Biological Motion

Perception

Lavanya Sharan

March 28th, 2011

Studying human movements

EtienneJules Marey (1884) developed ‘chronophotography’

Image sources: Wikimedia Commons, science-television.com

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Point Light Walker is born

Markers attached to head and joints.

Videos of walking, running etc.

Can use animation and motion captures techniques for the same purpose.

Point light (PL) animations are now the mainstay of biological motion research.

Image source: Johansson (1973)

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Examples of PL motions

QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video decompress or are needed t o s ee this pic ture.

QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video decompress or are needed t o s ee this pic ture.

Phase-scrambled motion

Normal motion

Video source: Randolf Blake Lab

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Alternative to PL animations

Hodgins et al. (1998) Knoblich & Flach (2001) McDonnell et al. (2009)

Very few studies that use ‘embodied’ forms.

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Human motion perception is quite robust.

QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to s ee this pic ture.

Video source: Randolf Blake Lab

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Human motion perception is quite robust.

Brief exposures (<100 ms)

Johannson 1973

Blurry dots, randomized contrast polarity over time

Mather et al., 1992, Ahlstrom et al. 1997

Stereoscopic depths are scrambled

Ahlstrom et al. 1997, Bulthoff et al. 1998, Lu et al. 2006

Dynamic noise dots

Bertenthal & Pinto 1994, Cutting et al. 1998, Ikeda et al. 2005

Markers not on joints

Bertenthal & Pinto 1994

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

How much can we tell about a figure?

Identity of figure

Cutting & Kozlowski 1977, Fani et al. 2005, Troje et al. 2005

Sex of figure

Kozlowski & Cutting 1977, 1978, Mather & Murdoch 1994,

Sumi 2000, Troje 2002, Pollick et al. 2005

Activities of two or more individuals

Mass et al. 1971

Emotional content

Clarke et al. 2005, Dittrich et al. 1996, Walk & Homan 1984

Facial expressions

Bassili 1978, Hill et al. 2003

Interactions with objects

Bingham 1993, Stoffregen & Flynn 1994

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Inversion effects for body motions (Sumi

1984)

QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to s ee this pic ture.

Video source: Randolf Blake Lab

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Sensitive to certain factors.

Number of markers and exposure duration

Neri et al. 1998, Poom & Olsson 2002, Thornton et al. 1998

Impaired recognition in periphery

Ikeda et al. 2005

Dim lighting

Grossman & Blake 1999

Phase scrambling

Grossman & Blake 1999, Hiris et al. 2005

Temporal duration

Beintema et al. 2003

Relative position of markers (form)

Beintema & Lappe 2002, Beintema et al. 2006, Hiris et al.

2005

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Not limited to humans.

QuickTime™ and a

Sorenson Video decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Video source: Randolf Blake Lab

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

What have we learn from PLWs?

Biological recognition develops early.

4 and 8 month olds respond to human motion vs. scrambled dots.

Bertenthal 1993, Fox & McDaniel 1982, Hirai & Hiraki 2005,

Reid et al. 2006

Reach adult level performance by age 5

Pavlova et al. 2001

Older adults can perceive human motion inspite of age-related deficits in visual processing

Norman et al. 2004

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Top-down vs. bottom-up?

Inversion effects

Good performance at temporal display rates higher than needed for lowlevel processing

Requires focused visual attention

Binocular rivalry

Perceived background flow

Image source: cs.bham.ac.uk

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Low-level models of motion processing

Longer ISIs impair performance

Motoric contributions to human motion perception

Action recognition and action planning share representations

Prinz 1997, Hommel et al. 2001

Carrying out the same action as the PL figure improves performance

Reed & Farah 1995, Jacobs & Shiffrar 2005, Hamilton et al.

2004

Better at recognizing one’s own actions

Knoblich & Flach 2001, Loula et al. 2005, Jacobs et al. 2004

Individual with motor deficit perform differently on motion perception tasks

Bosbach et al. 2005, Funk et al. 2005, Shiffrar 2006, Pavlova et al. 2003

Chameleon effect

Chartrand & Bargh 1999

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Social cues & human motion perception

Can tell a lot about identity, sex, sexual orientation, dancing ability etc.

Loula et al. 2005, Barclay et al. 1978, Brownlow et al. 1997,

Montepare & Zebrowitz-McArthur 1988, Gunns et al. 2002,

Runeson & Frykholm 1983

Can identify emotion from PL figures

Atkinson et al. 2004, Pollick et al. 2001

Angry walker easier to detect than other emotions

Chouchourelou et al. 2006

Chameleon effect or social mimicry important for social interactions

Chartrand & Bargh 1999

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Neural basis of human motion perception

Neurons in macaque STS

Perrett et al. 1982, 1985, Oram & Perrett 1996, Shiffrar

1994

Mirror neurons

Rizzolatti et al. 2001, Rizzolatti & Craighero 2004

Many case studies of individuals with deficits including autism

Schenk & Zihl 1997, Vaina et al. 1990, Cowey & Vaina

2000, Battelli et al. 2003, Jokisch et al. 2005, Blake et al. 2003, Kim et al. 2005, Virji-Babul et al. 2003,

Pavolova et al. 2006

TMS studies in STS

Grossman et al. 2005

Unlike MT, STSp selective for biological motion

Grossman et al. 2000, Grossman & Blake 2001,

Grossman et al. 2004

Image source & slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Superior temporal sulcus (STSp)

More activation in right hemisphere

Beauchamp et al. 2003, Grossman et al. 2000, Peusken et al. 2005, Santi et al. 2003

Crude retinotopy

Grossman et al. 2000

Whole body motion, motion of body parts

Pelphrey et al. 2003, Calvert et al. 1997, Grezes et al.

1998, Puce et al. 1998

Statics figures do not produce activation

Pelphrey et al. 2003, Peuskens et al. 2005

Sounds of footsteps

Bidet-Caulet et al. 2005

Intentionality of actions and social judgments

Saxe et al. 2004, Frith & Frith 1999, Morris et al. 2005,

Winston et al. 2002, Allison et al. 2000, Iacoboni et al.

2004

Image source & slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)

Open questions

McDonnell et al. (2009)

Connection between faces & bodies?

Interactions with motor and social learning?

What about more real-world stimuli?

Slide content: Blake & Shiffrar (2007)