cluster Sampling Nonproportional Sampling Advantage: When done correctly, a small percentage of the population can be selected which saves both time and money without sacrificing accuracy. Disadvantage: Population characteristics may be over- or underrepresented, leading to a generalization of results beyond the characteristics of the sample. This puts the validity at risk. Acknowledgments to Gill Hendry Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Nonprobability Sampling Convenience Sampling Purposeful Sampling Quota Sampling Advantages: • Easy to administer • Less costly and time consuming Disadvantages: • The generalizability of the findings are limited to the characteristics of the subjects in the sample. • The sample may be biased. • Snowball sampling Acknowledgments to Gill Hendry Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Acknowledgments to Uma Sekaran Sekaran Ch 10 Exercises Ex 1 Ex 10 Research Proposal Assessment Criteria (1) The research proposal (RP) is formulated clearly The RP contains a proper title page The RP contains a proper table of contents The presentation of the RP complies with academic standards The RP contains an appropriate brief introduction Research Proposal Assessment Criteria (2) The context of the research project is presented concisely and clearly in the RP The RP contains a proper problem statement The RP contains properly formulated objectives derived from the PS A preliminary literature review places this study within a broader research context Research Proposal Assessment Criteria (3) The RP concisely outlines how the final literature survey will be conducted The RP contains tentative critical questions aligned with the PS and objectives The RP concisely states why the research is important for the discipline The RP outlines what research methodology will be employed Research Proposal Assessment Criteria (4) The RP clearly states how the research will comply with ethical requirements The RP clearly states how respondents / interviewees will be selected The RP briefly states how primary data will be analysed The RP clearly states which factors would require limitation of validity of results Research Proposal Assessment Criteria (5) The RP contains a glossary of terms The RP provides a research timeline The RP includes a realistic budget The RP contains an appropriate bibliography (e.g. key articles & research methodology references) Sampling in your Project Population and approximate size Sampling choice Sample size For your study Ethical Clearance Things to do Design draft questionnaire / interview Submit for comment Sent for statistical feedback after EC approved Complete EC form – extract from RP Informed consent letter Templates provided – adapt Letters Questionnaire Ethical Clearance Assessment Criteria (1) The research instrument (RI) is formulated in concise and lucid academic language The questions in the RI are based on the critical research questions of the project The RI solicits appropriate types of information The questionnaire uses the appropriate measurement scales Ethical Clearance Assessment Criteria (2) The RI is presented in an aesthetically pleasing manner The RI is designed specifically with respondents in mind The letter of informed consent complies with UKZN ethical clearance research principles Ethical Clearance Assessment Criteria (3) The RI presents questions in an appropriate order (e.g. sensitive questions last) The ethical clearance application form has been completed correctly Next Session 3 - 7 May Research proposal presentations Supervisors present 10 minutes max plus questions/comment Participation assessed Pre-load presentations 20 minutes before start